Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 12:58:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839116 times)
benthach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2017, 06:04:39 AM
 #14061

is claymore's v12.5 work with rx570 and rx580, yet? it say nothing on OP about rx5 cards and a few posts said it is not stable.

reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 06:42:26 AM
 #14062

Still in love with my R9 Fury.
430H/s for 130W
I was thinking to change them... But I can't find better now

Is this backed by watt meter?
Sounds a bit too good for me, more like 1070 values.
Yep Smiley A lot of person was scpetical about R9 Fury.
But the GPU is really great and backed with a fu.cking fast mem ! And the best thing is that I bought them on discount for 240€ each.

The key, is the undervolting (-96 mV with AfterBurner) and reducing the max tdp (mine are -48% on Zcash for 410-430 H/s depending of the card, and something like 26 MH/s on ETH with those setting).
Back in the days, I made a video for a guy who don't want to believe in my results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86VLJirwN8
I was with Claymore 7 so the perf is less than the 400+ H/s from now. I'll try to record a new one.
But you can see the kill-o-watt meter + the second rig offline (no power draw) + the 5 Fury rig running

The Fury are really good, the only bad thing it's that they are huge and require 2x8pin PCI-E so you have to have a good PSU with a lot of cables.
That is why I was thinking about a card reseller and go for a new one ... but It seems that for now, it's the best.

I'll wait VEGA and the GTX 1170 to see

Yatsida
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:00:58 AM
 #14063

Still in love with my R9 Fury.
430H/s for 130W
I was thinking to change them... But I can't find better now

That is even better than my R9 nano.
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2017, 07:17:45 AM
 #14064

Yep Smiley A lot of person was scpetical about R9 Fury.
But the GPU is really great and backed with a fu.cking fast mem ! And the best thing is that I bought them on discount for 240€ each.

The key, is the undervolting (-96 mV with AfterBurner) and reducing the max tdp (mine are -48% on Zcash for 410-430 H/s depending of the card, and something like 26 MH/s on ETH with those setting).
Back in the days, I made a video for a guy who don't want to believe in my results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86VLJirwN8
I was with Claymore 7 so the perf is less than the 400+ H/s from now. I'll try to record a new one.
But you can see the kill-o-watt meter + the second rig offline (no power draw) + the 5 Fury rig running

The Fury are really good, the only bad thing it's that they are huge and require 2x8pin PCI-E so you have to have a good PSU with a lot of cables.
That is why I was thinking about a card reseller and go for a new one ... but It seems that for now, it's the best.

I'll wait VEGA and the GTX 1170 to see



I am like 95% sure those cards needed a lot less power with CM7 than they need now.
I am running a -96 mV undervolt which gives me 455@200W.

I have reduced the TDP as you suggested but neither hashrate nor the power draw changed. Still at 200W.

Reduced core to 1000 (I usually run 1050).
Hashrate dropped to 435. Power dropped to 170W.
I can see that card lowered core voltage by 0.05V with this move, pretty cool didnt know it can do that.

I think your furies are drawing near 170W right now as well Wink
Still thats an interesting setup, -20h/s for 30W, not bad, thanks for the tip.

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
TheRider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 08:16:45 AM
 #14065

Yep Smiley A lot of person was scpetical about R9 Fury.
But the GPU is really great and backed with a fu.cking fast mem ! And the best thing is that I bought them on discount for 240€ each.

The key, is the undervolting (-96 mV with AfterBurner) and reducing the max tdp (mine are -48% on Zcash for 410-430 H/s depending of the card, and something like 26 MH/s on ETH with those setting).
Back in the days, I made a video for a guy who don't want to believe in my results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86VLJirwN8
I was with Claymore 7 so the perf is less than the 400+ H/s from now. I'll try to record a new one.
But you can see the kill-o-watt meter + the second rig offline (no power draw) + the 5 Fury rig running

The Fury are really good, the only bad thing it's that they are huge and require 2x8pin PCI-E so you have to have a good PSU with a lot of cables.
That is why I was thinking about a card reseller and go for a new one ... but It seems that for now, it's the best.

