Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[VB1001]

Fix It...


Double

Thanks, some mistake had to be, my eyes are quite fatigued.

Already solved.

+ 1sM


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50825369#msg50825369

[1597503596]

1597503596

[1597503596]

1597503596

[1597503596]

1597503596

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I must wear the bitcasino avatar

You slut.

fudgepacker

Chocolate Chimney Sweeper

Rump Ranger
Colon Jockey
Colon Cowboy
Chocolate Pain

... are some additional terms that are dear to me.

Uphill Gardener

[alevlaslo]

sell BTC and buy BSV, will equal in price




[img ]https://www.FULLofSHITand DESPERATE/x/WD9D77oj/[/img]

NO

BSV only one altcoin which can go in the direction opposite to the falling crypto market

[bitcoinPsycho]

sell BTC and buy BSV, will equal in price




[img ]https://www.FULLofSHITand DESPERATE/x/WD9D77oj/[/img]

NO

BSV only one altcoin which can go in the direction opposite to the falling crypto market

Go fuck yourself

[Real_Ramsey]

Funding rates to borrow $BTC on Bitfinex hitting 100%+ annualized. This funding has rippled to Bitmex as well.

At these rates, it takes a little over one month for a 10x short to get liquidated even if BTC doesn't move. A 50x short gets liquidated in under a week.

https://twitter.com/zhusu/status/1122527945094905856

[LFC_Bitcoin]

BSV only one altcoin which can go in the direction opposite to the falling crypto market

BSV is dead bruh!

[LFC_Bitcoin]

https://twitter.com/BtcBlockBot/status/1122925043783225344

Elwar ? Is that you ? 

Is was gembitz.

No wait it wasn’t, it really, really wasn’t.

[kingcolex]

Fix It...


Double

Double your pleasure Double your fun! It's double mint gum!

PS holy fuck I've been on this site for almost 7 years.

[d_eddie]

sell BTC and buy BSV, will equal in price

[img ]https://www.FULLofSHITand DESPERATE/x/WD9D77oj/[/img]

NO

BSV only one altcoin which can go in the direction opposite to the falling crypto market

Go fuck yourself

Even the Roach is occasionally able to deliver more engaging content, alev. Cut it. Thanks.

[kingcolex]

sell BTC and buy BSV, will equal in price




[img ]https://www.FULLofSHITand DESPERATE/x/WD9D77oj/[/img]

NO

BSV only one altcoin which can go in the direction opposite to the falling crypto market

It's fun to see dweebs being fucking idiots and knowing they're going to lose their money.

BSV is trash.

[kingcolex]

https://twitter.com/BtcBlockBot/status/1122925043783225344

Elwar ? Is that you ? 

Hopefully he bought a new Trezor he has the private keys to now.

[MrFreeRoMan]

Double your pleasure Double your fun! It's double mint gum!

PS holy fuck I've been on this site for almost 7 years.

It's double mint gum

[jbreher]

Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

[alevlaslo]

BTC 8 tps
BCH 80 tps
BSV 800 tps

[siggy_77]

Funding rates to borrow $BTC on Bitfinex hitting 100%+ annualized. This funding has rippled to Bitmex as well.

At these rates, it takes a little over one month for a 10x short to get liquidated even if BTC doesn't move. A 50x short gets liquidated in under a week.

https://twitter.com/zhusu/status/1122527945094905856

So, if I had funds stuck in Bitfinex (I don't) that I couldn't get out, and was resigned to that fact... what would I do?

I'd say "fuck it" and make some very high risk margin trades, figuring that I've prolly lost my money anyways.   On the slim chance that Bitfinex gets through this and stays solvent, I could potentially come out with a huge windfall on funds that I had already written off.

With the above thinking, it does not surprise me that there is a huge demand for margin on that platform at this moment.

[alevlaslo]

Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

BTC will not be able to increase the block size because in this case it will have to cancel the Seqwit, which will not allow the signed transactions from Satoshi's wallets to work in January 2020

[kingcolex]

Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

Cool so how about if someone spammed Bchsv (I think that's the shitcoin flavor you're favoring now) and pumped out multiple spam attacks to the 128mb blocks for only 1 week. Now that would be an increase of 129gb. Let's say some bad actor like Roger came and kept at it (like he did to btc) and kept I up for let's say 2 months.
That's an extra 1.032 Terabyte, that's not too much to handle but i bet you'd have those on the bsv subreddits and forums complaining that they can't keep up, and being mad about spam. Especially since that community is moreso mad broke kids who missed out on real btc and want a redo.

TBH a bad actor could easily inflate bsv to 6.7 terabyte a year and possibly more if they had miners having to increase block sizes or the community being mad that they have to pay fees to be in the blocks.

[kingcolex]

Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

BTC will not be able to increase the block size because in this case it will have to cancel the Seqwit, which will not allow the signed transactions from Satoshi's wallets to work in January 2020

You're wrong quit spreading false information trying to justify your bullshit at least Jbreher stays honest.

[vapourminer]

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

a race to the bottom?

just how big a datacenter and monthly cost will eventually be needed to run bsv with its "everything including the kitchen sink" philosophy? to the point only billionaires and humongous companies etc can afford it?

is there any upper limit? i am genuinely curious.

[bitserve]

Bitcoin increases blocksize and shows it was indeed needing to have larger blocks (which then are filled with nonsense and can push nodes off)

Larger blocks are inanimate. Regardless of size, blocks do not have the power to 'push (so-called) nodes off' of anything. Bitcoin does not owe you a position in its network. Either expend the resources required, or drop to the side in your inability to keep up. Decision is fully yours. Own it.

BTC will not be able to increase the block size because in this case it will have to cancel the Seqwit, which will not allow the signed transactions from Satoshi's wallets to work in January 2020

I don't even have words to describe the level of retardness shown in each part of the above statement. Please stop it already.