Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[crypt0velli]

For XVG I was on zpool for 12 hours with zero rejected shares, but they take too much and my wallet for whatever reason is set to mine all blake2s instead of just verge then autoexchange.  Unimining = 10%+ rejected shares.  Antminepool I've only had one rejected share so far, but hasn't been running long.  Going to run for 12 hours and see the difference in currency between the two.

I have observed the same.  I am more 15+ hrs with 18.5 GH/s on zpool and only got 40% of what whattomine is reporting for the hashrate.  I am not sure about accuracy of whattomine on xvg-blake2s either but judging by other coins they have listed with reasonable estimate accuracy I would be suspicious on zpool.

Looking at other's response it seems,
zpool - less connectivity issues but lower payout.  
Unimining - connectivity issues mainly cause of surge in mining.
Antminepool - less connectivity issue.  payout is slow because it's much smaller mining pool.

Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.

I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting.  That's quite the cut zpool is taking!


There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier.   That was a red flag WTF moment for me.

... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why.     Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.


I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.

Dependin how much hash you have 25 hours might not be a big enough sample to gauge accurately but seems to line up with the zpool narrative regardless..

[1715467387]

1715467387

[1715467387]

1715467387

[1715467387]

1715467387

[CryptoCrucian]

Ya - I'm scratching my head with Zpool and blake2s
My wallet is showing that I'm mining Shield, Ninja, verge, Blackstar when I clearly defined c=xvg in my string..
Normal?

Hopefully, a better pool will pop up cause I'm just not sure
I need a clearer definition of what this means as well
"Exclusive FlexFee™ system reduces fee's based on the pool's hashrate on select algos. Look for the green line on the hashrate graphs."

[Golempl]

Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?


 B2S: Authorization failed
: [
   21,
   "Serverfull",
   null
]

3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.

antminepool   0% rejected

Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly

[groovytechno]

I've sent out a message to Nanopool requesting that they consider offering a pool for XVG.


Nanopool would be awesome.

[Vann]

Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?


 B2S: Authorization failed
: [
   21,
   "Serverfull",
   null
]

3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.

antminepool   0% rejected

Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly

Antmine pool is now finding about 1 block/hour. Hopefully it can handle the increased stratum load.

[buzzkillb]

Seem unimining.net bit overloaded ?


 B2S: Authorization failed
: [
   21,
   "Serverfull",
   null
]

3-10% rejected shares. Propably due to big wave of new miners pools can't handle it . Just need some patience I think - to allocate more resources to process miners.

antminepool   0% rejected

Confirmed, better hashrate and no rejects here. Pool Hashrate seems growing quickly

Antmine pool is now finding about 1 block/hour. Hopefully it can handle the increased stratum load.

Antmine has been good for Shield, so I am sure it will be fine for XVG. Nicehash has been hitting this pool for XSH and no problems over the last few weeks.

[minahan24]

I've been mining XVG for 24hrs, started with Antmine when there's was only 33 miner and now its like 500 miners, and all throughout the 24hrs, I discovered Unimining and been jumping back and forth between the two for comparison. Never tried zpool.

So my observation, with Antmine you get bigger payment but you need to wait longer while Unimining you get payment like every 10-15mins.

I got 185mhs(ETH )and 7000mhs(XVG) on 6x rx570. And so far I got 84XVG in my wallet and I still have 13XVG in my Unimining account.

I prefer Unimining, I did not experience any problems with unimining, I've used the 5766 port and declared the c=XVG value. I'm not sure if that makes a difference.

Either way you can't go wrong, I just prefer seeing continuous payment compared to waiting for hours.

[heavyarms1912]

Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.

I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting.  That's quite the cut zpool is taking!

There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier.   That was a red flag WTF moment for me.

... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why.     Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.

I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.

I guess I have messed it up.  I have XVG-blake2s instead of XVG (from someone who posted earlier on this thread couple of pages back).  Duh!
That might be cause of my low earnings (even lower than others who are suspicious on zpool).


"YOU MUST ALWAYS set your currency in your password field that matches your wallet address: c=SYMBOL. The pool has mined hundreds of different coins and many have the same address version. We CAN NOT read your mind and possible know what currency you want. If no c=SYMBOL is set, your currency will be randomly chosen from any matching coins we have used. This HAS TO BE A REAL EXCHANGE SYMBOL. Do not use a symbol that has an ALGO added. Such as XVG-blake2s

EDIT: It seems there is no difference between c=XVG-blake2s or c=XVG.  I still mine random blake2s coins with c=XVG.

[No.15]

So I just tried dual mining with claymore and my eth hash dropped from ~30 m/h straight eth, to 17 m/h (eth) when I added pascal.  Is this a config issue on my side?

[heavyarms1912]

So I just tried dual mining with claymore and my eth hash dropped from ~30 m/h straight eth, to 17 m/h (eth) when I added pascal.  Is this a config issue on my side?

Yes.  You need to reduce the intensity for the 2nd coin by adjusting -dcri <value>.  default is 30.  Reduce it until you get no drop in ETH hashrate. 

Btw Pascal is no longer a good choice as 2nd coin.  In fact soon you'll be running in loss with more power burned than coins earned.

[stepa12345]

All the same, something is happening in the country and has not achieved stability with new XVG coins as soon as I begin to mine that fall shares on ETH. dicri and increased and decreased did not give the effect.
ETH mine at nanopol

[cryptonitro]

unimining has lot of share lost and disconnect mining , i dont want to provide anypool but i have no problem since i am on antmine pool !
so i recommand to leave unimining and go on other pool , because it s not trust for reliable
for proof about that antmine is going from 500gh to 4 th in less than 1 day , that because of lot of people lose time on uniming and see the problem of connection. so dont waste time and earns friends

[ccminer.net]

More profitable blake2 or keccak for dual?

