fillippone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 17348
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2023, 09:45:18 PM Last edit: March 26, 2023, 10:23:09 PM by fillippone Merited by LFC_Bitcoin (5), JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Honestly didn't realise how far back proudhon went regarding being a bear on Bitcoin, but think I realise now! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FFLsAGt3WQAAuJbV%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dlarge&t=670&c=K9VcowkyLdqxXA) Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49389.msg588258#msg588258Also another gem. Ironically price didn't reach $5 by 2011, only $4.90, but another ATH arrived by 2013: I'm confident we won't go above $5 for the rest of 2011 and I'm even more sure the price will never reach the all time high again.
Had actually taken all the bearish predictions in the past year or so half seriously. Now I realise why it's more a parody than anything else. Am wondering if it's just the story of an early miner who sold all their coins and has forever been in regret? Wow, this is gold. I know Proudhon was trolling all of us with his bearish predictions! But this actually go beyond my wildest imagination! Anyway, the only post is relevant of me mad by him is the following: <...>
Target price: 170,000 USD
Not bad. Bullish. My body is ready.
Money is going to leave the bitcoin ecosystem over the next 12 months (and forever after on average). Bitcoin will never reach that price. If it does, I'll buy $10k worth and give it to you.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 26, 2023, 10:01:17 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 10864
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
Target price: 170,000 USD
Not bad. Bullish. My body is ready.
Mid to late 2025, no doubt about it. proudhon better pay up.
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2492
bitcoin retard
|
Target price: 170,000 USD
Not bad. Bullish. My body is ready.
Mid to late 2025, no doubt about it. proudhon better pay up. he probably still holds enough so that 10k is peanuts for him ... and it would for many WOers, when we reach 170k (10k would be under 0.06 BTC)
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 26, 2023, 11:01:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 12:01:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 4197
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 12:30:18 AM |
|
the Sunday evening wall report dyor decent close out of the week...up a couple percent on the day gazerbeams on the weekly might be coiling....see what liquidity gets turned on as legacy wakes up things feel bullish still and will be until they are not ahead standard D ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFqgTFGS.jpg&t=670&c=qjWYis1Amiercg) W ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F4ZYALvg.jpg&t=670&c=dwBcEGhErYKGdg) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCKfD0Hu.jpg&t=670&c=N3cPqhV8TW79QQ) stronghands
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 01:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11553
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 01:12:32 AM Last edit: March 27, 2023, 01:39:03 AM by JayJuanGee |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcQxhx7OLQIO37_0vDNwu8v8-xvpF75sgeSHWQ%26usqp%3DCAU&t=670&c=rWS-D5E16xNL_A) When they think Bitcoin is Safe if all Banking fails. It is already in Danger since a moderate a.i can just calculate any pkey 🤗 What's a pkey? Is "pkey" short for something else? I image that it somehow relates to dee cornz, otherwise why would you be mentioning it? I have to give you credit for revealing that one.. (it was new to me), and I would say that it was a potential contender.. but the end..? holy fucking shit.. a real buzz kill and there's an immediate need to kick that "bad boy" off the cliff once that shitcoin is brought up as if it is even in the ballpark of similar to bitcoin.... which we should already realize that affinity scams mislead folks whenever you paint them in a positive light.. next to king daddy.... that's a pretty serious infraction. This seems like a good one.. but the extent to which it is bitcoin specific? It seems that there may have been some other bitcoin specific versions.. at least throwing in more bitcoin memes into the video presentation, no?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 02:01:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
aesma
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1001
fly or die
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 02:14:21 AM |
|
Honestly, i don't even get the legality of it. Say, you are a stockholder at the Signature bank. Your stock is at $70 at the end of trading day on Fri, was trading freely all day, no halts. Suddenly, this bank is "seized" on Sunday and you read the following: "Shareholders and certain unsecured debtholders will not be protected", which means that your stock in this bank is suddenly worth ZERO. No other explanation given. Is there any legal scholars to comment?
