Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments

[Ninys]

The version 1.0.0 is stable

[1714289204]

1714289204

[grzem]

Cryptox.pl start with GBYTE market is delayed, we are contacting with tonych to alter some headless-wallet settings.

[ja23]

So anyone else here didn't get their Byteballs???

I'm so glad they changed it to 4 phases. And at least I have 3 more opportunities. I would have been so devastated. I think the issue is that I used the Electrum Bitcoin wallet.

[jwinterm]

So anyone else here didn't get their Byteballs???

I'm so glad they changed it to 4 phases. And at least I have 3 more opportunities. I would have been so devastated. I think the issue is that I used the Electrum Bitcoin wallet.

I received via signing txs with electrum.

[Equalizer1970]

Anybody get this error when sending their bytes: Could not send payment. There are no funded addresses.

Even when I have a balance of over 1.2 GB?

[yvv]

Cryptox.pl start with GBYTE market is delayed, we are contacting with tonych to alter some headless-wallet settings.

Why don't you run exchange on byteball? Be the first.

[azwccc]

There is no toggle switch on my GUI to switch to blackbytes. I tried both 32bit and 64bit windows version. Pretty sure im at 1.0.0

I restored my localappdata folder from a backup btw. The Bytes balance IS correct btw

[Equalizer1970]

Anybody get this error when sending their bytes: Could not send payment. There are no funded addresses.

Even when I have a balance of over 1.2 GB?

Looks like my first transaction that did go through, is unconfirmed even after an hour and that I cannot do any further transactions until I get a confirmation. Does anybody know how long a confirmation takes?

[BTCRoyal]

Woah. So I missed the deadline of Dec 25th. So does this mean that in Mid-February I will only get  62.5 ByteBalls for every 1 BTC of proven balance?

[o0o0]

Woah. So I missed the deadline of Dec 25th. So does this mean that in Mid-February I will only get  62.5 ByteBalls for every 1 BTC of proven balance?

not sure that value is concrete but yes. you will also get 100mb per 1gb of byteball you have so you could get some otc or from exchange in preparation. if doing otc use a trusted escrow you both agree on. never let a seller or buyer dictate which and only which escrow to use incase of collusion. agree together.

[ja23]

So anyone else here didn't get their Byteballs???

I'm so glad they changed it to 4 phases. And at least I have 3 more opportunities. I would have been so devastated. I think the issue is that I used the Electrum Bitcoin wallet.

I received via signing txs with electrum.

So you didn't send any Bitcoins? I'm going to have to learn to sign then.

[Equalizer1970]

Anybody get this error when sending their bytes: Could not send payment. There are no funded addresses.

Even when I have a balance of over 1.2 GB?

Looks like my first transaction that did go through, is unconfirmed even after an hour and that I cannot do any further transactions until I get a confirmation. Does anybody know how long a confirmation takes?

Here is the unconfirmed transaction after two hours!
https://explorer.byteball.org/#HQmfG2o2PYHjtyHZsYgaiBoGGc2Nr7VeZ4WrDew/CKk=

[Ghoom]

Any news for distribution to Lisk and Waves holders?

[marseille]

Any news for distribution to Lisk and Waves holders?

I think you need to check with Lisk and waves thread. They should tell you whether they distribute the received byteballs or not. I did read some ICO'ed coins distribute them.

[dfox101]

Do we have exchanges yet? It is a great coin I hope the exchanges will be ready soon.

It will be interesting to see more applications developed on top of it, as in the case of Ethereum.

[ajqjjj]

is Mineable?

[o0o0]

is Mineable?

no

[ICOcountdown.com]

Anybody get this error when sending their bytes: Could not send payment. There are no funded addresses.

Even when I have a balance of over 1.2 GB?

Wait for a confirmation to happen. You have sent a prior payment and it's unconfirmed.

[kaicrypzen]

So anyone else here didn't get their Byteballs???

If you didn't get them then something was probably not done properly ...

- Do you have the latest release installed? Here it is https://github.com/byteball/byteball/releases/tag/v1.0.0. (Install it and let it sync).
- If yes, do your Bitcoin address appear in transition.byteball.org?
By the way if you did a micropayment then your bitcoins got transferred to a change address, you should've moved them back to your linked address, if you didn't your balance may show 0.
--- If yes, grab your Byteball address and check the balance in explorer.byteball.org.
--- Does your Byteball address have a balance?
- if no (BTC address not in transition page), did you link an address that you control (not an exchange address)?
--- if yes, did you do it before the deadline?

Check all these elements, as far I know if you meet all the criteria there's no reason for you not to receive bytes and blackbytes.

[GODLIKE]

I contacted Sasha Ivanov, founder of Waves, about the linked address 1NGfrU4YNp8dox1gLeUDyjD5Vpfck9no5j that has 4800 BTC from Waves ICO.  His response was that if the project is successful, he is going to distribute our coin as dividend to Waves holders.
So, even the largest (so far) whale in our distribution is a kind of collective investment entity.

Could it become a potential threat for the Byteball system if the parties like Waves and Lisk and others will hold 10% of byteball for a fairly long time and won't distribute the coins to their investors, especially when they are in competition with Byteball? It may be not a bad idea to block their BTC addresses for the next distribution round if they don't distribute their coins from this round to their investors before the next round.

This is not a bad idea to block all ICO funds from getting Byteballs, as they are in the competition and it's not going to help us in anyway, unless they agree some sort of collaboration.

Maybe the right way is to actually cap the max amount of Byteballs given to any address.
If an address contains more than 1 BTC, in example, just give 1 BTC of Byteballs.
If the objective is to DISTRIBUTE Byteballs, you want this to happen this way, not to give immense quantities of Byteballs to people that ALREADY have a huge amount of real money stored in BTC.

This method seems more fair for community, but in practice is complicated to be managed correctly, people will split BTC to many addresses ...

Of course some will, but I doubt some millionaire will take time and split his multimillion addresses to gain Byteballs.
At least this should be tried anyway (imo).
Also, I don't think it's such a difficulty, as there is a coupling going on in a database on a server, for what I see. So when Byteballs are issued, they could easily be capped to X per address.