Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 02:06:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 59 (86.8%)
$48,000 - 9 (13.2%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 23451 23452 23453 23454 23455 23456 23457 23458 23459 23460 23461 23462 23463 23464 23465 23466 23467 23468 23469 23470 23471 23472 23473 23474 23475 23476 23477 23478 23479 23480 23481 23482 23483 23484 23485 23486 23487 23488 23489 23490 23491 23492 23493 23494 23495 [23496] 23497 23498 23499 23500 23501 23502 23503 23504 23505 23506 23507 23508 23509 23510 23511 23512 23513 23514 23515 23516 23517 23518 23519 23520 23521 23522 23523 23524 23525 23526 23527 23528 23529 23530 23531 23532 23533 23534 23535 23536 23537 23538 23539 23540 23541 23542 23543 23544 23545 23546 ... 33172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26330427 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
soxxx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 256
Merit: 62


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:07:36 AM

Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.
1710813979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710813979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710813979
Reply with quote  #2

1710813979
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710813979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710813979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710813979
Reply with quote  #2

1710813979
Report to moderator
1710813979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710813979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710813979
Reply with quote  #2

1710813979
Report to moderator
1710813979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710813979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710813979
Reply with quote  #2

1710813979
Report to moderator
GreatArkansas
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2254
Merit: 1338


Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2019, 03:10:04 AM

7k tonight? Cheesy
Make it 8k   Grin.

Lot of shitcoins dropping while the king is soaring!
Phil_S
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2087
Merit: 1456


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:12:00 AM

Not-Monday not-crash. Smiley
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:13:31 AM

Holy shit Bitstamp nearly touched $6k.  For reals.
Lambie Slayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 707



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:19:13 AM

7k tonight? Cheesy 8k tonight?  Cheesy
Make it 8k   Grin.

Lot of shitcoins dropping while the king is soaring!

Fixed Smiley
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 4080



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:32:29 AM

who has 2.6 trillion AUM?

rumor has it they might be getting into institutional

bigely pre pamp before terminal nocoiners get OTC and can enter the fray?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-06/fidelity-said-to-offer-cryptocurrency-trading-within-a-few-weeks


who knows..  dont care. 

regardless bitcoin continues to surge ahead.



new higher highs equal new fibs. thems the rules.  #dyor and buy the dips.
1h


4h


D

#stronghands
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2750
Merit: 1747


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:40:40 AM

guys, stop swearing, we need all three types of bitcoins at the same time: small blocks, medium blocks and large blocks
Maybe, maybe not.

But we certainly don't need CSW and his shitcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139844.msg50918896#msg50918896
Nobody needs BSV, period.

It's run by and associated with demonstrable human trash that deserves absolutely no spotlight.

I'm fine with jbreher advocating for larger blocks for technical reasons.


But CSW is obviously not interested in any technical argument. He isn't even competent enough to have one.
He's a filthy human scumbag that lies and deceives and can't produce a single original thought in his Master thesis.
His "winged" grades are worse than my grades with zero preparation or attendance.

And I'm certainly nowhere near capable enough to think up Bitcoin. So anyone south of me clearly isn't going to be either.

Add all the deception and plagiarism on top and you've got a piece of shit that should be ostracized by all of humanity, including any of his attempts to gain power.

For genius forgivable almost any behavior
1. No.

2. CSW is factually retarded, not a genius.

@alevlaslo lol who CSW??  Cheesy ok i'll engage, what would need to happen for you to admit that CSW is just a charlatan? That is, can you think of any outcome that would make you question your god (e.g. you'll disown him if he won't sign anything with Satoshi's keys by Jan 2020, or you'll disown him if Ayre's shill payment doesn't com in etc...)? So far you only put up a circular argument where CSW can do no wrong.
1-He doesn't want to prove that he's Satoshi because he's Satoshi
2-Every fart that comes out of his mouth is forgivable because he's Satoshi  
3-If you don't believe that he's Satoshi goto 1

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/166/kleiman-v-wright/

Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 1 of 4



                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                   SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                 CASE NO. 18-CIV-80176-Bloom/Reinhart


  IRA KLEIMAN, as personal representative of
  the estate of David Kleiman, and
  W&K INFO DEFENSE RESEARCH, LLC.

                 PlaintiffS,

         v.

  CRAIG WRIGHT

                 Defendant.

