Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2020, 02:41:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How much of your corn do you plan on cashing out in the next massive bull run?
None - 27 (19.9%)
1-10% - 18 (13.2%)
11-20% - 15 (11%)
21-30% - 19 (14%)
31-40% - 7 (5.1%)
41-50% - 15 (11%)
51-60% - 9 (6.6%)
61-70% - 6 (4.4%)
71-80% - 4 (2.9%)
81-90% - 2 (1.5%)
91-99% - 3 (2.2%)
100% - 11 (8.1%)
Total Voters: 136

Pages: « 1 ... 23190 23191 23192 23193 23194 23195 23196 23197 23198 23199 23200 23201 23202 23203 23204 23205 23206 23207 23208 23209 23210 23211 23212 23213 23214 23215 23216 23217 23218 23219 23220 23221 23222 23223 23224 23225 23226 23227 23228 23229 23230 23231 23232 23233 23234 23235 23236 23237 23238 23239 [23240] 23241 23242 23243 23244 23245 23246 23247 23248 23249 23250 23251 23252 23253 23254 23255 23256 23257 23258 23259 23260 23261 23262 23263 23264 23265 23266 23267 23268 23269 23270 23271 23272 23273 23274 23275 23276 23277 23278 23279 23280 23281 23282 23283 23284 23285 23286 23287 23288 23289 23290 ... 27115 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21799286 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (148 posts by 37 users deleted.)
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 4004


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:26:42 PM

hello 5K
Bump Roll Eyes
1597416068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597416068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597416068
Reply with quote  #2

1597416068
Report to moderator
1597416068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597416068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597416068
Reply with quote  #2

1597416068
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1597416068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597416068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597416068
Reply with quote  #2

1597416068
Report to moderator
1597416068
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597416068

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597416068
Reply with quote  #2

1597416068
Report to moderator
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1040


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:32:20 PM
Merited by HairyMaclairy (1)

I think he’s very likely to be a paid shill.

You can consider it likely if you want. But I am not paid for my advocacy of Bitcoins in any flavor, be it SV, BCH, or BTC. Meantime, half of y'all are whoring out your reputations to shill some crap product in y'all's sigs. Imagine the irony.
I would never expect you to be a shill, I think they have you and most of the BCH community wrong. I just think you are all very ideological and wanting Bitcoin to be a digital cash and see no use of anything not directly on the blockchain. No second layer no whatnot,

I don't have any issue with second layer innovation, per se. What galls me is that Blockstream and the rest of Core deliberately crippled Layer 1 in order to accomplish their layer 2 'innovation'. Which, for all intents and purposes, still sucks two years down the line.



Oh for fucks sake it's not crippling it's simply preferring security, distribution and censorship resistance OVER EVERYTHING ELSE.

NO EXCEPTIONS!

So no I don't give a fuck if you have to pay high fees for your level 1 transaction. If you do, fuck of to one of the trash versions of Bitcoin and stay there.

The simple fact that you have not learned this simple fact after 3 years of this "discussion" means you are willfully ignorant and purposely trolling this topic.

See now you even tricked me into responding. This will be my one and only post on the topic.
kingcolex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1248



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:33:10 PM

I think he’s very likely to be a paid shill.

You can consider it likely if you want. But I am not paid for my advocacy of Bitcoins in any flavor, be it SV, BCH, or BTC. Meantime, half of y'all are whoring out your reputations to shill some crap product in y'all's sigs. Imagine the irony.
I would never expect you to be a shill, I think they have you and most of the BCH community wrong. I just think you are all very ideological and wanting Bitcoin to be a digital cash and see no use of anything not directly on the blockchain. No second layer no whatnot,

I don't have any issue with second layer innovation, per se. What galls me is that Blockstream and the rest of Core deliberately crippled Layer 1 in order to accomplish their layer 2 'innovation'. Which, for all intents and purposes, still sucks two years down the line.


I think layer 1 isn't crippled but we didn't have a size increase just for the ability to do so. We aren't filling the current blocks, when we consistently have close to full 2mb blocks we can have the fun little discussion on 4mb blocks.

No need to rush to wildly large blocks just for theoretical reasons.
VB1001
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 2140


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 04:34:55 PM

Well, Rick is off jet-setting around the globe, somewhere, to attend some fancy event, and I'm left home alone this weekend.

Thinking of consuming 7mg of dried mushrooms and talking to Jah and The Flying Spaghetti Monster tonight.

What could possibly go wrong ?

