BeneQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 07, 2017, 10:59:27 PM |
|
Zec miner 0.1.0b.
EVGA GTX 1080 FTW 2100MHz/5500MHz 511 Sol/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
_ZET_
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 100
Mining manufacturer & Mining pools
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 02:45:53 AM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
|
|
|
|
skillface
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 03:26:24 AM |
|
Getting 500 sol/s on my Gigabyte GTX 1080 (Windforce OC) with 0.1.0b @ 75% power limit, +175mhz Core and +400mhz Mem (~1847mhz Core and 10800mhz Mem)
Running at maximum power (which is 108%) only increases hashrate to ~520 sol/s but the heat generated is ridiculous, to the point where I need to keep the fan running at 100% to keep the card at or below 60C and you could feel the heat in the room, while running at 75% allows me to keep the card at or below 60C easily at around 60% fan).
0.0.8b only got me around 470 sol/s and 0.0.9b pretty much ran the same as 0.0.8b, so pretty happy so far with 0.1.0b.
|
|
|
|
wll1rah
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 05:50:35 AM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1003
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 08:22:58 AM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano. seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 09:09:08 AM |
|
My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :
Power Limit : 50% GPU clock: +150 MEM clock: +550
385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )
Nvidia much better than Amd
.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 10:17:11 AM |
|
I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least  cheers. My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :
Power Limit : 50% GPU clock: +150 MEM clock: +550
385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )
Nvidia much better than Amd
.
You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp)
|
BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips 
|
|
|
agente
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 10:33:44 AM |
|
Someone has 1050/1050ti for give us 0.0.1.0 hashrates?
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 12:08:32 PM |
|
I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least  cheers. My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :
Power Limit : 50% GPU clock: +150 MEM clock: +550
385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )
Nvidia much better than Amd
.
You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp) Yes i think so , but the power consumption is more 100 watt  .
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1003
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 12:39:17 PM |
|
What is the hash rate on gtx 1060 3G on last version? Does it affect on speed 3G and 6G card version?
I just tested a (borrowed) Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming 6GB version 1 (no coil whine btw) at 80W TPL i get 262 Sol/s Stock (no OC) at 90W TPL i get 248 Sol/s Stock (WTF?? more power consumption less hashrate? ,crazy!) i cannot test below 80W TPL because my driver is a little old, but i wouldn't be surprise that at 70W TPL the card will perform better and hash more  What i didn't like it's the temperature, 64 C (core) at 80W TPL, WHAT??, My GTX 1070 G1 Gaming barely gets over 57 C at 90W TPL. Also the backplane is so hot that you can barely touch it. I don't have a 3GB version but it should be 10% less hashrate, not less. (because of less cuda cores). Test done on Lubuntu 1404, Cuda 8, driver 367.44. are you sure about getting 9only 262 sol? another guy reported 300 sol good job:
1070 +100 core , power limit. 70 = 430ish 1060 6g +100 core , power limit 70 = stable 300 1080 +100 core = stable 530
950 +51 core, +195 mem, PL 80 = 136sol's 1060 3GB +185 core, +350 mem, PL 80 = 268-273
|
|
|
|
xPwnK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 12:58:39 PM |
|
305 sol/s with gtx 970  . At least for gtx 970 ewbf 0.1.0b miner is faster than eqm 1.0.4c.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 01:01:19 PM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano. seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king 
|
BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips 
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1003
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 01:10:50 PM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano. seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king  not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1011
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 01:29:41 PM |
|
I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least  cheers. My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :
Power Limit : 50% GPU clock: +150 MEM clock: +550
385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )
Nvidia much better than Amd
.
You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp) This depends entirely on the card and how they rate their TDPs. A TDP for one make and model isn't the same for another. You wont get the same results unless it's exactly the same make and model, even then they have different voltages so it's not guaranteed.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
induktor
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 03:12:34 PM |
|
are you sure about getting 9only 262 sol? another guy reported 300 sol
100% sure, keep in mind that windows users report target power limit as a percentage, but linux users report target power limit as Watts, he's saying target power limit 70, maybe it's 70% which is a huge difference. and he is overclocking the card, i'm not, i always use at stock speeds. also he may be getting more because of windows drivers, i am using 367.44 driver which is pretty old but play very well with the GTX 1070s which are what i use here, maybe newer drivers perform better for 1060s.