  ___________________________________/

   ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION REGARDING PRODUCTION OF A LIST OF
   THE PUBLIC ADDRESSES OF HIS BITCOIN AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 [DE 155]

         Before the Court is the Defendant’s Sealed Motion Regarding Production of a List of the

  Public Addresses of his Bitcoin as of December 31, 2013 (“the Bitcoin Holdings Motion.”) [DE

  155]. The Defendant filed a Motion to Seal the Bitcoin Holdings Motion, DE 151, which the

  undersigned granted. DE 153. Plaintiffs filed their Response under seal. DE 162. For the reasons

  stated below, the Court finds that redacted, unsealed versions of the Bitcoin Holdings Motion and

  the Plaintiffs’ Response to that motion can be filed in the public record. Nothing contained in the

  instant Order discloses material that remains under seal.

         The Court, sua sponte¸ has reconsidered its Order granting Dr. Wright’s Motion to Seal. It

  is this Court’s general policy that its proceedings are public and Court filings are matters of public

  record. SDFL Local Rule 5.4(a). A party seeking to seal materials related to a discovery motion

  must satisfy the burden for a Rule 26 protective order, that is, good cause. Chicago Tribune Co.

  v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 263 F.3d 1304, 1312-13 (11th Cir. 2001); FTC v. AbbVie Products,
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 2 of 4



  LLC, 713 F.3d 54, 63 (11th Cir. 2013). Having had the opportunity to review the party’s pleadings,

  the Court finds there is good cause to seal portions of the pleadings, but not the pleadings in their

  entirety.   Redacted versions of those pleadings can be filed in the public record without

  compromising the original purpose for sealing them. 1 The Court will allow the parties to be heard

  before finalizing its redactions.

          At issue is whether it would be unduly burdensome for Dr. Wright to produce a list of his

  bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013. This Court has held multiple discovery hearings that

  addressed issues relating to Dr. Wright’s current and past bitcoin holdings. DE 107 at 120-123;

  DE 122 at 61-63; DE 124 at 18-23. Ultimately, the Court ordered Dr. Wright to produce a list of

  his bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013, without prejudice to Dr. Wright filing a motion for

  protective order based on undue burden. DE 124 at 18-23.

          Thereafter, Dr. Wright filed an unverified motion in which he identified a number of

  bitcoin public addresses that he mined. Although not delineated as a Motion for Protective Order,

  that is what the pleading is. Dr. Wright asserted that he does not have a complete list of the public

  addresses he owned on any date, including December 31, 2013. He further asserted that in 2011

  he transferred ownership of all his bitcoin to a blind trust. Although he makes the conclusory

  statement that it would be unduly burdensome to produce a list of his bitcoin holdings as of

  December 31, 2013, this conclusion is not supported by facts. In essence, he does not argue undue

  burden, he argues impossibility. The argument that Dr. Wright is incapable of providing an

  accurate listing of his current or historical bitcoin holdings was never presented in any of the prior

  hearings before this Court, when the Court was crafting the scope of discovery. Notably, the



  1
   Remaining under seal are the names of non-parties and the identifying information for the amount
  and identity of certain bitcoin. In addition, discovery material attached to Plaintiffs’ Response as
  Exhibits 1 and 2 remains under seal.
                                                        2
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 3 of 4



  Bitcoin Holdings Motion does not refute the obvious response to this argument – get the

  information from the trustee of the blind trust.

         In response to Dr. Wright’s Motion, the Plaintiffs ask the Court to order the following

  additional discovery: (1) make Dr. Wright produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,

  2013; (2) make Dr. Wright identify all bitcoins he transferred to the blind trust in 2011; (3) make

  Dr. Wright produce documents related to the blind trust; (4) make Dr. Wright identify, under oath,

  the identity of the current and past trustees of the blind trust, the beneficiaries of the blind trust,

  and the manner in which the bitcoins were transferred to the blind trust; and (5) permit further

  deposition of Dr. Wright with regard to his ownership and control over bitcoins. DE 162 at 5-6.

  The Court finds that this additional discovery is warranted. The Court has already found that

  tracing Dr. Wright’s bitcoin holdings is relevant to the Plaintiffs’ theft claims. The order to

  produce a list of bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013, was a compromise; it was the Court’s

  attempt to provide Plaintiffs with relevant and material evidence without unduly burdening Dr.

  Wright. That Dr. Wright now argues it is not feasible for him to identify the bitcoin he held on

  December 31, 2013, does not diminish Plaintiffs’ entitlement to the pertinent evidence. That

  evidence can be obtained through other means, which the Court will authorize Plaintiffs to use.

         It is therefore ORDERED that:

         1. Dr. Wright’s Motion Regarding Production of a List of the Public Addresses of His

             Bitcoin as of December 31, 2013, [DE 155] which is deemed to be a Motion for

             Protective Order, is DENIED.