I'll wait VEGA and the GTX 1170 to see



I am like 95% sure those cards needed a lot less power with CM7 than they need now.
I am running a -96 mV undervolt which gives me 455@200W.

I have reduced the TDP as you suggested but neither hashrate nor the power draw changed. Still at 200W.

Reduced core to 1000 (I usually run 1050).
Hashrate dropped to 435. Power dropped to 170W.
I can see that card lowered core voltage by 0.05V with this move, pretty cool didnt know it can do that.

I think your furies are drawing near 170W right now as well Wink
Still thats an interesting setup, -20h/s for 30W, not bad, thanks for the tip.

@ th00ber and fredeq

What do you guys think about the PRO DUO card at $580 for ZEC? It's basically two Nanos in a single package. Is it a viable option?
dragonmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 556



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 09:01:04 AM
 #14066

Could it be that tight memory strap mods used for ETH mining are not working for ZCash?
Quickly tried to use Claymore Zcash miner on my RX570 mining farm for the lulz... and everything crashed within seconds. What's the catch? Or do I just have to lower intensity?

EDIT: same thing happens if I try Optiminer. After a few seconds of mining, miner freezes, PC reboots.
Any ideas on this?
vi1son
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 10:21:48 AM
 #14067

Its make sense buy 580 or better 480?
Vann
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 606



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 10:26:56 AM
Last edit: June 02, 2017, 10:47:55 AM by Vann
 #14068

Its make sense buy 580 or better 480?

Whichever you can find. 480 is cheaper and easier to setup on Windows with 6+ GPU. Hash is almost the same, but the 580 uses more power. While there has been recent availability of 580's, the 480's are all but gone.
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 10:47:16 AM
 #14069

Yep Smiley A lot of person was scpetical about R9 Fury.
But the GPU is really great and backed with a fu.cking fast mem ! And the best thing is that I bought them on discount for 240€ each.

The key, is the undervolting (-96 mV with AfterBurner) and reducing the max tdp (mine are -48% on Zcash for 410-430 H/s depending of the card, and something like 26 MH/s on ETH with those setting).
Back in the days, I made a video for a guy who don't want to believe in my results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86VLJirwN8
I was with Claymore 7 so the perf is less than the 400+ H/s from now. I'll try to record a new one.
But you can see the kill-o-watt meter + the second rig offline (no power draw) + the 5 Fury rig running

The Fury are really good, the only bad thing it's that they are huge and require 2x8pin PCI-E so you have to have a good PSU with a lot of cables.
That is why I was thinking about a card reseller and go for a new one ... but It seems that for now, it's the best.

I'll wait VEGA and the GTX 1170 to see



I am like 95% sure those cards needed a lot less power with CM7 than they need now.
I am running a -96 mV undervolt which gives me 455@200W.

I have reduced the TDP as you suggested but neither hashrate nor the power draw changed. Still at 200W.

Reduced core to 1000 (I usually run 1050).
Hashrate dropped to 435. Power dropped to 170W.
I can see that card lowered core voltage by 0.05V with this move, pretty cool didnt know it can do that.

I think your furies are drawing near 170W right now as well Wink
Still thats an interesting setup, -20h/s for 30W, not bad, thanks for the tip.
Nope, power is limited
They consume the same than with cm7 Smiley
I'll post a New video
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2017, 12:56:55 PM
 #14070

Nope, power is limited
They consume the same than with cm7 Smiley
I'll post a New video

No idea how this is possible.
Reducing TDP does nothing for my fury.
Whats your core voltage from gpu-z?

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
vi1son
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 02:37:59 PM
 #14071

Its make sense buy 580 or better 480?

Whichever you can find. 480 is cheaper and easier to setup on Windows with 6+ GPU. Hash is almost the same, but the 580 uses more power. While there has been recent availability of 580's, the 480's are all but gone.
Ok, thanks. Trying find some 480 so
Iza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 03:18:07 PM
 #14072

Yep Smiley A lot of person was scpetical about R9 Fury.
But the GPU is really great and backed with a fu.cking fast mem ! And the best thing is that I bought them on discount for 240€ each.

