Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 02:18:07 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 254 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 1763445 times)
DeCrypterManiac
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 543


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 05:57:47 PM
 #81

Miner is working good on suprnova, good work !
1508681887
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508681887

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508681887
Reply with quote  #2

1508681887
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508681887
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508681887

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508681887
Reply with quote  #2

1508681887
Report to moderator
1508681887
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508681887

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508681887
Reply with quote  #2

1508681887
Report to moderator
antantti
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 05:59:57 PM
 #82

Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b

I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...

You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s

P0 state enabled?

what the miners reporting im not worry about that ...


Have you enabled power state 0 (P0)? If your memory speed is 3005 you are in P2 state which is slower in some memory hard algos.
WaspEye
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 06:05:55 PM
 #83

45-50 Sol/s on GTX 680
mrada1204
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 06:07:33 PM
 #84

1070 g1 +100 core , + 700 mem gives 282 at 82% power limit .
any best config for power/hash ? ... with 100% i think hits 300 Grin
TIKCrazy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 06:24:17 PM
 #85

Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?
reb0rn21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 06:32:03 PM
 #86

ocminer is there some problem, pool reporting 95% invalid shares with ewbf just now?

miner say all ok, 5min ago had 2% bad shares

No problems here, running fine on 1060 and 970 here on zec.suprnova.cc

yeah one miner (I have 10+ miners) had win10 right click pause and that was the cause, even you pool credited me fine, just you dashboard was 98% red

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            __¦¦¦__
                        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
            __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                     ¯¯¦¦¦
__¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦
¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦__                               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦__                       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯  ________
¦¦¦       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       ¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯ ¦¦
      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
          ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
              ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                          ¯
sshinr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 06:34:41 PM
 #87

awww. finally someone release nvidia miner with some increase speed..
just tested with my old gtx 960 2gb.. run good with 95sols/s stock rom.
really nice working dude. much appreciate..  Smiley Smiley love it and keep working.
scryptr
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1134



View Profile WWW
December 07, 2016, 06:37:23 PM
 #88

Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?

BUG FIXES--

The miner is the same speed, but the bug fixes have resulted in better performance.  Fewer rejected shares means better payout.  It works fine on NiceHash now, for example.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
Bluecheese
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:04:39 PM
 #89

Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b

I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...

You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s

P0 state enabled?


It needs work.  I can't change one of my 1060 clock.  Both of my 1060's are locked at P2.  But all in all it rocking away.  Thanks for the update
reb0rn21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:08:21 PM
 #90

EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance

I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            __¦¦¦__
                        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
                __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
            __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                     ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
        __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                             ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__
    __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                     ¯¯¦¦¦
__¦¦¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦
¦¦¦¯¯                                         __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦__                               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
¦¦¦     ¦¦¦¦¦__                       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯  ________
¦¦¦       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__               __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       ¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯ ¦¦
      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
          ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       ¯       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
              ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦__       __¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                  ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦___¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                      ¯¯¦¦¦¦¦¯¯
                          ¯
jiggytom
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:10:35 PM
 #91

What is your effective memory speed at +1000? I use a different skin, and maybe mine is showing the base clock, and not the 5x for gddr.  In Linux I remember setting +1000 but in Windows it's usually closer to +200
At 100% power target, i'm getting about 325 sol/s per gtx 1080, at 60% power target about 290 sol/s, great improvement over other miners. +200mhz core +1000 mhz memory in msi afterburner, I have founders edition cards.

how do you change power target?

Just adjust slider in msi afterburner : https://i.imgur.com/vjW0qPv.png

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            ▄▄███▄▄
                        ▄▄█████▀█████▄▄
                    ▄▄█████▀▀     ▀▀█████▄▄
                ▄▄█████▀▀             ▀▀█████▄▄
            ▄▄█████▀▀                     ▀▀█████▄▄
        ▄▄█████▀▀                             ▀▀█████▄▄
    ▄▄█████▀▀                                     ▀▀███
▄▄█████▀▀                                         ▄▄███
███▀▀                                         ▄▄█████▀▀
███     █▄▄                               ▄▄█████▀▀
███     █████▄▄                       ▄▄█████▀▀  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███       ▀▀█████▄▄               ▄▄█████▀▀       ██████
█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▄▄       ▄▄█████▀▀       ▄▄███████
  ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▄▄▄█████▀▀       ▄▄█████▀▀ ██
      ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▀▀       ▄▄█████▀▀
          ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀       ▄▄█████▀▀
              ▀▀█████▄▄       ▄▄█████▀▀
                  ▀▀█████▄▄▄█████▀▀
                      ▀▀█████▀▀
                          ▀
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye
LBC: bFrTLRcP9GSSHq2v5muLex4Sep4jphbNSU
Dr_Victor
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 187


