bigjme
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:42:49 PM |
|
The coin was a giant flop
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
liomojo1
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:45:50 PM |
|
MINE MAX, HELIX WITH THE 2014-02-28 release. Also use this for improved Yacoin performance. For keccak, use the T kernel now for Compute 3.5 devices. Careful, its warp limit is 24 not 32. My GTX 750 Ti makes 164 MHash/s << this is the new keccak ACE CARD. My GTX 780 now breaks 200 MHash/s at 80% TDP. YEAH BABY! Thanks to Alexey for the submission, even though he bungled up the ROL macro at the first attempt, which is why we didn't make the Helixcoin launch Christian What setting do you use for 750 ti . i can`t get more than 76000?
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:46:55 PM |
|
What setting do you use for 570 ti . i can`t get more than 76000?
you're lacking a hardware feature that enables this speed-up: the funnel shifter. The keccak improvements target Compute 3.5 devices or better. unless you meant to say 750 Ti cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780,gt640,gtx750ti,gtx750ti#2 -i 0 -m 1 -l T2304x24,T768x24,T1024x24,T1024x24 -L 1024 -o stratum+tcp://maxpool.1gh.com:17333 -u mKbA9HoN13R6MYzhfuRCAeAyVAsqb7TiDy -p x
[2014-02-28 23:43:01] accepted: 55/69 (79.71%), 555165 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-02-28 23:43:11] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 147494 khash/s [2014-02-28 23:43:38] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 161607 khash/s [2014-02-28 23:43:38] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 208707 khash/s [2014-02-28 23:43:39] GPU #1: GeForce GT 640, 38774 khash/s
use this line to mine MAX right into my wallet ;-) Christian
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:47:33 PM |
|
I am almost at 5 helix lol For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:47:55 PM |
|
I am almost at 5 helix lol For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?
and lower the x32 to x24. yes.
|
|
|
|
liomojo1
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:50:00 PM |
|
What setting do you use for 570 ti . i can`t get more than 76000?
you're lacking a hardware feature that enables this speed-up: the funnel shifter. The keccak improvements target Compute 3.5 devices or better. unless you meant to say 750 Ti --algo=keccak -d gtx780,gt640,gtx750ti,gtx750ti#2 -i 0 -m 1 -l T2304x24,T768x24,T1024x24,T1024x24 -L 1024 -o stratum+tcp://maxpool.1gh.com:17333 -u mKbA9HoN13R6MYzhfuRCAeAyVAsqb7TiDy -p x
use this line to mine right into my wallet ;-) Christian Thanks , I was lacking brain features , cause i was using the 18.02 release. now i get 167mhs each. You rock man!!!
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:53:03 PM |
|
I had the lucky idea to check the 64 bit rotate performance, and Alexey @nVidia did it this afternoon - and this is the result. Turns out the compiler was originally creating a complex instruction sequence, which Alexey was able to replace with two funnel shifts only. Christian
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:55:33 PM |
|
I am almost at 5 helix lol For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?
and lower the x32 to x24. yes. Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:04:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
chapmanjw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:05:19 PM |
|
Happened to be at my machine when it came through on the feed from GitHub :-)
|
|
|
|
DrAlco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:08:27 PM |
|
Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)
Do you overclock? Everytime I see your hashrates they're always a bit higher than mine. My 780ti is getting ~280Mhash/sec with: --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -m 1 -L 1024 -l T2880x24 Card is stack EVGA SC clocks.
|
|
|
|
chapmanjw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:12:46 PM |
|
Happened to be at my machine when it came through on the feed from GitHub :-) Also have it scripted and all I have to do is enter the build date
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:16:26 PM |
|
Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)
Do you overclock? Everytime I see your hashrates they're always a bit higher than mine. My 780ti is getting ~280Mhash/sec with: --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -m 1 -L 1024 -l T2880x24 Card is stack EVGA SC clocks. Yes It is overclocked (on a mod bios) TDP 120% (that's why I modded the bios) Temp Limit: 75°C Core Clock: 1240MHz (in MSI AB: +230) Mem Clock: 3500Mhz (stock) here the command line I use: cudaminer.exe --algo=keccak -i0 -q -m1 -d gtx780 -b16384 -C2 -lT2880x24 -L1024 -s3 -R2 -H 2 I am not entirely sure the the -b16384 play a role with i0 though (the -C2 is in principle useless)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:23:21 PM |
|
Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table 1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth. 2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins. 3) look at implementing some failover options 4) see if I can get a monitoring API included
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:25:29 PM |
|
Here's my roadmap for continued development
1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.
2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.
3) look at implementing some failover options
4) see if I can get a monitoring API included
Nvidia will give you some big $$...would turn those 40w/350kh/s 750ti's into proper mining cards if you did. EDIT: and the linux oc soft? I want precision x for linux :p -will donate if these things come out-
|
|
|
|
whitetoo
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:26:23 PM |
|
Hey guys, A friend has 2x 690s The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed: GPU #0 GPU #1 GPU #2 GPU #3 There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows. We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however. Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config. Currently using: cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0 I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ? Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something. Thanks for any help in advance.
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:27:00 PM |
|
Hey guys, A friend has 2x 690s The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed: GPU #0 GPU #1 GPU #2 GPU #3 There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows. We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however. Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config. Currently using: cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0 I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ? Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something. Thanks for any help in advance. Same bat, -d 0,1,2,3 ?
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:34:15 PM |
|
EDIT: and the linux oc soft? I want precision x for linux :p -will donate if these things come out-
happy with a basic command line tool, too?
|
|
|
|
whitetoo
|
|
February 28, 2014, 11:35:37 PM |
|
Hey guys, A friend has 2x 690s The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed: GPU #0 GPU #1 GPU #2 GPU #3 There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows. We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however. Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config. Currently using: cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0 I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ? Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something. Thanks for any help in advance. Same bat, -d 0,1,2,3 ? Ty will give it a whirl
|
|
|
|
|