[ANN] Firo (FIRO) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup

[hwgeek]

More good news!  we found another 2 blocks last day- it's 7 block per 24hr!
Look it the Luck - Any 1 that joined made the Double of profit at least, Better Speed Reported, Better CCminer support and 0 fee! Come On Join all, Try and compare your reported speed and see yourself, We already passed 1700Mhs!.
https://xzc.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

[teknohog]

After updating to the latest git version, the daemon prompted me to -reindex the database. Since then it's been stuck on block 54396. I've done a complete resync from scratch, with the same results. The log has a repeating complaint about a single block:

Code:

2017-10-21 10:01:24 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 226b443c3f8b387ebea927b5aa2cc07b544df1ef1dbd5f2e9c37b4a0bd3fe4fa is marked invalid
2017-10-21 10:01:24 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 226b443c3f8b387ebea927b5aa2cc07b544df1ef1dbd5f2e9c37b4a0bd3fe4fa is marked invalid
2017-10-21 10:05:27 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 226b443c3f8b387ebea927b5aa2cc07b544df1ef1dbd5f2e9c37b4a0bd3fe4fa is marked invalid
2017-10-21 10:05:27 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 226b443c3f8b387ebea927b5aa2cc07b544df1ef1dbd5f2e9c37b4a0bd3fe4fa is marked invalid
2017-10-21 10:05:29 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 226b443c3f8b387ebea927b5aa2cc07b544df1ef1dbd5f2e9c37b4a0bd3fe4fa is marked invalid

Any ideas?

[ed_teech]

Marketing and development seems promising. I'm marking this to invest.

[k0a1l0]

With only 1 Ghs Suprnova is doing great!! Come on join us, the Luck is on our side, the Reported speed is ~15% more then on MPH + The latest CCminer 2.2.2 has special option for Suprnova!!

--submit-stale parameter for supernova pool (which change diff too fast)

Pls come and join more, I don't understand why CCminer users are not mining @ Suprnova- is much better for us!.
Come for 24Hrs and see your Graph and compare against MPH and see What I mean!

You forgot to mention that when people come to suprnova and make mining blocks more smooth, there will be no more 'better', but equal to calcs. So, you can mine anywhere, it all balances in the end.

[hwgeek]

Balanced- yes, but like all sad before me- the reported hashrate with ccminer- even the latest 2.2.2 is higher then MPH + there is no fee on Suprnova.

[keithbradley]

With only 1 Ghs Suprnova is doing great!! Come on join us, the Luck is on our side, the Reported speed is ~15% more then on MPH + The latest CCminer 2.2.2 has special option for Suprnova!!

--submit-stale parameter for supernova pool (which change diff too fast)

Pls come and join more, I don't understand why CCminer users are not mining @ Suprnova- is much better for us!.
Come for 24Hrs and see your Graph and compare against MPH and see What I mean!
https://s1.postimg.org/1i4dqobk3z/super.jpg

I'm currently mining on MPH because I don't know how to mine XZC on Suprnova.  Can you provide a link and info to get me started?  I see two available pools listed on Suprnova for Z coin, and neither of them work (maxminers and poll.mn).

I'm averaging less than 6000kh/s realized while my rig is a consistent 9700kh/s+.

[TheHas]

There has been some attention on zencash lately. In what ways is zcoin different from some of these other forks?

[elec7ronic]

Suprnova better than MPH currently.

[webtimmi]

There has been some attention on zencash lately. In what ways is zcoin different from some of these other forks?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DG8nK_UUIAAujRu.jpg

[webtimmi]

With only 1 Ghs Suprnova is doing great!! Come on join us, the Luck is on our side, the Reported speed is ~15% more then on MPH + The latest CCminer 2.2.2 has special option for Suprnova!!

--submit-stale parameter for supernova pool (which change diff too fast)

Pls come and join more, I don't understand why CCminer users are not mining @ Suprnova- is much better for us!.
Come for 24Hrs and see your Graph and compare against MPH and see What I mean!
https://s1.postimg.org/1i4dqobk3z/super.jpg

I'm currently mining on MPH because I don't know how to mine XZC on Suprnova.  Can you provide a link and info to get me started?  I see two available pools listed on Suprnova for Z coin, and neither of them work (maxminers and poll.mn).

I'm averaging less than 6000kh/s realized while my rig is a consistent 9700kh/s+.

just change the bat configuration file. ccminer-x64 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u username.workername -p x  -i 19

[keithbradley]

With only 1 Ghs Suprnova is doing great!! Come on join us, the Luck is on our side, the Reported speed is ~15% more then on MPH + The latest CCminer 2.2.2 has special option for Suprnova!!

--submit-stale parameter for supernova pool (which change diff too fast)

Pls come and join more, I don't understand why CCminer users are not mining @ Suprnova- is much better for us!.
Come for 24Hrs and see your Graph and compare against MPH and see What I mean!
https://s1.postimg.org/1i4dqobk3z/super.jpg

I'm currently mining on MPH because I don't know how to mine XZC on Suprnova.  Can you provide a link and info to get me started?  I see two available pools listed on Suprnova for Z coin, and neither of them work (maxminers and poll.mn).

