Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[Xianantung]

Got also had a working rig with 12 radeon r9 390 stabile running, but power use is high, i need 3 PSU to run it
At this time 3 cards are down (power supply cable burns out), rest still works

I also had a second rig with 10GPUs with the 4pin connector riser cards an an asus p10ws stabile for weeks

What driver and windows version?

[DukeStylez]

I Have a R9 380X and a R9 280X. mining with claymore on nanopool for ETC, is that usefull at all anymore? Could someone help me choose the best pool and settings for my GK's?
I have a R9 255 with 2GB in a second rig, what can i mine with that card? since v.11 it should be possible to mine altcoins with it? how and which one is usefull?
it's just for Fun and maybee a few $ over.....

[OptimusMine]

After spending the night reading all the posts in this thread and from other sources besides bitcointalk it seems to me that currently there are no reliable pools for mining XVG , due to overload of miners getting in the dual mining these days, since Claymore released v11 miner. Some pool are stealing just to much of your earnings while others are unreilable and disconnecting miners. People are calculating estimated profits on whattomine, etc and getting great earings but only on the paper, while in practise, when doing this new dual mining (Ethhash + Blake 2s) on these pools that currently support XVG the earings are half or less of the ones shown on whattomine and other calculators. Besides that we had a huge jump in difficulty in mining XVG due to the same reasons. So lets see, more powe consumption, maybe a drop of eth hashrate when dual mining, much more stress on cards then on solo mining, currently unreliable pools, struggle to configurate optimal settings. Mine conclusion: you should wait a few days or a week or two to see the level of difficulty of XVG,  and to see are there any reliable pools with no issues and steals.
Hope that some of ya agree!

[cas33]

Any confirmation on this or it is just the next FUD?

http://news.8btc.com/bitmain-to-release-ethereum-asic-miner-f3-with-72gb-ddr3-dram-in-q2

[mine_phun]

Greetings miners,
I just started new pool for XVG on blake2s algo(for ETH+XVG dual). I will be more than happy if you help to test it and see if everything is okay. We set up only 0.5% fee and in next days or week expect more coins to mine or even few more algos.

stratum+tcp://xvg.ehu.bg:5766 -dpsw c=XVG

Kind Regards!
Enjoy  

@Aliscomputers , it seems you'r VERGE wallet of the pool is configured with the wrong algo as the displayed difficulty is way to low. If you want some help with this you can e-mail me @ nlpool.nl (At) outlook.com so i can help you. Now the people mining in your pool are not getting rewards  

And sorry for this way, but i cannot message you from this forum and couldn't find any e-mail address.

[FFI2013]

After spending the night reading all the posts in this thread and from other sources besides bitcointalk it seems to me that currently there are no reliable pools for mining XVG , due to overload of miners getting in the dual mining these days, since Claymore released v11 miner. Some pool are stealing just to much of your earnings while others are unreilable and disconnecting miners. People are calculating estimated profits on whattomine, etc and getting great earings but only on the paper, while in practise, when doing this new dual mining (Ethhash + Blake 2s) on these pools that currently support XVG the earings are half or less of the ones shown on whattomine and other calculators. Besides that we had a huge jump in difficulty in mining XVG due to the same reasons. So lets see, more powe consumption, maybe a drop of eth hashrate when dual mining, much more stress on cards then on solo mining, currently unreliable pools, struggle to configurate optimal settings. Mine conclusion: you should wait a few days or a week or two to see the level of difficulty of XVG,  and to see are there any reliable pools with no issues and steals.
Hope that some of ya agree!

I agree at first I was earning around whattomine calculated now I can't make a 1/10 of that plus I can't keep my rigs on one pool it keeps switching to my failovers these yiimp copy paste pools with their junk servers need to go

[wtfonly16]

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

[mine_phun]

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

You can mine on NLpool if you want

STRATUM SERVERS

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XVG] | for VERGE (Blake2S)

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XSH] | for SHIELD

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=CREA] | for CREATIVECOIN

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=MAX] | for MAXCOIN

[BennyT]

Any confirmation on this or it is just the next FUD?

http://news.8btc.com/bitmain-to-release-ethereum-asic-miner-f3-with-72gb-ddr3-dram-in-q2

Lots of posts on this already. If you're new to mining I understand but or else the DDR3 ram headline should tell you it's not going to mine equihash.

