Dimitry
|
|
August 18, 2017, 05:00:55 AM |
|
Why does bittrex still let this coin trade on the exchange when there is only red flags?
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 9022
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 18, 2017, 01:25:53 PM |
|
The question has probably already been asked, but is this project a direct competitor of MobileGo? What are the main differences?
Has MobileGo delivered anything? If yes, then ionomy is probably not a competitor - they only blow smoke and ask for more money once in a while. Why does bittrex still let this coin trade on the exchange when there is only red flags?
Bittrex will list any coin (well, maybe except obvious malware) that can pay their listing fee, 5 BTC or whatever it is. So being listed on Bittrex is not an indication of legitimacy, and Bittrex won't delist them for being assholes.
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
August 18, 2017, 03:20:41 PM Last edit: August 18, 2017, 04:12:31 PM by WildShark |
|
The question has probably already been asked, but is this project a direct competitor of MobileGo? What are the main differences?
Has MobileGo delivered anything? If yes, then ionomy is probably not a competitor - they only blow smoke and ask for more money once in a while. Why does bittrex still let this coin trade on the exchange when there is only red flags?
Bittrex will list any coin (well, maybe except obvious malware) that can pay their listing fee, 5 BTC or whatever it is. So being listed on Bittrex is not an indication of legitimacy, and Bittrex won't delist them for being assholes. Bittrex wants to be a successful exchange and ION will continue to trade there until the Volume is really low! Watch for ION appearing and being traded on other EXCHANGES!!!
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
August 18, 2017, 10:34:53 PM |
|
Ok, let's recap. Day 1: https://news.ionomy.com/lightning/ - tournaments with prizes (Gravity leaderboard still broken), ability to buy in-game trinkets via ionomy website and avoid Apple/Google 30% cut (sounds kinda fishy but maybe they can stay under the radar, what with their 50 users). Day 2: https://news.ionomy.com/thunder/ - on-chain in-game currency (vaporware as of yet, they only have PNG tokens). Day 3: https://news.ionomy.com/jumpstart/ - crowdfunding (a bunch of buzzwords but pretty sure none of it actually exists). Day 4: https://news.ionomy.com/alchemy/ - web wallets (some more PNGs), masternode hosting for Dash (they could probably cook up a Dash VM pretty quickly if someone is willing to hand them the coins). Day 5: https://news.ionomy.com/spark/ - ad network (again a bunch of buzzwords, throwing stuff at the wall, etc). Day 6: https://news.ionomy.com/core/ - trying to make it sound like they have real developers, not very convincing given their history of broken shitcloning. Day 7: https://news.ionomy.com/darkmatter/ - oh, by the way, give us more money, cuz we pissed away xpybits funds and ICO funds and other money we asked for before (remember shark bragging how smart it was to sell BTC at $700). I'm sure korvas will be stopping by to explain how all this makes perfect sense and fits with the grand vision but in reality it is a brazen money grab - and not the first one - with nothing to show for it. The team is so comfortable in fleecing the flock that they don't even bother with details any more, like updating their roadmap: https://ionomy.com/about/roadmap (still 1 game a month). Obviously nobody on slack will ever ask about old promises. Nice job of summarizing the Ionomy Storm! Are you going to slide this info into the Bitcoin ION FAQ?
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 9022
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 19, 2017, 12:13:23 AM Last edit: November 29, 2020, 05:37:45 AM by suchmoon |
|
The team is so comfortable in fleecing the flock that they don't even bother with details any more, like updating their roadmap: https://ionomy.com/about/roadmap (still 1 game a month). Obviously nobody on slack will ever ask about old promises. I'm pretty sure matlack learnt that from GOD himself, isn't that the whole point of religion (that and control) I'd say this applies more to cults than religions maybe, but that's a discussion for another thread. I think we can describe the ionomy congregation as "lying assholes making money off blind faith". Speaking of assholes, the top cheater on Gravity leaderboard is named "FairPlay" Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image
|
|
|
|
drwoo
|
|
August 19, 2017, 03:20:28 PM |
|
The question has probably already been asked, but is this project a direct competitor of MobileGo? What are the main differences?
Has MobileGo delivered anything? If yes, then ionomy is probably not a competitor - they only blow smoke and ask for more money once in a while. Why does bittrex still let this coin trade on the exchange when there is only red flags?