The key, is the undervolting (-96 mV with AfterBurner) and reducing the max tdp (mine are -48% on Zcash for 410-430 H/s depending of the card, and something like 26 MH/s on ETH with those setting).
Back in the days, I made a video for a guy who don't want to believe in my results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y86VLJirwN8
I was with Claymore 7 so the perf is less than the 400+ H/s from now. I'll try to record a new one.
But you can see the kill-o-watt meter + the second rig offline (no power draw) + the 5 Fury rig running

The Fury are really good, the only bad thing it's that they are huge and require 2x8pin PCI-E so you have to have a good PSU with a lot of cables.
That is why I was thinking about a card reseller and go for a new one ... but It seems that for now, it's the best.

I'll wait VEGA and the GTX 1170 to see



I am like 95% sure those cards needed a lot less power with CM7 than they need now.
I am running a -96 mV undervolt which gives me 455@200W.

I have reduced the TDP as you suggested but neither hashrate nor the power draw changed. Still at 200W.

Reduced core to 1000 (I usually run 1050).
Hashrate dropped to 435. Power dropped to 170W.
I can see that card lowered core voltage by 0.05V with this move, pretty cool didnt know it can do that.

I think your furies are drawing near 170W right now as well Wink
Still thats an interesting setup, -20h/s for 30W, not bad, thanks for the tip.
Nope, power is limited
They consume the same than with cm7 Smiley
I'll post a New video

+1 on the Fury's. I have about the same results with the two in my rig. I wish they were still available (or had the $$ to buy more when they were on sale with a rebate!)

I just pulled the trigger on a 580 card. Should be here early next week. I'm a bit nervous because I have read in the forms that 580's don't like to play well with Win 7, Catalyst 5.12, and Claymore. I have two slots open on my OLD OLD Intel Core-Duo MB so I would like to use the 580 in the same rig as my 2 fury's and one r9 290 (which hash out 1150 drawing 600-610w at the wall with basically the setting described above). I also do not want to spend $$ to set-up a second rig. 

Anyone have any advice on the set-up? Can it be done?
Monkey1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 06:08:36 PM
 #14073

I loved the version 12.5 . It works very stable.

            ▄▄█████▄▄
         ▄▄███████████▄▄
      ▄▄█████████████████▄▄
   ▄▄███████████████████████▄▄
 ▄█████████████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████
████████▀▀  ▀██▀       ▀▀████████
███████  ▄████  ███████▄  ███████
███████ █████  ██████████ ███████
███████ ██████████  █████ ███████
███████  ▀███████  ███▀   ███████
████████▄▄        ██   ▄▄████████
█████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████
 ▀█████████████████████████████▀
   ▀▀███████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
         ▀▀███████████▀▀
            ▀▀█████▀▀




.THRIVING CRYPTOCURRENCY..
.MARKET WITH CRYPTOBONDS..

▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

INITIAL COIN OFFERING
SEPTEMBER 30

    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
██████
         ▄▄████████▄▄
     ▄████████████████▄
   ▄███▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀███████▄
  █████ ███████ █▄▀███████
 ██████ ███████ ███▄▀██████
▐██████ ███████▄▄▄▄▄▄ █████▌
▐██████ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █████▌
▐██████ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █████▌
 ██████ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █████
  █████ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ ████
   ▀███▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄██▀
     ▀████████████████▀
        ▀▀████████▀▀

...READ THE....
.WHITEPAPER.



