Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 10:58:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 17060 17061 17062 17063 17064 17065 17066 17067 17068 17069 17070 17071 17072 17073 17074 17075 17076 17077 17078 17079 17080 17081 17082 17083 17084 17085 17086 17087 17088 17089 17090 17091 17092 17093 17094 17095 17096 17097 17098 17099 17100 17101 17102 17103 17104 17105 17106 17107 17108 17109 [17110] 17111 17112 17113 17114 17115 17116 17117 17118 17119 17120 17121 17122 17123 17124 17125 17126 17127 17128 17129 17130 17131 17132 17133 17134 17135 17136 17137 17138 17139 17140 17141 17142 17143 17144 17145 17146 17147 17148 17149 17150 17151 17152 17153 17154 17155 17156 17157 17158 17159 17160 ... 33300 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26367648 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ShroomsKit_Disgrace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 08:44:11 AM

While we were busy being all thinky about it somebody crashed ETH down to ten cents. They're calling it 'The Floppening' Cool

ETH is well above $300, but this topic is not about ETH

This thread is about Bitcoin price, therefore anything impacting Bitcoin price is "on topic", right?
1714042703
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714042703

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714042703
Reply with quote  #2

1714042703
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 08:53:32 AM

I am thinking that Core not supporting SegWit2x may be because after SegWit is activated, all eyes will be on them to raise the block size to 2mb. By not supporting it they can push for just moving on with SegWit and LN instead. They are also balking at the 3 month timeline which is not a lot of time for testing something that would fork the chain.

I can also see that the miners are agreeing to this compromise because they see that BIP148 will probably get SegWit activated so they might as well try to get the 2mb if they can.

Either way, it's looking like we will have SegWit some time around August.

Yeah, but what code is going to be run?

Will it be the segwit tested code or some inferior variation?

It is going to be the original SegWit BIP141! So you don't need to worry about that.
What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork. Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys! And only then a hardfork with enough support would be successful for them.
Core is pretty quite at the moment. I'm looking forward what's going to happen when SegWit is finally activated.
Dakustaking76
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 579
Merit: 267


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 08:58:36 AM

Whats holding btc back to rise again?
There is No move in iT
Bad news came out oresomething?
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:12:40 AM

All that matters in the end is whether you reach your goals, or rather fulfill your deep desires.

What if your goal and deep desire is to find the truth?
flipperfish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


Dolphie Selfie


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:21:30 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:30:39 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

Oh the fighting will be huge!Social enginerring, FUD, false information and so on.
Trust me!
And I will definitely not run a client where Core is not involved with!Period!
Cause that's the only aim here the other party is looking for. To push out Core!
By the way Andresen and Garzik where something once!
This time is over since few years!
The big talent, experience and skills is with core! More than 150+ coders! You can not beat that!
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:34:14 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!

BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:41:08 AM

All that matters in the end is whether you reach your goals, or rather fulfill your deep desires.

What if your goal and deep desire is to find the truth?


Kuhn's idea of scientific paradigms is an abandoned version of the coherence theory of truth. It was sexy for a while, but it doesn't blend.
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:43:04 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!



Yepp I agree.
To me this is another attempt to take control over Bitcoin!
I will do everything I can to prevent that to happen.
Use social media and inform people what's really going on.
And as I said, the smart users, especially the vets here will not run any rushed built client, especiall where nobody from Core is involved with.
This is why the other side will again use social engineering and spreading false information as their main weapon.'Cause the newbies have mostly no clue and are extremely easy to influence.
flipperfish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


Dolphie Selfie


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 09:45:50 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!