         2. The Order to Seal [DE 153] is modified to allow for the filing of redacted copies of DE

             155 and DE 162. The Court will provide copies of its proposed redacted pleadings to

             the parties, but will not yet file those redacted pleadings on the docket. The parties



                                                        3
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 4 of 4



             shall notify the Court by May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time if they seek additional

             redactions.

         3. On or before May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall provide to

             Plaintiffs a sworn declaration identifying the name and location of the blind trust, the

             name and contact information for the current trustee and any past trustees, and the

             names and contact information of any current or past beneficiaries.

         4. On or before May 9, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce to

             Plaintiffs a copy of any and all documents relating to the formation, administration, and

             operation of the blind trust.    The production shall be accompanied by a sworn

             declaration of authenticity.

         5. On or before May 15, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce all

             transactional records of the blind trust, including but not limited to any records

             reflecting the transfer of bitcoin into the blind trust in or about 2011. The production

             shall be accompanied by a sworn declaration of authenticity.

         6. Dr. Wright shall execute any and all documents, or other legal process, necessary to

             effectuate the release of documents in the possession, custody, or control of the Trustee.

         7. Any ruling on whether Dr. Wright’s deposition should be re-opened will be deferred

             pending the production described in this Order.

         DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers this 3rd day of May, 2019, at West Palm Beach in

  the Southern District of Florida.




                                             UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


                                                       4



So you'll disown CSW if he doesn't provide the above court ordered information by May 15th? Did i understand you correctly? e.g. If CSW won't provide info for any reason (including claiming that court has no jurisdiction over him etc...) you'll admit that CSW is a fraud and STFU about BSV forever??
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:47:52 AM

Yeah, US audiences are bored by poor people sending free remittances home, after it used to cost a bundle....
No one cares about all the bitcoin & crypto charities and non-profit orgs. that make the world a better place.
Not interesting that millions of unbankable women can have saving and spending power now

Who are you supposed to be, George Soros?  The only thing NGOs do is flood white countries with endless waves of noggers to try and destroy them (the Hooton & Kalergi Plan).  As for "unbankable women", how the hell is bitcoin useful for any of these 3rd worlders when transaction fees were like $50 each during the last pump and dump?  And NO, Lightning does JACK SHIT to solve that.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3413
Merit: 4319



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:50:27 AM

Nobody needs BSV, period.

It's run by and associated with demonstrable human trash that deserves absolutely no spotlight.


kenzawak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 851



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 03:58:33 AM
Last edit: May 07, 2019, 04:24:42 AM by kenzawak

avatar-sized

 


Loved the dragon - did you make it?


Well, now I feel kinda stupid.
I just found out it's not a dragon but a crane, a Japanese lucky charm (tsuru in Japanese : a symbol associated to new year and... marriage. It is said that if you make 1000 paper cranes, your wish will be granted).
A dragon would have looked like that :



Well I prefer mine and I'll keep saying that IT IS A DRAGON anyway !
rdbase
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1495


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2019, 03:58:50 AM

Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.
Might be cause cftc is thinking about approving futures just like bitcoin was late 2017.
https://www.coindesk.com/cftc-would-approve-ether-futures-if-asked-insider-says

I say concentrate on getting bitcoin back to the level it was when it was approved...
what a sec
That was probably the reason why it dropped 45% afterwards. Roll Eyes
Nevermind eth is doomed! Undecided
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:07:35 AM

Man, LED light bulbs really suck.  Bought both Phillips and GE Reveal (2700k + 2850k).  I think even CFLs might look better.  The LEDs cause all colors in the room to have this dull, gray look where colors, especially things like orange and red don't pop out at all.  Every color in the room feels like it's adjusted -20-30% saturation, then add some gray to it.  The GE reveal is supposed to be a 90 CRI (Color Rendering Index) to prevent this, but it's little improvement over the Phillips.  They also seem to have some disorentation/dizziness effect that you might find in some of the worst CFL bulbs.

There's a brand called SORAA that's supposed to be better than both, but I doubt it comes anywhere near an incandescent in terms of lighting qualify.  If you get a 800 Lumens LED bulb, it feels as uncomfortable as being next to a 1200 lumens incandescent while using the computer.  The GE Reveal is ONLY 650 Lumens and still feels uncomfortably harsh and as irritating as sitting next to a 1000 lumens incandescent while reading or whatever.  I'm guessing the only one that would be remotely bearable are the 550 Lumens SORA ones, but like I said, still probably suck compared to incandescent.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3122
Merit: 4271


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:16:48 AM

so I am going down for reboot, it has been many weeks

I found this notepad under everything...not sure what I was going to do with it...

