dbt1033
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
 |
October 17, 2016, 02:52:11 AM |
|
any news of a GPU miner on the horizon?
seems a modified version of lyra2 with additional rows and block height as a parameter is definitely in the realm of doable..
i'd say it most likely already exists but someone is holding it close to their chest..
If zcoin is switching algos soon i dont think we'll ever see one Where did you read about algo change? Sure you don't mean zcash? It's under development milestones on github. They are switching to MTP. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity16/sec16_paper_biryukov.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
NotMyFarm
|
|
October 17, 2016, 02:52:42 AM |
|
are there any Mac wallets available ?
Why is this coin only available on these 'weird and shitty ' exchanges ?
does not seem/feel good !
Because it's a weird and shitty coin that is going to be superceded in the "weird and shitty and premined and trusted setup" niche by zcash in about 10 days. The only weird thing here is the persistence of those who can only blame their own ignorance for missing the ZCoin train in spreading lies and FUD. Myth: "Weird and shitty" Fact: Based upon the very advanced ZCoin protocol proposed by academic researchers (See http://spar.isi.jhu.edu/~mgreen/ZerocoinOakland.pdf) Myth: "Premined" Fact: There was no premine whatsoever. Myth: "Trusted setup is insecure" Fact: The inability to perform prime factorization in a reasonable amount of time (where 'reasonable' means CPU-years) is the basis of modern cryptography. If you can easily compromise a trusted setup then congratulations, the entire world is yours to take. I'm seriously wondering how some people are even able to breathe. easy there i am asking a general question here and your answer does NOT help at all ! so .... ? |
|
|
|
dbt1033
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 17, 2016, 02:55:16 AM
Last edit: October 17, 2016, 03:15:55 AM by dbt1033 |
|
 I drew the fib levels for our market on tradingview (because you can't anywhere for nova). We are currently at the .382 retracement level. It's usually a good spot to buy, we will see...  |
|
|
|
|
|
ret
|
|
October 17, 2016, 04:13:26 AM |
|
MTP algo CPU friendly ?
ASIC resistant?
|
|
|
|
|
dbt1033
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 17, 2016, 04:19:35 AM |
|
MTP algo CPU friendly ?
ASIC resistant?
According the the whitepaper, yes. It's memory hard. |
|
|
|
|
matejbilahora
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 275
Community built, Privacy driven
|
|
October 17, 2016, 04:38:02 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
|
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
October 17, 2016, 04:53:51 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
Both are accurate; nethashrate (equivalent to networkhashps via getmininginfo) is quite irrelevant, as it is based on calculations derived from the rate that blocks are being solved, its not actually derived from network conditions. Suprnova is 1,600kh/s and Pool.mn is around 240kh/s. If you were to take the same share rate/size as currently being submitted (as scrypt), you'd divide the results by 128 for Lyra2. Additionally, i got quite sick of xzc.pool.mn; as the stratum appeared to continuously fail and reappear last night (no doubt due to traffic). This may actually be an implementation problem with Zerocoin and not pool.mn itself. |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
matejbilahora
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 275
Community built, Privacy driven
|
|
October 17, 2016, 05:08:06 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
Both are accurate; nethashrate (equivalent to networkhashps via getmininginfo) is quite irrelevant, as it is based on calculations derived from the rate that blocks are being solved, its not actually derived from network conditions. Suprnova is 1,600kh/s and Pool.mn is around 240kh/s. If you were to take the same share rate/size as currently being submitted (as scrypt), you'd divide the results by 128 for Lyra2. Additionally, i got quite sick of xzc.pool.mn; as the stratum appeared to continuously fail and reappear last night (no doubt due to traffic). This may actually be an implementation problem with Zerocoin and not pool.mn itself. Ok, that is good to know. But statistics page on both pool show total different results. |
|
|
|
|
xiaolin1579
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 17, 2016, 05:17:12 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
cpu-pool is current hashrate real. |
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
October 17, 2016, 05:24:23 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
Both are accurate; nethashrate (equivalent to networkhashps via getmininginfo) is quite irrelevant, as it is based on calculations derived from the rate that blocks are being solved, its not actually derived from network conditions. Suprnova is 1,600kh/s and Pool.mn is around 240kh/s. If you were to take the same share rate/size as currently being submitted (as scrypt), you'd divide the results by 128 for Lyra2. Additionally, i got quite sick of xzc.pool.mn; as the stratum appeared to continuously fail and reappear last night (no doubt due to traffic). This may actually be an implementation problem with Zerocoin and not pool.mn itself. Ok, that is good to know. But statistics page on both pool show total different results. apologies; my answer contradicts itself.. whichever nethashrate is higher will be the accurate 'world' hashrate. however both pool hashrates are correct. |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
October 17, 2016, 05:29:46 AM |
|
cpu-pool what does Orphaned mean in the transactions ??
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
October 17, 2016, 06:06:45 AM |
|
cpu-pool what does Orphaned mean in the transactions ??
Orphaned (in the context of blocks found) basically means that two found blocks on the network were found to conflict and the 'orphaned' one was chosen to be invalid. Usually because one was propogated across the network quicker than the other block finder (pool or individual) was able to. |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
matejbilahora
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 275
Community built, Privacy driven
|
|
October 17, 2016, 06:34:55 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
cpu-pool is current hashrate real. Problem loading page, unable to connect.. |
|
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
October 17, 2016, 06:37:41 AM |
|
Is there any news on possible listing of zcoin on bittrex? volume on nova is big enough compared to other coins listed there. I have a hunch it will be this week..  |
|
|
|
|
cpu-pool.com
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2016, 06:40:06 AM |
|
Yeah unfortunately the block we've found was orphaned by another block, so ours became invalid :-(
We simply need more hash on the pool and it should be better, is there anything we might do to get more users on the pool ?
Whats so bad about the pool that only a few hop over ?
|
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
BTCLife.global participant
|
|
October 17, 2016, 06:50:43 AM |
|
You can set a little additional reward for those who will find a block. At least untill there will be enough hashing power at your pool. Also, as I mentioned before, please add a port 443, may be 80 for those who are behing the firewalls. It will be your advantage.  |
|
|
|
xiaolin1579
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
October 17, 2016, 07:09:46 AM |
|
Where is current hashrate Suprnova or MN? Can not choose which info is real..
cpu-pool is current hashrate real. Problem loading page, unable to connect.. please refresh |
|
|
|
|
cryptodove
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2016, 07:28:49 AM |
|
Is there any news on possible listing of zcoin on bittrex? volume on nova is big enough compared to other coins listed there. I have a hunch it will be this week.. I tweeted bittrex via my twitter if they would add zcoin soon? they said... "no. we don't comment on launches." This is a standard response from them, Anyway hopefully they add it soon. Cheers CryptoDove |
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
October 17, 2016, 07:42:29 AM |
|
Yeah unfortunately the block we've found was orphaned by another block, so ours became invalid :-(
We simply need more hash on the pool and it should be better, is there anything we might do to get more users on the pool ?
Whats so bad about the pool that only a few hop over ?
So this means no coins for mister doktor83? Oh my...one day mining gone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
