|
22naru
|
 |
January 03, 2017, 11:05:07 PM |
|
voted  xrp icn byte |
|
|
|
|
|
hubballi
|
|
January 03, 2017, 11:31:37 PM |
|
Is the offer of the free bytes if download the software and follow the procedure is still active or it has finished it as i also wanted to join this coin.
|
|
|
|
drays
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1073
|
|
January 03, 2017, 11:55:31 PM |
|
Is the offer of the free bytes if download the software and follow the procedure is still active or it has finished it as i also wanted to join this coin.
First round is finished. The second round will be in February. Monitor this thread if you don't want to miss the second round too |
... this space is not for rent ... |
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
|
January 04, 2017, 12:12:48 AM |
|
Did tonych - the OP starter, do this coin alone ? how long it took ? if a team did it, how many people ? I think this is the best thing I've seen since launch of ethereum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
valley365
|
|
January 04, 2017, 12:50:52 AM |
|
Is the offer of the free bytes if download the software and follow the procedure is still active or it has finished it as i also wanted to join this coin.
First round is finished. The second round will be in February. Monitor this thread if you don't want to miss the second round too Need to link your BTC address. 1st round distribution solely based on your BTC holdings. Second round will be based on your BTC and byteball holdings. So get soime byteballs before second round! |
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
|
January 04, 2017, 02:43:00 AM |
|
Is the offer of the free bytes if download the software and follow the procedure is still active or it has finished it as i also wanted to join this coin.
First round is finished. The second round will be in February. Monitor this thread if you don't want to miss the second round too Need to link your BTC address. 1st round distribution solely based on your BTC holdings. Second round will be based on your BTC and byteball holdings. So get soime byteballs before second round! when is that ? |
yolo
|
|
|
|
lizidev
|
|
January 04, 2017, 02:46:55 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HI-TEC99
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2847
|
|
January 04, 2017, 03:38:47 AM |
|
Is the offer of the free bytes if download the software and follow the procedure is still active or it has finished it as i also wanted to join this coin.
First round is finished. The second round will be in February. Monitor this thread if you don't want to miss the second round too Need to link your BTC address. 1st round distribution solely based on your BTC holdings. Second round will be based on your BTC and byteball holdings. So get soime byteballs before second round! when is that ? The second round is expected in mid-February. |
|
|
|
|
|
imbladednow
|
|
January 04, 2017, 03:43:32 AM |
|
Distribution on this sucks. How can any of you want to buy this knowing that some people ( I wont name names) are using ico funds to collect on. Its crazy.
I wont invest one cent into the almost like a premined scam byteball. I know its not premined but its like it the way the distribution looks.
|
I need crypto in my life and garbage out of it.
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
January 04, 2017, 05:10:33 AM |
|
Selling blackbyte for white. 4 to 1. Up to 500 GB black for 125 GB white.
|
|
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
January 04, 2017, 05:40:55 AM |
|
Selling blackbyte for white. 4 to 1. Up to 500 GB black for 125 GB white.
Lol, that's true, we don't have markets for blackbyte yet, the exchange should create one, but with direct connection it will be more work to implement I guess. |
|
|
|
|
NorrisK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 04, 2017, 08:12:20 AM |
|
Distribution on this sucks. How can any of you want to buy this knowing that some people ( I wont name names) are using ico funds to collect on. Its crazy.
I wont invest one cent into the almost like a premined scam byteball. I know its not premined but its like it the way the distribution looks.
You can still link an address and share in the distribution. Free is free, no matter how many bitcoins others hold.. |
|
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
January 04, 2017, 09:16:00 AM |
|
Approximately how many distribution cycles will it take to distribute all coins if linked wallets remain at 70K btc?
For the second round, 1 BTC will give 62.5 MB so 70 000 BTC will give 4 375 GB and the 100 000 GB already distributed will give 10 000 GB so that's 14 375 GB in the second round which is like 1.5%. In the subsequent rounds, 1 BTC weight will decrease so 1 BTC will give less bytes, it seems that the majority of the distributed bytes will come from already distributed bytes. Hopefully, way more BTC would be linked in the following phases. If we assume that 1.5% is distributed at each round, the remaining 88% will take almost 59 rounds, if we assume they are 1 to 2 months apart then this takes us to 5 to 10 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
freebutcaged
|
|
January 04, 2017, 09:29:00 AM
Last edit: January 04, 2017, 10:42:43 AM by freebutcaged |
|
no one care enough to mention that extra c in bold and huge font above? why would anyone wants to link their bitcoin wallets to byeball wallets? is this a trojan horse for later hacks attempts or are you a government agent ? |
|
|
|
|
|
tomkat
|
|
January 04, 2017, 09:42:47 AM |
|
...
