Bitcoin Forum
September 07, 2025, 01:25:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 20672 20673 20674 20675 20676 20677 20678 20679 20680 20681 20682 20683 20684 20685 20686 20687 20688 20689 20690 20691 20692 20693 20694 20695 20696 20697 20698 20699 20700 20701 20702 20703 20704 20705 20706 20707 20708 20709 20710 20711 20712 20713 20714 20715 20716 20717 20718 20719 20720 20721 [20722] 20723 20724 20725 20726 20727 20728 20729 20730 20731 20732 20733 20734 20735 20736 20737 20738 20739 20740 20741 20742 20743 20744 20745 20746 20747 20748 20749 20750 20751 20752 20753 20754 20755 20756 20757 20758 20759 20760 20761 20762 20763 20764 20765 20766 20767 20768 20769 20770 20771 20772 ... 34893 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26836579 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:10:46 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1), BobLawblaw (1)

Schnorr signatures

Imagine if you could use just one signature for all of your transaction inputs rather than one signature for each of your transaction inputs. That's all us mortals need to understand. Leave it to the gods to work out how the math behind all of that works.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:15:23 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1), BobLawblaw (1)

Yes whenever you use a wallet you may have multi-inputs and multiple signatures, you just don’t necessarily realize it. 

Besides, Schnorr is just a stepping stone to coinjoin. 
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:16:08 AM

Now that I realize I can use lightning for shit posting, I may need to start my own node.

This might be the second funniest war in history.



I actually see what you did there...not bad

Don’t mention the war. 
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 6262


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:17:25 AM

Yes whenever you use a wallet you may have multi-inputs and multiple signatures, you just don’t necessarily realize it. 

Besides, Schnorr is just a stepping stone to coinjoin. 

Linky?
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:26:53 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1)

Yes whenever you use a wallet you may have multi-inputs and multiple signatures, you just don’t necessarily realize it. 

Besides, Schnorr is just a stepping stone to coinjoin. 

Linky?

Here's a good repost re CoinJoin
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/building-on-bitcoin/2018/coinjoinxt/


Nothing on Schnorr tho
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3138
Merit: 2007


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:30:18 AM

And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!

I have thought about that. Today, that is indeed the case. Or even maybe longer - as 32MB is the currently supported max, which is subject to miners' decisions to create blocks smaller than max.

Which is, of course, why there has been discussion within the BCH development community -- for as long as there has been a BCH -- on other orthogonal approaches to scaling.

So while true today, it will be false for some value of 'tomorrow'.

In the meantime, BCH is not suiciding itself for the sake of some illusory benefit of 'decentralization' along some axis that is entirely irrelevant.

Orthogonal? You mean like side chains! WTF that wasn't in Satoshi's white paper!!!
Wait so you're saying that different solutions might come in the future so time and resources are better spent on near term issues rather than arbitrary usages cases for the whole population! You're so cute with your flawed logic, i bet your tears will taste sweet
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:46:09 AM

Yes whenever you use a wallet you may have multi-inputs and multiple signatures, you just don’t necessarily realize it. 

Besides, Schnorr is just a stepping stone to coinjoin. 

Linky?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1447960.msg14644650#msg14644650
V1lpu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 332
Merit: 12


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 01:50:37 AM
Merited by Wekkel (1)

The next bull cycle is coming?

Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 6262


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:29:31 AM

Yes whenever you use a wallet you may have multi-inputs and multiple signatures, you just don’t necessarily realize it.  

Besides, Schnorr is just a stepping stone to coinjoin.  

Linky?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1447960.msg14644650#msg14644650


Here's a good repost re CoinJoin
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/building-on-bitcoin/2018/coinjoinxt/


Nothing on Schnorr tho


Thanks Guys, I think this is it.

Quote
Then he suggested just using Schnorr multi-signature instead of the BLS signatures. The idea is that if you have inputs with pubkeys P and P2  you can combine them and to form a P+P2 pubkey and sign with that to prove authorization with both keys.  When this had previously been discussed the fact that someone malicious could set their P2 to P3-P and then sign the aggregate with just P3 seemed to kill it.

But actually a few months ago Pieter Wuille solved this as a side effect of his key tree multi-signature work,  He suggested instead that to combine P and P2, you use P*H(P) + P2*H(P2); this doesn't inhibit signing, but it makes it impossible to create a pubkey as a linear combination of other pre-existing pubkeys. Pieter has an implementation of this as part of the Libsecp256k1 multi-signature work: https://github.com/bitcoin/secp256k1/pull/322

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.msg14011669#msg14011669
stelee68
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 19


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:37:47 AM

The next bull cycle is coming?



I am quite sure this is the signal we have been waiting for...

BTC To the moon!
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1917
Merit: 3245


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:45:49 AM

This guy must be 100% sure that BTC will surpass $280K in 2023 to bet $6.3 mil.  Grin
https://www.etftrends.com/crypto-trader-big-on-bitcoin-exceeds-warren-buffett-berkshire-price
josephpogi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 168



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:49:08 AM

Hold on! bear months is more exciting
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:51:10 AM

This guy must be 100% sure that BTC will surpass $280K in 2023 to bet $6.3 mil.  Grin
https://www.etftrends.com/crypto-trader-big-on-bitcoin-exceeds-warren-buffett-berkshire-price

Not a bad bet I think. But that counterparty risk Shocked. Trusting someone to actually pay out 1.2 billion, that's more trust than I have in anyone.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 6344



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:51:58 AM
Merited by BobLawblaw (2), jojo69 (1)

^unrelatedly: Have fun while making those private keys secure!



https://www.etsy.com/listing/614770978/d20-twerk-o-matic-booty-dice-butt-plug (via @shinohai)

Oh lord.  You are gonna have Bob dressed up as a wizard with a dungeons and dragons campaign going with that kind of post...
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:57:14 AM

^unrelatedly: Have fun while making those private keys secure!

https://www.etsy.com/listing/614770978/d20-twerk-o-matic-booty-dice-butt-plug (via @shinohai)

Oh lord.  You are gonna have Bob dressed up as a wizard with a dungeons and dragons campaign going with that kind of post...

