Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[infofront]

Bitcoin is still measured in dollars and not dollars in Bitcoin :/

Good point but I really dont think it will reverse order to that extent.  The follow up to USD reverse system based off political debt will be another form of FIAT currency operated by the IMF which is called SDR and the IMF does have some gold but this wont be formally linked either or even close to informally backed by reserves.   Politics will keep on operating or attempting to extent control of populations income and capital.

IMF also said they might operate an online version, the dollar is currently digital imo anyway so I dont see thats anything special really.

Anyway my point is I think it'll always be a mix of national currencies and possibly we see a rise in precious metals and also crypto is used more as well especially for fast transactions.  It wont be a great big switch on of crypto imo, they'll be competition between them all and upsets as one sector tries to undermine the others perhaps.


I think Australian dollar could rise alot, giant natural reserves not formally but just because their country is massive and they have few people and afaik not that much debt.   Any rise in commodities and trade relating world currency would favour such an economy.   I guess also Canada similarly but they have more debt, ties to this old system.    Ive never thought crypto will rise singularly.

Let's level with each other for a moment. Nick Szabo is Satoshi. It's an open secret.

My own personal take was the protocol for bitcoin even though its open source was designed and initially constructed by a group of people or at least keys were split up and shared to various wallets such that no one person had sole control.   Thats how I explain why the coins were never moved.   They had more invested in the success of their work then simply taking out the value which would have undermined it, splitting responsibility would be standard practise in software engineering procedure I think.      

Its natural for the public to attribute success or the image of a new dynamic product to just one person like how Steve Jobs was Apple or whatever.   Sure important key people but I wouldnt presume it was just 1 person who decided its fate alone, Apple fired Steve Jobs if I remember right and I just think this Satoshi name thing is just like a reference or code name for the operation more then literally his inventors name or nickname even.  Could have been a women of course, the best cover.  I dont know if anyone has gone through each post and communique under his name and checked its duplicate in style.

I'll admit that saying Nick Szabo is defnitely Satoshi is a bit of a stretch. He could've been a part of the team known as Satoshi.

You may find this interesting:

https://towardsdatascience.com/stylometric-analysis-satoshi-nakamoto-294926cdf995

Based on the results, Satoshi who had written the Bitcoin paper may not be the same Satoshi who had exchanged emails. Satoshi Nakamoto may possibly be more than one person; Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym for a team of computer scientists and cryptographers who were involved in creating Bitcoin and blockchain. Nick Szabo and Ian Grigg are the two authors who are linguistically similar to Satoshi Nakamoto in the Bitcoin paper and his email texts, respectively. In addition, Wei Dai and Timothy C. May are two potential candidates for the Bitcoin paper in terms of semantic similarity. Hal Finney and Ian Grigg are two possible candidates for Satoshi’s email exchanges. Since it is a known fact that Hal Finney had interacted with Satoshi Nakamoto via email, Hal Finney should not be included in the list of possible candidates for Satoshi who exchanged emails; Ian Grigg is linguistically and semantically similar to Satoshi Nakamoto. Therefore, the possible candidates for Satoshi Nakamoto are Nick Szabo, Ian Grigg, Wei Dai, and Timothy C. May.

[Elwar]

Finally Bitcoin is recovering from the bloodbath that happend this past months. we're at the 7k$ mark right now! more and more are entering the market

Bitcoin price still under $10k.

 


Has the chain of blocks failed us all?

[Last of the V8s]

It puts its Ledger Nano S in the basket.

[bitebits]

SEC Proposes New Approval Process for Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-118

boom soon?

The proposal would therefore facilitate greater competition and innovation in the ETF marketplace, leading to more choice for investors.

If, they don't know what is heading towards them.

[HairyMaclairy]

If the Dow continues crashing like it did today after the holiday, we're going to need Hairy's patented Liquid Koala Asset Sidechain much sooner than anyone could have predicted.

Initial distribution is by air drop.  Think golden shower but greenish brown. 

[El duderino_]

Finally Bitcoin is recovering from the bloodbath that happend this past months. we're at the 7k$ mark right now! more and more are entering the market

Bitcoin price still under $10k.

 


Has the chain of blocks failed us all?

still little under 40K in my head....

[El duderino_]

3-2 last goal was a perfect beauty i runned down my house like a crazy fucker that i am!!!!! so happy

Awesome match, well done for your lot.

