Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2020, 04:20:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Oct. 23 Closing Price:
<$8,000 - 2 (3%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 0 (0%)
$8,500-$9,000 - 0 (0%)
$9,000-$9,500 - 0 (0%)
$9,500-$10,000 - 0 (0%)
$10,000-$10,500 - 1 (1.5%)
$10,500-$11,000 - 0 (0%)
$11,000-$11,500 - 3 (4.5%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 5 (7.6%)
$12,000-$12,500 - 16 (24.2%)
$12,500-$13,000 - 12 (18.2%)
$13,000-$13,500 - 8 (12.1%)
$13,500-$14,000 - 5 (7.6%)
>$14,000 - 14 (21.2%)
Total Voters: 66

Pages: « 1 ... 19462 19463 19464 19465 19466 19467 19468 19469 19470 19471 19472 19473 19474 19475 19476 19477 19478 19479 19480 19481 19482 19483 19484 19485 19486 19487 19488 19489 19490 19491 19492 19493 19494 19495 19496 19497 19498 19499 19500 19501 19502 19503 19504 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19511 [19512] 19513 19514 19515 19516 19517 19518 19519 19520 19521 19522 19523 19524 19525 19526 19527 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 ... 27400 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 23388023 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (148 posts by 37 users deleted.)
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3234
Merit: 1787


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2018, 08:09:44 PM
Merited by yefi (1), kurious (1), bitebits (1), bitserve (1), fabiorem (1)

Shouldn't an Economist at the NYU at least be smart enough to factor out the monetary supply? Would sure be nice to see someone in such a position making educated assessments rather than spreading propaganda or bullshit statements that don't hold under scrutiny.

https://twitter.com/Nouriel/status/962479746444652544


Re: Bitcoin is the biggest bubble in history. Glenn Beck even did a show about it.

All they factor in is percentage rise, not market cap. Beck said that when the bitcoin bubble bursts it would be worse than the dotcom bubble and the housing bubble combined. Silly because there are so few people affected.

If you want the biggest bubble in history I have one that is bigger.

My brother had an ice cream cone when I was a kid. I told him I'd give him 1 cent for it. He said no. At that point the price per ice cream cone was $.01. Then I offered $1. He said no. So I offered him $10. Knowing I didn't have that much money he again said no. I then offered him $1 million for the ice cream cone. He said I don't have that much money. So I said I have 50 cents and offered him 50 cents for it.

In the span of 5 minutes the price of one ice cream cone went up millions of percent and then the bubble popped and crashed. That was the biggest bubble in history. It should be recorded. The economic impact was felt for years after that, the recovery felt by all.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1603383616
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603383616

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603383616
Reply with quote  #2

1603383616
Report to moderator
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 5727


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2018, 08:10:04 PM


moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:10:49 PM

8185 gonna get broken soon
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1660


born once atheist


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:15:43 PM


As a professional power-top, I must wholeheartedly agree. Astroglide is preferable. Avoid Vaseline altogether. Can use Olive Oil if you or your partner can't generate enough spit.

hmmm... might have to tell Grandma to avoid this thread when she asks about my bitcorns...
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 4293


Be a bank


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:17:12 PM
Last edit: February 11, 2018, 09:43:29 PM by Last of the V8s
Merited by BlindMayorBitcorn (1)

back to rsk for a sec.: simplicity language for smart contracts seems much more popular right now https://youtu.be/OM3lmnytGfM?t=2h4m10s
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2547


no FOMO


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:17:58 PM
Merited by BlindMayorBitcorn (1)


As a professional power-top, I must wholeheartedly agree. Astroglide is preferable. Avoid Vaseline altogether. Can use Olive Oil if you or your partner can't generate enough spit.

hmmm... might have to tell Grandma to avoid this thread when she asks about my bitcorns...

one of the whalepool guys had his mom on the mic yesterday, it was hilarious
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 799



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:19:58 PM
Merited by BlindMayorBitcorn (1)

When number of pages in this thread equals the btc/usd ATH, will it then drop to 6k pages?
Keeping fingers crossed.
The ATH already passed the number of pages last year, but apparently the page count didn't get the message. Let's see what happens during the next round. Tongue
Is page count a leading indicator or a lagging indicator?

it is the mean to which the price will revert
Brilliant. I'm ashamed I didn't come up with that despite my training in Mathematics.


Shouldn't an Economist at the NYU at least be smart enough to factor out the monetary supply? Would sure be nice to see someone in such a position making educated assessments rather than spreading propaganda or bullshit statements that don't hold under scrutiny.

https://twitter.com/Nouriel/status/962479746444652544


Re: Bitcoin is the biggest bubble in history. Glenn Beck even did a show about it.