- Do exercise
- Read a good book
- Plan a trip
- Order dinner at home
- Then you go back to WO and you tell us. Wink

julian071
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 949
Merit: 574



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:41:09 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)


The human condition is complete shit.


If that is your state of mind currently, taking hallucinogenics might not be the best choice of the substances that are available.

I wish everyone a great weekend, and you especially Bob!
kingcolex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1248



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:43:38 PM

I am pleasantly surprised to see we aren't pushed down to lower to mid 4s. That's where I figured we would go.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 4004


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:45:47 PM

I am pleasantly surprised to see we aren't pushed down to lower to mid 4s. That's where I figured we would go.

I think most would of think that.... could still, though I always hope for the PUMP, gotta know me by NOW Tongue
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1490


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:48:11 PM
Last edit: April 05, 2019, 05:37:14 PM by jbreher

Still unanswered: How LN is going to help when Layer 1 is already clogged to the point of uselessness.

We will cross that bridge when we get there.  

If this price pump continues, we could get there next week. Unfortunately, there is no solution on the horizon under discussion.

And, get the fuck out of here with your exaggeration that there is no plan in BTC..

OK, JJG. Tell me what the plan is to deal with the fact that once blocks are persistently full, then average fees rise uncontrollably, average wait times raise uncontrollably, LN channel openings and closings get economically prohibitive, and number of new entrants gets hard-capped.

What is the plan, JJG - what is the plan?

Bitcoin don't no need additional plan,

So you admit that the bolded statement of yours above was an untruthful attack.

Nope.  I am not admitting that bitcoin has no plan. I am just cursorily dismissing your assertion that whatever is going on in bitcoin is deficient in terms of preparing for the future.  

OK, so you keep asserting that BTC has a plan to deal with the negative effects of persistently full blocks. HOWEVER, after repeated requests to reveal what that plan actually consists of, you do nothing but deflect and dissemble. I call BullShit.

Quote
I like bitcoin's conservative approach.

Then you are deluded. BTC's The SegWit Omnibus Changeset was the most radical change ever to be foisted upon Bitcoin, from every discernable dimension. It changed the protocol radically, it changed the supported use cases radically, it changed the economics radically, and it drove a huge percentage of Bitcoiners to greener pastures.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 4004


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:48:28 PM

via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1114207622658449408?s=21
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1598


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:48:28 PM

Just watch, we'll be stuck at 6502 soon enough.....
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1490


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:50:24 PM

blocksize increase would not have stopped the stupid ass forks.. unless it were to break bitcoin, which was part of their goal to change bitcoin's governance and make bitcoin easier to change.....

Again with the delusion. One of the major 'features' in The SegWit Omnibus Changeset was for the sole stated purpose of making Bitcoin easier to change in the future.
kingcolex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1248



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:50:53 PM

Still unanswered: How LN is going to help when Layer 1 is already clogged to the point of uselessness.

We will cross that bridge when we get there.  

If this price pump continues, we could get there next week. Unfortunately, there is no solution on the horizon under discussion.

And, get the fuck out of here with your exaggeration that there is no plan in BTC..

OK, JJG. Tell me what the plan is to deal with the fact that once blocks are persistently full, then average fees rise uncontrollably, average wait times raise uncontrollably, LN channel openings and closings get economically prohibitive, and number of new entrants gets hard-capped.

What is the plan, JJG - what is the plan?

Bitcoin don't no need additional plan,

So you admit that the bolded statement of yours above was an untruthful attack.

Nope.  I am not admitting that bitcoin has no plan. I am just cursorily dismissing your assertion that whatever is going on in bitcoin is deficient in terms of preparing for the future. 

OK, so you keep asserting that BTC has a plan do deal with the negative effects of persistently full blocks. HOWEVER, after repeated requests to reveal what that plan actually consists of, you do nothing but deflect and dissemble. I call BullShit.

Quote
I like bitcoin's conservative approach. 

Then you are deluded. BTC's The SegWit Omnibus Changeset was the most radical change ever to be foisted upon Bitcoin, from every discernable dimension. It changed the protocol radically, it changed the supported use cases radically, it changed the economics radically, and it drove a huge percentage of Bitcoiners to greener pastures.
Now let's be fair Jbreher, I really don't think anyone is going to agree that the shitshow of bch and bchsv is "Greener Pastures"
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 4004


#STAYinsideSTAYdrunk *the dude*


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 04:51:59 PM

Just watch, we'll be stuck at 6502 soon enough.....