I'm averaging less than 6000kh/s realized while my rig is a consistent 9700kh/s+.

just change the bat configuration file. ccminer-x64 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u username.workername -p x  -i 19

Edit: Thank you.  I think I have it figured out now.  So far, it looks much more rewarding that MPH.

[k0a1l0]

Balanced- yes, but like all sad before me- the reported hashrate with ccminer- even the latest 2.2.2 is higher then MPH + there is no fee on Suprnova.

Well, ok, maybe you are right

[Dump3er]

Hi again, is the development of the Zcoin market already under way? Or is that just an untouched item on the roadmap so far? Thank you.

[crofly]

Hi again, is the development of the Zcoin market already under way? Or is that just an untouched item on the roadmap so far? Thank you.

Dunno where you see "market" in their roadmap. Are you sure you are talking about ZCoin and not some other coin?
Or maybe I'm blind but I don't find anything on zcoin.io roadmap

[elsystem]

With only 1 Ghs Suprnova is doing great!! Come on join us, the Luck is on our side, the Reported speed is ~15% more then on MPH + The latest CCminer 2.2.2 has special option for Suprnova!!

--submit-stale parameter for supernova pool (which change diff too fast)

Pls come and join more, I don't understand why CCminer users are not mining @ Suprnova- is much better for us!.
Come for 24Hrs and see your Graph and compare against MPH and see What I mean!
https://s1.postimg.org/1i4dqobk3z/super.jpg

I'm currently mining on MPH because I don't know how to mine XZC on Suprnova.  Can you provide a link and info to get me started?  I see two available pools listed on Suprnova for Z coin, and neither of them work (maxminers and poll.mn).

I'm averaging less than 6000kh/s realized while my rig is a consistent 9700kh/s+.

just change the bat configuration file. ccminer-x64 -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u username.workername -p x  -i 19

Edit: Thank you.  I think I have it figured out now.  So far, it looks much more rewarding that MPH.

I'm switching to suprnova as well. More people need to move over. Performance is much better.

[Historical]

Code:

[2017-10-23 15:31:21] reject reason: job not found
[2017-10-23 15:31:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1070, 1755.45 kH/s
[2017-10-23 15:31:29] accepted: 4185/4416 (diff 0.028), 3501.42 kH/s booooo
[2017-10-23 15:31:29] reject reason: job not found
[2017-10-23 15:31:34] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1070, 1750.74 kH/s
[2017-10-23 15:31:34] accepted: 4185/4417 (diff 0.016), 3501.43 kH/s booooo
[2017-10-23 15:31:34] reject reason: job not found
[2017-10-23 15:31:50] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1070, 1746.37 kH/s
[2017-10-23 15:31:56] accepted: 4185/4418 (diff 0.018), 3500.91 kH/s booooo
[2017-10-23 15:31:56] reject reason: job not found
[2017-10-23 15:32:15] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1070, 1753.87 kH/s
[2017-10-23 15:32:15] accepted: 4186/4419 (diff 0.041), 3501.40 kH/s yes!
[2017-10-23 15:32:26] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1070, 1764.75 kH/s

Anybody knows why getting this rejects on suprnova?

[zcoinofficial]

Zcoin is happy to be listed on the Korean exchange UPBit.com launched by Kakao, Korea's biggest messaging app.

UPBit.com

[kalymist]

Hi zcoiners


We have made a custom ccminer that won't loose share anymore.

Having almost same hashrate on the ccminer and on the reported hashrate on pools (works on miningpoolhub and suprnova just fine)

If interested MP me.


Selling this miner for 0.02 BTC


Screenshot taken with (21 x 1070 nvidia) (2x 7 gpu rig + 1x 6 gpu rig + 1x 1 gpu test rig)

power comsuption is 1850w (for all of these, out of the wall hardware monitoring)







And by the way, This coin is the best to mine @ the moment, as it really doesn't suck lot of power like most of the others.
It's really a nice coin to mine, best profit, best power sucking rate, pretty stable in the income (trending growing on long therm)

[snmoney]

Hi zcoiners


We have made a custom ccminer that won't loose share anymore.

Having almost same hashrate on the ccminer and on the reported hashrate on pools (works on miningpoolhub and suprnova just fine)

If interested MP me.


Selling this miner for 0.02 BTC


Screenshot taken with (21 x 1070 nvidia) (2x 7 gpu rig + 1x 6 gpu rig + 1x 1 gpu test rig)

power comsuption is 1850w (for all of these, out of the wall hardware monitoring)







And by the way, This coin is the best to mine @ the moment, as it really doesn't suck lot of power like most of the others.
It's really a nice coin to mine, best profit, best power sucking rate, pretty stable in the income (trending growing on long therm)

a  over 12 hour Graphs snapshot should have more persuasion

BTW. i think the ccminer cuda9 version is good enough solving MPH lost hashrate issue.

[teknohog]

After updating to the latest git version, the daemon prompted me to -reindex the database. Since then it's been stuck on block 54396.

"This reverts bad commit". https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/commit/8fc1b2622afa82eb1ce94ead97ffd2367a3903f2