At this point, who would hold any other bank stock, apart from top 4 (JPM, C, BAC and WFC)?
all this is bullish for bitcoin, though. I think there can be legal actions to get more details but I don't really see the issue. The bank got bankrupt and in bankruptcy shareholders are screwed. If it was another kind of company that could continue doing business under bankruptcy protection, shares might hold some value, but apparently there is no bankruptcy protection for banks, which is understandable as we just saw that banks need trust, who is going to trust a bankrupt bank ? no evidence that Signature was bankrupt and NO ONE even alleged that. Are you a shareholder or are you upset a "crypto bank" went down ? I don't know enough to be able to counter your point, but to me it seems clients were withdrawing funds at a rapid rate that the bank couldn't sustain (a bank run) and thus it would run out of cash in a matter of hours. Is that a bankruptcy ? I let you decide.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 03:01:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
In the silence
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1297
Merit: 294
''Vincit qui se vincit''
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 03:34:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11553
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 03:41:39 AM |
|
"The market" doesnt want Bitcoin to stay over $28k now ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ...... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FFppFhxAWAAgrZOo.png&t=670&c=VNjL8GFr303q9w) It will come in due course. They say people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones so firstly, I promise not to subject any of you to my attempts at the vocal arts and secondly, ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzcJcRsB.gif&t=670&c=5EgPrpLuypAJGg) Are you a hater of talent? #askingforafriend ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcRBNU92CmairK7S1rnWxrNEtjr-5eAT05aAGw%26usqp%3DCAU&t=670&c=_OZhj0Xo4oEscg) Yeah, but what does it mean? From time to time, we need some analysis so we can understand the significance of various potentially relevant substantive posts... We are supposed to try to figure it out ourselves? Target price: 170,000 USD Not bad. Bullish. My body is ready.
Mid to late 2025, no doubt about it. proudhon better pay up. he probably still holds enough so that 10k is peanuts for him ... and it would for many WOers, when we reach 170k (10k would be under 0.06 BTC) Yep. Even at current prices, 0.06 BTC can be hedged (bought) for about $1,650, so it surely seems doable to put that kind of BTC away.. as kind of an extra rainy day fund. I would expect that proudhon has been keeping at least 0.06 BTC in cold-storage, and he might even have more than the amount that I admit to which is more than 10x more than that.. namely the 0.63 BTC amount that is likely going to be triple entry-level fuck you status in 12 years from now (3 cycles from now).. not guaranteed, but still seems like it could be. I like that one too.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 04:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4655
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 04:07:42 AM |
|
Honestly, i don't even get the legality of it. Say, you are a stockholder at the Signature bank. Your stock is at $70 at the end of trading day on Fri, was trading freely all day, no halts. Suddenly, this bank is "seized" on Sunday and you read the following: "Shareholders and certain unsecured debtholders will not be protected", which means that your stock in this bank is suddenly worth ZERO. No other explanation given. Is there any legal scholars to comment?
At this point, who would hold any other bank stock, apart from top 4 (JPM, C, BAC and WFC)?
all this is bullish for bitcoin, though. I think there can be legal actions to get more details but I don't really see the issue. The bank got bankrupt and in bankruptcy shareholders are screwed. If it was another kind of company that could continue doing business under bankruptcy protection, shares might hold some value, but apparently there is no bankruptcy protection for banks, which is understandable as we just saw that banks need trust, who is going to trust a bankrupt bank ? no evidence that Signature was bankrupt and NO ONE even alleged that. Are you a shareholder or are you upset a "crypto bank" went down ? I don't know enough to be able to counter your point, but to me it seems clients were withdrawing funds at a rapid rate that the bank couldn't sustain (a bank run) and thus it would run out of cash in a matter of hours. Is that a bankruptcy ? I let you decide. you are talking about SVB, not Signature. There was very little 'run' at signature. The excuse was something else. Not a shareholder, but seems like something strange.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 05:01:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 2077
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 06:01:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 3086
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2023, 06:11:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|