Bitcoin Forum
November 30, 2021, 03:38:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will we close Nov. at or above Plan B's posited minimum of $98K?
Yes - 43 (37.4%)
No - 72 (62.6%)
Total Voters: 115

Pages: « 1 ... 19476 19477 19478 19479 19480 19481 19482 19483 19484 19485 19486 19487 19488 19489 19490 19491 19492 19493 19494 19495 19496 19497 19498 19499 19500 19501 19502 19503 19504 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19511 19512 19513 19514 19515 19516 19517 19518 19519 19520 19521 19522 19523 19524 19525 [19526] 19527 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 ... 29918 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25491748 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (158 posts by 14 users with 9 merit deleted.)
babanana
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:44:28 AM

It seems the "old ones" doesn't understand what bitcoin is or the whole cryptocurrency. The so called experts are also old and calling all fud against bitcoin. Yet almost all crypto enthusiasts are the younger generation, mid 30's and below. There is the barrier. The technological gap between old and young. Give it a few years when we "young" are the old, then we'll see it flourish.

Early 30's here.  Wink
1638243538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638243538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638243538
Reply with quote  #2

1638243538
Report to moderator
1638243538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638243538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638243538
Reply with quote  #2

1638243538
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638243538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638243538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638243538
Reply with quote  #2

1638243538
Report to moderator
1638243538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638243538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638243538
Reply with quote  #2

1638243538
Report to moderator
1638243538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638243538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638243538
Reply with quote  #2

1638243538
Report to moderator
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 5132


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:45:54 AM

really interested to see what will happen at the 8190-8160 area


Like I already said, newbie, it does not matter until it gets down to $7k-ish or perhaps $6,666... then we are fucked... that is if it gets there.   Tongue
moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:46:41 AM

Your only real risk is that it runs off in a huge move that exhausts your supply of one side of the pair.

That is possible, if you don't have sufficient assets to ride out any macro move. Which is why I have only a small percentage of my crypto in my trading stash.

jbreher:  I don't know if you response adequately outlines what you actually would do in such a extreme downwardly volatile situation.  Are you suggesting that at certain price points you would stop buying, or do you just change the amounts and the increments?

Let's just concede that our recent price run of BTC went up to $20k, and you had been pretty much selling incrementally all the way up to nearly that price point.  Therefore you had accumulated a decent amount of a stash of fiat to buy back BTC all the way down to $6k, which was about a 70% price correction. 

How much further down could the BTC price go before you would stop buying?  Were you prepared for 85%, which would have been around $3k?  or 90%, which would have been around $2k? or 95%, which would have been around $1k? or 97.5%, which would have been around $500?
 
Let's talk real world numbers and the extent of your plan past 70% down.... We did get to witness 70% down in the real world and numbers like that really do put stresses on a large number of plans, and some folks had to rethink their plans and even to completely change their plans because they might not have been psychologically or financially prepared for anything much beyond 35% (which in this case was around $13k).  We actually witnessed several live participants of the WO thread panicking around 35% correction.. and even if they did not completely panick they engaged in a kind of conduct that was a bit contrary to having had a good plan that they could actually follow in the real world of bitcoin, which involves downward price corrections that go beyond rational expectations..
*yawn*
I will start buying at 2k and stop buying at 1k
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 5132


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:50:52 AM

[edited out]
*yawn*
I will start buying at 2k and stop buying at 1k

The question is not for you, newbie, because if you read the contents of the post and the set up, we are already assuming an incrementalist practice of buying on the way down.

You assume a different kind of gambling scenario, when it appears to be a pretty big stretch to assume that this correction would be 90% to 95%... and that you would wait to buy in that range.. because it seems pretty unlikely to reach such range, so your odds of winning seem pretty low... still in the less than 5% arena.. so it seems to me.
moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:55:02 AM

really interested to see what will happen at the 8190-8160 area


Like I already said, newbie, it does not matter until it gets down to $7k-ish or perhaps $6,666... then we are fucked... that is if it gets there.   Tongue

Please speak for yourself. When price gets to 6666, and you r fucked, can I have your merits Cheesy?

