Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 05:24:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 [110] 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 ... 348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: MtGox withdrawal delays [Gathering]  (Read 908381 times)
Nagle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 06:33:26 PM
 #2181

It is important to remember that the mtgox btc valuation is artificially high because of them being blacklisted by as much of the fiat banking system the USG can influence. So, transferring the btc to another exchange and selling it is only realizing what the btc are really worth.

Enough with the conspiracy theories. Mt. Gox's troubles are due to Mt. Gox.

This has been going on for months. If Mt. Gox really wanted a high-volume banking arrangement, they would have found one by now. But they seem to find having excuses for non-payment more useful. This suggests they don't have the depositors' money.
1714065879
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065879

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065879
Reply with quote  #2

1714065879
Report to moderator
1714065879
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065879

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065879
Reply with quote  #2

1714065879
Report to moderator
1714065879
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065879

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065879
Reply with quote  #2

1714065879
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714065879
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714065879

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714065879
Reply with quote  #2

1714065879
Report to moderator
Keyser Soze
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 470
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 10:28:30 PM
 #2182

This has been going on for months. If Mt. Gox really wanted a high-volume banking arrangement, they would have found one by now. But they seem to find having excuses for non-payment more useful. This suggests they don't have the depositors' money.

While it is very likely they have less then 100% of client's funds on deposit, we really don't know if they are insolvent. If most banks deem their activity as high risk, they may not be able to set up a relationship that meets their needs in a reasonable time frame.

Either scenario is certainly possible, we cannot (currently) say for certain which one it is.
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 11:30:17 PM
 #2183

If most banks deem their activity as high risk
Fun thing is, their activity is at high risk mostly because the banks themselves are boycotting it.

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 11:55:05 PM
 #2184

What surprises me the most is that you are all mostly talking about why they are having trouble processing/covering withdrawals and not why they haven't been straight forward (honest) about the whole situation and told you. Even worse, there have been countless chances to get out at zero loss. We had $130 btc a few weeks ago. Cheaper before that. Several opportunities to buy cheap (SR dump) etc, etc. After all these months why in God's name would you still have money in there. Are you all sadistic?
much +1, I've been wondering this too, still baffled.

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
solex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 11:56:04 PM
 #2185

What surprises me the most is that you are all mostly talking about why they are having trouble processing/covering withdrawals and not why they haven't been straight forward (honest) about the whole situation and told you.

They are straight forward about not being straight forward.
2.5 months have passed and the situation seems unchanged.

CONFIRMATION TIME!

I was on at #mtgox on irc.freenode.org when identified user MagicalTux, CEO of MtGox, gave the statements in sturles post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179586.msg2924021#msg2924021 and I can confirm that the quotes are accurate and exactly what was said.

It would be great if one or two other people who also have the conversation in their scrollback buffer can also confirm this.

13:48 <@MagicalTux> sturles, we already applied to that one
13:51 <@MagicalTux> samson_, things are not easy, but it's far from what you could qualify as "embargo"
13:54 <@MagicalTux> sturles, we've been reducing SEPA delay day by day
13:54 <@MagicalTux> things are much better than one month ago
13:54 <@MagicalTux> nope
13:59 <@MagicalTux> sturles, "blocked" is not the correct word
14:00 <@MagicalTux> SleepersTide, right now all SWIFT transfers are processed up to the limits of our current bank (up to 10 transfers per day - we should be able to increase that as soon as we have more banking partners ready - it's taking longer than expected because of the time required by the people at the bank to understand our business)
14:01 <@MagicalTux> sturles, we are not allowed to talk about the exact problem (doing so would only make things worse)
14:12 <@MagicalTux> sturles, most companies in Japan will do one, maybe two SWIFT transfers a month to providers overseas (actually most will do zero)
14:16 <@MagicalTux> Delerium, literal
14:17 <@MagicalTux> when we were in the second largest bank in Japan, we represented more than half of all the volume of SWIFT processed by that bank (almost overloading their systems a couple of times)
14:18 <@MagicalTux> rfish, rather than spending time on this, fixing it is likely going to bring more on the long term
14:19 <@MagicalTux> those wires are processed in received order, nothing else
14:25 <@MagicalTux> publishing that would be against our ToS
14:26 <@MagicalTux> (specifically privacy policies)

^^ see sturles post for full conversation, just confirming MagicalTux's statements.

..if you're wondering why we should confirm this is true: various "news outlets" are now watching and typing up stories

Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 12:00:49 AM
 #2186

They are straight forward about not being straight forward.
2.5 months have passed and the situation seems unchanged.

14:01 <@MagicalTux> sturles, we are not allowed to talk about the exact problem (doing so would only make things worse)
Not being allowed to state the exact problem might be fine, but why then they are lying elsewhere, such as with plain wrong wait times, and ridiculous excuses ("network congestion")?

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
papamoi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 06:52:59 AM
 #2187

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 07:02:20 AM
 #2188

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
eZc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 10:05:38 AM
 #2189

So what is now the expected withdrawal time for:

SEPA >1000EUR
SEPA <1000EUR
Int Wire >1000USD
Int Wire <1000USD
Int Wire JPY
bnjmnkent
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 10:27:54 AM
 #2190

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.


Having found the strongest hypothesis, what are the actions to derive (otherwise the search process is just
a big waste of time)?
sturle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002

https://bitmynt.no


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2013, 10:29:05 AM
 #2191

So what is now the expected withdrawal time for:

SEPA >1000EUR
SEPA <1000EUR
Six weeks.  You need to go below 400 EUR to get it significantly faster.