You do realize, that these guys built the original BitcoinQt, which was the basis for Core, as well?
By the way: Jeff Garzik has a lot of code also in the linux kernel. So if you don't trust him, good luck with Microsoft/Apple. But yeah, I guess, that's the main problem here: You are trusting large corporations more than voluntary open development. Why do you even use Bitcoin?! There have been large corporations providing financial services around for years, you know?
soullyG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1011
Merit: 721


Decentralize everything


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 10:01:27 AM


Yepp I agree.
To me this is another attempt to take control over Bitcoin!
I will do everything I can to prevent that to happen.
Use social media and inform people what's really going on.
And as I said, the smart users, especially the vets here will not run any rushed built client, especiall where nobody from Core is involved with.
This is why the other side will again use social engineering and spreading false information as their main weapon.'Cause the newbies have mostly no clue and are extremely easy to influence.

You realise there is social engineering and fud from both sides right? You're probably contributing to it without realising! Let's just get along and try to find a compromise?

 Kiss

On topic: moving up!
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 10:03:56 AM

What gives me headaches is, that a few months later we will again have to argue and fight about the hardfork.
I guess, there won't be much fighting about that: With Segwit2x miners are signalling in bit 4, that they activate segwit once it reaches 80% and EXACTLY 3 months later the 2mb part. Miners backing out of the 2mb part risk getting orphaned blocks.

Although I can not believe any smart user is willing to run a client build by Jihan and the Shilbert guys!

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!

You do realize, that these guys built the original BitcoinQt, which was the basis for Core, as well?
By the way: Jeff Garzik has a lot of code also in the linux kernel. So if you don't trust him, good luck with Microsoft/Apple.
But yeah, I guess, that's the main problem here: You are trusting large corporations more than voluntary open development. Why do you even use Bitcoin?! There have been large corporations providing financial services around for years, you know?

You do realize that I can't trust a person that opposed translation of BitcoinQt UI in Farsi language because US gov introduced sanctions against Iran!
flipperfish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


Dolphie Selfie


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 10:11:05 AM

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!

You do realize, that these guys built the original BitcoinQt, which was the basis for Core, as well?
By the way: Jeff Garzik has a lot of code also in the linux kernel. So if you don't trust him, good luck with Microsoft/Apple.
But yeah, I guess, that's the main problem here: You are trusting large corporations more than voluntary open development. Why do you even use Bitcoin?! There have been large corporations providing financial services around for years, you know?

You do realize that I can't trust a person that opposed translation of BitcoinQt UI in Farsi language because US gov introduced sanctions against Iran!


Can you explain to me, why you think that Blockstream has to fear less issues with the US government than single individuals around the globe?
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 10:34:29 AM

You do realize, that the Segwit2x client is mainly built by Jeff Garzik and has also some commits/reviews from Gavin Andresen?

You do realize that these guys built the clients for XT, Classic, and Unlimited as well?
All they do is the same just under another name!

You do realize, that these guys built the original BitcoinQt, which was the basis for Core, as well?
By the way: Jeff Garzik has a lot of code also in the linux kernel. So if you don't trust him, good luck with Microsoft/Apple.
But yeah, I guess, that's the main problem here: You are trusting large corporations more than voluntary open development. Why do you even use Bitcoin?! There have been large corporations providing financial services around for years, you know?

You do realize that I can't trust a person that opposed translation of BitcoinQt UI in Farsi language because US gov introduced sanctions against Iran!


Can you explain to me, why you think that Blockstream has to fear less issues with the US government than single individuals around the globe?

Blockstream has to fear not less, but more issues with US gov. And thats good! Blockstream is the best that is left of the cypherpunk movement and companies like Cygnus Solutions.

BTW, US gov is a very broad term. There are all different kinds of people there. Certainly, there are such that do not approve the coup d'état that took place during the fall of 2008 in US.
soullyG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1011
Merit: 721


Decentralize everything


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 10:50:47 AM

BTW, US gov is a very broad term. There are all different kinds of people there. Certainly, there are such that do not approve the coup d'état that took place during the fall of 2008 in US.


Do you mean Obama getting elected?
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 11:07:10 AM

BTW, US gov is a very broad term. There are all different kinds of people there. Certainly, there are such that do not approve the coup d'état that took place during the fall of 2008 in US.


Do you mean Obama getting elected?

