Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 10:55:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 [972] 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426876 times)
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2014, 09:55:50 AM
Last edit: August 14, 2014, 10:28:53 AM by djm34
 #19421

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:09:00 PM
 #19422

My rig of 6x750Ti was working some hours with previous reliece of ccminev and then have been stoping responding.
I set it v2 now, and I'm testing..
With the first reliece (posted into cryptonite thread) the rig was pritty stable...
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:17:07 PM
 #19423

My rig of 6x750Ti was working some hours with previous reliece of ccminev and then have been stoping responding.
I set it v2 now, and I'm testing..
With the first reliece (posted into cryptonite thread) the rig was pritty stable...

As the new version puts out greater hashrate, it is most certain that it is pushing the cards harder. Usually that just means that you need to turn down your overclocking a bit, if you were right at the edge of stability. The best practice and for maximum performance, is that for any new algorithm, you should start from 0 overclock (or a very modest one), and work your way up to find out what the highest setting that the cards will take with that algorithm.
An overclock that works fine for X13 mining, might crash with X11 mining (just a random example).

Happy Mining,
~ Myagui

go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:30:43 PM
 #19424

My rig of 6x750Ti was working some hours with previous reliece of ccminev and then have been stoping responding.
I set it v2 now, and I'm testing..
With the first reliece (posted into cryptonite thread) the rig was pritty stable...

As the new version puts out greater hashrate, it is most certain that it is pushing the cards harder. Usually that just means that you need to turn down your overclocking a bit, if you were right at the edge of stability. The best practice and for maximum performance, is that for any new algorithm, you should start from 0 overclock (or a very modest one), and work your way up to find out what the highest setting that the cards will take with that algorithm.
An overclock that works fine for X13 mining, might crash with X11 mining (just a random example).

Happy Mining,
~ Myagui


Thanks , I was thinking about certain thing , I'll test it longer and will give a feedback Smiley
sciakysystem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:39:23 PM
 #19425

I confirm my problem were 16to16 risers.. I confirm that 1400mhz core clock is a stable OC for evga 750ti ACX cooler version.. 3 hours of mining with 6 750ti at 1400mhz and all it is ok until now. Im mining x11.

Many thanks for your help to solve my issue.

MCMK
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:50:55 PM
 #19426

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:56:11 PM
Last edit: August 14, 2014, 03:06:51 PM by myagui
 #19427

I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(

Perhaps post your batch/command parameters to see if there's something off.

Edit: In other news, JPC is fast approaching a good looking jackpot again (~2 BTC), though not sure it's worthwhile mining it unless you're the one hitting the jackpot!  Grin

~ Myagui

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2014, 03:12:25 PM
 #19428

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
might be on your side... or some wrong parameters

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
camelion
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:12:54 PM
 #19429

Hey guys,

i dont know if this is a normal behaviour of cudaMiner, cuz i just started to mine a couple of days ago, but my cudaMiner is always telling me, that stratum has detected a new block, but it's finding an accepted share extreme rarely.

Code:
[2014-08-14 18:58:29] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 18:58:29] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 15.43 khash/s
[2014-08-14 18:59:31] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 18:59:31] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 14.59 khash/s
[2014-08-14 18:59:38] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 18:59:38] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 14.97 khash/s
[2014-08-14 18:59:51] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 18:59:51] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 14.83 khash/s
[2014-08-14 19:00:04] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 19:00:04] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 15.13 khash/s
[2014-08-14 19:00:18] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 19:00:18] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 16.19 khash/s
[2014-08-14 19:00:35] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 19:00:35] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 15.95 khash/s
[2014-08-14 19:00:46] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-14 19:00:46] GPU #0: GeForce GT 240M, 15.87 khash/s

Thats, what i sometimes get for an hour or even two, before it's finding an accepted share, even my cpu-miner got a bigger rate of accepted shares with just about 6khash/s


the configuration i use:

Code:
cudaminer.exe -H 1 -i 0 -m 1 -l f18x3 -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool:port -u user.worker -p x

i also tried if it would work better, if i allow the autoconfiguration, but there's no difference.

So, can you guys help me pls? is it normal in this way, or is there something going wrong?
baton
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:17:15 PM
 #19430

what is
Code:
const int throughput = 256*256*8;
in the ccminer code
and why it is what it is ?
I mean 256x256x8 ?

thanks.
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:28:23 PM
 #19431

what is
Code:
const int throughput = 256*256*8;
in the ccminer code
and why it is what it is ?
I mean 256x256x8 ?

thanks.

Same thing as writing = 524288;

256*256*8 just makes it easier from a dev standpoint to understand where the number came from.

throughput is usually the 2nd parameter passed to most functions that use it (threads).