no one care enough to mention that extra c in bold and huge font above?
why would anyone wants to link their bitcoin wallets to byeball wallets? is this a trojan horse for later hacks attempts or are you a government agent ?
well, this is something that worries me too - why the hell they want BTC holders to do this "linking" while they could easily implement some other method for proving BTC ownership, like sending few satoshis to an address, or other not-so-fishy methods? |
|
|
|
|
|
SatoNatomato
|
|
January 04, 2017, 10:35:15 AM |
|
Giving the key holders too much power indeed could be bad idea. But holding the funds in a multisig address is a great solution. We may all trust tonych, but the point is - not everyone will trust a single man to keep all the funds. Its easier to trust a group of unrelated people than one person. "Power is a great seducer." The funds keepers only need to be honest people with very good reputation, and guarantee the funds will be intact. They should not hold any power on making decisions, or invest or moreover to have some interest. They just should hold and be responsive. Having those funds secured until distribution will make it easier for the project to attract more investors, and clear up FUD. In any case, though I "hail" no-one , I am sure tonych makes the right decision on this your key argument holds and fails on "only need to be honest people". Fucking LOL. Diogenes enteres the scene, with his lantern in broad daylight, people ask him wtf mate, he says im looking for an honest man amongst you. To trust tonych is far easier than to trust 3 people, especially together. A group is shit. A group is a horde, can be herded, individuals are elegant, groups only leave massive amounts of shit - see bitcoin, it could have evolved if it was 1 person making decision instead of 5. Tonych dont make the same mistake as Satoshi, keep control and carry on, distribution method is excellent despite maybe 2 people complaining, and they can go make their own distribution method as a group. Ehm... Man whats up with you? Why so much distrust in people? There are lots of honest people, and even very honest ones (like me for example ). I have seen some others too, so I am not the only one  . You are free to believe or not, but I would be less cinical... You don't seem to like democracy, right? Would definitely prefer totalitarian systems it seems. Well you are right to some extend, totalitatian systems are more effective. But there are so much other benefits in democratic approach... This is very interesting topic (to me at least), but this thread is not the right place to discuss it though... " dont repeat the same mistake as Satoshi" That was a good one lol . How far BTC would have gone, if Satoshi kept all the power..? i too am very honest, probably the most honest up in this thread right after tonych. The problem is groups and group dynamics. Groups I do not trust, the bigger the worse they get. See you already began talking about politics. Democrat sure, depends on flavor, representative or direct? A group to distribute byteblls is not democratic at all it is oligopoly or oligarchy at best. Btc woul have biggee blocksize by now if Satoshi was around. |
|
|
|
|
|
SatoNatomato
|
|
January 04, 2017, 10:42:31 AM |
|
...
no one care enough to mention that extra c in bold and huge font above?
why would anyone wants to link their bitcoin wallets to byeball wallets? is this a trojan horse for later hacks attempts or are you a government agent ?
well, this is something that worries me too - why the hell they want BTC holders to do this "linking" while they could easily implement some other method for proving BTC ownership, like sending few satoshis to an address, or other not-so-fishy methods? dumbasses both of you. The method of sending a few satoshis to prove holder of btc address was already implemented and used by most people. Signing a message with your btc address is what its made to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
freebutcaged
|
|
January 04, 2017, 10:54:04 AM |
|
I get it now, the rich will get richer nice! I have this idea that I will make a coin and ask people to give it value by putting money (investing) and then I'll get my dev and future expenses shares, really easy income I made for myself and other people in community helped it to come to life because if they didn't then my random lines of code wouldn't be considered valuable.
Just like a few thousands other devs making coins and community willingly provide the value and then the devs just get their percentage as their cut in the deal, no wonder why so many many many many many many many and even more many altcoins exist.
|
|
|
|
|
metamorphin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!
|
|
January 04, 2017, 11:20:38 AM |
|
I get it now, the rich will get richer nice! I have this idea that I will make a coin and ask people to give it value by putting money (investing) and then I'll get my dev and future expenses shares, really easy income I made for myself and other people in community helped it to come to life because if they didn't then my random lines of code wouldn't be considered valuable.
Just like a few thousands other devs making coins and community willingly provide the value and then the devs just get their percentage as their cut in the deal, no wonder why so many many many many many many many and even more many altcoins exist.
But only one made the BYTEBALL!  Greetz Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
