Yatsida
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2017, 07:39:52 AM |
|
Just wondering what the performance difference between a 4GB and an 8GB is on the Radeon RX480?
I have a number of sapphire RX480 8GB and they hash around 300
I bought 1 Asus Dual X to try out also 8GB but it is crap@ 280 hash
Looking to try a 4GB RX480 from Gigabyte - any ideas ?
I got a PowerColor RX480 8GB, going to add that to my HD7950. Not sure if I can get 300 sol/s with it though. You need the newer driver for the RX 480 and old driver for 7950. that's incorrect. 7950 and rx480 work fine with latest driver. Glad to know. I will buy some RX 480.
|
|
|
|
AceCobra2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2017, 07:12:38 PM |
|
Is it me or has Suprnova has really shitty luck atm? I checked earlier and I got 0.46 coins the last 24 hours hashing 6.1k!
|
|
|
|
fittsy
|
|
April 05, 2017, 07:59:59 PM |
|
Is it me or has Suprnova has really shitty luck atm? I checked earlier and I got 0.46 coins the last 24 hours hashing 6.1k!
Dwarfpool only hit like 4 blocks in the past 24 hours. It looks to me like a lot of hash has moved to another pool causing some of the smaller pools to hit less often. I don't have all the stats at my fingers but I bet the hash has moved to another pool. I can see Dwarf's hash has been reduced by about half.
|
|
|
|
AceCobra2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2017, 08:27:43 PM |
|
Is it me or has Suprnova has really shitty luck atm? I checked earlier and I got 0.46 coins the last 24 hours hashing 6.1k!
Dwarfpool only hit like 4 blocks in the past 24 hours. It looks to me like a lot of hash has moved to another pool causing some of the smaller pools to hit less often. I don't have all the stats at my fingers but I bet the hash has moved to another pool. I can see Dwarf's hash has been reduced by about half. I might move to flypool soon if I don't get lucky lol
|
|
|
|
phobosq
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
April 05, 2017, 08:39:20 PM |
|
Just wondering what the performance difference between a 4GB and an 8GB is on the Radeon RX480?
I have a number of sapphire RX480 8GB and they hash around 300
I bought 1 Asus Dual X to try out also 8GB but it is crap@ 280 hash
Looking to try a 4GB RX480 from Gigabyte - any ideas ?
I have: 2 Asus RX480 4GB ------> 275-280 H/s, 2 Gigabyte RX480 4GB --> 280-285 H/s. My Gigabyte 480 4 GB does the same on stock, after bios mod it does 305 sols with 1190 core/2000 mem. Bios mod was the key here.
|
|
|
|
AceCobra2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2017, 10:20:36 PM |
|
Which bios are you using ?
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
April 06, 2017, 03:44:37 AM |
|
Just wondering what the performance difference between a 4GB and an 8GB is on the Radeon RX480?
I have a number of sapphire RX480 8GB and they hash around 300
I bought 1 Asus Dual X to try out also 8GB but it is crap@ 280 hash
Looking to try a 4GB RX480 from Gigabyte - any ideas ?
I got a PowerColor RX480 8GB, going to add that to my HD7950. Not sure if I can get 300 sol/s with it though. You need the newer driver for the RX 480 and old driver for 7950. that's incorrect. 7950 and rx480 work fine with latest driver. 7870, 7750, 7850, all work fine with the same 16.10.1 WQHL driver that works well with the RX 470. 12.4 on the other hand doesn't seem to like the 7870 much - lotta "driver reset" issues even with -i 1 on a card at stock clocks - but gets along fine on my RX 470s (about 270h/s with stock 4GB cards and a VERY minimal overclock) and the 7750s I've tried it on so far.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
AceCobra2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2017, 05:35:00 PM |
|
Just as I was about to switch to another pool, Suprnova gets lucky. 0.9 coins the last 24 hours - probably partly helped by declining ZEC prices!
|
|
|
|
cashen
|
|
April 06, 2017, 05:47:02 PM |
|
I'm getting an error on the last card whenever I start the miner. It says GPUx returned invalid data
And it repeats this very fast and freezes the computer if I don't disable the GPU quickly. and then it runs fine with out that GPU on.