Carlo
baton
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:33:58 PM
 #19432

what is
Code:
const int throughput = 256*256*8;
in the ccminer code
and why it is what it is ?
I mean 256x256x8 ?

thanks.

Same thing as writing = 524288;

256*256*8 just makes it easier from a dev standpoint to understand where the number came from.

throughput is usually the 2nd parameter passed to most functions that use it (threads).

Carlo

thanks. but where it comes from ? why it is not 1024x1024x64 ?
is it e.g. maximum x-, y-, or z-dimension of a grid of thread blocks or something like that ? hardware related ?
MCMK
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:34:15 PM
 #19433

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
might be on your side... or some wrong parameters

My bat is pretty simple:
ccminer.exe -a m7 -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 46vNVkVQRPibMbUuVtup9HNZvY59BqhYBioF6zF61QsNQez1NpwSiv6ARwkBxRCWq7X538p3kPCika8 ZNRLoy59pSCtm4Hb -p x

Same basic structure all my bats are. m7 is cor XMR right? perhaps i just misread.


topnetdeal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:36:24 PM
 #19434

m7 = XCN = Cryptonite = http://xcn.1gh.com/

▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒
ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service  (( changenow.io ))
Whitepaper  ▓  Telegram  ▓  Twitter  ▓  Facebook  ▓  Medium  ▓  Reddit  ▓  Bounty Thread
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2014, 05:40:06 PM
 #19435

what is
Code:
const int throughput = 256*256*8;
in the ccminer code
and why it is what it is ?
I mean 256x256x8 ?

thanks.

Same thing as writing = 524288;

256*256*8 just makes it easier from a dev standpoint to understand where the number came from.

throughput is usually the 2nd parameter passed to most functions that use it (threads).

Carlo

thanks. but where it comes from ? why it is not 1024x1024x64 ?
is it e.g. maximum x-, y-, or z-dimension of a grid of thread blocks or something like that ? hardware related ?
may-be you can try...

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 05:43:55 PM
 #19436

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
might be on your side... or some wrong parameters

My bat is pretty simple:
ccminer.exe -a m7 -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 46vNVkVQRPibMbUuVtup9HNZvY59BqhYBioF6zF61QsNQez1NpwSiv6ARwkBxRCWq7X538p3kPCika8 ZNRLoy59pSCtm4Hb -p x

Same basic structure all my bats are. m7 is cor XMR right? perhaps i just misread.




-a cryptonight is what you use for xmr, I do believe.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2014, 05:48:45 PM
 #19437

Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
might be on your side... or some wrong parameters

My bat is pretty simple:
ccminer.exe -a m7 -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 46vNVkVQRPibMbUuVtup9HNZvY59BqhYBioF6zF61QsNQez1NpwSiv6ARwkBxRCWq7X538p3kPCika8 ZNRLoy59pSCtm4Hb -p x

Same basic structure all my bats are. m7 is cor XMR right? perhaps i just misread.




-a cryptonight is what you use for xmr, I do believe.
It isn't included in my release (it is in tsiv release)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
MCMK
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 06:01:04 PM
 #19438

Ok. Sorry about the mix up. Thanks guys.



Thanks djm!

Question: is it working for solomining?
yes...

I'm not sure. I always get "submit_upstream_work OOM" which I guess is out of memory error, which is strange as it has plenty of memory and it only happens during solomining and I should have found half a dozen blocks by now.
I need to check that, I know for sure the first version was working on testnet wallet since it was developed around it.
This error has nothing to do with memory, it just mean it wasn't able to submit its work to the wallet.

edit: the problem should be corrected in this version: https://mega.co.nz/#!RVNw1JgC!SLiKTtkMLQ7wdZOVzxHKv2LxGpXcpSbNHYxagrllVJI


I cannot connect to any pools. Tried 3 all unable to connect =*(
might be on your side... or some wrong parameters

My bat is pretty simple:
ccminer.exe -a m7 -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u 46vNVkVQRPibMbUuVtup9HNZvY59BqhYBioF6zF61QsNQez1NpwSiv6ARwkBxRCWq7X538p3kPCika8 ZNRLoy59pSCtm4Hb -p x

Same basic structure all my bats are. m7 is cor XMR right? perhaps i just misread.




-a cryptonight is what you use for xmr, I do believe.
It isn't included in my release (it is in tsiv release)
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2014, 07:09:16 PM
 #19439

Ok. Sorry about the mix up. Thanks guys.

It's not your fault...  Grin And for the record there is also an x11 coin called cryptonite...

xcn dev hesitated a long time between cryptonite and pandacoin  Grin

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
labestia
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 07:17:05 PM
 #19440

anyone have a ballpark for how many XCN they're getting per 750ti/day at current diff?



Pages: « 1 ... 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 [972] 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!