Personally, I'm selling the up bounces.
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 292


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:56:36 AM

Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1417



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 09:58:58 AM
Merited by yefi (1), bitserve (1)

May I please get September 1st 2018? Nobody got September and I love September. Since I am a latecomer I will donate the entire sum if it happens to be me. Sounds good?
If you snatched the prize from somebody who would have otherwise won, I don't think they'd be too pleased about that, even if you do donate your windfall. You're working with new information now that wasn't available to the other participants, so you shouldn't be allowed to compete.
One of the reasons (there are more) I picked 28/08/2018 is because it also covered a good part of September.
If it is allowed to pick new dates now, it should also be allowed to change the previous picks too. Maybe even the ones that already "lost" because maybe (or surely) they would have picked a later date now.
Fair enough, I actually agree with you both. My bad I was not around to pick a date to participate in mic's contest. I'll keep that date in my mind though  Wink
flynn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 540



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:05:21 AM

May I please get September 1st 2018? Nobody got September and I love September. Since I am a latecomer I will donate the entire sum if it happens to be me. Sounds good?
If you snatched the prize from somebody who would have otherwise won, I don't think they'd be too pleased about that, even if you do donate your windfall. You're working with new information now that wasn't available to the other participants, so you shouldn't be allowed to compete.
One of the reasons (there are more) I picked 28/08/2018 is because it also covered a good part of September.
If it is allowed to pick new dates now, it should also be allowed to change the previous picks too. Maybe even the ones that already "lost" because maybe (or surely) they would have picked a later date now.
Fair enough, I actually agree with you both. My bad I was not around to pick a date to participate in mic's contest. I'll keep that date in my mind though  Wink

Beside, It's far easier to guess now than a month ago.
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 2148



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:33:33 AM
Merited by 600watt (3), JayJuanGee (1), conspirosphere.tk (1)

I ain't 'playing victim'. There is a wide gulf from permissionless innovation that you don't happen to care for, and outright lying in order to besmirch character.
I understood the first sentence, but I couldn't make sense of the second. Care to explain?

Certainly. MoA stated that I engaged in spamming in order to cripple Bitcoin Segwit. Of course, I have done nothing of the sort. As might be deduced from the fact that MoA was unable to provide a single shred of evidence for such an accusation. Ergo, MoA was lying. Likely in order to besmirch my character.

how about this ... just piss off you duplicitous tosser? This is no longer 'your' bitcoin after you have now pitched your tent at the Bcash shit-show circus along with Peter_R, the other daft thinkers and outright sociopath control freaks ... why do you really keep slinking back around here, to preach to us the error of segwit ways and straying from the One True Vision of Satoshi?? it's really kind of stalky and a bit creepy.

"besmirch your character" Huh it's an anonymous internet forum you plonker, who cares about your non-existent character?

.... and after all that I didn't say YOU specifically engaged in spamming just that you were from the cohort of Bcash idiots that were cheering on, encouraging and engaging in a myriad of despicable attacks on bitcoin, including spamming, to pump their shitcoin Bcash.

The amount of half-truths, lies, misinformation-spreading, slander and personal attacks against people in real life the deluded 'hard-fork now!' cultists have engaged in is disgusting, maybe heal thyself physician? Or are you just projecting the worst traits of your Bcash partners elsewhere to ease your conscience?
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1115


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2018, 10:38:49 AM
Last edit: February 13, 2018, 10:53:06 AM by Majormax

really interested to see what will happen at the 8190-8160 area


Like I already said, newbie, it does not matter until it gets down to $7k-ish or perhaps $6,666... then we are fucked... that is if it gets there.   Tongue

Please speak for yourself. When price gets to 6666, and you r fucked, can I have your merits Cheesy?

Personally, I'm selling the up bounces.


You have a plan, and that is good.  

Taking a view that $2000 would be the bottom, and $1000 would indicate failure of BTC. Those levels have some basis in the historical charts, if you view the whole price history of BTC as 5 big waves.

The 5 highs can be estimated at 3x to 10x the previous high, but more accurately, the lows can be estimated just above the preceding high. That gives the $2000 and $1000 levels.

It is only one way of viewing it, but better than choosing more arbitary levels.

moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:43:03 AM

I ain't 'playing victim'. There is a wide gulf from permissionless innovation that you don't happen to care for, and outright lying in order to besmirch character.
I understood the first sentence, but I couldn't make sense of the second. Care to explain?