[Redstar007]

Dualmining Pirl and xvg. Xvg on zpool, after apx 12h at a speed of 8000mh/s I have only gained 25 xvg. Somethings fishy bout this.

And, the dualmining makes my rig really unstable. I have 6x rx 580, bios modd and a little overclocking. But it still hangs up the rig occasionally.

Gpu core 1200, 950. And memory 2090, 950. Any idea whatI should do to reduce the errors? The memory was first at 2140, 4 of 5 cards could handle this, but the other two I reduced to 2090 on memory, but the cards still gives me incorrect shares. Both on dual and single mining.

Edit: my code on dual:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://lb.geo.pirlpool.eu:8004 -ewal 0xB397D610533A33Bba32Ce5feD3Ad09C7b51A9FB5 -epsw x -allpools 1 -allcoins -1 -gser 2 -eworker rig1 -dpool stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -dwal DCWSRbQUB8GnvUJLUD4sFUbD3xYyfW66mK -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVG-blake2s -dcri 44

[heavyarms1912]

Dualmining Pirl and xvg. Xvg on zpool, after apx 12h at a speed of 8000mh/s I have only gained 25 xvg. Somethings fishy bout this.

And, the dualmining makes my rig really unstable. I have 6x rx 580, bios modd and a little overclocking. But it still hangs up the rig occasionally.

Gpu core 1200, 950. And memory 2090, 950. Any idea whatI should do to reduce the errors? The memory was first at 2140, 4 of 5 cards could handle this, but the other two I reduced to 2090 on memory, but the cards still gives me incorrect shares. Both on dual and single mining.

Edit: my code on dual:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://lb.geo.pirlpool.eu:8004 -ewal 0xB397D610533A33Bba32Ce5feD3Ad09C7b51A9FB5 -epsw x -allpools 1 -allcoins -1 -gser 2 -eworker rig1 -dpool stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -dwal DCWSRbQUB8GnvUJLUD4sFUbD3xYyfW66mK -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVG-blake2s -dcri 44

mostly cards are heating up.  Reduce the voltage to 900 or lower and clocks to 1150 range.

[preda]

BLAKE2S:
-dcri 50 with no drop on ETH
RX 470 = 1300MH/s
RX 480 = 1450MH/s

So it should be possible to mine Verge in Dual Mode with Blake2s (there are 3 pools for it) without any drop in eth-mining, correct?

Does the dual mode heat up the cards more or stress them much, so the cards can break down at some point earlier? :-)

someone cn post bat file?

ETH: ethermine.org
Verge (Blake2s): http://www.zpool.ca/

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x54abE209A969A9f3B0BF07D54647b786F09753b4.RX480 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -dwal D9dMdBssQZRDueBzVeRUsEFzmA5smW1kQA -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVG-blake2s -dcri 50

At least for me it works without any problems and is mining the right coin (XVG).

Thank you mate

[Redstar007]

Dualmining Pirl and xvg. Xvg on zpool, after apx 12h at a speed of 8000mh/s I have only gained 25 xvg. Somethings fishy bout this.

And, the dualmining makes my rig really unstable. I have 6x rx 580, bios modd and a little overclocking. But it still hangs up the rig occasionally.

Gpu core 1200, 950. And memory 2090, 950. Any idea whatI should do to reduce the errors? The memory was first at 2140, 4 of 5 cards could handle this, but the other two I reduced to 2090 on memory, but the cards still gives me incorrect shares. Both on dual and single mining.

Edit: my code on dual:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://lb.geo.pirlpool.eu:8004 -ewal 0xB397D610533A33Bba32Ce5feD3Ad09C7b51A9FB5 -epsw x -allpools 1 -allcoins -1 -gser 2 -eworker rig1 -dpool stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -dwal DCWSRbQUB8GnvUJLUD4sFUbD3xYyfW66mK -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVG-blake2s -dcri 44

mostly cards are heating up.  Reduce the voltage to 900 or lower and clocks to 1150 range.

The voltage on both core and memory?
Will it not be too undervolted for dualmining?

Or I'm thinking on just leaving it on singlemining, seems to be less problem. Do you still think I would lower the core on single mining?

[preda]

Here's a .bat example for Ethermine ETH / UniMining XVG combination:

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal <ETH ADDRESS>.<RIG NAME> -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:5770 -dwal <XVG ADDRESS>.<RIG NAME> -dpsw x -dcoin blake2s -allpools 1 -dcri 47

I also want to use this chance to say thanks a lot for all your hard work Mr. Claymore!
As a fellow developer, I really appreciate all the hard work you put into this.
If you ever come to Serbia, I'm buying you a beer. Or a 6-pack. Or a 24-pack. Cheers!

What i was looking for thanks

[heavyarms1912]

Quick test on a gtx 1070 Ti and gtx 1060 (not optimized).  -dcri flags are 140 and 175 respectively.

GTX 1070 Ti 8gb Micron, 75% PL, ETH+XVG 31.3 MH/s + 1450 MH/s
GTX 1060 3gb Hynix,      60% PL, ETH+XVG 15.5 MH/s + 900 MH/s

[Metroid]

@Claymore, anyway to send 2 or more bat files, for example, I can send only reboot.bat remotely, anyway to send a second or third bat file?