Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 10:03:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 [391] 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426929 times)
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:42:49 PM
 #7801

The coin was a giant flop

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
liomojo1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:45:50 PM
 #7802


MINE MAX, HELIX WITH THE 2014-02-28 release. Also use this for improved Yacoin performance.

For keccak, use the T kernel now for Compute 3.5 devices. Careful, its warp limit is 24 not 32.

My GTX 750 Ti makes 164 MHash/s   << this is the new keccak ACE CARD.
My GTX 780 now breaks 200 MHash/s at 80% TDP.  YEAH BABY!

Thanks to Alexey for the submission, even though he bungled up the ROL macro at the first
attempt, which is why we didn't make the Helixcoin launch Wink

Christian

What setting do you use for 750  ti . i can`t get more than 76000?
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:46:55 PM
 #7803


What setting do you use for 570 ti . i can`t get more than 76000?

you're lacking a hardware feature that enables this speed-up: the funnel shifter.
The keccak improvements target Compute 3.5 devices or better.

unless you meant to say 750 Ti

Code:
cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780,gt640,gtx750ti,gtx750ti#2 -i 0 -m 1 -l T2304x24,T768x24,T1024x24,T1024x24 -L 1024 -o stratum+tcp://maxpool.1gh.com:17333 -u mKbA9HoN13R6MYzhfuRCAeAyVAsqb7TiDy -p x

[2014-02-28 23:43:01] accepted: 55/69 (79.71%), 555165 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-28 23:43:11] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 147494 khash/s
[2014-02-28 23:43:38] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 161607 khash/s
[2014-02-28 23:43:38] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 208707 khash/s
[2014-02-28 23:43:39] GPU #1: GeForce GT 640, 38774 khash/s

use this line to mine MAX right into my wallet ;-)

Christian
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 10:47:33 PM
 #7804

I am almost at 5 helix lol
For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:47:55 PM
 #7805

I am almost at 5 helix lol
For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?

and lower the x32 to x24. yes.
liomojo1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:50:00 PM
 #7806


What setting do you use for 570 ti . i can`t get more than 76000?

you're lacking a hardware feature that enables this speed-up: the funnel shifter.
The keccak improvements target Compute 3.5 devices or better.

unless you meant to say 750 Ti

Code:
--algo=keccak -d gtx780,gt640,gtx750ti,gtx750ti#2 -i 0 -m 1 -l T2304x24,T768x24,T1024x24,T1024x24 -L 1024 -o stratum+tcp://maxpool.1gh.com:17333 -u mKbA9HoN13R6MYzhfuRCAeAyVAsqb7TiDy -p x

use this line to mine right into my wallet ;-)

Christian

Thanks , I was lacking brain features , cause i was using the 18.02 release. now i get 167mhs each.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
You rock man!!!
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 10:53:03 PM
 #7807


Thanks , I was lucking brain features , cause i was using the 18.02 release. now i get 167mhs each.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
You rock man!!!

I had the lucky idea to check the 64 bit rotate performance, and Alexey @nVidia did it this afternoon - and this is the result. Turns out the compiler was originally creating a complex instruction sequence, which Alexey was able to replace with two funnel shifts only.

Christian

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 10:55:33 PM
 #7808

I am almost at 5 helix lol
For the new version what kind of config should we used ? same as the previous version except T instead of K ?

and lower the x32 to x24. yes.

Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 11:01:04 PM
 #7809

CudaMiner for OS X has been updated to run without requiring Xcode, MacPorts, and other setup steps. 

For binaries and instructions see http://www.johnchapman.net/cudaminer/

Prerequisites

CudaMiner for OS X previously required installing Xcode and MacPorts, in addition to a number of configuration steps.  These are no longer required.  Grin

The 2014-02-28 release for OS X is available here: http://www.johnchapman.net/crypto-currency/cudaminer-2-28-2014-release-now-available-for-os-x-10-7-10-8-and-10-9/
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:04:39 PM
 #7810


wow, that was quick.
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 11:05:19 PM
 #7811


Happened to be at my machine when it came through on the feed from GitHub :-)
DrAlco
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:08:27 PM
 #7812

Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)

Do you overclock? Everytime I see your hashrates they're always a bit higher than mine. My 780ti is getting ~280Mhash/sec with:
--algo=keccak -d gtx780 -m 1 -L 1024 -l T2880x24
Card is stack EVGA SC clocks.
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 11:12:46 PM
 #7813


Also have it scripted and all I have to do is enter the build date  Wink
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 11:16:26 PM
 #7814

Nice increase in the hashrate, the 780ti runs now around 315Mhash/s (before it was around 250~260Mhash/sec)

Do you overclock? Everytime I see your hashrates they're always a bit higher than mine. My 780ti is getting ~280Mhash/sec with:
--algo=keccak -d gtx780 -m 1 -L 1024 -l T2880x24
Card is stack EVGA SC clocks.
Yes It is overclocked (on a mod bios)
TDP 120% (that's why I modded the bios)
Temp Limit: 75°C
Core Clock: 1240MHz    (in MSI AB: +230)
Mem Clock: 3500Mhz (stock)

here the command line I use:
cudaminer.exe --algo=keccak  -i0 -q -m1 -d gtx780 -b16384 -C2 -lT2880x24 -L1024 -s3 -R2 -H 2

I am not entirely sure the the -b16384 play a role with i0 though (the -C2 is in principle useless)


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:23:21 PM
 #7815

Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
    hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:25:29 PM
 #7816


Here's my roadmap for continued development

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
    hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included


Nvidia will give you some big $$...would turn those 40w/350kh/s 750ti's into proper mining cards if you did.

EDIT: and the linux oc soft? I want precision x for linux :p -will donate if these things come out-
whitetoo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:26:23 PM
 #7817

Hey guys,

A friend has 2x 690s

The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed:
GPU #0
GPU #1
GPU #2
GPU #3

There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows.

We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however.
Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config.

Currently using:
Quote
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0

I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ?
Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something.

Thanks for any help in advance.

ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:27:00 PM
 #7818

Hey guys,

A friend has 2x 690s

The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed:
GPU #0
GPU #1
GPU #2
GPU #3

There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows.

We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however.
Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config.

Currently using:
Quote
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0

I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ?
Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something.

Thanks for any help in advance.



Same bat, -d 0,1,2,3 ?
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:34:15 PM
 #7819

EDIT: and the linux oc soft? I want precision x for linux :p -will donate if these things come out-

happy with a basic command line tool, too? Wink
whitetoo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 11:35:37 PM
 #7820

Hey guys,

A friend has 2x 690s

The 690s have dual-cores so when running benchmarking the following GPUs are listed:
GPU #0
GPU #1
GPU #2
GPU #3

There are also 4 GPU's listed in the device manager in windows.

We can only get GPU #0 and GPU #1 to mine in a pool however.
Can anyone advise if they are using the hashing power of the other cores on the circuit board, or whether we have missed something in the config.

Currently using:
Quote
cudaminer.exe -H 2 -d 0,1 -l K16x16,K16x16 -i 1,0

I know the above is specified for 2 cards but not sure if this is relating to cores? Should we setup another bat file and define -d 2,3 ?
Didn't want to experiment with this incase it forced too much load onto the cards or something.

Thanks for any help in advance.



Same bat, -d 0,1,2,3 ?

Ty will give it a whirl
Pages: « 1 ... 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 [391] 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!