Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 03:48:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 2163918 times)
Slava_K
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 17, 2016, 04:42:55 PM
 #441

Power target 90, GPU load 90, temp 61 by celsius, hashrate 346. 1080 Wink

                                 
                  █████████████████████████████▒
               ▒███████████████████████████████▓░
             ▒████▓                         ░▓███▒░
         ░▒▓████▓                             ░▓███▓▓▒▒░
▓▓▓▓▓████████▓▒               ░░░▒▒▒▒▒░         ░▒█████████▓▓▓▓▓
████████▓▒                ░▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▒         ░░▒▒████████
▓██▓                   ░▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓███▒░             ███▓
▒███                 ░▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓█████▒░         ▓▓█░
░█▓█                ▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓█████▓██░     ▓███
 ▓██▓             ▒██▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒░  ░▓█▓      ███▓
 ▒█▓█            ▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░░░░░▒▒░ ░▒░░▓███▓      ▒███▒
  █▓█▓          ▓█▓▒▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▓▒▒░░▒▒▓█████░      ███▓
  ▒█▓█░        ░██▓▓▒░░░░░░░░░▒▓▒░ ░░░ ░░▒▒▓▓▓▓▓█▒█░     ▓███▒
   ▓▓▓▓        ███▒░░░░░▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ █░    ▒███▒
   ░▓▓▓▓   ░▒▒ █▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒░▒░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▓ ▒█    ░████
    ░▓▒▓▒ ░▓████▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒  ██   ░████
     ▒▓▓██  ▓████▓▒▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒▒░ ░██▒  ░████▒
      ▓████  ░██████▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░  ░███▓  ░████░
       ▒████   ▓█▓░█████▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▓████░  ▒████▒
        ░████▒  ▒░   ▒██████▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓██████▓░   ▓████▒
          ████▓         ░▒▓██████████████▓░░    ░████▓
           ▒████▒                              ▓████░
             ▓████░                          ▒████▒
              ░████▓░                      ▒████▓
                ░████▓░                  ▒████▓░
                  ░████▓░              ▒████▓
                     ░▓████▒          ▓████▒
                       ░▒████▓░    ▒████▓
                          ░▓████▓▓████▓░
                             ▒█████▓░
                               ░▒▒░
✬✬✬✬✬















[/cen
1710820098
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820098

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820098
Reply with quote  #2

1710820098
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710820098
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820098

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820098
Reply with quote  #2

1710820098
Report to moderator
1710820098
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710820098

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710820098
Reply with quote  #2

1710820098
Report to moderator
kell234
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 05:17:46 PM
 #442

2x 1070

nice 700 h/s
EWBF  675-2% =  660h/s
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
December 17, 2016, 05:17:48 PM
 #443

The miner 0.0.5b use only 94% of GPU that means there is room for more speed.

it was the same on 4b version, so it's not clear how much a 5% increase would get you, if it's possible to maximize the usage

it's not clear also what will be the limit with nvidia, instead amd is there at their limit confirmed by clymore with his last version
marvykkio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 05:23:52 PM
 #444

version 0.0.4b
 2 x 1070 =  599 / 606  h/s


version 0.0.5b
 2 x 1070 =  716 / 722  h/s



bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 05:27:10 PM
 #445

Compared to EQM .03 getting a 15% reduction in hashrate. This miner also has a 5% reduction in power. So overall net loss in hash and a tiny bit less efficiency. There is something to be said of mining the coin direct though too.

EWBF, as with other miners, add the ability to execute multiple instances (or threads) of your miner with the same program. For instance running the miner twice right now increases hashrate by about 8%.

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
Viperho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 07:27:52 PM
 #446

Would it be possible to compile a compute 2.0 version of 0.5b?  Thank you
EWBF_ (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 160


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 07:55:57 PM
 #447

Would it be possible to compile a compute 2.0 version of 0.5b?  Thank you

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiNzlWT3NIbFJhZ00
jiggytom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 08:45:05 PM
 #448

1080 performance now the same as a 1070 for me... Do you think there are model specific enhancements needed?