Bittrex will list any coin (well, maybe except obvious malware) that can pay their listing fee, 5 BTC or whatever it is. So being listed on Bittrex is not an indication of legitimacy, and Bittrex won't delist them for being assholes. That seems like a valid point. But maybe this coin will get to that point where we get to see a working product some day.
|
|
|
|
o0o0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
|
|
August 19, 2017, 07:09:26 PM |
|
notice now how they are calling it a crowdsale and not ico on dark matter? they think a word changes the fact. i hope they are excluding us citizens from it like us based exchanges. its funny they cant help themselves they cant make content so they keep making new tokens to sell. atoms, dark matter, ion thats 3 tokens they've sold to their users now. garza would be proud he was only able to sell xpy as a token once. matlacks done it 3 times.
also whats the point in their ad network which im assuming is just a wrapper on an existing ad network they piggy back on if they only have 1/2 a game to show them in?
you'd have to be an idiot to buy dark matter... ion hasnt really achieved its use case and they want to sell you another token?
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:31:04 AM |
|
notice now how they are calling it a crowdsale and not ico on dark matter? they think a word changes the fact. i hope they are excluding us citizens from it like us based exchanges. its funny they cant help themselves they cant make content so they keep making new tokens to sell. atoms, dark matter, ion thats 3 tokens they've sold to their users now. garza would be proud he was only able to sell xpy as a token once. matlacks done it 3 times.
also whats the point in their ad network which im assuming is just a wrapper on an existing ad network they piggy back on if they only have 1/2 a game to show them in?
you'd have to be an idiot to buy dark matter... ion hasnt really achieved its use case and they want to sell you another token?
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 9022
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 20, 2017, 02:49:13 AM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck.
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:31:53 PM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. Bet you wish you were one of those idiots that were the first to support Ionomy unless off course you have an allergic reaction to making money. If making money is your affliction then shrewd move steering clear of ionomy.
|
|
|
|
o0o0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:39:45 PM |
|
notice now how they are calling it a crowdsale and not ico on dark matter? they think a word changes the fact. i hope they are excluding us citizens from it like us based exchanges. its funny they cant help themselves they cant make content so they keep making new tokens to sell. atoms, dark matter, ion thats 3 tokens they've sold to their users now. garza would be proud he was only able to sell xpy as a token once. matlacks done it 3 times.
also whats the point in their ad network which im assuming is just a wrapper on an existing ad network they piggy back on if they only have 1/2 a game to show them in?
you'd have to be an idiot to buy dark matter... ion hasnt really achieved its use case and they want to sell you another token?
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate. are we going to talk usd or sat increase. my btc has earnt me way more. free airdrop from byteball and others. ionwould have lost. not only that but ionomy is yet to deliver. in over a year and 350btc they have released half a game. by your own admission its an incomplete mobile platformer. since you love usd at current rate thats 4100usd x 350btc so approx 1.4 million usd. tell me korvas is gravity or rather 1/2 gravity worth 1.4 million usd? be honest. it must be 1.4 million usd because they want more money so im assuming they are out. your turn. justify where $1.4 millions gone to ask for more. by holding ion instead of btc you missed, btc increase, bitcoin cash, byteball and its monthly compound and many others.
|
|
|
|
CryptoBuds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1048
HODL
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:41:16 PM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. Bet you wish you were one of those idiots that were the first to support Ionomy unless off course you have an allergic reaction to making money. If making money is your affliction then shrewd move steering clear of ionomy. so every single Ionomy member could sell their daily stake/MN rewards and the current price would hold? This is what you're communicating to potemtial investors.
|
|
|
|
o0o0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:44:49 PM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. korvas ignores the fact of those that didnt pay 20/25 cents. he laughs at those and ignores them. he refuses to ackknowledge people $10 an xpy that maybe paid $80 for 1 ion in conversion. he just pretends everyone paid 20/25 cents to suit his advert for ion success. such a blind shill else he'd use median rates to show averages. so deluded and a deliberate fact obscurer and he knows it. korvas what do you think the average price is that people paid ion for in usd and sat.. time to put this to bed with your proper statement. average for everyone not just values that make your investments look good to suck others in.
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
August 20, 2017, 07:22:49 PM Last edit: August 20, 2017, 08:07:44 PM by WildShark |
|
korvas ignores the fact of those that didnt pay 20/25 cents. he laughs at those and ignores them. he refuses to ackknowledge people $10 an xpy that maybe paid $80 for 1 ion in conversion. he just pretends everyone paid 20/25 cents to suit his advert for ion success. such a blind shill else he'd use median rates to show averages. so deluded and a deliberate fact obscurer and he knows it.
korvas what do you think the average price is that people paid ion for in usd and sat.. time to put this to bed with your proper statement. average for everyone not just values that make your investments look good to suck others in.
@o0o0 You can find the price of a Bitcoin (sat) for any day here: https://blockchain.info/charts/market-price?showDataPoints=true×pan=30days&show_header=true&daysAverageString=1&scale=0&address=https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ion/I think ION has been a successful investment for me and continues to provide a new vision!!!
|
|
|
|
WildShark
|
|
August 20, 2017, 07:46:41 PM Last edit: August 20, 2017, 08:14:36 PM by WildShark |
|
so every single Ionomy member could sell their daily stake/MN rewards and the current price would hold? This is what you're communicating to potemtial investors.
