DeCrypterManiac
|
|
December 07, 2016, 05:57:47 PM |
|
Miner is working good on suprnova, good work !
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
December 07, 2016, 05:59:57 PM |
|
Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s P0 state enabled? what the miners reporting im not worry about that ... Have you enabled power state 0 (P0)? If your memory speed is 3005 you are in P2 state which is slower in some memory hard algos.
|
|
|
|
WaspEye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:05:55 PM |
|
45-50 Sol/s on GTX 680
|
|
|
|
mrada1204
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:07:33 PM |
|
1070 g1 +100 core , + 700 mem gives 282 at 82% power limit . any best config for power/hash ? ... with 100% i think hits 300
|
|
|
|
TIKCrazy
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:24:17 PM |
|
Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:32:03 PM |
|
ocminer is there some problem, pool reporting 95% invalid shares with ewbf just now?
miner say all ok, 5min ago had 2% bad shares
No problems here, running fine on 1060 and 970 here on zec.suprnova.cc yeah one miner (I have 10+ miners) had win10 right click pause and that was the cause, even you pool credited me fine, just you dashboard was 98% red
|
|
|
|
sshinr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:34:41 PM |
|
awww. finally someone release nvidia miner with some increase speed.. just tested with my old gtx 960 2gb.. run good with 95sols/s stock rom. really nice working dude. much appreciate.. love it and keep working.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
December 07, 2016, 06:37:23 PM |
|
Is here any speed difference beyween 0.0.1b and 0.0.2b? Or only bug fixes?
BUG FIXES-- The miner is the same speed, but the bug fixes have resulted in better performance. Fewer rejected shares means better payout. It works fine on NiceHash now, for example. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Bluecheese
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 18
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:04:39 PM |
|
Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s P0 state enabled? It needs work. I can't change one of my 1060 clock. Both of my 1060's are locked at P2. But all in all it rocking away. Thanks for the update
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:08:21 PM |
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
|
|
|
|
jiggytom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:10:35 PM |
|
What is your effective memory speed at +1000? I use a different skin, and maybe mine is showing the base clock, and not the 5x for gddr. In Linux I remember setting +1000 but in Windows it's usually closer to +200 At 100% power target, i'm getting about 325 sol/s per gtx 1080, at 60% power target about 290 sol/s, great improvement over other miners. +200mhz core +1000 mhz memory in msi afterburner, I have founders edition cards.
how do you change power target? Just adjust slider in msi afterburner : https://i.imgur.com/vjW0qPv.png
|
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye LBC: bWYN8NXGKWsgEAd6tQnJ5YRo2Z4r6PjxBH
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:28:50 PM |
|
Author, what is better for your miner - memory clock or gpu?
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:30:40 PM |
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 07, 2016, 07:51:40 PM |
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better Your setting ? .
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:01:42 PM Last edit: December 07, 2016, 09:00:12 PM by Amph |
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better Your setting ? . 120 core 55 tdp 400 mem on pool side the earning is not right, are we sure the dev fee is 2% only?
|
|
|
|
Allmessedup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:02:33 PM |
|
Running 2b on my msi 970 with latest driver 376.19 and power state on GPU set to 0, I'm getting 175 SOL. This is pretty impressive. Thanks for your work.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:07:47 PM |
|
EWBF behave totaly different ewbf use a lot GPU power, depending on card near 90% tdp, Memory controller load is ~60%, memory use ~1.5Gb nicehash use same 10-15% less power, memory load in 2x exe go up to 71%, memory use ~250mb per instance
I presume both have one or other parts done better, so in time i bet we can have more then 300sol (maybe even 400 with OC as 1070 is a lot bettern then AMD in blace algo calculations) on default 1070 or even more, at least more then AMD HW have atm
i managed to do 250 sol at 100 watt like nicehash, but ncicehash was only 220 at the same wattage, so this is actually coded better Your setting ? . 120 core 55 tdp 400 mem on pool side the earning is not right, are e sure the dev fee is 2% only? I see hashrate in miner 1:1 on suprnova
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:11:51 PM |
|
On Nanopool the hashrate and profit is also in line with the miner for me - using 6 hour averages. This is great work! Thanks! EWBF!
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
harmach
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:16:25 PM |
|
Nicehash Miner v1.0.2d vs EWBF's CUDA Zec miner 0.0.1b
I got 155 sols/s with Nvidia GTX 980 ref card / win 10 64bit ...
You have something not right, i have with nicehash v1.0.2d win 7 64bit 195 sols/s gtx 980 stock, EWBF doing 170 sol/s P0 state enabled? what the miners reporting im not worry about that ... Have you enabled power state 0 (P0)? If your memory speed is 3005 you are in P2 state which is slower in some memory hard algos. P0 State on GTX980 gave me 210~215 Sol/s 1404 gpu / 3814 mem 74C on W8 (W10 had me some hash trouble on miner). using 376.09 nvidia driver Now checking stability on long run https://s15.postimg.org/pnmjnz55n/nvidia_980_gtx.jpgNOTE: up to 215~218 on v0.02... Nice work!!!!
|
|
|
|
k0stas
|
|
December 07, 2016, 08:32:27 PM |
|
Very good miner 162sol/s only 74w gtx1060 3GB
|
|
|
|
|