Certainly. MoA stated that I engaged in spamming in order to cripple Bitcoin Segwit. Of course, I have done nothing of the sort. As might be deduced from the fact that MoA was unable to provide a single shred of evidence for such an accusation. Ergo, MoA was lying. Likely in order to besmirch my character.

Oh dear! this guy sounds like hes in your naughty cnorner?

how about this ... just piss off you duplicitous tosser? This is no longer 'your' bitcoin after you have now pitched your tent at the Bcash shit-show circus along with Peter_R, the other daft thinkers and outright sociopath control freaks ... why do you really keep slinking back around here, to preach to us the error of segwit ways and straying from the One True Vision of Satoshi?? it's really kind of stalky and a bit creepy.

"besmirch your character" Huh it's an anonymous internet forum you plonker, who cares about your non-existent character?

.... and after all that I didn't say YOU specifically engaged in spamming just that you were from the cohort of Bcash idiots that were cheering on, encouraging and engaging in a myriad of despicable attacks on bitcoin, including spamming, to pump their shitcoin Bcash.

The amount of half-truths, lies, misinformation-spreading, slander and personal attacks against people in real life the deluded 'hard-fork now!' cultists have engaged in is disgusting, maybe heal thyself physician? Or are you just projecting the worst traits of your Bcash partners elsewhere to ease your conscience?
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:44:24 AM

I guess nobody cares about this: http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/11/investing/lagarde-bitcoin-regulation/index.html

Wow was 8000 the new bottom retest?

Where’s Smokey the Bear?

Maybe that IMF statement was too pathetic sounding?
Why would anybody give a rat's ass about regulation when decentralized exchanges are on the horizon? For the very first time in history regulators won't be able to dictate their rule upon citizens.
Decentralized exchanges need fiat on/offramps too, so they can be choked or leashed by regulation. That's the one issue that still makes me give a ratt's ass.
But wouldn't that be peer to peer also? Ie a private person sending money to another private person through Paypal or SEPA or Swish or whatever. Impossible for any bank or government to connect with a selling or buying of crypto.
You're correct, Arriemoller. But they've got automatic bank information exchange all over already, so they can at least be leashed by governments threatening banks if they don't playy watchdog on you. Your bank becomes your enemy. Uh, "becomes"?  Huh
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:44:43 AM
Merited by suchmoon (1), bitebits (1)

TA confirms 1 Doge = 1 Dog

BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:45:36 AM

TA confirms 1 Doge = 1 Dog


What if someone hacks the markets and changes 1 Doge to 0 Doge?
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 7248


Observing No-Coiners.


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:47:48 AM

May I please get September 1st 2018? Nobody got September and I love September. Since I am a latecomer I will donate the entire sum if it happens to be me. Sounds good?
If you snatched the prize from somebody who would have otherwise won, I don't think they'd be too pleased about that, even if you do donate your windfall. You're working with new information now that wasn't available to the other participants, so you shouldn't be allowed to compete.
One of the reasons (there are more) I picked 28/08/2018 is because it also covered a good part of September.
If it is allowed to pick new dates now, it should also be allowed to change the previous picks too. Maybe even the ones that already "lost" because maybe (or surely) they would have picked a later date now.
Fair enough, I actually agree with you both. My bad I was not around to pick a date to participate in mic's contest. I'll keep that date in my mind though  Wink


Yeah sorry but its allways few days and Just When close i put No one more on it ...... its So very random but also much more fair for everybody like This.....  hopefully we break iT quick and you can take 1september on the next game Smiley
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 5132


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:50:14 AM

really interested to see what will happen at the 8190-8160 area


Like I already said, newbie, it does not matter until it gets down to $7k-ish or perhaps $6,666... then we are fucked... that is if it gets there.   Tongue

Please speak for yourself. When price gets to 6666, and you r fucked, can I have your merits Cheesy?

First, I will concede that when I used the "we are fucked" expression, I am presuming the vast majority of WO thread participants who come to this thread to learn about bitcoin, and are generally pro bitcoin and the various tangential developments around it.  So, in that sense, I am using a kind of variation of the "royal we" to ascribe some sentiments to the vast majority of guys and gal who are involved in the thread to be largely better off with rising bitcoin prices rather than lowering bitcoin prices.

