WhyMe
|
|
February 16, 2017, 03:52:58 PM |
|
Can someone share his hashrate on ETH and ZEC with MSI RX 470 ARMOR 4G OC?
28M on ETH @1100/1950 with 1500 strap That's on my 480s ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Fujitzo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2017, 03:58:36 PM |
|
There seems to be an issue with -li mode. I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)
I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6. But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2. Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?
Exactly! Once I installed v12 I got stability problems on all 3 rigs (mixed 280s and 290s) I guess from the heavier Vram utilization, which is clocked to 1500 on all cards (no bios mod, just MSI aft) So I read here about the li mode, so I switched it on and noticed immediate 20% drop in consumption and same hashrate in miner. Thought hm... too good to be true ?? But ok, let's give it a try. I mined in coinmine.pl pool for 1 night and the reported by pool speed was more than 30% lower over this period. I switched to flypool - the same. Finally removed li mode and speeds in pool improved (and payouts consequently) but are still quite far from speeds in miner. In miner I get 5300 H/s total in the pool is like 4300 - 4700 which is a whopping 17% difference. They say pool luck.. ok, but then I should be getting speeds ABOVE what I see in miner from times to times, right? So if this is due to variance the 24h average should be pretty close to what I see in miner. Why is such a big difference ? Anyone else have such a big gap in reported speed in miner vs pool? Have you tried several pools and noticed which one is closest to speeds in miner? Cheers
|
|
|
|
Benchman
|
|
February 16, 2017, 04:22:56 PM |
|
+1,
Definitely problem with -li command. I'm not using it righ now. On pool, i'm getting 10-15% smaller hashrate.
|
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 16, 2017, 04:41:46 PM |
|
+1,
Definitely problem with -li command. I'm not using it righ now. On pool, i'm getting 10-15% smaller hashrate.
Same, pool hash rate at least 10% lower than hash rate reported by Claymore, and Awesomeminer.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1709
|
|
February 16, 2017, 05:02:57 PM |
|
Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
February 16, 2017, 05:56:05 PM |
|
Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?
That's not what at least I mean. What I mean is that the reported hash rate in Claymore differ wildly from the reported hash rate pool-side. Something that for me is new with version 12 vs. any other version. Previously the reported hash rate as per Claymore software was very similar to the pool side reported result, not so with version 12.
|
|
|
|
stealth.money
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 561
Merit: 255
Going stealthy
|
|
February 16, 2017, 05:58:19 PM |
|
Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s.
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
February 16, 2017, 06:20:59 PM |
|
Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?
if, like me, you test -li for the first time with v12 only, you don't know hashrate is bad ...
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
February 16, 2017, 06:32:31 PM |
|
Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s. You mean you don't mine for the fun of it??
|
|
|
|
stealth.money
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 561
Merit: 255
Going stealthy
|
|
February 16, 2017, 06:44:26 PM |
|
Claymore, you could try to reach 450 h/s for 390x If you could let us know what is the wattage it would be useful, this post considered useless and no point of posting it. Say 390x could reach 555 h/s with 750w, there is not much profit. All miners want is profit/s. You mean you don't mine for the fun of it?? Back in the old day(Litecoin/Dogecoin) I mine for fun, now a days I'm looking to mine for profits.
|
|
|
|
Benchman
|
|
February 16, 2017, 06:47:15 PM |
|
Well its common sense, if it uses much less electricity and all, why would the hashrate stay exactly the same?
Lol, though I found magic stealth optimisation trick.
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
February 16, 2017, 07:16:26 PM |
|
There seems to be an issue with -li mode. I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)
I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6. But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2. Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?
Exactly! Once I installed v12 I got stability problems on all 3 rigs (mixed 280s and 290s) I guess from the heavier Vram utilization, which is clocked to 1500 on all cards (no bios mod, just MSI aft) So I read here about the li mode, so I switched it on and noticed immediate 20% drop in consumption and same hashrate in miner. Thought hm... too good to be true ?? But ok, let's give it a try. I mined in coinmine.pl pool for 1 night and the reported by pool speed was more than 30% lower over this period. I switched to flypool - the same. Finally removed li mode and speeds in pool improved (and payouts consequently) but are still quite far from speeds in miner. In miner I get 5300 H/s total in the pool is like 4300 - 4700 which is a whopping 17% difference. They say pool luck.. ok, but then I should be getting speeds ABOVE what I see in miner from times to times, right? So if this is due to variance the 24h average should be pretty close to what I see in miner. Why is such a big difference ? Anyone else have such a big gap in reported speed in miner vs pool? Have you tried several pools and noticed which one is closest to speeds in miner? Cheers yes, the only pool where i see an accurate hash is at dwarf but they are way too small and luck goes up and down like a rolercoaster
|
|
|
|
Madmach
|
|
February 16, 2017, 07:25:45 PM Last edit: February 17, 2017, 06:04:17 AM by Madmach |
|
R-280 - 290H/s(230W), R-380 - 200H/s(130W). Really??? Very curious algo.
|
|
|
|
magicsys.nw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2017, 07:52:56 PM |
|
I got 4 rigs with 290/290x, 3 of them on win10 - cant run under -i 8 (always drops to 5) and one rig with 290 with win7 runs fine eith -i 8.
|
|
|
|
GTCG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2017, 08:10:28 PM |
|
Claymore v.12 in Linux after 12 hours seems pretty stable even with modded Rom
Currently this is the biggest weapon of Claymore vs the Optiminer
In Linux: Claymore is slightly more power hungry vs Optiminer Optiminer gives slightly bigger hashing vs Claymore
But
Claymore's stability is a winner since you don't have to be there to reboot because everything is stuck like in Optiminer (stuck to the point that you can't reboot remotely)
If Claymore breaks the 2-day straight without reboot it's the winner for me
Regardless of that Claymore thanks for a great job and that you always deliver and keep promises This shows character...
Indeed it does. His miner has been running here stable for over a month. great work.
|
|
|
|
Rtyf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2017, 08:25:56 PM |
|
at the beginning of mining Miner v12.0 it is one of the five cards will not start. At v11.1 is all OK. What's the problem can be?
Win 10, 5 card's - 390x sapphire
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
February 16, 2017, 08:31:18 PM |
|
at the beginning of mining Miner v12.0 it is one of the five cards will not start. At v11.1 is all OK. What's the problem can be?
Win 10, 5 card's - 390x sapphire
Check your Virtual Memory setting in windows. If it's 16GB increase it and reboot.
|
|
|
|
Mitja1998
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2017, 09:02:57 PM |
|
modded rx 470 -285 h/s (80W in Afterburner), modded rx480 - 305 h/s (86W in Afterburner), modded HD7950 - 245 h/s (around 110w I think). Very nice results Claymore, you made equihash most profitable algo at nicehash again.
|
|
|
|
Schwacke
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
February 16, 2017, 09:15:04 PM |
|
modded rx 470 -285 h/s (80W in Afterburner), modded rx480 - 305 h/s (86W in Afterburner), modded HD7950 - 245 h/s (around 110w I think). Very nice results Claymore, you made equihash most profitable algo at nicehash again.
would you pls post your settings? BR
|
|
|
|
|