The price of ION on the Bittrex market seems to be doing quite well to support the Volume generated by the current ION Investors...
|
|
|
|
CryptoBuds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1048
HODL
|
|
August 20, 2017, 08:43:44 PM |
|
so every single Ionomy member could sell their daily stake/MN rewards and the current price would hold? This is what you're communicating to potemtial investors.
The price of ION on the Bittrex market seems to be doing quite well to support the Volume generated by the current ION Investors... Your response had literally nothing to do with what I said. Quit turning every question into your shill fest. How about instead addressing he question like an adult? I know it's tough for a person such as yourself, shamelessly earning back lost investments by misrepresenting facts to rope people into an investment.
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
August 20, 2017, 09:10:06 PM |
|
notice now how they are calling it a crowdsale and not ico on dark matter? they think a word changes the fact. i hope they are excluding us citizens from it like us based exchanges. its funny they cant help themselves they cant make content so they keep making new tokens to sell. atoms, dark matter, ion thats 3 tokens they've sold to their users now. garza would be proud he was only able to sell xpy as a token once. matlacks done it 3 times.
also whats the point in their ad network which im assuming is just a wrapper on an existing ad network they piggy back on if they only have 1/2 a game to show them in?
you'd have to be an idiot to buy dark matter... ion hasnt really achieved its use case and they want to sell you another token?
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate. are we going to talk usd or sat increase. my btc has earnt me way more. free airdrop from byteball and others. ionwould have lost. not only that but ionomy is yet to deliver. in over a year and 350btc they have released half a game. by your own admission its an incomplete mobile platformer. since you love usd at current rate thats 4100usd x 350btc so approx 1.4 million usd. tell me korvas is gravity or rather 1/2 gravity worth 1.4 million usd? be honest. it must be 1.4 million usd because they want more money so im assuming they are out. your turn. justify where $1.4 millions gone to ask for more. by holding ion instead of btc you missed, btc increase, bitcoin cash, byteball and its monthly compound and many others. We all make a shit ton of money when we predict the past About the $1.4 million they probably have more this figure you quote is just ICO money, don't forget their additional revenue streams. Concerning the spend you need to review recent announcements in more detail then if your bored try to figure out how much each element costs to develop, implement then maintain. Once done subtract that from the $1.4 million. Ionomy is a business not a charity, they are a business with morality. Every day that passes this seems to become more & more of a unique trait. If it was all about stealing the ICO money then we wouldn't be having this conversation as Ionomy would be long gone and I would be licking my wounds. If it about spending the money then why don't you share with everyone how you would have spent it ?
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
August 20, 2017, 09:27:38 PM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. Bet you wish you were one of those idiots that were the first to support Ionomy unless off course you have an allergic reaction to making money. If making money is your affliction then shrewd move steering clear of ionomy. so every single Ionomy member could sell their daily stake/MN rewards and the current price would hold? This is what you're communicating to potemtial investors. My guess is it's more than one but less than 378 do exactly what you just said
|
|
|
|
korvas128
|
|
August 21, 2017, 12:13:55 AM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. korvas ignores the fact of those that didnt pay 20/25 cents. he laughs at those and ignores them. he refuses to ackknowledge people $10 an xpy that maybe paid $80 for 1 ion in conversion. he just pretends everyone paid 20/25 cents to suit his advert for ion success. such a blind shill else he'd use median rates to show averages. so deluded and a deliberate fact obscurer and he knows it. korvas what do you think the average price is that people paid ion for in usd and sat.. time to put this to bed with your proper statement. average for everyone not just values that make your investments look good to suck others in. Once again you chose to ignore the fact that Ion is a POS coin in which the stake rewards vary dependant on volume. Too many variables exist to just pick USD or sat values. This image was taken May 1 2017. As off now it's Look at the numbers.................. What what your seeing is the difference between a POW & POS coin It's not just about the price
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 9022
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:58:53 AM |
|
Just like the idots that bought ION for 20/25 cents or those that bought atoms for $2....... Let's hope dark matter suffers the same fate.
More like the idiots who paid for XPY and stuck with this flustercuck for three more iterations. If all those atoms and other trinkets were so great why does the team need more "crowdfunding" every year from the shrinking "crowd"? You'd think by now they would have a steady revenue stream... oh wait, you morons ARE their revenue stream . Good luck. Bet you wish you were one of those idiots that were the first to support Ionomy unless off course you have an allergic reaction to making money. If making money is your affliction then shrewd move steering clear of ionomy. The way I'm making money doesn't depend on illiquid shitcoins, pumpy shills, and incompetent teams doubling down on their lies. Weird, I know. You on the other hand seem to be enjoying being lied to and/or deliberately perpetuating the lies.
|
|
|
|
|