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.

[Metroid]

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.

It must be a coincidence, friend has a farm and his hashrate is the same as it was, no change.

[molitar]

Since I moved to version 11 and blake my system keeps crashing Catalyst drivers and rebooting. It does not like Blake that is for sure or the new miner.

[wtfonly16]

Any confirmation on this or it is just the next FUD?

http://news.8btc.com/bitmain-to-release-ethereum-asic-miner-f3-with-72gb-ddr3-dram-in-q2

Lots of posts on this already. If you're new to mining I understand but or else the DDR3 ram headline should tell you it's not going to mine equihash.

Back to Claymore. Second day testing two identical rigs and 10.6 beat 11.0 in accepted shares by almost 200 on the second day. No comparison. Not sure what's going on.

you do know gddr5 has same bandwidth and speed as ddr3 right
asics dont use gpu memory...

[Kent2]

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

You can mine on NLpool if you want

STRATUM SERVERS

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XVG] | for VERGE (Blake2S)

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XSH] | for SHIELD

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=CREA] | for CREATIVECOIN

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=MAX] | for MAXCOIN

i mining this pool nlpool.nl  12 hours and 0 balance. 30 gh/s

[2bitninja]

I'm getting only half of my mining speed with Claymore 11 as compared to version 10. This on both my Windows machine and my Linux (EthOS) machine.
I'm dual mining ELLA and keccak (Smartcoin). Amy suggestions would be great. This is across all my AMD RX cards.

[wsminer]

nothing but garbage blake2s verge pools... anybody know solution ?

You can mine on NLpool if you want

STRATUM SERVERS

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XVG] | for VERGE (Blake2S)

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=XSH] | for SHIELD

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=CREA] | for CREATIVECOIN

-o stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5133 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> [-p c=MAX] | for MAXCOIN

i mining this pool nlpool.nl  12 hours and 0 balance. 30 gh/s

?
Can you contact me on the email address on the site www.nlpool.nl? I will check for you

[nitrobg]

i mining this pool nlpool.nl  12 hours and 0 balance. 30 gh/s

What exactly do you expect from a pool with only 35 miners and 200GH/s b2s hashpower?

[Metroid]

I'm getting only half of my mining speed with Claymore 11 as compared to version 10. This on both my Windows machine and my Linux (EthOS) machine.
I'm dual mining ELLA and keccak (Smartcoin). Amy suggestions would be great. This is across all my AMD RX cards.

Probably is your config cause like I said my friend has a farm and everything is the same, well I did the config so I can say everything is fine.

[Maniac9331]

Hello, what is the expected hashrate for dualmining with GTX 1070? I have a rig of 6x Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070 and I get an average of 31,3 ETH and 880 XVG. My OC settings are +670 memory, +100 clock and 80% voltage. I use -dcri 80 value.

i use 790 memory, 63% voltage, -200 core i get 32.500mhs this is eth only

[aliscomputers]

Greetings miners,
I just started new pool for XVG on blake2s algo(for ETH+XVG dual). I will be more than happy if you help to test it and see if everything is okay. We set up only 0.5% fee and in next days or week expect more coins to mine or even few more algos.

stratum+tcp://verge.ehu.bg:5766 -dpsw

Kind Regards!
Enjoy  

NEW XVG POOL 0% FEE

UP UP UP
The Pool is with 0% fee for next 1 month!!!
 

stratum+tcp://verge.ehu.bg:5766

[groovytechno]

Here's something interesting....


I'm using Unimining for XVG. (for the past 27 hours, I'm not noticing any difference to ZPOOL regarding payouts, unfortunately)

They have 2 XVG pools, where one of them they ask us to not use it, which is this one: "Please do not use pool.unimining.net to mine XVG"

They also have this pool where they are encouraging us to use it. "Please use xvg.eu1.unimining.net to mine XVG"



The strange thing is my hashrate for XVG is almost half using xvg.eu1.unimining.net to mine XVG.
My hashrate is almost double when I use pool.unimining.net to mine XVG.


Everything in my .bat file is identical, other than the pool address.


I wonder why that is...  


It doesn't seem to affect my 480s and my 570s too much, my 580's on multiple rigs are the cards performing about half the hash on the pool in question.