Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 03:06:58 PM |
|
Words have meanings. I am not renumerated by others for my BCH advocacy. Accordingly, I am not a shill.
Language changes news at eleven. Have you not noticed, you silly old fossil? Lotsa the young now use 'shill' to mean 'advocate' or 'adherent' and they use 'paid shill' to mean that insult that scares you so, the older-fashioned 'shill'. I am a bitcoin shill. You are a shitcoin shill. Deal with it lol. He is, however, profiting from doing so, which is an indirect form of shilling. That's not the problem. The problem is that a lot of you use it simply as a catch-all to shut people up. Again no. It is your problem not 'the' problem. You don't like it, fine, good, but own it, say 'my problem'. I don't happen to agree, as I reckon we would all be better off if the language police could fuck off and leave us to shutting a lot more people the fuck up by whatever means necessary. Things that affect us all, affect us all. Even if you can't see it. And you ARE the language police. Every time you call someone a shill who is not actually shilling anything, that's policing. It's calling someone a wrongthinker. And if you don't know what that means then go read 1984. Actually read it, don't just google that term. Someone once said shilling doesn't mean anything. Oh wait that was you. You were right, it's lost almost all of its negative meaning nowadays. And don't do that - go and ~do homework~ read such and such children's book. fuck that we all read that shit in kindergarten ffs, and at o-level and again when we grew up. If it's all new to you , fine, but wake me up when you've read half what I have that is relevant to this. Oh wait you'll never catch up because of your cruel confirmation bias. In the meantime, you're back on ignore. You can have the last words, as all you seem to want to do is get your own point across. I said it doesn't mean anything beyond "shut up". Which is how you are using it, again, right here. And did you just call 1984 a childrens book with a straight face? And for the record, no. What I want is to be wrong. So help me out. It's the only way to learn.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4923
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 03:10:28 PM |
|
may the Lord bless and keep Roger...far away from us
|
|
|
|
|
TReano
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 03:58:23 PM |
|
If you haven't seen this before it's worth a watch. Andreas explains why Big Blocks are not going to work. (watch time: 5-6mins, Petabyte Blocks & Streaming Money) https://youtu.be/AecPrwqjbGw?t=11m39she is talking about how big block sizes would make bitcoin centralized (because he knows how Computing technologie would develop in the next 10 years ofc.) Even if so: LN is by design centralized. So whats that argument even about?
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:02:55 PM |
|
If you haven't seen this before it's worth a watch. Andreas explains why Big Blocks are not going to work. (watch time: 5-6mins, Petabyte Blocks & Streaming Money) https://youtu.be/AecPrwqjbGw?t=11m39sSegwit in its current form can't handle hundreds of millions of users either. That was never what it was about. We needed a step up, a year earlier than we got it, and we had a few options to do so. For the current leg, and I repeat myself yet again, why was segwit better than simply doubling the blocksize? Nobody seems willing to explain that bit, for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:06:30 PM Merited by BobLawblaw (1) |
|
So, really this time, positive things about bcashers.
The old man has finally lost it. Sad 
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:06:54 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
The point is that people who are not shilling anything are being called shills. It's exactly the same process as when lefties call peoples nazis. It doesn't mean anything anymore, beyond "shut up".
The point is that people who come in here criticizing Bitcoin for being somehow broken, or not working as intended, when the exact *opposite* is true, do need to be told to SHUT THE FUCK UP. So, really this time, positive things about bcashers.
Why don't you fuck off if we don't care to answer your fkn forced question that no one asked for or even gives a shit about? BCashers are deluded idiots, sorry.
