d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 2913
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:31:17 PM |
|
We need more throughput. It is that simple. Right. We have segwit now, and it is not enough. Of course it isn't. Segwit just makes a little additional blockchain space available. The throughput will come from L2/L3 solutions: Sidechains, Lightning Network, whatnots. A multitude of L2+ solutions can be at work at the same time. That's where I hope to see competition for new ideas - not on the basic protocol, which IMO should stay as resilient and lean as possible. If you have a better alternative than segwit+bigger blocks, feel free to share. Clonecoins would not even matter if we already had the benefit they chose to incorporate.
Just as an example of a better alternative, on this thread a few days ago someone posted a link to a new technology which could be plugged in at L2, just below LN and therefore pushing it to L3. It would allow opening multiple (shared) payment channels with a single blockchain transaction. The idea can be improved, but already as it is, it could significantly improve on the problem, rightfully bannered by Jbreher, of opening and closing a channel for every human on earth (impossible with 1 MB blocks. Or 2 MB, or 8 MB, for that matter). It's not that I expect this particular gimmick to be the final solution, but it does show a lot of work is being done. A constellation of partial solutions can very well ease us into the L2 era. I think that's where the future is headed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1076
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:31:24 PM |
|
Im not getting why you people are panicking over shitfork.
Because of this: Bitcoin is the ledger of not-previously-spent, validly signed transactions contained in the chain of blocks that begins with the genesis block (hash 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f), follows the 21-million coin creation schedule, and has the most cumulative double-SHA256-proof-of-work. You can curse him as much as you want, but that CIA employee is right about the definition. Verbal consensus is worth nothing, the only consensus mentioned in the Whitepaper is the consensus which chain has more POW. I'm not saying there is a reason to panic, but this is full-blooded attack on what we consider BTC. They will probably fail (hopefully), but you can't say they are not trying. It is possible that either the whitepaper is wrong, or that interpretation of the whitepaper is wrong. Will we find out in the real world, perhaps? Surely the longest chain with the most POW is important - however, there is also quite a bit of importance that is given to the various networking effects that support bitcoin. Accordingly, there could be temporarily more POW on a chain that is not recognized by the community - and that longer POW could exist for a while. Surely, after some passage of time, if the community continues to NOT support that artificially inflated chain (and perhaps the artificially inflated chain has more POW because they changed what is POW), then likely the longest POW is going to revert to the chain that has the most community supporting it.... So in the end, my point is that there is some value to assign to the support of the community that goes beyond mere textbook definitions of longest POW = bitcoin. You may be right, don't forget when I wrote this, at the peak of the attack: At that point total BTC + BCH hashrate was 9.98 Eh/sec, BTC had 3.29 and BCH 6.69. Everyone knew the miners will go back to BTC eventually, but BCH having > 67% hashrate at that moment was more than a scary.
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:36:28 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:37:03 PM |
|
This thing will pump, Bob. You know it and I know it. Why even consider dumping now?
Oh heck. I'm not dumping yet. Just getting everything loaded and locked, so to speak. The price is utter crap right now and totally not worth it. I dumped BCH at .18, totally convinced I wasn't the dumbest one in the room. Live and learn. Ideally. snip
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:38:00 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
That depends solely on how many wash trades will take place during the next "rally".
|
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1076
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:39:10 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
Your shilling is starting to get naive.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:41:07 PM Last edit: November 13, 2017, 11:03:07 PM by Last of the V8s |
|
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:50:36 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
Sorry man this is "Wall Observer BTC/USD" go shilling your Shitcoin in the Altcoin-Section. IMO people like you are destroying or at least harming satoshis vision.
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:52:42 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
Your shilling is starting to get naive. one must be desperate to publicly sink that low.