        ▄▄████████▄▄
     ▄████████████████▄
   ▄████████████████████▄
  ███████████████▀▀  █████
 ████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
 ████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
  ████████████████▄▄██████
   ▀████████████████████▀
     ▀████████████████▀
        ▀▀████████▀▀
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
MEDIUM
REDDIT
GITHUB
SLACK
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:02:03 PM
 #14074

https://youtu.be/aAdW0wdUmos

My Fury rig on Claymore 12.5 with 15.12 drivers + (ASM activated)

846W for 6 cards.
Let's round to 790W to remove CPU/Mobo/RAM
Now remove PSU efficiency (8% for my platinium)
732W / 6 = 122W per card for 400-430 H/s

chup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 736
Merit: 262


Me, Myself & I


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:05:07 PM
 #14075

https://youtu.be/aAdW0wdUmos

My Fury rig on Claymore 12.5 with 15.12 drivers + (ASM activated)

846W for 6 cards.
Let's round to 790W to remove CPU/Mobo/RAM
Now remove PSU efficiency (8% for my platinium)
732W / 6 = 122W per card for 400-430 H/s



cclock/mclock/powlim?

orbital_station
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:12:00 PM
Last edit: June 02, 2017, 07:23:59 PM by orbital_station
 #14076

Getting hang in opencl call message with R9 390X.
Along with: GPU returned incorrect data
Tried with new riser (powered usb3), same thing.

stats:
+13mV
+0 power limit
1080 clock (stock)
1500 mem (stock)
stock bios

Tried:
new riser (didnt help)
lowering to -i7 (didnt help)
lowering to -i6 (didnt help)
+50mV (didnt help)
+100mV (didnt help)
lowering to -i5 (didnt help)
1050 clock (didnt help)

Help pls.
Other 3x R9 390 mining steady on that same rig...
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 07:36:38 PM
Last edit: June 02, 2017, 08:38:09 PM by th00ber
 #14077

https://youtu.be/aAdW0wdUmos

My Fury rig on Claymore 12.5 with 15.12 drivers + (ASM activated)

846W for 6 cards.
Let's round to 790W to remove CPU/Mobo/RAM
Now remove PSU efficiency (8% for my platinium)
732W / 6 = 122W per card for 400-430 H/s



cclock/mclock/powlim?

Powlim = -50%
Cclock = auto adjusted by powlim
Mclock = 500
Vcore = -96mV

Check my dashboard
http://www.monitorig.com/#?panel=dashboard&id=1086db9224632d26671ab42df5ee1d92bf0187bbdd
BigWolf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 09:54:57 PM
 #14078

Getting hang in opencl call message with R9 390X.
Along with: GPU returned incorrect data
Tried with new riser (powered usb3), same thing.

stats:
+13mV
+0 power limit
1080 clock (stock)
1500 mem (stock)
stock bios

Tried:
new riser (didnt help)
lowering to -i7 (didnt help)
lowering to -i6 (didnt help)
+50mV (didnt help)
+100mV (didnt help)
lowering to -i5 (didnt help)
1050 clock (didnt help)

Help pls.
Other 3x R9 390 mining steady on that same rig...

Did you replace the power cables and the USB cable going to the riser as well?  most of my 'riser fails' have been actually due to those 2 cables and the riser is actually fine.
Jukagid
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 06:29:33 AM
 #14079

https://youtu.be/aAdW0wdUmos

My Fury rig on Claymore 12.5 with 15.12 drivers + (ASM activated)

846W for 6 cards.
Let's round to 790W to remove CPU/Mobo/RAM
Now remove PSU efficiency (8% for my platinium)
732W / 6 = 122W per card for 400-430 H/s



That is almost as good as the nVidia 1080 cards.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 03, 2017, 08:22:54 AM
 #14080

https://youtu.be/aAdW0wdUmos

My Fury rig on Claymore 12.5 with 15.12 drivers + (ASM activated)

846W for 6 cards.
Let's round to 790W to remove CPU/Mobo/RAM
Now remove PSU efficiency (8% for my platinium)
732W / 6 = 122W per card for 400-430 H/s



That is almost as good as the nVidia 1080 cards.

 More like 1070 numbers - 1080 should be able to do somewhat more hashrate than 430.

 Still not bad for a generation-old card you can't hardly find any more since it's been out of production for quite a while.

 Makes me wonder what the Vega cards are going to manage.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!