No. I mean the capitulation of GW Bush administration to Wall Street extortionists. By the end of 2008 US gov was already a division of Wall Street.

Obama was the choice of the financial capital. With Trump's victory the industrial capital managed to gain some ground back but not too much.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 12:01:57 PM

No. I mean the capitulation of GW Bush administration to Wall Street extortionists. By the end of 2008 US gov was already a division of Wall Street.

Obama was the choice of the financial capital. With Trump's victory the industrial capital managed to gain some ground back but not too much.


becoin, you're very observant. I agree.

Bush and Obama caved to the "club" and became club members themselves, the club being the Deepstate - Fed/Bankers/Megacorp/Wallstreet with their Globalist world financial agenda. That is why the MSM largely gave both of them a pass.

But Trump is pushing back, and that's why the Deepstate controlled MSM is out to hang him on something. They want him out of office now because he's not completely on board with selling out the U.S. citizens and continuing the U.S. demise.

Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 12:18:04 PM

Segwit is working fine in Litecoin
Segwit is working fine on TestNet in Bitcoin environment.

valta4065
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500


Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!


View Profile
June 22, 2017, 12:19:19 PM

No. I mean the capitulation of GW Bush administration to Wall Street extortionists. By the end of 2008 US gov was already a division of Wall Street.

Obama was the choice of the financial capital. With Trump's victory the industrial capital managed to gain some ground back but not too much.


becoin, you're very observant. I agree.

Bush and Obama caved to the "club" and became club members themselves, the club being the Deepstate - Fed/Bankers/Megacorp/Wallstreet with their Globalist world financial agenda. That is why the MSM largely gave both of them a pass.

But Trump is pushing back, and that's why the Deepstate controlled MSM is out to hang him on something. They want him out of office now because he's not completely on board with selling out the U.S. citizens and continuing the U.S. demise.



Could we stay on topic gentlemen? ^^

Note that I don't mind discussing politics but there is a part on the forum dedicated for that. Especially as I don't see how Trump is linked to BTC price... He won't do anything to make the dollar stronger: I don't think he wants to, he doesn't care at all about his country or its economy, and even if he wanted to I'm not sure he could do anything.

And on topic: Did you see how the price is on the rise again? Do you think there is a link with the segwit2x increasing support?
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
June 22, 2017, 12:23:02 PM
Last edit: June 22, 2017, 12:34:14 PM by BlindMayorBitcorn

No. I mean the capitulation of GW Bush administration to Wall Street extortionists. By the end of 2008 US gov was already a division of Wall Street.

Obama was the choice of the financial capital. With Trump's victory the industrial capital managed to gain some ground back but not too much.


becoin, you're very observant. I agree.

Bush and Obama caved to the "club" and became club members themselves, the club being the Deepstate - Fed/Bankers/Megacorp/Wallstreet with their Globalist world financial agenda. That is why the MSM largely gave both of them a pass.

But Trump is pushing back, and that's why the Deepstate controlled MSM is out to hang him on something. They want him out of office now because he's not completely on board with selling out the U.S. citizens and continuing the U.S. demise.



Could we stop having conversations during sideways action and focus on discussing said sideways action?


Nope.
Pages: « 1 ... 17060 17061 17062 17063 17064 17065 17066 17067 17068 17069 17070 17071 17072 17073 17074 17075 17076 17077 17078 17079 17080 17081 17082 17083 17084 17085 17086 17087 17088 17089 17090 17091 17092 17093 17094 17095 17096 17097 17098 17099 17100 17101 17102 17103 17104 17105 17106 17107 17108 17109 [17110] 17111 17112 17113 17114 17115 17116 17117 17118 17119 17120 17121 17122 17123 17124 17125 17126 17127 17128 17129 17130 17131 17132 17133 17134 17135 17136 17137 17138 17139 17140 17141 17142 17143 17144 17145 17146 17147 17148 17149 17150 17151 17152 17153 17154 17155 17156 17157 17158 17159 17160 ... 33300 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!