I see 2 camps here. One that want to maximize their profit, thus burn coins, reduce supply and make masternodes to get higher stakes. Not good! And the other one that looks into practical applicability of the coin. I see myself in the second camp. I'm happy to see a huge amount of tiny coins floating around. I said already that micro financing would be a great application and IFLT would be right sized for just that. Not too few coins that would be too expensive (forget about satoshis, count full numbers) and not too many that look inflationary for that purpose (like IOTA would be, but they have another target).
So, again, I think we need to discuss strategy here, not marketing, technicalities or short term rubbish. Rebranding would be an important part, if the strategy is decided. And I would like to see it going into micro payment direction. And we have an Android wallet for this already, of course it would need major rework, but the basics are there already.
I agree with your opening statement. Although I did mention masternodes I too would lean more to camp 2. I do feel that masternodes are a good way to secure coin longevity but at 80% that would put this coin into an inflationary stage that there are just way to many coins. However, if masternodes could be implemented alongside of something like you have stated here such as micro financing, we could preserve longevity while creating a viable use-case for IFLT. I like the way you think, and look forward to reading more of your ideas.
