ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 02:01:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
HI-TEC99
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
|
|
January 31, 2023, 02:17:54 AM |
|
For some medication it's easier to gradually reduce the dose rather than suddenly quit. But I'm not a doctor. Don't rely on my advice because WTF do I know?
Probably you don't know much. ... You're best off getting medical advice from a doctor.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 03:01:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 04:01:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8725
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 31, 2023, 04:05:14 AM |
|
be blocking bud.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 4425
|
|
January 31, 2023, 04:17:06 AM Last edit: January 31, 2023, 04:27:24 AM by Biodom |
|
watched first 6 episodes of Andor...pretty, pretty good (1st is the weakest, don't let it discourage you)..the vibes of ww2 french resistance movies, "The Guns of Navarone", etc....in space.
bitcoin derped here a bit..no matter.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 06:01:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 07:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 08:01:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 09:01:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 2766
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
|
January 31, 2023, 09:09:06 AM |
|
ChatGPT 2.0
|
|
|
|
|
Tipeform$
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 15
|
|
January 31, 2023, 09:19:38 AM |
|
ChatGPT 2.0 Billy means I recommend investing. Because if his promotion money is invested in Bitcoin then surely Billy will do well later in life. I think Billy currently owns 44 Bitcoins
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 2766
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
|
January 31, 2023, 09:39:14 AM |
|
I bet many women wouldn't care and this guy will probably only get more action as a result of what is written on his car.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 10:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3150
Merit: 8519
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
January 31, 2023, 10:10:31 AM |
|
What about NFTs stored inside the Bitcoin blockchain? Ordinals is causing a huge stir but relative silence on the forum about it. NFTs Coming to Bitcoin Sparks Handwringing About Crypto PuristsNothing triggering about that headline at all I don't blame anyone here if they're against it. I'm kind of on the fence about it personally. But it seems to be happening whether anybody likes it or not. - An NFT implementation which embeds NFT content in Taproot witnesses, assigning them to the first sat of the first output of the transaction, "inscribing" that sat with content
Super interesting to watch the discussion over this bullet point in particular unfolding on Twitter as it now appears to be possible to upload several KB (theoretically up to ~4 MB) worth of data to the blockchain for the purposes of on-chain NFT storage. https://ordinals.com/inscription/69d500051f9a0812ed41798eeb06d4af93349529480c23e9cf1ef0ccb2a921a8i0On one side you have lukedashjr calling it an attack on Bitcoin and Adam Back calling for transaction censorship by miners; on the other side you have Peter Todd calling the "freakout" about ordinals "stupid" and reminding everyone that adding non-standard transaction data to transactions has always been possible. It has reinvigorated the age-old debate of "appropriate use of block space," what "blockchain spam" entails, and whether Bitcoin should be used to store data not related to the actual transaction of BTC (for financial purposes). Here is a brief overview of how it works as far as NFTs are concerned: https://read.pourteaux.xyz/p/illegitimate-bitcoin-transactions... Almost zero mentions of this debate here, so let's mention it.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2023, 11:01:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 13096
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
January 31, 2023, 11:13:37 AM |
|
All of my friends and me Wild about
The last of us “serie”
But maaaaaaaaaaaaan that 3th episode fucked up a lot
|
|
|
|
hisslyness
|
|
January 31, 2023, 11:29:22 AM |
|
What about NFTs stored inside the Bitcoin blockchain? Ordinals is causing a huge stir but relative silence on the forum about it. NFTs Coming to Bitcoin Sparks Handwringing About Crypto PuristsNothing triggering about that headline at all I don't blame anyone here if they're against it. I'm kind of on the fence about it personally. But it seems to be happening whether anybody likes it or not. - An NFT implementation which embeds NFT content in Taproot witnesses, assigning them to the first sat of the first output of the transaction, "inscribing" that sat with content
Super interesting to watch the discussion over this bullet point in particular unfolding on Twitter as it now appears to be possible to upload several KB (theoretically up to ~4 MB) worth of data to the blockchain for the purposes of on-chain NFT storage. https://ordinals.com/inscription/69d500051f9a0812ed41798eeb06d4af93349529480c23e9cf1ef0ccb2a921a8i0On one side you have lukedashjr calling it an attack on Bitcoin and Adam Back calling for transaction censorship by miners; on the other side you have Peter Todd calling the "freakout" about ordinals "stupid" and reminding everyone that adding non-standard transaction data to transactions has always been possible. It has reinvigorated the age-old debate of "appropriate use of block space," what "blockchain spam" entails, and whether Bitcoin should be used to store data not related to the actual transaction of BTC (for financial purposes). Here is a brief overview of how it works as far as NFTs are concerned: https://read.pourteaux.xyz/p/illegitimate-bitcoin-transactions... Almost zero mentions of this debate here, so let's mention it. I really don’t see the problem with this. I personally wouldn’t do it, as it is a waste of Bitcoins. But, if someone wants to create a transaction that will take up an entire block and it is willing to pay for the privilege, then go for it! If they want to waste/spend 16sat/vbyte or approx. 0.32BTC per block, with stupid NFT monkeys, then good luck to them! Not sure how long they would be able to keep it up! Bitcoin blockchain has a predictable growth, using it to store data in Taproot script-path isn’t going to change that growth! If this forces transactions off to a second layer (LN), even better! In regards to "appropriate use of block space" who am I to decide what you put in your transactions? as long as you are not double spending, i couldn't give a shit!
|
|
|
|
|