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:53:09 PM |
|
So... Time to mine a block is spiking again... Did core or anybody come with a solution or this time we are iced for good? Anybody knows? Solution for what?
|
|
|
|
ragnar0k
|
|
November 13, 2017, 10:56:46 PM |
|
So... Time to mine a block is spiking again... Did core or anybody come with a solution or this time we are iced for good? Anybody knows? Solution for what? My understanding is that they reduced the difficulty again forking today on BCH and probably they will keep doing it... So profitability for BTC will remain down indefinitely, leading us back to >24h for a transaction - but this time we have no real hope for the situation to improve https://www.bitcoinabc.org/novemberor did I miss something?
|
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:02:50 PM |
|
or did I miss something?
yes.
|
|
|
|
Hyperjacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1119
It's all mathematics...!
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:04:10 PM |
|
You don't buy BCH. That's silly. It comes free just by holding your BTC. Not for people who are buying BTC after the fork occurred, they get nothing for free. And the BCH cartel knows this. They know that in order for BCH to survive into the future, it's not enough to have existing holders. They must have new buyers, now and into the future. For decades. And someone's got to buy all the existing free BCH coins being traded for BTC. Ain't gonna happen. Ver still has an ungodly wad of coins sitting on Bitfinex, if the story is to be believed. This might not be over yet. Satoshi and people like WinkleVii, Tim Draper, and Loaded have an ungodly amount of BCH ready to dump at any time. Checkmate? Not checkmate IMO. It just means it will be incredibly volatile until the coins get disbursed. And what trader doesn't like volatility
|
|
|
|
Lopumbo
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:05:24 PM |
|
difficulty of BCH is now adjusted every! block and smoothly. No supersonic spikes in "blocks found per hour". Important update imo so that both chains work properly (in their technical limits ) so for the next week BCH will most likely be more profitable. So get used for high fees and >100K unconfirmed transactions for a while and place your bets
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:06:51 PM |
|
So... Time to mine a block is spiking again... Did core or anybody come with a solution or this time we are iced for good? Anybody knows? Solution for what? My understanding is that they reduced the difficulty again forking today on BCH and probably they will keep doing it... So profitability for BTC will remain down indefinitely, leading us back to >24h for a transaction - but this time we have no real hope for the situation to improve https://www.bitcoinabc.org/novemberor did I miss something? They might fork their altcash everyday to reduce the difficulty. That doesn't matter. Only thing that matters is how many bitcoins do they have to sell and pay miners that mine altcash. The higher is altcash price the faster they bleed bitcoins. Just sit back and relax and watch how they commit suicide.
|
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1076
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:06:57 PM |
|
So... Time to mine a block is spiking again... Did core or anybody come with a solution or this time we are iced for good? Anybody knows? Solution for what? My understanding is that they reduced the difficulty again forking today on BCH and probably they will keep doing it... So profitability for BTC will remain down indefinitely, leading us back to >24h for a transaction - but this time we have no real hope for the situation to improve https://www.bitcoinabc.org/novemberor did I miss something? Yes you are: Miners have already eaten through insanely high transaction fees, now are those < 50 s/B in order to be processed and in a few days we should be back to normal fees teritory.
|
|
|
|
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:07:25 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
|
|
|
|
ragnar0k
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:13:29 PM |
|
No supersonic spikes in "blocks found per hour". [/quote] ...Yet They might fork their altcash everyday to reduce the difficulty. That doesn't matter. Only thing that matters is how many bitcoins do they have to sell and pay miners that mine altcash. The higher is altcash price the faster they bleed bitcoins. Just sit back and relax and watch how they commit suicide.
Good point! The problem I see here is that they are fueled by BTC 'leaks', so we can possibly pay their miners indefinitely with enough weak hands on our side Miners have already eaten through insanely high transaction fees, now are those < 50 s/B in order to be processed and in a few days we should be back to normal fees teritory.
The question I guess is... what happens when BCH is profitable again (soon)
|
|
|
|
ragnar0k
|
|
November 13, 2017, 11:16:13 PM |
|
Any thoughts on how high the next BCH rally will go? I'm thinking we might hit 0.8 temporarily, and then crash. I don't think we'll spike above 1.0 on the next wave. At this stage, I think anything over 0.4 is a good place to take profits.
Just as an addendum to your work of art, I permit myself to note also the middle finger formation given by the initial bump in the chart.
|
|
|
|
|