Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards
|
 |
January 19, 2017, 10:37:40 PM |
|
target 845?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
|
January 19, 2017, 10:46:45 PM |
|
target 845?
Or 945?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Master mind
|
|
January 19, 2017, 10:52:13 PM |
|
Wow, what caused that little lurch downwards??
 |
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
January 19, 2017, 11:10:37 PM |
|
There will be new ATH beyond $1150 next month.
|
|
|
|
|
snipie
Legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1157
|
|
January 19, 2017, 11:22:29 PM |
|
There will be new ATH beyond $1150 next month.
Indeed next monthS until the bitcoin price gets a solid floor so it can jumps higher and higher @becoin yes i meant it when I added the S to mean that it may happens in the next months |
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
January 19, 2017, 11:29:08 PM |
|
There will be new ATH beyond $1150 next month.
Indeed next monthS until the bitcoin price gets a solid floor so it can jumps higher and higher I mean next month - February. But I might be wrong. There might be new ATH by the end of this month. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sourgummies
|
|
January 19, 2017, 11:55:19 PM |
|
I'M READY
Me too. Let's go! |
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2017, 12:13:26 AM |
|
Whose got control of adamstgBit account and is censoring around here?
No idea but you have people that don't even know how Bitcoin works typing "Bitcoin is the new gold", then I post that it's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat metals as a store of value on Exter's pyramid and post is insta-deleted. Posting the simple objective fact that Bitcoin does not make metals obsolete is considered heresy. This is an economics speculation thread. Whether Bitcoin can or can't defeat gold or silver's market cap is part of the equation in quantifying price. |
|
|
|
|
|
the artful bodger
|
|
January 20, 2017, 12:25:20 AM
Last edit: January 20, 2017, 12:36:48 AM by the artful bodger |
|
Do we get another week stuck at $900?  |
|
|
|
|
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards
|
|
January 20, 2017, 12:35:26 AM |
|
Whose got control of adamstgBit account and is censoring around here?
No idea but you have people that don't even know how Bitcoin works typing "Bitcoin is the new gold", then I post that it's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat metals as a store of value on Exter's pyramid and post is insta-deleted. Posting the simple objective fact that Bitcoin does not make metals obsolete is considered heresy. This is an economics speculation thread. Whether Bitcoin can or can't defeat gold or silver's market cap is part of the equation in quantifying price. fiat beats gold's and silvers and ever other metal's market caps combined. put that in you pipe and smoke it. |
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2017, 01:22:38 AM |
|
Whose got control of adamstgBit account and is censoring around here?
No idea but you have people that don't even know how Bitcoin works typing "Bitcoin is the new gold", then I post that it's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat metals as a store of value on Exter's pyramid and post is insta-deleted. Posting the simple objective fact that Bitcoin does not make metals obsolete is considered heresy. This is an economics speculation thread. Whether Bitcoin can or can't defeat gold or silver's market cap is part of the equation in quantifying price. fiat beats gold's and silvers and ever other metal's market caps combined. put that in you pipe and smoke it. Fiat has always been a derivative of metals, a coupon to exchange for them. What essentially happened is that the bank defaulted on you and you were left holding the bag if you didn't turn your coupons in beforehand. Just like everyone who currently owns fiat is holding the bag still. Fiat can default. Bitcoin can essentially default if the thing becomes unusable somehow. Metals can't default because it exists as more than a concept. |
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
|
January 20, 2017, 01:53:19 AM |
|
Damn... these whales trying to soooo hard to peg right at $899.9999  |
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1767
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
January 20, 2017, 02:00:57 AM |
|
Fiat has always been a derivative of metals, a coupon to exchange for them.
Always? A thousand times no. Fiat was a receipt for metals initially, this is true. But that was just the bait in the bait n switch scheme. Today, fiat is completely divorced from metals. Further, these days, most 'metal' investments are a bait n switch as well, with 'investors' buying paper gold that ultimately is not redeemable for gold. |
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
January 20, 2017, 03:02:37 AM |
|
Fiat has always been a derivative of metals, a coupon to exchange for them.
Always? A thousand times no. Fiat was a receipt for metals initially, this is true. But that was just the bait in the bait n switch scheme. Today, fiat is completely divorced from metals. Further, these days, most 'metal' investments are a bait n switch as well, with 'investors' buying paper gold that ultimately is not redeemable for gold. +1 I'd MUCH RATHER have bitcoin on "paper" in a zip lock bag than gold on "paper"... hehe ; ) |
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14400
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
|
January 20, 2017, 03:49:09 AM |
|
Damn... these whales trying to soooo hard to peg right at $899.9999 Nonsense.   |
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
|
January 20, 2017, 03:50:57 AM |
|
Damn... these whales trying to soooo hard to peg right at $899.9999
Nonsense. Really JJG?  JJG is like our resident Trump. He tries to gaslight us all into not believing our own powers of observation. |
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14400
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
|
January 20, 2017, 03:59:32 AM |
|
Damn... these whales trying to soooo hard to peg right at $899.9999
Nonsense. Really JJG? we are kind of like in broken record territory, going over points that each of us has made several times, yet I wonder how much weight you give to each of the exchanges. In 2010, 2011 and 2012 there were only a few exchanges, yet MTGOX dominated a considerable amount of the trading activities, and therefore the price in many regards. In 2013 there were about half a dozen exchanges, and sure maybe a few more ways that BTC was being traded, including Localbitcoins and directly. Between 2014 and present, the number of exchanges have increased well into the 100s, the number of liquidation avenues have increased, but sure I will give it to you that some exchanges are more BTC price influential than others, yet even if there happen to be some exchanges that are dominant or leaders at any moment, their prices also tend to vary and some times, also, the leader(s) can change. So, how the fuck do you continue to assert that there is any one numerological sticking point AND attempt to also make sense at the same time? Are you a bit bonkers that you want to continue to attempt to describe some non-existing phenomenon in order that you can look at your astrology charts? |
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
|
January 20, 2017, 04:05:18 AM |
|
So, how the fuck do you continue to assert that there is any one numerological sticking point AND attempt to also make sense at the same time? Are you a bit bonkers that you want to continue to attempt to describe some non-existing phenomenon in order that you can look at your astrology charts?
It's not numerology you idiot, that whale traders can control the market and peg the price to whatever they want (in this case right at Dollar-denominated whole round number values, which says alot about who the traders are) Quit saying it's numerology or astrology. It's neither. You're just continuing to sound like a complete idiot. |
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1864
Clueless!
|
|
January 20, 2017, 04:09:42 AM |
|
Well ....in the short term....I think the odds are pretty good that JUST when we get around $1,000 usd for a BTC again....China Gov't will drop the other shoe on regulation irregularities as they call them on the Chinese exchanges. One way or another we will know how the China Gov't really feels about crypto and BTC in how soft or hard they come down on them with fines etc. Not looking like they really will slap them up much imho. But am accumulating $$$ for $750 btc price again. Also if I'm wrong and they really slap them up. Then I can to to the mantra/motto: 'cheap coins, cheap coins' my other mantra is ' moon,moon' its all pretty 'binary' to protect my ego.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
