EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[xPwnK]

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8

ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?

[1503062058]

1503062058

[1503062058]

1503062058

[1503062058]

1503062058

[EWBF_]

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8

ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?

Solver more optimized for pascal cards. In next release i add another solvers that will be faster on other cards.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least

[laik2]

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least

As I said overclocking is impossible because even with default clocks miner crashes, I actually have to underclock by -200+ to get it working but unstable, -280 gives stable enough results.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least

As I said overclocking is impossible because even with default clocks miner crashes, I actually have to underclock by -200+ to get it working but unstable, -280 gives stable enough results.

Well upgrade drivers then and we'll see , we're all running latest version very stable on a good amount of rigs, there is something wrong on your end for sure, keep up trying, good luck

[micairvas]

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.

[Kompik]

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.

Best setup depends on your cost of electricity. Overall your settings look fine, usually the most efficient is to have Powerlimit even a little bit lower.

[micairvas]

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.

Best setup depends on your cost of electricity. Overall your settings look fine, usually the most efficient is to have Powerlimit even a little bit lower.

Hmm Electricity is not so important here, those cards generally has very low electricity consumption, it depends. On factory settings I getting 240 sol, with overclock I getting only 20 sol more, so maybe's not worth. After OC temperatures are 67-69C, on stock, my temperatures are 55c, there is also room to decrease powerlimit.

[bensam1231]

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8

ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?

Solver more optimized for pascal cards. In next release i add another solvers that will be faster on other cards.

Should take a look at Maxwell for 970s.

[lokko]

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

You damn nice hash bastard pissed you off !!
You since the biggest scammers,

(I always wanted to say that)


as always EWBF
continue so, good work !!! 

[disman]

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

If someone steals the code Claymore, Claymore makes the next miner even faster and better protect the code.

Why do not you do the same?

Your profit is 20% lower than in the other pools. Make profits higher, and no one will interest you to break.

[lokko]

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

If someone steals the code Claymore, Claymore makes the next miner even faster and better protect the code.

Why do not you do the same?

Your profit is 20% lower than in the other pools. Make profits higher, and no one will interest you to break.

Just the way it is, they hide 20% fees and rant their customers
Pay only in btc and lock your miner only for your pool

[lokko]

NiceHash is not a pool.
It is a marketplace where you can buy or sell hashing power.

It is like asking eBay to pay you more for your stuff. You can't, right? Because eBay is a marketplace - just like NiceHash.

Go Home scammer ! you are not welcome !

[lokko]

Go Home scammer ! you are not welcome !

You must be EWBF's wife or you logged in with the wrong user account. 

Went very fast and already falls the mask;)
I think your parents are siblings and you want to prove the opposite to us;)

[bensam1231]

NiceHash is not a pool.
It is a marketplace where you can buy or sell hashing power.

It is like asking eBay to pay you more for your stuff. You can't, right? Because eBay is a marketplace - just like NiceHash.
You get paid as much as others think your hashing power is worth at the given time.

If you clicked your heels together you could become a multipool that mines coins direct and allows people to purchase hash for more then can be earned simply by mining coins through the multipool... >>

[lokko]

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

[/quote


Robin Hood:

No, he is not, he is the best! It takes Nicehash and gives it to us.
Robin Hood says it all!

[lokko]

Everyone will be able to see our EQM's source code soon and compare it to his PTX. There will be plenty of proofs.
So, expect EQM to be free to use, with no pool lock and no fee!

We will see, as long as you do not change your politics, we will continue as it is


Nice regards

AntiNicehash !

[fmz89]

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

hmm big bucks  
both of you need to realese the source and compare it 

[jonesskill]

Its not Nicehash miner.

Nicehash miner don't archieve 320 sol/s with a GTX 1080, with this miner and a little overclock i get 450 Sol/s

[ol92]

Its not Nicehash miner.

Nicehash miner don't archieve 320 sol/s with a GTX 1080, with this miner and a little overclock i get 450 Sol/s

with nicehash eqm 1.04, I have around 490 sol/s with a GTX 1080: you may talk about an earlier version or the generic nicehash package.