Price rises .... did you sell any?
Cause most times that what’s causing a rise or am I wrong??
VB1001
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 2140


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2019, 05:06:40 PM

Coinbase CEO Names Three Things Crypto Needs for Mass Adoption

Brian Armstrong, CEO of major United States cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase,
believes that crypto mass adoption mostly depends on volatility, scalability and usability.


https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinbase-ceo-names-three-things-crypto-needs-for-mass-adoption

Thinking head. Cheesy
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1712



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:10:38 PM

blocksize increase would not have stopped the stupid ass forks.. unless it were to break bitcoin, which was part of their goal to change bitcoin's governance and make bitcoin easier to change.....

Again with the delusion. One of the major 'features' in The SegWit Omnibus Changeset was for the sole stated purpose of making Bitcoin easier to change in the future.

jbreher..

What is your actual point?  Seriously...can you dumb it down for all us plebs and just state what the problems are and how you would fix them. In simple non technical terms so we can all follow along at home.

Thank you.
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 1800


You're never too old to be young.


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:13:29 PM

Just watch, we'll be stuck at 6502 soon enough.....

6502?

Now you're taking me back.... MOS Technology's "little chip that could".

Pretty much sparked the microcomputer/homePC revolution (and console gaming too). Remember the Apple II, Commodore 64, Atari and Nintendo? All 6502.

My first attempt to learn assembly language was with a 6502 for dummies book. I guess I was too much of a dummy, retreated back to the simpler world of MSbasic.

Those were exciting times, just as they are for Bitcoin now.

Thanx for the memories.
hodl_2015
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 56


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:14:26 PM

Ah thanks. Interesting an abandoned websites keeps running for so long. Of course I saw they never removed old exchanges such as btc-e.
That is what abandoned websites do. I once looked up the local Chinese restaurant in a small village, They had an extensive website with route description. We also looked through the on-line menu and already made our choice before we got into the car. When we got there we found that the restaurant didn't exist any more. Current owner confirmed that we where at the correct place, and that it was indeed a Chinese restaurant several years ago.
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 2067



View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:23:53 PM
Merited by BobLawblaw (1)

I am sorry if this is a repost:


https://twitter.com/PeterLBrandt/status/1114150288007421952

Quote
Either from Dec '18 low or from retest of same (circa analog dbl bottom in 2015) it would not surprise me if $BTC enters a new parabolic phase. $btcusd

This dude says BTC can hit $50k next year. It is not $100k but i guess many of us would still like it.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1490


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:29:41 PM

I think he’s very likely to be a paid shill.

You can consider it likely if you want. But I am not paid for my advocacy of Bitcoins in any flavor, be it SV, BCH, or BTC. Meantime, half of y'all are whoring out your reputations to shill some crap product in y'all's sigs. Imagine the irony.
I would never expect you to be a shill, I think they have you and most of the BCH community wrong. I just think you are all very ideological and wanting Bitcoin to be a digital cash and see no use of anything not directly on the blockchain. No second layer no whatnot,

I don't have any issue with second layer innovation, per se. What galls me is that Blockstream and the rest of Core deliberately crippled Layer 1 in order to accomplish their layer 2 'innovation'. Which, for all intents and purposes, still sucks two years down the line.



Oh for fucks sake it's not crippling it's simply preferring security, distribution and censorship resistance OVER EVERYTHING ELSE.

Your assertion is not supported by any factual analysis that I have ever seen. Show your work.
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1040


View Profile
April 05, 2019, 05:32:50 PM

Ok you're retarded. I'll add you to my ignore list you're the third to manage that ever. Good bye.

People please don't quote him.
Pages: « 1 ... 23190 23191 23192 23193 23194 23195 23196 23197 23198 23199 23200 23201 23202 23203 23204 23205 23206 23207 23208 23209 23210 23211 23212 23213 23214 23215 23216 23217 23218 23219 23220 23221 23222 23223 23224 23225 23226 23227 23228 23229 23230 23231 23232 23233 23234 23235 23236 23237 23238 23239 [23240] 23241 23242 23243 23244 23245 23246 23247 23248 23249 23250 23251 23252 23253 23254 23255 23256 23257 23258 23259 23260 23261 23262 23263 23264 23265 23266 23267 23268 23269 23270 23271 23272 23273 23274 23275 23276 23277 23278 23279 23280 23281 23282 23283 23284 23285 23286 23287 23288 23289 23290 ... 27115 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!