Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2019, 08:00:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 17:
$0 - 2 (1.8%)
<$6,500 - 7 (6.1%)
$6,500-$6,750 - 1 (0.9%)
$6,751-$7,000 - 2 (1.8%)
$7,001-$7,250 - 3 (2.6%)
$7,251-$7,500 - 6 (5.3%)
$7,501-$7,750 - 4 (3.5%)
$7,751-$8,000 - 12 (10.5%)
$8,001-$8,250 - 13 (11.4%)
$8,251-$8,500 - 6 (5.3%)
$8,501-$8,750 - 6 (5.3%)
$8,751-$9,000 - 11 (9.6%)
$9,001,$9,250 - 10 (8.8%)
$9,251-$9,500 - 9 (7.9%)
>$9,500 - 15 (13.2%)
$20,000 - 7 (6.1%)
Total Voters: 114

Pages: « 1 ... 23350 23351 23352 23353 23354 23355 23356 23357 23358 23359 23360 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 [23400] 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23406 23407 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 23417 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 23431 23432 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 23440 23441 23442 23443 23444 23445 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 ... 24211 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21223516 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (64 posts by 15 users deleted.)
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2160


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:03:59 PM

1560715250
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560715250

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560715250
Reply with quote  #2

1560715250
Report to moderator
1560715250
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560715250

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560715250
Reply with quote  #2

1560715250
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 972


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:09:17 PM

1h


W 50day MA

 its beautiful
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1758


no FOMO


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:15:29 PM

What happened to Rosewater Foundation?

We wish we knew.  Speculation that he may have been caught in Quadringa CX...
Raja_MBZ
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 1232
Merit: 854


Vegeta! What does the scouter say about BTC value?


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:15:30 PM

Mt Gox giving out coins in the next few weeks? What gave you that idea?

Last I heard they were released in May 2019 from the settlement.

https://bitcoinist.com/mt-gox-creditors-bitcoins-next-summer/

well, says May/June 2019 for the above. Maybe more than a few weeks I guess...but still...

Mt Gox giving out coins in the next few weeks? What gave you that idea?

yeah, Gox creditors aren't seeing shit till Q4...if then

from what I understand the folk doing the liguidating are the ones wanting this wrapped up so they can get paid and move on....so who knows...
but it has drag'd on now what 3 years?

August would be better IMHO,  we will see





Will today's candle close above or below (ideal for bears) $5200? Next 3 hours are critical...
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1255


You're never too old to be young.


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:26:42 PM

What happened to Rosewater Foundation?

We wish we knew.  Speculation that he may have been caught in Quadringa CX...

I think he's too smart to keep coins on an exchange.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1275


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:44:42 PM

@jbreher So what is likely to happen if BCH-ABC or SV wants to implement another improvement of the protocol that a significant portion disagree with? Are groups of miners going to square off on two or more camps

To the extent that each side is entrenched in their way forward, this would seem likely. Just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp.

Quote
and cause more forks,

Perhaps. If one side defaults on the approach satoshi suggested -- colloquially known as a hash battle -- than a fork would seem inevitable. Again, just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp.

Quote
each fork being less secure since each have less hash rate?

If neither side capitulates, yes. Again, just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp. Of course, with a fairly pervasive narrative within Core of 'miners are evil', BTC may find other ways to lose hash security.
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1591


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 09:54:07 PM

@jbreher So what is likely to happen if BCH-ABC or SV wants to implement another improvement of the protocol that a significant portion disagree with? Are groups of miners going to square off on two or more camps

To the extent that each side is entrenched in their way forward, this would seem likely. Just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp.

Quote
and cause more forks,

Perhaps. If one side defaults on the approach satoshi suggested -- colloquially known as a hash battle -- than a fork would seem inevitable. Again, just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp.

Quote
each fork being less secure since each have less hash rate?

If neither side capitulates, yes. Again, just as would be the case for a schism within the Bitcoin Core camp. Of course, with a fairly pervasive narrative within Core of 'miners are evil', BTC may find other ways to lose hash security.

But a schism for BTC is less likely because they usually implement some kind of voting mechanism to ensure that most are on the same page before implementing. Also, what is great about segwit is if you are a user or a miner and don't care for segwit, you can ignore/avoid segwit tx and still be part of the network. Unfortunately, if you are a miner who ignores/avoids canonical ordering, it's not possible for you to remain on the same network as BCH ABC.
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2160


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:00:18 PM

come on BTC every minute = Critical !!!!!!!!!
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 972


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:13:56 PM

problem: bear talks to much
solution: feed bear more bitcoins until properly immobilized.
problem: solved.