Second, I am prepared for down, even though I exaggerated a bit about the we being fucked thing.. but of course, I am better off with rising BTC prices rather than falling prices, even though I do take decent mitigating actions to attempt to profit from any downfalls in the BTC price by buying on the way down.

Third, let's assume that I was going to be fucked to death and you are merely referring to my bank of smerits, you would likely be somewhere near the bottom of any list of final distribution that I would make....   You are ranking pretty low on any good will that I have, and part of my lacking of good will towards you remains that I have a suspicion that you are probably in violation of forum rules, and you are a previous banned member who is using a new account with an attempt to get around forum rules.  So likely your days are numbered..  Cry Cry Cry    

Personally, I'm selling the up bounces.

Nothing wrong with that, as long as you are mostly buying on the way down and selling on the way up, so if you end up selling on bounces, you should not be selling really large portions, because your net preparation should be for UP, rather than DOWN, because it is most likely that we are at the bottom of our various corrections, and if you sell too many on the way UP, then you are not going to be adequately prepared for UP... so ultimately, you need to prepare for both UP and DOWN... not just DOWN - especially when the odds are not in favor of such DOWNity, as I repeated already, several times.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:55:26 AM

I ain't 'playing victim'. There is a wide gulf from permissionless innovation that you don't happen to care for, and outright lying in order to besmirch character.
I understood the first sentence, but I couldn't make sense of the second. Care to explain?

Certainly. MoA stated that I engaged in spamming in order to cripple Bitcoin Segwit. Of course, I have done nothing of the sort. As might be deduced from the fact that MoA was unable to provide a single shred of evidence for such an accusation. Ergo, MoA was lying. Likely in order to besmirch my character.

On the other end of the statement, the leveraging of Satoshi client assets by the Bitcoin Cash project is part and parcel of open source. There is nothing untoward nor illegitimate about doing so. This is how open source technology progresses.
Ah, now I see what "permissionless innovation that you don't happen to care for" means. The leveraging of open source assets is an intended possibility - a feature, so to say - and totally legit in my opinion, too. Kind of like dogecoin did. However, the naming, marketing and politics around Bcash is highly debatable. Well, that's my opinion anyway.
supertee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 689
Merit: 255



View Profile WWW
February 13, 2018, 10:55:38 AM

TA confirms 1 Doge = 1 Dog


What if someone hacks the markets and changes 1 Doge to 0 Doge?

you didn't get it. the chart looks like a dog.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1586



View Profile
February 13, 2018, 10:59:16 AM

...chained orders...

I have been experimenting with JJG (and jbrher)s chained order strategy on the BTC/ETH pair.

Perhaps I am being dense...but I am just not getting it.

It goes down, I am buying ETH every 0.001, ok fine, then it goes back up and I am selling ETH at the exact same prices...it looks like a total wash to me.

Did I miss something in the explanation?
You remove the "other side" order at the point you just filled, otherwise they will cancel out for sure.
Example: you have orders each 500$.
Sell at 8500 on the way up, but remove "buy at 8500 on the way down". Next you'll buy will be at $8000.
Same for the opposite direction, buy at $8000 on the way down, remove "sell at $8000 on the way up".

That's why you have a gap between your top buy and your bottom sell that is 2x your base interval. The gap is where the profit is made.

Admittedly, in my most comprehensive explanation, I explicitly left the reason for such 'as an exercise for the reader'. Perhaps I should have stated it.
Letting the readers figure some details by themselves helps to ensure full assimilation of the material  Wink

By the way, as opposed to JJG's implementation, so to say, of this system, you do seem to have a ladder of sells/buys already set up, and you do your maintainance by removing debris - that is, orders at the same price but on the opposite side of the one just executed. At least, that is the way I understand it.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
February 13, 2018, 11:05:14 AM

Imagine the souls that would be crushed if it just dropped below 6K right here.
Pages: « 1 ... 19476 19477 19478 19479 19480 19481 19482 19483 19484 19485 19486 19487 19488 19489 19490 19491 19492 19493 19494 19495 19496 19497 19498 19499 19500 19501 19502 19503 19504 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19511 19512 19513 19514 19515 19516 19517 19518 19519 19520 19521 19522 19523 19524 19525 [19526] 19527 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 ... 29918 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!