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:28:50 PM
 #92

Author, what is better for your miner - memory clock or gpu?
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:30:40 PM
 #93

EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance

I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm

i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
giagge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728



View Profile
December 07, 2016, 07:51:40 PM
 #94

EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance

I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm

i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better

Your setting ? .


                ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
             ▄███████████▄
           ▄███████████████▄
         ▄███████████████████▄
       ▄███████████████████████▄          ▄▄            ▄▄      ▄▄                                           ▄▄
     ▄███████████████████████████▄        ██          █ ██      ██                                           ██
   ▄█████████▀███████████▀█████████▄      ██            ██      ██                                           ██
 ▄█████████▀  ▐█████████▌  ▀█████████▄    ██ ▐██████▄ █████████ ██  ███████ ▄██████████████████▄  ████████████████▌
█████████▀     █████████     ▀█████████   ██    ▄████ █▌██      ██    ▄████▌██       ▐█        █▌▐█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
 ▀█████▀       ▐███████▌       ▀█████▀    ██  ▄█▀  ██ █▌██      ██  ▄█▀  ▐█▌██       ▐█        █▌ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▐█▌██
   ▀█▀          ███████          ▀█▀      ██       ██ █▌██      ██       ▐█▌██       ▐█▌      ▐█▌         ▐█▌██
                ▐█████▌                   █████████▀▀ █▌██      ██████████▀  ▀█████████████████▀ ▀█████████▀ ██
                 █████
                 ▐███▌
                  ███
                   ▀
║█
║█
║█
█║
█║
█║

 
 
       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████

 
 
                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

 
 
 
 
 ▄████████████████████▄
████████████████████████
██████████ ▀████████████
██████████    ▀█████████
██████████    ▄█████████
██████████ ▄████████████
████████████████████████
 ▀████████████████████▀

 
 
             ▄██▄
     ▄      ▐████   ▄▄
   █████     ██████████
    █████████████████▀
 ▄████████████▀████▌
██████████     ▀████   
 ▀▀   █████     ██████████
      ▀████▌▄████████████▀
    ▄▄▄███████████████▌
   ██████████▀    ▐████
    ▀▀▀  ████▌     ▀▀▀
         ▀███▀
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:01:42 PM
 #95

EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance

I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm

i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better

Your setting ? .

120 core 55 tdp 400 mem

on pool side the earning is not right, are we sure the dev fee is 2% only?
Allmessedup
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:02:33 PM
 #96

Running 2b on my msi 970 with latest driver 376.19 and power state on GPU set to 0, I'm getting 175 SOL.  This is pretty impressive.  Thanks for your work.
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile WWW
December 07, 2016, 08:07:47 PM
 #97

EWBF behave totaly different
ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb
nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance

I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm

i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better

Your setting ? .

120 core 55 tdp 400 mem

on pool side the earning is not right, are e sure the dev fee is 2% only?


I see hashrate in miner 1:1 on suprnova

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:11:51 PM
 #98

On Nanopool the hashrate and profit is also in line with the miner for me - using 6 hour averages. This is great work! Thanks! EWBF! Smiley
harmach
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23

Miner / Trader


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:16:25 PM
 #99

Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b

I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...

You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s

P0 state enabled?

what the miners reporting im not worry about that ...


Have you enabled power state 0 (P0)? If your memory speed is 3005 you are in P2 state which is slower in some memory hard algos.

P0 State on GTX980 gave me 210~215 Sol/s 1404 gpu / 3814 mem 74C on W8 (W10 had me some hash trouble on miner). using 376.09 nvidia driver

Now checking stability on long run
https://s15.postimg.org/pnmjnz55n/nvidia_980_gtx.jpg

NOTE: up to 215~218 on v0.02... Nice work!!!!
k0stas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 440


View Profile
December 07, 2016, 08:32:27 PM
 #100

Very good miner 162sol/s only 74w gtx1060 3GB

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 254 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!