All they factor in is percentage rise, not market cap. Beck said that when the bitcoin bubble bursts it would be worse than the dotcom bubble and the housing bubble combined. Silly because there are so few people affected.

If you want the biggest bubble in history I have one that is bigger.

My brother had an ice cream cone when I was a kid. I told him I'd give him 1 cent for it. He said no. At that point the price per ice cream cone was $.01. Then I offered $1. He said no. So I offered him $10. Knowing I didn't have that much money he again said no. I then offered him $1 million for the ice cream cone. He said I don't have that much money. So I said I have 50 cents and offered him 50 cents for it.

In the span of 5 minutes the price of one ice cream cone went up millions of percent and then the bubble popped and crashed. That was the biggest bubble in history. It should be recorded. The economic impact was felt for years after that, the recovery felt by all.
Never heard of that dude. Doesn't seem like he's worth knowing either if he argues like a toddler?
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:30:27 PM

Oh cool, war talk!


Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.


I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).

Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.

Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Look. Look at the fucking numbers you are quoting. Where do you see higher numbers on the axis side? Point it out. Dickwad.
No seriously, what the fuck happened here?
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1660


born once atheist


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:33:02 PM


My crushed bull soul on ice is getting flat. Need some fresh FUD in it ASAP

I think you need to say "crushed bull" again...its kinda sexy....
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 799



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:35:50 PM

Oh cool, war talk!


Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.


I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).

Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.

Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Look. Look at the fucking numbers you are quoting. Where do you see higher numbers on the axis side? Point it out. Dickwad.
No seriously, what the fuck happened here?
Perhaps he compared the bold figures only and considered the gaps to not be large enough to justify those metaphors? Fuck knows.
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 281


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 08:58:23 PM

Did someone mention total war against the Jews until not a single one of the demonic rats is left standing?

yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2418
Merit: 1289



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:18:45 PM
Merited by BlindMayorBitcorn (1)

hmmm... might have to tell Grandma to avoid this thread when she asks about my bitcorns...

Maybe if we get Lambchop back, she'll see some content more to her liking...
rolling
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 706
Merit: 624


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:19:21 PM
Merited by BlindMayorBitcorn (1)

this recent ETH/BTC peg at .1 is eerie...and boring AF

I agree, it needs to get back to 0.01 where it belongs.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 4293


Be a bank


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:24:36 PM

Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead

Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!

Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough

In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1022


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:30:13 PM

Oh cool, war talk!


Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.


I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).

Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.

Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Look. Look at the fucking numbers you are quoting. Where do you see higher numbers on the axis side? Point it out. Dickwad.
No seriously, what the fuck happened here?

Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1107



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:32:28 PM

Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead

Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!

Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough

In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.

Not sure many people consider this crash a crash. I mean, I do, but I'm seeing too much on the optimism charts to think we'll go anywhere that low again anytime soon.

NB. My doom indicators are also becoming weaker.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1107



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:36:36 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Also note, for anyone keeping score, that my 5% cash-out sort of became my trading stash. I got roached out at the bottom. Roll Eyes
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 799



View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:39:40 PM

Oh cool, war talk!


Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.


I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).

Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.

Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Look. Look at the fucking numbers you are quoting. Where do you see higher numbers on the axis side? Point it out. Dickwad.
No seriously, what the fuck happened here?

Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.
20m vs 3,8m paints quite a different picture.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1877


Inverse Bearish Spike Indicator!


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:56:32 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

8185 gonna get broken soon

The neeto thing about using a sockpuppet is the lack of accountability...  If you happen to be right you can prance around gloating.  But when you are wrong, you can just slink back into the shadows, and fire up the next sock puppet for round 2.  Or 3... or 300?

But your screenshot gives us some clues Wink

Running win 7 with a minimalist win95 sort of theme and firefox.  Makes you late forties... early 50s.  And how's the weather in New Zealand?  Because I know it would be pretty damn cold there in that part of Russia that Ms. Palin can see from her back porch.
infofront
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 2131


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
February 11, 2018, 09:56:50 PM


Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.

Hitler was a retard when it came to military science. His strategies were terrible, and his micromanagement was even worse. If he would've left the war to the generals, most of Eurasia would be speaking German now.
Pages: « 1 ... 19462 19463 19464 19465 19466 19467 19468 19469 19470 19471 19472 19473 19474 19475 19476 19477 19478 19479 19480 19481 19482 19483 19484 19485 19486 19487 19488 19489 19490 19491 19492 19493 19494 19495 19496 19497 19498 19499 19500 19501 19502 19503 19504 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19511 [19512] 19513 19514 19515 19516 19517 19518 19519 19520 19521 19522 19523 19524 19525 19526 19527 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 ... 27400 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!