Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bitcoinPsycho]

All those days I thought BSV and BCHSV are two separate shitcoins before today I figured out that Kucoin calls it BCHSV. It's confusing.

Anyway, I used to have this shit bought sometimes in the last year January (that time BCH) and sold them all today with over 60% loss I guess.

Official, it was 62.187% loss LOL

At least you got away with 37.813%
IT Could have been worse

[VB1001]

CMC

[El duderino_]

CMC

Should be way worse.... this still is a succes for that sh*tcoin

[jojo69]

looks like a lot of the SV selloff is flowing into BCH



 

[jbreher]

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?

[Paashaas]

CMC

Should be way worse.... this still is a succes for that sh*tcoin

https://twitter.com/krakenfx/status/1117828361269571586

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?

I differentiate between participation and taking over control, which is what was suggested during a Coingeek conference in which the blights of society were supposed to get sufficient tools to keep doing what they have been in a more efficient manner.
This could also be the issue on which CSW and Roger parted and to some extent why I don't have any hard feelings against him. CSW clearly cares about nothing worth caring about, unlike Roger (anti-establishment).

If Roger hadn't teamed up with CSW and Bitmain (phony hash war) I might've very well been persuaded to at least keep sensible portions of both chains in cold storage.

[El duderino_]

looks like a lot of the SV selloff is flowing into BCH



 

Trading one turd for another, gotta love it.

Let them remain in the sjalot part of the pool, that where all the turds float

[El duderino_]

CMC

Should be way worse.... this still is a succes for that sh*tcoin

https://twitter.com/krakenfx/status/1117828361269571586

#voted in that 76%

[jojo69]

sjalot

I rather like that

[silverfuture]

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1

[bitcoinPsycho]

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1

Me

[d_eddie]

Yeah, I dunno. I could see the state dept sitting this one out on 'challenge to any state authority' grounds. It's not going to be high profile stateside, so they can probably take a flyer without any public notice.

If he's blacklisted - as I assume he is - he can't fly from Thailand, but must cross some land border. At least he's a USA citizen, so I don't think the Thai government wants to get into a fight over him. I see a bigger problem for his gf (unfortunately not protected by wife status), who is Thai and could get to be used as an eloquent example.

[silverfuture]

Ready Player One, Satoshi edition.  Who wants to win a millio in BTC?

https://satoshistreasure.xyz/1

Me

Everyone playing is hoping they find the 400th key at the time of the dip!

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Battle to go sub 5k right now

[JSRAW]

Small battle.... In the end we are going to win an war.

[jbreher]

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?

I differentiate between participation and taking over control, which is what was suggested during a Coingeek conference in which the blights of society were supposed to get sufficient tools to keep doing what they have been in a more efficient manner.

You would need to provide more info if you expect me to know what you are talking about. All I have seen from CSW as public pronouncements on changes to the protocol have been to restrict any such protocol changes to be to 'unfucken' (not his term, actually Shadders', I believe) it back to parity with v0.1. Any tools sitting atop such a protocol are just that - not base layer. Accordingly, I don't understand what that has to do with SV. If any public pronouncement has even been made.

I note also that you have not answered the posited question(s).

If Roger hadn't teamed up with CSW and Bitmain (phony hash war)

Exactly what is a 'phony hash war'? As differentiated, I suppose, from a 'real hash war?

[rolling]

Looks like CSW is pissed and dumping everything in a fit of rage

[Saint-loup]

[cAPSLOCK]

What he has been doing has been obvious to me (I think) and this supports it.  He has been trying to make "bitcoin" something that the state and the CBs could embrace.

Question: Would you prefer to prohibit any state actor from participating in Bitcoin?

Followup: If answer to above is 'yes', how do you square this with the mutually-exclusive attribute of 'permissionless'?

Absolutely not.  But neither would I work to smooch up to them with some sort of dystopian nightmare about "all your crimes will forever be recorded on the blockchain", which as I have followed BSV twitter has been a pretty strong narrative.  And CSW has been talking about how privacy is bad and the evidence trail for law is so important...  Orwell probably bumped his head on the lid of his coffin.