------
imho i would have to say yep, thats a bounce not a skip
you can put the squiggle lines where you please but im with the purple and gold camp prevailing at the end of the day  #dyor
D 50 day MA
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2160


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:26:52 PM

Wrapped up mainland trip. Latest news Bitmain is out of cash and is desperately trying to raise capital to fund TSMC wafers. Yield is not good -below 80%. Existing investors asking for significant valuation discount or force them to sell BCH portfolio. Regardless they are screwed “And Bcash as well ??” Cheesy

https://twitter.com/btcking555/status/1115376669861105664?s=21
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2160


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:32:23 PM

via Imgflip Meme Generator

For reference, Bitcoin Cash vs Bitcoin. 🔥


via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/jacobcanfield/status/1114928230635659264?s=21
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2160


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:35:00 PM

via Imgflip Meme Generator

^
Indeed Cheesy Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 10:41:53 PM

In case you had not noticed, miners have always been happy to mine blocks large enough such that average wait tx latencies were darned near universally next-block or so. That is, until blocks became persistently full, making such performance impossible.

Who gives any shits about what miners want?  It’s irrelevant.  Same as what users want.  That’s irrelevant too.

 Either they mine or they don’t.  So the incentives for mining are already built into bitcoin.   Same with users.  Either they use bitcoin or they don’t. 

Again, in bitcoin incentives are already well established from the beginning.  That’s what makes bitcoin so powerful as contrasted with the various shitcoin bitcoin wannabes.
cryptjh
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 546
Merit: 125



View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:00:29 PM

Say hello to bitcoin wallet number 35 million!
The last 2 days 120.000 new bitcoins wallets, have been added to the bitcoin blockchain!

https://www.blockchain.com/ja/charts/my-wallet-n-users?timespan=all
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 514
Merit: 123



View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:01:43 PM

In case you had not noticed, miners have always been happy to mine blocks large enough such that average wait tx latencies were darned near universally next-block or so. That is, until blocks became persistently full, making such performance impossible.

Who gives any shits about what miners want?  It’s irrelevant.  Same as what users want.  That’s irrelevant too.

 Either they mine or they don’t.  So the incentives for mining are already built into bitcoin.   Same with users.  Either they use bitcoin or they don’t. 

Again, in bitcoin incentives are already well established from the beginning.  That’s what makes bitcoin so powerful as contrasted with the various shitcoin bitcoin wannabes.

You do realize miners vote?
fillippone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 496


Self Made Sr. Member


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:08:01 PM
Last edit: April 08, 2019, 11:19:10 PM by fillippone
Merited by micgoossens (1)


Transaction spike is probably due only to Veriblock spamming bitcoin blocks with their OP_Return transactions.
This is even suggested on the commment to the original tweet you posted.
I said something about that in my monthly analysis, but basically they are doing transactions on BTC blockchain, effectively using space on BTC blocks, and using their own protocol (Proof-of-Proof) trying to secure other weak blockchains (say a random shitcoin with low hashing power) using Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work blockchain and its massive security to protect them against 51% attacks. As they put transactions from other blockchains on the Bitcoin network, that takes space in a Bitcoin block, some estimates say up to 25%, crowding out legit BTC transactions and pushing fees higher.

This is only a quick and dirty explaination, more at www.veriblock.com.

Edit: now I really regret getting so excited about this spike a couple of days ago...
Arriemoller
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 620



View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:09:36 PM

Since I'm the only one here, Ill just sign out and take a nap, see you in the evening.
[/quote

And I'm back, that was a hell of a nap, but I do fell well rested.
Arriemoller
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 620



View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:13:39 PM

How much would it cost to move such amount of money with traditional banking system?

Where I live - $0.

I don't understand why this particular meme gives people erections.

Where I live as well.
katrinmi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 9


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:16:20 PM

I've been seeing the market for the last 24 hours like this one


HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1399


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 08, 2019, 11:24:50 PM

In case you had not noticed, miners have always been happy to mine blocks large enough such that average wait tx latencies were darned near universally next-block or so. That is, until blocks became persistently full, making such performance impossible.

Who gives any shits about what miners want?  It’s irrelevant. Same as what users want.  That’s irrelevant too.

 Either they mine or they don’t.  So the incentives for mining are already built into bitcoin.   Same with users.  Either they use bitcoin or they don’t.  

Again, in bitcoin incentives are already well established from the beginning.  That’s what makes bitcoin so powerful as contrasted with the various shitcoin bitcoin wannabes.

You do realize miners vote?

1.  Miners don’t vote.

2.  If miners don’t like it, they can piss off. There’s plenty of other miners out there that would appreciate a slight hash rate drop.
Pages: « 1 ... 23350 23351 23352 23353 23354 23355 23356 23357 23358 23359 23360 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367 23368 23369 23370 23371 23372 23373 23374 23375 23376 23377 23378 23379 23380 23381 23382 23383 23384 23385 23386 23387 23388 23389 23390 23391 23392 23393 23394 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 [23400] 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23406 23407 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 23417 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 23431 23432 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 23440 23441 23442 23443 23444 23445 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 ... 24211 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!