... PLAY SHARE EARN...
.LBRY...
                            ▄▄███▄▄
                        ▄▄█████▀█████▄▄
                    ▄▄█████▀▀     ▀▀█████▄▄
                ▄▄█████▀▀             ▀▀█████▄▄
            ▄▄█████▀▀                     ▀▀█████▄▄
        ▄▄█████▀▀                             ▀▀█████▄▄
    ▄▄█████▀▀                                     ▀▀███
▄▄█████▀▀                                         ▄▄███
███▀▀                                         ▄▄█████▀▀
███     █▄▄                               ▄▄█████▀▀
███     █████▄▄                       ▄▄█████▀▀  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███       ▀▀█████▄▄               ▄▄█████▀▀       ██████
█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▄▄       ▄▄█████▀▀       ▄▄███████
  ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▄▄▄█████▀▀       ▄▄█████▀▀ ██
      ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀▀█████▀▀       ▄▄█████▀▀
          ▀▀█████▄▄       ▀       ▄▄█████▀▀
              ▀▀█████▄▄       ▄▄█████▀▀
                  ▀▀█████▄▄▄█████▀▀
                      ▀▀█████▀▀
                          ▀
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye
LBC: bWYN8NXGKWsgEAd6tQnJ5YRo2Z4r6PjxBH
dafyk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 09:05:58 PM
 #449


Thank you my fake GT 730 now gives stable 7sol/s, v0.4 made 5-7sol/s and very high rejection rate.
0.5b with Quadro K620 33sol/s, with eqm 1.0.3b 38sol/s
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 09:34:48 PM
 #450


Thank you my fake GT 730 now gives stable 7sol/s, v0.4 made 5-7sol/s and very high rejection rate.
0.5b with Quadro K620 33sol/s, with eqm 1.0.3b 38sol/s

Real GT 730 DDR5 gives 13sol/s on v0.5 up by 1sol/s from v0.4
hichemsaid92
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 09:58:21 PM
 #451

can some one help !

http://image.prntscr.com/image/d4a11ccb2e5d437789dca6d8028a40d1.png
Psynthax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 504



View Profile
December 17, 2016, 10:00:31 PM
 #452

can some one help !



I think you need to input zcash t-address instead of your username for suprnova..
suggsy89
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 10:48:54 PM
 #453

can some one help !



Config needs to be like this..

Code:
miner --server zec.suprnova.cc --user suggsy89.test --pass x --port 2142

You're missing a worker name and you need to remove -eu
wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 11:07:15 PM
 #454

@EBWF,  the compute 2.0 miner you compiled you might try using cuda6.5 to compile.  I'm not a developer but with claymore's eth miner he uses cuda6.5 for the older card support.  It may help with performance.
ioglnx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 12:03:10 AM
 #455

Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.

GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
BeneQ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 12:19:45 AM
 #456

There is a little improvement ,  my  gtx 1080  was  320-330 sol/s   now  is   360-368 sol/s

Thanks for this  software
lucasan123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 18, 2016, 12:25:27 AM
 #457

280 sols with gtx 980 ti. nicehash is making 325............ but not so bad  .......... less power used

wll1rah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 03:35:42 AM
 #458

Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.

Because Nvidia keeps putting them out Fermi based cards in the OEM market, so people are bound to have them.
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 06:20:29 AM
 #459

Looks like best results come from running 4 instances. Definitely something needs to be toned up as far as GPU utilization. There is basically 15% overhead the miner isn't taking advantage of for some reason. You can reach EQM speeds by running this many instances. Even just two instances is a huge boost (10%) compared to running one.

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 06:48:55 AM
 #460

Why not buy a new card instead of hassle with outdated hardware and make a problem of not supporting a device that even nvidia dropped long long time ago.


 Do keep in mind that a lot of us have EXISTING hardware on hand we'd like to mine more efficiently with, and don't see any reason to toss out working hardware just to spend $$$ on new stuff.
 There are also the SMALL miners that can't afford to casually just "buy a new card".


 Also keep in mind that AMD in particular had *3 generations* of "new" stuff that was no more than a bios refresh + slightly faster RAM with NO CHANGE TO THE ACTUAL GPU for most of the cards in the "new" line.
 (HD 7750/7770/78xx/79xx series, R5/7/9 2xx series, R5/7/9 3xx series - each generation only added 1 or 2 actual NEW gpu chips, usually at the top-end of the new line).

 Some of the R9 3xx series IS STILL IN PRODUCTION as AMD hasn't released their RX 4xx series replacements yet - which makes cards like the HD 7970 and 7950 arguably still current, and DEFINITELY the HD 7990.
 They also haven't released replacements for the bottom-end cards, so my HD 7750 is arguably still a CURRENT GPU (not one a miner should go out to buy, but since I have them on hand already no point in not USING them and achieving even MORE profit past the ROI they managed years ago).


 As far as the GPU goes, my HD 7870 is in actual FACT only one generation behind current, even if it's OFFICIALLY 4 generations old and 3-4 years out of production - and my R9 290s blow away ANY RX SERIES CARD that has been released to date on hashrate on pretty much ANY coin despite having been "dropped years ago".




I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!