|
|
|
|
cashen
|
|
April 06, 2017, 05:55:33 PM |
|
Ubuntu 15.10 Catalyst 15.2 GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290 Command: ./zecminer64 -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal xx.xx -zpsw x -tt 60,90,90,90,90,90 -tstop 96,96,96,96,96,96 -powlim 0,-10,-10,-10,-10,0 -r -1 I'm running the miner (v.1.1) since today and noticed the following. At the start it runs fine, but after an half hour or so the zecminer64 process is taking 99% cpu load. Also, bind errors (notice GPU0 jumping to 0 sometimes btw): ZEC - Total Speed: 141.329 H/s, Total Shares: 200, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 ZEC: GPU0 28.519 H/s, GPU1 23.528 H/s, GPU2 21.890 H/s, GPU3 23.123 H/s, GPU4 22.991 H/s, GPU5 21.277 H/s GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=29%, GPU3 t=84C fan=58%, GPU4 t=91C fan=59%, GPU5 t=85C fan=26% server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec... GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=90C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=31%, GPU3 t=84C fan=56%, GPU4 t=91C fan=61%, GPU5 t=85C fan=25% ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5) ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:20 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 ZEC - Total Speed: 112.830 H/s, Total Shares: 105, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08 ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s, GPU1 23.295 H/s, GPU2 22.808 H/s, GPU3 21.948 H/s, GPU4 22.337 H/s, GPU5 22.442 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 ZEC - Total Speed: 144.112 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10 ZEC: GPU0 29.249 H/s, GPU1 24.831 H/s, GPU2 21.970 H/s, GPU3 22.697 H/s, GPU4 23.528 H/s, GPU5 21.839 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)! server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
And also GPU incorrect data errors: GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35396c83 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396cb3 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU0 t=51C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=88C fan=25%, GPU3 t=90C fan=64%, GPU4 t=88C fan=25%, GPU5 t=90C fan=25% GPU returned incorrect data! 35196c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 15396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35316c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c5c GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c0f GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35394c93
Any clues? This is what happening to me. Its always the last card. So If I run all 7 it says GPU6 and If i start it with 6 diabled it does with with GPU5
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
April 06, 2017, 07:11:13 PM |
|
Ubuntu 15.10 Catalyst 15.2 GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290 Command: ./zecminer64 -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal xx.xx -zpsw x -tt 60,90,90,90,90,90 -tstop 96,96,96,96,96,96 -powlim 0,-10,-10,-10,-10,0 -r -1 I'm running the miner (v.1.1) since today and noticed the following. At the start it runs fine, but after an half hour or so the zecminer64 process is taking 99% cpu load. Also, bind errors (notice GPU0 jumping to 0 sometimes btw): ZEC - Total Speed: 141.329 H/s, Total Shares: 200, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 ZEC: GPU0 28.519 H/s, GPU1 23.528 H/s, GPU2 21.890 H/s, GPU3 23.123 H/s, GPU4 22.991 H/s, GPU5 21.277 H/s GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=29%, GPU3 t=84C fan=58%, GPU4 t=91C fan=59%, GPU5 t=85C fan=26% server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec... GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=90C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=31%, GPU3 t=84C fan=56%, GPU4 t=91C fan=61%, GPU5 t=85C fan=25% ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5) ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:20 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 ZEC - Total Speed: 112.830 H/s, Total Shares: 105, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08 ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s, GPU1 23.295 H/s, GPU2 22.808 H/s, GPU3 21.948 H/s, GPU4 22.337 H/s, GPU5 22.442 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 ZEC - Total Speed: 144.112 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10 ZEC: GPU0 29.249 H/s, GPU1 24.831 H/s, GPU2 21.970 H/s, GPU3 22.697 H/s, GPU4 23.528 H/s, GPU5 21.839 H/s ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5) ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)! ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1) ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)! server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
And also GPU incorrect data errors: GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35396c83 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396cb3 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU0 t=51C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=88C fan=25%, GPU3 t=90C fan=64%, GPU4 t=88C fan=25%, GPU5 t=90C fan=25% GPU returned incorrect data! 35196c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 15396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35316c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c5c GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c0f GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93 GPU returned incorrect data! 35394c93
Any clues? This is what happening to me. Its always the last card. So If I run all 7 it says GPU6 and If i start it with 6 diabled it does with with GPU5 First I would keep those temps under 70C. Second what GPUs are you using to give so little hashes?
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 06, 2017, 07:26:44 PM |
|
First I would keep those temps under 70C. Second what GPUs are you using to give so little hashes?
he write GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
April 06, 2017, 07:29:07 PM |
|
First I would keep those temps under 70C. Second what GPUs are you using to give so little hashes?
he write GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290 with 144 H/s? It should be at least 10 times that
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
April 06, 2017, 07:55:00 PM |
|
First I would keep those temps under 70C. Second what GPUs are you using to give so little hashes?
he write GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290 with 144 H/s? It should be at least 10 times that I had to read it 3 times to figure out that he took that example from way back in the beginning of the threads with version 1.1. He is having the same problem as A.Rothstein had.
|
|
|
|
Muddybit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2017, 06:51:45 AM |
|
will a 600W PSU be enough for a Kaby Lake rig running 2 x RX480 (Sapphire Nitro 8GB)?
|
|
|
|
Ik88
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2017, 08:06:58 AM |
|
Hello guys
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
|
*Link Removed*
|
|
|
Hallmader
|
|
April 07, 2017, 09:50:04 AM |
|
Hello guys
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
For the ZEC, it will be around or lower than 180W.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1877
Merit: 3014
All good things to those who wait
|
|
April 07, 2017, 10:31:19 AM |
|
Guys, do you want ZEC to rise? If you do, why you put 40-50-60 btc sell walls on poloniex during pumps? Do you really think that your lazy trading will bring you profit? Place small bids several times during the pump if you are so eager to sell at that price. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
GH
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2017, 11:26:08 AM |
|
will a 600W PSU be enough for a Kaby Lake rig running 2 x RX480 (Sapphire Nitro 8GB)?
A Kaby Lake CPU has a TDP between 4.5W and 91W, so not much information in here. But never mind, for 2x480 a 600W PSU should be a good choice. Not very high costs, proper reserves and good load point for high efficiency during normal operation. Happy mining!
|
|
|
|
Ragnarokdel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2017, 02:17:37 PM Last edit: April 07, 2017, 05:48:09 PM by Ragnarokdel |
|
The miner doesnt work for me anymore since Creators Update
edit: actually latest amd drivers
|
|
|
|
|