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
induktor
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 03:16:19 PM |
|
305 sol/s with gtx 970  . At least for gtx 970 ewbf 0.1.0b miner is faster than eqm 1.0.4c. at what target power level?. GTX 970, specially if you have the G1 Gaming version is an overclocking beast, but at top power you will need a nuclear reactor to feed it hehe 
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
induktor
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 03:29:41 PM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano. seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king  not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less Maybe I can clear it up a little (too bad i didn't film it when i did the tests yesterday) Rig used: AM1M-S2H with APU 5350, PSU sentey 80 Plus (superflower desing) 850W, bronce-gold efficiency, no HDD (flashdrive) linux 1404 Power: 18Wwith card Gigabyte GTX 1060 (6GB) G1 Gaming Version 1 (and no, it does not whine at all hehe), At 80W TPL, runing EWBF 010b, 98% utilization Power: 105W (so 105 - 18 = 87W)measured at the wall with two meters, a direct type (industrial panel meter trueRMS, that gets W, VA, A, V) and with a top of the line appa trueRMS clamp meter same measure exactly). the card is extremely efficient, i think it's better in terms of efficiency compared to GTX 1070 but, at least here in my country, the price doesn't make sense. Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming costs here: 675 US Dollars Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming (6GB version) costs here: 506 US dollars so, because of the price here 1070 is better, but looking at international prices, it would be better 1060 i think. i can do tests with same rig with 1070's and 970s if anyone's interested on that data. i have those test equipments because it's what i do for a living (power electronics) 
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1003
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 03:40:34 PM |
|
500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!
Looking for that for a while.
Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.
Our cards are already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed - improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano. seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king  not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less Maybe I can clear it up a little (too bad i didn't film it when i did the tests yesterday) Rig used: AM1M-S2H with APU 5350, PSU sentey 80 Plus (superflower desing) 850W, bronce-gold efficiency, no HDD (flashdrive) linux 1404 Power: 18Wwith card Gigabyte GTX 1060 (6GB) G1 Gaming Version 1 (and no, it does not whine at all hehe), At 80W TPL, runing EWBF 010b, 98% utilization Power: 105W (so 105 - 18 = 87W)measured at the wall with two meters, a direct type (industrial panel meter trueRMS, that gets W, VA, A, V) and with a top of the line appa trueRMS clamp meter same measure exactly). the card is extremely efficient, i think it's better in terms of efficiency compared to GTX 1070 but, at least here in my country, the price doesn't make sense. Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming costs here: 675 US Dollars Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming (6GB version) costs here: 506 US dollars so, because of the price here 1070 is better, but looking at international prices, it would be better 1060 i think. i can do tests with same rig with 1070's and 970s if anyone's interested on that data. i have those test equipments because it's what i do for a living (power electronics)  if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive
|
|
|
|
induktor
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 04:03:02 PM |
|
if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt
if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive
My 1070's does 365 Sol/s at 90W (no OC) so yes, you probably right about it, 1070 is still better  I don't have a 3GB version to test, but i will never buy one anyway, because in a year from now it would be very difficult to sell, because nobody will want a 3GB card anymore, even the GTX 970 G1 Gaming which is a fantastic gpu, is difficult to sell well nowadays because of the memory. if i can get my hands on one i will do the tests and report.
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1003
|
 |
January 08, 2017, 04:05:15 PM |
|
if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt
if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive
My 1070's does 365 Sol/s at 90W (no OC) so yes, you probably right about it, 1070 is still better  I don't have a 3GB version to test, but i will never buy one anyway, because in a year from now it would be very difficult to sell, because nobody will want a 3GB card anymore, even the GTX 970 G1 Gaming which is a fantastic gpu, is difficult to sell well nowadays because of the memory. if i can get my hands on one i will do the tests and report. this is my exact reason why i ignored the 3gb version, for resale value also it's on the way the new pascal refresh, 2070 and 2080 model they are faster than current one but same price, another reason not to have a dead card that cannot be resold
|
|
|
|
|