Quote
lobsters all the way down

burst in his face and drown him in the pus of righteousness

run early and run fast before the government has time to get organized

a free man and a dreamer, far more dangerous than a nuclear aircraft carrier
kenzawak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 851



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:18:59 AM

@kenzawak

A few tips for vegetarian/vegan food in Tokyo


CAFETE, fairly central, Ryogoku/Asakusa
Only 13 seats. Lunch till 2 PM and coffee till 4 PM, then it closes.
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/989


Inochi no gohan Tsukifune
It is advised to reserve for vegetarian/vegan, take the Chuo line from Shinjuku (25 mins approximately)
Not too central maybe, but food and atmosphere worth the bother
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/1639


Manu Ku, in Tsukishima, vegetarian or vegan
closed on Wednesdays and Thursdays
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/1357


Himi Zutsuchi, in Higashi Ginza (metro Hibiya line)
Maybe a bit more costly, it's Ginza after all
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/946


Ki to Mizu to Tsuchi, in posh Omotesando
Pancake, cafe, casual Japanese cuisine
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/1725


Saido, in Jiyugaoka
Closed on Wednesdays
From Shibuya, Tokyu Toyoko line
https://vegewel.com/ja/restaurant/1656


Thanks, I appreciate it.  Wink
Smerit coming to you when I refill.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:21:50 AM

A bit of crypto satire
Quote
Adam Back questioned on his support of fraudulent exchange Bitfinex, starts screaming "CRAIG WRIGHT"
May 05, 2019

But honestly, this lightning shit isn’t working out as planned, the number of active channels on the lightning network is actually falling believe it or not,

I can believe it.  The concept of 'funding channels' is nothing but a vendor lock-in facilitator that's not conducive to how people want to handle their monetary affairs at a retail level.  It's something that only really belongs on the BACKEND of two exchanges doing some kind of arb.  Then the only network topology that can form in the real world is you opening a channel to a bank and having them route all your transactions from there since they will be far more connected than you are with more liquidity to each party.

Not true. We only need some big merchants (like amazon) to connect for the LN to be useful for every retail client. Like now, there are too little sites who use LN, and they are at most experimental....so right, there are no many reasons to lock your coins as now, but that' only because the immaturity of the system.

What in the fuck is your malfunction, son?  Amazon is a MONOPOLY that needs to be broken up, NOT becoming an EVEN BIGGER monopoly where you just open a single Lightning Network channel to them and it's the ONLY STORE YOU EVER SHOP AT for the rest of your life (your scenario where Lightning Network is actually useful).  Like I said, the whole channels bullshit is nothing but a vendor lock-in mechanism that would further the cause of corporate & banking monopolies.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:46:19 AM

7k tonight? Cheesy

Looks like you be in a process to rejuvenate some optimism, here?

We had witnessed a few hairy days, in which you had revealed some kinks in your BTCxxx BTCxxx armor.... hahahahahahaha

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 9981


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:48:34 AM

Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.


Who, here, besides you, and a few troll/shills gives any shits about that crap?
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:50:13 AM

Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.

Who, here, besides you, and a few troll/shills gives any shits about that crap?

It's Goldman Sachs Jew shills.  Tons of these banker douchebags are bagholding Ethereum.  They better watch out, JayJuanGee's own mama says he's a dangerous thug.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 4080



View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:55:16 AM
Merited by bones261 (2)

The Bears are on their heels, make no mistake about it. They are battered but not broken however. Time to prepare for the death blow.


Company!  Lances at the ready..!      Gentlemen...at a gallop.   Charge!




1h


4h


D

#MCC2019


FrodoBagHolder
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 07, 2019, 04:55:51 AM
Merited by Toxic2040 (1)

Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.

Who, here, besides you, and a few troll/shills gives any shits about that crap?

It's Goldman Sachs Jew shills.  Tons of these banker douchebags are bagholding Ethereum.  They better watch out, JayJuanGee's own mama says he's a dangerous thug.

Love how you only show up when they REALLY need FUD. Lol. Been lurking for a while now and you’re a hoot Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 23451 23452 23453 23454 23455 23456 23457 23458 23459 23460 23461 23462 23463 23464 23465 23466 23467 23468 23469 23470 23471 23472 23473 23474 23475 23476 23477 23478 23479 23480 23481 23482 23483 23484 23485 23486 23487 23488 23489 23490 23491 23492 23493 23494 23495 [23496] 23497 23498 23499 23500 23501 23502 23503 23504 23505 23506 23507 23508 23509 23510 23511 23512 23513 23514 23515 23516 23517 23518 23519 23520 23521 23522 23523 23524 23525 23526 23527 23528 23529 23530 23531 23532 23533 23534 23535 23536 23537 23538 23539 23540 23541 23542 23543 23544 23545 23546 ... 33172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!