EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[BeneQ]

Zec miner 0.1.0b.

EVGA GTX 1080  FTW  2100MHz/5500MHz  511 Sol/s

[1508787367]

1508787367

[1508787367]

1508787367

[1508787367]

1508787367

[1508787367]

1508787367

[_ZET_]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

[skillface]

Getting 500 sol/s on my Gigabyte GTX 1080 (Windforce OC) with 0.1.0b @ 75% power limit, +175mhz Core and +400mhz Mem (~1847mhz Core and 10800mhz Mem)

Running at maximum power (which is 108%) only increases hashrate to ~520 sol/s but the heat generated is ridiculous, to the point where I need to keep the fan running at 100% to keep the card at or below 60C and you could feel the heat in the room, while running at 75% allows me to keep the card at or below 60C easily at around 60% fan).

0.0.8b only got me around 470 sol/s and 0.0.9b pretty much ran the same as 0.0.8b, so pretty happy so far with 0.1.0b.

[wll1rah]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

[Amph]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

[giagge]

My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :

Power Limit : 50%
GPU clock: +150
MEM clock: +550

385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )

Nvidia much better than Amd

.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least

cheers.

My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :

Power Limit : 50%
GPU clock: +150
MEM clock: +550

385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )

Nvidia much better than Amd

.

You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp)

[agente]

Someone has 1050/1050ti for give us 0.0.1.0 hashrates?

[giagge]

I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least

cheers.

My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :

Power Limit : 50%
GPU clock: +150
MEM clock: +550

385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )

Nvidia much better than Amd

.

You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp)

Yes i think so , but the power consumption is more 100 watt .

[Amph]

What is the hash rate on gtx 1060 3G on last version? Does it affect on speed 3G and 6G card version?

I just tested a (borrowed) Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming 6GB version 1 (no coil whine btw)

at 80W TPL i get 262 Sol/s Stock (no OC)
at 90W TPL i get 248 Sol/s Stock (WTF?? more power consumption less hashrate? ,crazy!)

i cannot test below 80W TPL because my driver is a little old, but i wouldn't be surprise that at 70W TPL the card will perform better and hash more

What i didn't like it's the temperature, 64 C (core) at 80W TPL, WHAT??, My GTX 1070 G1 Gaming barely gets over 57 C at 90W TPL.
Also the backplane is so hot that you can barely touch it.

I don't have a 3GB version but it should be 10% less hashrate, not less. (because of less cuda cores).

Test done on Lubuntu 1404, Cuda 8, driver 367.44.

are you sure about getting 9only 262 sol? another guy reported 300 sol

good job:

1070 +100 core , power limit. 70 = 430ish
1060 6g +100 core , power limit 70 = stable 300
1080 +100 core = stable 530

950 +51 core, +195 mem, PL 80 = 136sol's
1060 3GB +185 core, +350 mem, PL 80 = 268-273

[xPwnK]

305 sol/s with gtx 970 . At least for gtx 970 ewbf 0.1.0b miner is faster than eqm 1.0.4c.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king

[Amph]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king

not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown

but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less

[bensam1231]

I would be interested to hear what the latest version give for 1060 users on the 3GB and 6GB version @ different TDPs. This card price could make things really interesting for zcash at least

cheers.

My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :

Power Limit : 50%
GPU clock: +150
MEM clock: +550

385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )

Nvidia much better than Amd

.

You should try 60% TDP and 150/600, it's the sweet spot for profitability (earn me 5% more than @50% tdp)

This depends entirely on the card and how they rate their TDPs. A TDP for one make and model isn't the same for another. You wont get the same results unless it's exactly the same make and model, even then they have different voltages so it's not guaranteed.

[induktor]

are you sure about getting 9only 262 sol? another guy reported 300 sol

100% sure, keep in mind that windows users report target power limit as a percentage, but linux users report target power limit as Watts, he's saying  target power limit 70, maybe it's 70% which is a huge difference.

and he is overclocking the card, i'm not, i always use at stock speeds.

also he may be getting more because of windows drivers, i am using 367.44 driver which is pretty old but play very well with the GTX 1070s which are what i use here, maybe newer drivers perform better for 1060s.

