Bitcoin Forum
October 24, 2017, 04:15:55 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 254 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 1771682 times)
xPwnK
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 08:51:33 PM
 #761

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8
ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508818555
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508818555

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508818555
Reply with quote  #2

1508818555
Report to moderator
EWBF_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 08:59:17 PM
 #762

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8
ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?


Solver more optimized for pascal cards. In next release i add another solvers that will be faster on other cards.
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 09:02:40 PM
 #763

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least Smiley

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink - Please don't PM about sharing my tools, they're not for share.
laik2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 09:17:18 PM
 #764

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least Smiley
As I said overclocking is impossible because even with default clocks miner crashes, I actually have to underclock by -200+ to get it working but unstable, -280 gives stable enough results.

ZEC: t1KbbHtXqzSS6qHBaPZDKyWnzxhRjr9oCtW
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112

CryptoLearner


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 09:27:15 PM
 #765

Extremely strange card behaviour...

This is default settings without being touched.OC is impossible for GPU core.

Lowering the core below -250 seems to do the trick.
Memory +200 without errors. If I go above +200 strange noise appears.

Any suggestions/ideas much appreciated!

EDIT: This is supposed to be MSI Armor GTX 1070 8GB but is recognized as Armor OC version by SN also.
Found latest bios on MSI site(supposed to fix Micron memory crashing) and upgraded it, but the error still remains...

I had quite a bit of instability with 375.x try upgrading to 376.x drivers. Also from what i read around msi cards arent very reputable in OC stability. But try it at least Smiley
As I said overclocking is impossible because even with default clocks miner crashes, I actually have to underclock by -200+ to get it working but unstable, -280 gives stable enough results.

Well upgrade drivers then and we'll see Smiley, we're all running latest version very stable on a good amount of rigs, there is something wrong on your end for sure, keep up trying, good luck Wink

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink - Please don't PM about sharing my tools, they're not for share.
micairvas
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 09:32:38 PM
 #766

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 327


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 09:44:04 PM
 #767

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.
Best setup depends on your cost of electricity. Overall your settings look fine, usually the most efficient is to have Powerlimit even a little bit lower.
micairvas
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 10:06:07 PM
 #768

Hi guys, what is best setup for Gigabyte G1 Gaming gtx 1060 3gb, Samsung memory? Currently I getting about 260 with +160 (core), +550 (mem), powerlimit 68. Last NV drivers 376.48.
Best setup depends on your cost of electricity. Overall your settings look fine, usually the most efficient is to have Powerlimit even a little bit lower.

Hmm Electricity is not so important here, those cards generally has very low electricity consumption, it depends. On factory settings I getting 240 sol, with overclock I getting only 20 sol more, so maybe's not worth. After OC temperatures are 67-69C, on stock, my temperatures are 55c, there is also room to decrease powerlimit.
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 03:29:16 AM
 #769

970 gets a bit less hashrate with 0.0.8 than 0.0.7. Does anyone else have this problem with maxwell cards?
260 sol/s with 0.0.7 and 250 sol/s with 0.0.8
ewbf why am i getting less hashrate using 0.0.8?


Solver more optimized for pascal cards. In next release i add another solvers that will be faster on other cards.

Should take a look at Maxwell for 970s.

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 09:47:06 AM
 #770

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.



You damn nice hash bastard pissed you off !!
You since the biggest scammers,

(I always wanted to say that)


as always EWBF
continue so, good work !!!  Grin
disman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:03:09 AM
 #771

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.


If someone steals the code Claymore, Claymore makes the next miner even faster and better protect the code.

Why do not you do the same?

Your profit is 20% lower than in the other pools. Make profits higher, and no one will interest you to break.
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:05:29 AM
 #772

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.


If someone steals the code Claymore, Claymore makes the next miner even faster and better protect the code.

Why do not you do the same?

Your profit is 20% lower than in the other pools. Make profits higher, and no one will interest you to break.


Just the way it is, they hide 20% fees and rant their customers
Pay only in btc and lock your miner only for your pool
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:09:14 AM
 #773

NiceHash is not a pool.
It is a marketplace where you can buy or sell hashing power.

It is like asking eBay to pay you more for your stuff. You can't, right? Because eBay is a marketplace - just like NiceHash.

Go Home scammer ! you are not welcome !
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:17:22 AM
 #774

Go Home scammer ! you are not welcome !

You must be EWBF's wife or you logged in with the wrong user account.  Roll Eyes


Went very fast and already falls the mask;)
I think your parents are siblings and you want to prove the opposite to us;)
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:18:33 AM
 #775

NiceHash is not a pool.
It is a marketplace where you can buy or sell hashing power.

It is like asking eBay to pay you more for your stuff. You can't, right? Because eBay is a marketplace - just like NiceHash.
You get paid as much as others think your hashing power is worth at the given time.

If you clicked your heels together you could become a multipool that mines coins direct and allows people to purchase hash for more then can be earned simply by mining coins through the multipool... >>

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:29:51 AM
 #776

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.

[/quote


Robin Hood:

No, he is not, he is the best! It takes Nicehash and gives it to us.
Robin Hood says it all!
lokko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 10:41:20 AM
 #777

Everyone will be able to see our EQM's source code soon and compare it to his PTX. There will be plenty of proofs.
So, expect EQM to be free to use, with no pool lock and no fee!



We will see, as long as you do not change your politics, we will continue as it is


Nice regards

AntiNicehash !
fmz89
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848


~~~~Dracarys~~~~


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 11:25:58 AM
 #778

[WARNING]

EWBF is fake. He is using our EQM to make 2% fee on it.
He is always one step behind as you may noticed.

It is sad, because we have paid big bucks for the EQM's source, just to protect our miners from the dev fee. And here we go again, a dev fee. He is not a Robin Hood, he is practically leasing our miner for a 2% dev fee! Is this something you support? I would understand he would stole it and release the source, but no. He is egoistic like that.

Actions like this are delaying our miner development and its quality.

STOP using his software or ask him to release HIS source first.


hmm big bucks  Grin Grin Grin Grin
both of you need to realese the source and compare it  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
jonesskill
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 82


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 01:04:02 PM
 #779

Its not Nicehash miner.

Nicehash miner don't archieve 320 sol/s with a GTX 1080, with this miner and a little overclock i get 450 Sol/s

ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 372


View Profile
December 30, 2016, 01:13:05 PM
 #780

Its not Nicehash miner.

Nicehash miner don't archieve 320 sol/s with a GTX 1080, with this miner and a little overclock i get 450 Sol/s


with nicehash eqm 1.04, I have around 490 sol/s with a GTX 1080: you may talk about an earlier version or the generic nicehash package.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 254 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!