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 5784
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:08:34 PM |
|
If you haven't seen this before it's worth a watch. Andreas explains why Big Blocks are not going to work. (watch time: 5-6mins, Petabyte Blocks & Streaming Money) https://youtu.be/AecPrwqjbGw?t=11m39she is talking about how big block sizes would make bitcoin centralized (because he knows how Computing technologie would develop in the next 10 years ofc.) Even if so: LN is by design centralized. So whats that argument even about? I think your assertion that LN is centralized needs proof, Jonald. To the extent LN becomes a distributed network with nodes that handle different amounts of traffic we could arguably move in the direction of less centralization but there are two points worth making. Early days. The protocol can be extended to improve it's distribution. High speed, low fee payments, Improved privacy, cross atomic swaps, deferred settlements, all outweigh the small amount of centralization, imo.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:11:10 PM |
|
For the current leg, and I repeat myself yet again, why was segwit better than simply doubling the blocksize? Nobody seems willing to explain that bit, for whatever reason.
Answer why doubling the block size is even needed at this point in time. With actual logic and facts to back your argument.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 9392
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:12:11 PM |
|
Dude, we've already visited the China/bicycle issue in this thread; been there meme'd that. Try to keep up! I don't really have a need for a surplus bike atm... too bad the bicycles weren't Bitcoin.  ...dreaming
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:12:38 PM |
|
The point is that people who are not shilling anything are being called shills. It's exactly the same process as when lefties call peoples nazis. It doesn't mean anything anymore, beyond "shut up".
The point is that people who come in here criticizing Bitcoin for being somehow broken, or not working as intended, when the exact *opposite* is true, do need to be told to SHUT THE FUCK UP. Never said that. I said that bigger blocks would have been a better solution. Can you explain why I'm wrong, with something other than emotional outbursts?
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:13:50 PM |
|
Never said that. I said that bigger blocks would have been a better solution. Can you explain why I'm wrong, with something other than emotional outbursts?
Answer why doubling the block size is even needed at this point in time. With actual logic and facts to back your argument. Or, ya know, stfu.
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:15:34 PM Last edit: June 28, 2018, 04:26:20 PM by Anon136 |
|
Even if so: LN is by design centralized.
This is the big fallacy. Bro, Even if LN is centralized (debatable but it is more centralized in some aspects by necessity) that doesn't make Bitcoin more or less centralized because Lightning Network ISN'T BITCOIN.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:16:27 PM |
|
For the current leg, and I repeat myself yet again, why was segwit better than simply doubling the blocksize? Nobody seems willing to explain that bit, for whatever reason.
Answer why doubling the block size is even needed at this point in time. With actual logic and facts to back your argument. Stop putting words in my mouth already.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:18:21 PM |
|
Even if so: LN is by design centralized.
This is the big fallacy. Bro, Lightning Network does't make bitcoin centralized because Lightning Network ISN'T BITCOIN. So it's not bitcoin being moved around?
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:22:02 PM |
|
Even if so: LN is by design centralized.
This is the big fallacy. Bro, Lightning Network does't make bBitcoin centralized because Lightning Network ISN'T BITCOIN. So it's not bitcoin being moved around? Sorry you are right. FTFY
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:24:39 PM |
|
For the current leg, and I repeat myself yet again, why was segwit better than simply doubling the blocksize? Nobody seems willing to explain that bit, for whatever reason.
Answer why doubling the block size is even needed at this point in time. With actual logic and facts to back your argument. Stop putting words in my mouth already. I can't put words in your mouth, because your foot is stuck in there already. Quit trollin'.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 9392
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:25:33 PM |
|
Ok. I will learn to steal groceries. Let's do this thing.  Are we so poor now? Damn, this is getting ugly too fast. Guys, we don't need to resort to theft; there is food for hodlers:  ...and less sodium means less blockchain bloat.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
|
 |
June 28, 2018, 04:26:14 PM |
|
@crandl Rumors circulating that Facebook buying @coinbase for $18BB and investors euphoric after $8.5BB last round. Crypto experts think @RobinhoodApp a much better buy.for $FB . #bitcoin #crypto @zerohedge 5:06 PM - 28 Jun 2018
FAKE NEWS aka 'buy my bags'
|
|
|
|
|