[induktor]

305 sol/s with gtx 970 . At least for gtx 970 ewbf 0.1.0b miner is faster than eqm 1.0.4c.

at what target power level?.

GTX 970, specially if you have the G1 Gaming version is an overclocking beast, but at top power you will need a nuclear reactor to feed it hehe   

[induktor]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king

not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown

but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less

Maybe I can clear it up a little (too bad i didn't film it when i did the tests yesterday)
Rig used: AM1M-S2H with APU 5350, PSU sentey 80 Plus (superflower desing) 850W, bronce-gold efficiency, no HDD (flashdrive) linux 1404

Power: 18W
with card Gigabyte GTX 1060 (6GB) G1 Gaming Version 1 (and no, it does not whine at all hehe), At 80W TPL,  runing EWBF 010b, 98% utilization
Power: 105W  (so 105 - 18 = 87W)

measured at the wall with two meters, a direct type (industrial panel meter trueRMS, that gets W, VA, A, V) and with a top of the line appa trueRMS  clamp meter same measure exactly).

the card is extremely efficient, i think it's better in terms of efficiency compared to GTX 1070 but, at least here in my country, the price doesn't make sense.

Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming costs here: 675 US Dollars
Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming (6GB version) costs here: 506 US dollars

so, because of the price here 1070 is better, but looking at international prices, it would be better 1060 i think.

i can do tests with same rig with 1070's and 970s if anyone's interested on that data.
i have those test equipments because it's what i do for a living (power electronics)  

[Amph]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

I do 400 @ 92w but the price is half, so yeah pretty much what you say, king

not sure anymore, it seems only the 6gb can do 300 sol, reports from users are not very clear, it depend on the model i guess, and the wattage is unknown

but the 6GB don't cost half of a 1070, more like 1/3 less

Maybe I can clear it up a little (too bad i didn't film it when i did the tests yesterday)
Rig used: AM1M-S2H with APU 5350, PSU sentey 80 Plus (superflower desing) 850W, bronce-gold efficiency, no HDD (flashdrive) linux 1404

Power: 18W
with card Gigabyte GTX 1060 (6GB) G1 Gaming Version 1 (and no, it does not whine at all hehe), At 80W TPL,  runing EWBF 010b, 98% utilization
Power: 105W  (so 105 - 18 = 87W)

measured at the wall with two meters, a direct type (industrial panel meter trueRMS, that gets W, VA, A, V) and with a top of the line appa trueRMS  clamp meter same measure exactly).

the card is extremely efficient, i think it's better in terms of efficiency compared to GTX 1070 but, at least here in my country, the price doesn't make sense.

Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming costs here: 675 US Dollars
Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming (6GB version) costs here: 506 US dollars

so, because of the price here 1070 is better, but looking at international prices, it would be better 1060 i think.

i can do tests with same rig with 1070's and 970s if anyone's interested on that data.
i have those test equipments because it's what i do for a living (power electronics)  

if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt

if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive

[induktor]

if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt

if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive

My 1070's does 365 Sol/s at 90W (no OC) so yes, you probably right about it, 1070 is still better 

I don't have a 3GB version to test, but i will never buy one anyway, because in a year from now it would be very difficult to sell, because nobody will want a 3GB card anymore, even the GTX 970 G1 Gaming which is a fantastic gpu, is difficult to sell well nowadays because of the memory.

if i can get my hands on one i will do the tests and report.

[Amph]

if the 1060 does 300 sol at 87 watt it's not better than a 1070 that can reach 400 sol at 100watt

if it was the 3GB version that i would say it is better because of the price but the 6gb is expensive

My 1070's does 365 Sol/s at 90W (no OC) so yes, you probably right about it, 1070 is still better  

I don't have a 3GB version to test, but i will never buy one anyway, because in a year from now it would be very difficult to sell, because nobody will want a 3GB card anymore, even the GTX 970 G1 Gaming which is a fantastic gpu, is difficult to sell well nowadays because of the memory.

if i can get my hands on one i will do the tests and report.

this is my exact reason why i ignored the 3gb version, for resale value

also it's on the way the new pascal refresh, 2070 and 2080 model they are faster than current one but same price, another reason not to have a dead card that cannot be resold