Hurtman
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 09:23:59 AM |
|
ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. For 4xx cards (Polaris) Crimson 16.12.2 is recommended.
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 09:29:08 AM |
|
ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. Thanks ffthomas, you beat me to the reply 
|
|
|
|
kinsik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 09:43:10 AM |
|
ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. 16.3.2 does not support Polaris. See http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMD-Radeon-Software-Crimson-Edition-16-3-2.aspx16.6.2 is the first driver to support Polaris.
|
|
|
|
issie81
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 09:54:27 AM |
|
to be honest i am disappointed the given specs 450sol for Nanos are no way near (between 395-410) i think voor Nano the speed is about the same as 11.1, Optiminer is quicker (atleast for Nanos)
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:04:17 AM |
|
ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. 16.3.2 does not support Polaris. See http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMD-Radeon-Software-Crimson-Edition-16-3-2.aspx16.6.2 is the first driver to support Polaris. I can't make a test right now but.. anyway.. I use Crimson 16.7.3 for both RX and R9 series too. So there is no problem if you have a mixed (R9 Fury / RX 4xx) rig. Update: Claymore recommends 16.12.2 for RX cards.
|
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:06:42 AM |
|
msi rx 470 - 250h/s / card on win 10, i used the recommended drivers. 290 only linux ?
Do you use -asm 1 and -i 6 parameters? (these are the defaults if you didn't set them)
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:08:43 AM |
|
to be honest i am disappointed the given specs 450sol for Nanos are no way near (between 395-410) i think voor Nano the speed is about the same as 11.1, Optiminer is quicker (atleast for Nanos)
"-powlim 50" option + drivers 15.12 or 16.3.2 is the solution. ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. 16.3.2 does not support Polaris. See http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMD-Radeon-Software-Crimson-Edition-16-3-2.aspx16.6.2 is the first driver to support Polaris. I can't make a test right now but maybe there is a mistake on AMD's site. Anyway.. Claymore use 16.3.2 for testing his miner on RX series. And also he recommends 16.3.2 for RX series (Polaris cards). I use Crimson 16.7.3 for both RX and R9 series too. So there is no problem if you have a mixed (R9 Fury / RX 4xx) rig. For mixed rigs Fury + RX4xx you won't be able to get full speed from Fury because latest good drivers for Fury is 16.3.2 and they don't support Polaris. 16.6.2 and higher support Polaris but they cannot provide full speed for Fury.
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:09:29 AM |
|
ASM does not work for R9 Fury with any intensity on 17.1.1 driver. Is this expected?
For the Fury's i would return to 16.3.2 drivers This is not possible as it does not support RX series and i have a mixed rig. Still is there anyone that uses different drivers or have mixed rig either? 16.3.2 supports Polaris (RX) cards. 15.12 is the older one that doesn't support RX series. 16.3.2 does not support Polaris. See http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMD-Radeon-Software-Crimson-Edition-16-3-2.aspx16.6.2 is the first driver to support Polaris. Try 16.10.1 I can vouch they work for me Use DDU and safe mode to change drivers Also don't forget to disallow Windows 10 from updating your drivers
|
|
|
|
coinscrow
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:12:03 AM Last edit: February 14, 2017, 10:24:58 AM by coinscrow |
|
msi rx 470 - 250h/s / card on win 10, i used the recommended drivers. 290 only linux ?
Do you use -asm 1 and -i 6 parameters? (these are the defaults if you didn't set them) I set -asm 1 and -i6 now 266H/s. Can i take it higher? with setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 about 270h/s https://minerstat.xyz/public/coinscrow.html
|
|
|
|
Mr047
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:26:10 AM |
|
msi rx 470 - 250h/s / card on win 10, i used the recommended drivers. 290 only linux ?
Do you use -asm 1 and -i 6 parameters? (these are the defaults if you didn't set them) I set -asm 1 and -i6 now 266H/s. Can i take it higher? with setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 about 270h/s https://minerstat.xyz/public/coinscrow.htmlWin7 + 16.10.1 drivers + Rx470 4Gb (Elpida and Hynix) ~ 295 h/s (no miner options)
|
|
|
|
coinscrow
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:27:35 AM |
|
msi rx 470 - 250h/s / card on win 10, i used the recommended drivers. 290 only linux ?
Do you use -asm 1 and -i 6 parameters? (these are the defaults if you didn't set them) I set -asm 1 and -i6 now 266H/s. Can i take it higher? with setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 about 270h/s https://minerstat.xyz/public/coinscrow.htmlWin7 + 16.10.1 drivers + Rx470 4Gb (Elpida and Hyix) ~ 295 h/s (no miner options) 16.12.2 driver what i use.
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:41:46 AM |
|
Are you guys finding that different makes/speed of ram make any difference to mining rigs ?
|
|
|
|
forato
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 10:45:43 AM |
|
to be honest i am disappointed the given specs 450sol for Nanos are no way near (between 395-410) i think voor Nano the speed is about the same as 11.1, Optiminer is quicker (atleast for Nanos)
Claymore made The same speed as optiminer.. I think he still can get more speed.
|
|
|
|
offon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 11:05:09 AM |
|
Good Work Claymore
Indeed speed is increased Out of 6 RX 480's I am now getting 1860-1880 H/s That is 310-315 H/s per GPU
The power consumption though is still High Measured from the wall i get 1150 Watts
In comparison with Optiminer i get 1840 H/s That is an average of 305-307 H/s per GPU But measured from the wall i get 940 Watts
So for the people that pay their electricity Opti ( In Linux) is still a better deal
PS. I am about to check Claymore in Linux also to see if i get better consumption
moded cards? what settings oc?
|
|
|
|
nokapol
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 11:30:08 AM |
|
Yeah I did not concentrate on tonga cards. I can reach 430H/s on stock 390X. Or I can try to add Pascal coin to dual miner, or improve CryptoNight miner. Need to select.
Choose, please, CryptoNight miner 
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 11:48:08 AM |
|
Good Work Claymore
Indeed speed is increased Out of 6 RX 480's I am now getting 1860-1880 H/s That is 310-315 H/s per GPU
The power consumption though is still High Measured from the wall i get 1150 Watts
In comparison with Optiminer i get 1840 H/s That is an average of 305-307 H/s per GPU But measured from the wall i get 940 Watts
So for the people that pay their electricity Opti ( In Linux) is still a better deal
PS. I am about to check Claymore in Linux also to see if i get better consumption
moded cards? what settings oc? Yes custom rom -powlim -7 -cclock 1350 -mclock 2000 -cvddc 1110 -mvddc 1000 -i 5
|
|
|
|
issie81
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 11:56:14 AM Last edit: February 14, 2017, 12:06:15 PM by issie81 |
|
"-powlim 50" option + drivers 15.12 or 16.3.2 is the solution.
yeah but doing powlim 50 makes my VGA 16c hotter.. 61c vs 77c (still going up) stressing the videocard that much for not even 10% is way to much
|
|
|
|
fronder59
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 12:03:12 PM |
|
miner work about 4 hours and stop mining because miner can't connect to DevFee port. my pool is coinmine.pl and ssl port doesn't work, only stratum port.  Tahiti cards give me 320-325 H/s
|
|
|
|
daviez777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 14, 2017, 12:07:49 PM |
|
card : 3 290x
claymore 11.1 320 320 320
claymore 12.0 360 360 180
Why ?
same problem here...but with 7990... Try to reduce your -i, I had this problem at first and solve it with reducing -i 8 to -i 7 with Furys.
|
|
|
|
|