Jesus man. What is wrong with you?
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 6344



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 03:59:11 AM
Merited by Last of the V8s (1)

^unrelatedly: Have fun while making those private keys secure!

https://www.etsy.com/listing/614770978/d20-twerk-o-matic-booty-dice-butt-plug (via @shinohai)

Oh lord.  You are gonna have Bob dressed up as a wizard with a dungeons and dragons campaign going with that kind of post...

Jesus man. What is wrong with you?

Top problem at the moment?  Or the top 10 list?
kaushiks093
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 04:03:25 AM

As times change, your methods may need to change, too.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1763


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 04:06:09 AM

And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!

I have thought about that. Today, that is indeed the case. Or even maybe longer - as 32MB is the currently supported max, which is subject to miners' decisions to create blocks smaller than max.

Which is, of course, why there has been discussion within the BCH development community -- for as long as there has been a BCH -- on other orthogonal approaches to scaling.

So while true today, it will be false for some value of 'tomorrow'.

In the meantime, BCH is not suiciding itself for the sake of some illusory benefit of 'decentralization' along some axis that is entirely irrelevant.

Orthogonal?

Yes. Do you understand the term? In this case, meaning scaling in a manner unrelated to the max block size.

Quote
You mean like side chains!

Sidechainy things are within the universe of things being discussed, though certainly not exclusively, nor even leadingly.

Quote
WTF that wasn't in Satoshi's white paper!!!

Point?

Quote
Wait so you're saying that different solutions might come in the future so time and resources are better spent on near term issues

In a manner of speaking, yes. Time tested engineering principles focus on the bang-for-the-buck solutions. Always.

However, it is not 'might come'. We know of several scaling solutions orthogonal to increasing the max block size. The discussions underway are focused upon cost/benefit analysis. Or alternately risk/benefit analysis. You know - the essence of engineering.
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 10236



View Profile
July 17, 2018, 04:15:16 AM
Merited by bitebits (1)

As times change, your methods may need to change, too.

  I think we ate at the same restaurant today!

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12838


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
July 17, 2018, 04:50:20 AM

[edited out]

yeah, I agree, just in this instance..just seeing the old ETF supposed, maybe happening, and then does not happen...usual reversal

what is the reason it pops up NOW, besides my 'paranoia'?  Not seeing much, but the 'supposed' ETF angle

than again, wtf do I know...just saying, what came to mind on the current pump

O.k.  Let's attempt to isolate reasons and to play a hypothetical. 

Let's hypothetically say that the ETF is having some kind of effect on the BTC price currently, if so, we could still have a buy on the rumor and sell on the news situation.  Sometimes just the idea of something bullish happening could cause a pump  in a time period that is quite a bit before the official announcement, and then when the thing actually hits, whether yes or no, then the opposite effect could happen (a dump, even with positive news, although positive news would likely cause a longer term financialization and therefore pump upon the BTC price).

On the other hand, the hypothetical is all wrong - because a large amount of the time, there are several factors that affect the price, including supply and demand issues across 100s of liquidation mechanisms, including dynamics with alts.  We also have momentum and manipulation, too.... So, sure we can play with hypotheticals that attempt to narrow down the reasons for a pump or a dump and maybe even we can list out five things that are going on that have an effect on the price in one direction or another, yet I still maintain my position that we do not necessarily benefit from putting too much effort on attempting be conclusive about the direction one way or another, because as soon as we do, then we are likely to get surprised in the other direction.   

Take margin positions for example, and I have seen a post from today saying that everything is lining up for long, including long positions, but as soon as a bunch of longs line up with margin, there will be some whale(s) who believe its to their advantage to force them to close (by pushing the price down)


I would rather this just be a coincidence and part of the general fatigue and pump back to what I think are reasonable above 10k prices

but if wishes were fishes...we'd all take a swim...

(wanders off mumbling to self..have a hard enough time with 'current' reality....add magical internet money on top of that mess and I'm

more than a bit befuddled...) Sad

I do agree with you that if you can pinpoint the reason(s), then you can figure out a little bit what you are going to do, and what kind of tentative timeline to give your plan.   On the other hand, you can still make a plan for what the price actually does rather than needing some kind of reason(s) for it.  So in that regard, if the price goes up, then you make play x, and if prices go down you make plan y.. also you could have a plan to cash out.. certain percentage(s) of your stash for every certain amount of time period (that is also not dependent upon reasons).  So if your overall plan was to cash out 3% per year, then instead you might choose to cash out .25% per month (which is 1/12) of 3%.. or some variation that does not depend on any explanation for why BTC prices are doing A, B or C.
Pages: « 1 ... 20672 20673 20674 20675 20676 20677 20678 20679 20680 20681 20682 20683 20684 20685 20686 20687 20688 20689 20690 20691 20692 20693 20694 20695 20696 20697 20698 20699 20700 20701 20702 20703 20704 20705 20706 20707 20708 20709 20710 20711 20712 20713 20714 20715 20716 20717 20718 20719 20720 20721 [20722] 20723 20724 20725 20726 20727 20728 20729 20730 20731 20732 20733 20734 20735 20736 20737 20738 20739 20740 20741 20742 20743 20744 20745 20746 20747 20748 20749 20750 20751 20752 20753 20754 20755 20756 20757 20758 20759 20760 20761 20762 20763 20764 20765 20766 20767 20768 20769 20770 20771 20772 ... 34893 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!