Immediately Fellaini came on it changed everything.   I reckon you can take Brazil.  See you in the final, eh?

hope so , i'm a little bit suprised to see brazil is a BIG time favorite 2.0-3.8...... i would think more equal as belgium got the better players brazil more experienced

That reflects what people betting think - and most people just think Brazil must be better, mostly due to past form.

However, past form proves nothing and I think Belgium can beat Brazil.  If the odds stay like this, I will probably bet against Brazil (better value for money).

Either way - it should be a hell of a game - and (emotionally) I would like Belgium to win.  Teams that think they deserve to win have fallen fast in this amazing World Cup.  If Brazil go into this game assuming they will succeed, they will lose.  Belgium on the other hand will know they are up against it and will not give up, as proved by the Japan game.

WHOOOwhoo the penalty's pfffffffff     

[Last of the V8s]

https://www.binance.com/en/trade/SYS_BTC
syscoin went mental
millions of % move

[bitebits]

^ Where there any walls to observe?

[d_eddie]

SEC Proposes New Approval Process for Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-118

What do these new rules imply? I couldn't make much sense of that terse communication.

[Last of the V8s]

^ Where there any walls to observe?

no it was a tiny book. guess it was a fat finger/typo
someone had a mad limit up there and if it was enough, became rich
volume can't have been much up till then, so 10k btc??

[HairyMaclairy]

^ Where there any walls to observe?

no it was a tiny book. guess it was a fat finger/typo
someone had a mad limit up there and if it was enough, became rich
volume can't have been much up till then, so 10k btc??

Probably just a bot trading with itself, plus some FOMO from day tards seeing the volume spike.  

[HairyMaclairy]

SEC Proposes New Approval Process for Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-118

What do these new rules imply? I couldn't make much sense of that terse communication.

It means you don’t need SEC approval to launch an ETF so long as your ETF meets certain conditions.

It’s not clear to me from the statement whether an Bitcoin ETF could meet the conditions.  I don’t need to explain the consequences.

[El duderino_]

https://www.binance.com/en/trade/SYS_BTC
syscoin went mental
millions of % move

had a small amount from long long time back sold @ 0.00005290   

[infofront]

SEC Proposes New Approval Process for Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-118

What do these new rules imply? I couldn't make much sense of that terse communication.

It means you don’t need SEC approval to launch an ETF so long as your ETF meets certain conditions.

It’s not clear to me from the statement whether an Bitcoin ETF could meet the conditions.  I don’t need to explain the consequences.

I'll explain the consequences:

[mymenace]

Satoshi

The Programmers’ Stone

The Programmer’s Stone is a theory and training course on how to think as an effective and adaptable computer programmer. Alan Carter and Colston Sanger wrote the guide with the aim to explore, recapture and celebrate the programming art form.

https://www.reciprocality.org/Reciprocality/r0/index.html

[Last of the V8s]

https://www.binance.com/en/trade/SYS_BTC
syscoin went mental
millions of % move

had a small amount from long long time back sold @ 0.00005290   

should have held out for 95btc per

bots/hack of syscoin/exit scam/fat finger

https://twitter.com/CryptoTutor/status/1014262801681080321

[Elwar]

So another peek behind the curtain of the ICO world...

Most of these ICOs that raised a shitload within seconds of opening up their sale are actually big crypto funds that have all been worked behind the scenes where the majority is the huge fund while they have the last couple of percent from the small investors.

Blue Frontiers went into this believing the hype that if your idea is good enough, people will flock to invest in it. Our grassroots effort has gotten us about half way to our soft cap, even while not allowing US and Chinese investors which is pretty decent. We close the pre-sale next week and hopefully we can get some of the big funds to take it from there.

While I doubt anyone from these big funds will be my future neighbors, I look forward to the current crop of varyon buyers who saw the vision early on to come live on the new seasteads.

[ivomm]

SEC Proposes New Approval Process for Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-118

What do these new rules imply? I couldn't make much sense of that terse communication.

It means you don’t need SEC approval to launch an ETF so long as your ETF meets certain conditions.

It’s not clear to me from the statement whether an Bitcoin ETF could meet the conditions.  I don’t need to explain the consequences.

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/sec-seeks-comments-another-bitcoin-etf/

There is a lot going on in that direction recently. Only insiders know if (or rather when) the first Bitcoin ETF will be approved. Usually the sign is a spike in the price   And then deja vu - 20K and beyond.

[JayJuanGee]

So, just got back from a nice vacation with Rick.

See the price of corn has bounced back nicely since we went off-the-grid.

Starting to feel bullish again.

Ouch!!!!