Quote
Int Wire >1000USD
Int Wire <1000USD
USD have to pass through US banks, which aren't very cooperative.  I think there are still withdrawals left dating back to mid June.

Quote
Int Wire JPY
For other currencies in general the queue is shorter than the USD queue, but I don't know exactly how long.

Sjå https://bitmynt.no for veksling av bitcoin mot norske kroner.  Trygt, billig, raskt og enkelt sidan 2010.
I buy with EUR and other currencies at a fair market price when you want to sell.  See http://bitmynt.no/eurprice.pl
Warning: "Bitcoin" XT, Classic, Unlimited and the likes are scams. Don't use them, and don't listen to their shills.
Nagle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2013, 04:37:20 PM
 #2192

USD have to pass through US banks, which aren't very cooperative.  I think there are still withdrawals left dating back to mid June.
Enough with the bullshit. Nobody has reported that a US bank has refused an incoming wire transfer from Mt. Gox. If there's a problem on the bank side (which is questionable; Mt. Gox has never offered any concrete proof of this) it's at the sending end in Japan.

Mt. Gox doesn't seem to be having any trouble getting wire transfers from the US. If some limits were being applied at the US end, there would be trouble sending to Mt. Gox from the US.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 05:36:08 PM
 #2193

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.


Having found the strongest hypothesis, what are the actions to derive (otherwise the search process is just
a big waste of time)?


If this hypothesis is the correct one, then inaction is the most appropriate course of action for me.  This was my best hypothesis before I risked the money I did with them, and it factored into a decision about how much money to put at risk here.  I would not have done so if I needed to see results within a certain time-frame.

To reiterate my posture:

 - having loss of access to a non-trivial sum of $$$ gives me a legitimate rational to attack the problems at their root (which I feel is probably the established financial corporations and the regulators they sponsor.)

 - the $5M (or $10M) of formerly Mt. Gox controlled value is now sitting in a pool that Mt. Gox cannot touch should they implode or decide to run.  I have a better chance of recouping my losses out of this pool since it is held by the the U.S. govt and I am a U.S. citizen.

 - It is perfectly possible that Mt. Gox figures out a way to overcome their issues eventually and the wire lands in my bank account someday with little fan-fare.  Mt. Gox's best bet is to agree to be a pliant honey-pot in exchange for return of their funds, and I think there is a fair chance that they will be offered that option and accept it.

The greatest good would be possible by perusing the first bullet point, but absent some cooperation from Mt. Gox, it is not very practical to do so.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
wuala
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


Luk, soy tu padreeee


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 08:02:10 PM
 #2194

Anyone with a new witdraw processed??

Wich date??

 Huh

Leave the force be with you...
bernard75
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 08:06:12 PM
 #2195

They stopped sending money, it was just annoying and a major inconvenience anyway.
They will now dedicate all of their time on receiving cash, although that doesnt happen very often.
EuroTrash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2013, 08:42:17 PM
 #2196

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.

Someone important told me that the lawyers he chose are not the best ones in the field, yet he refused any external offer for help.

<=== INSERT SMART SIGNATURE HERE ===>
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
October 31, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
 #2197

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.

Someone important told me that the lawyers he chose are not the best ones in the field, yet he refused any external offer for help.

It occurred to me the other day when I was talking to someone about it that it is quite possible that Karpeles is simply not a person with a lot of potential for handling various kinds of loads.  He might simply be swamped and confused and floundering about quite a bit.  That would explain some of the observations that various people have made.

My basic assumption was that Mark was a clever and capable guy since he landed at the top of a fairly powerful organization.  But when one thinks about it, when he obtained Mt. Gox from the original creator it was nothing near what it later became.  People from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of capabilities could have decided that a fantasy card trading outfit who adapted their software to deal with a new and tiny crypto-currency was worth obtaining.  Especially if they had some spare cash kicking around or for some reason to need to move some which is why a lot of the early adopters probably got into things.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
ardana123
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 01, 2013, 12:25:11 AM
 #2198

http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/1pnc2a/mt_gox_price_spread_discussion/

report from a USD withdrawal in this thread?
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
November 01, 2013, 01:21:36 AM
 #2199

so what should we understand from this??

they are not cheaters but just fucked up by the system?


As annoyed as I am with Mt. Gox, that still strikes me as the strongest hypothesis.  The reason is still that it would make little sense for Mt. Gox to fuck up their reputation and marketshare when they had a damn good and very profitable thing going.


Having found the strongest hypothesis, what are the actions to derive (otherwise the search process is just
a big waste of time)?


If this hypothesis is the correct one, then inaction is the most appropriate course of action for me.  This was my best hypothesis before I risked the money I did with them, and it factored into a decision about how much money to put at risk here.  I would not have done so if I needed to see results within a certain time-frame.

To reiterate my posture:

 - having loss of access to a non-trivial sum of $$$ gives me a legitimate rational to attack the problems at their root (which I feel is probably the established financial corporations and the regulators they sponsor.)

 - the $5M (or $10M) of formerly Mt. Gox controlled value is now sitting in a pool that Mt. Gox cannot touch should they implode or decide to run.  I have a better chance of recouping my losses out of this pool since it is held by the the U.S. govt and I am a U.S. citizen.

 - It is perfectly possible that Mt. Gox figures out a way to overcome their issues eventually and the wire lands in my bank account someday with little fan-fare.  Mt. Gox's best bet is to agree to be a pliant honey-pot in exchange for return of their funds, and I think there is a fair chance that they will be offered that option and accept it.

The greatest good would be possible by perusing the first bullet point, but absent some cooperation from Mt. Gox, it is not very practical to do so.



Western Union should buy MtGox.
It would save both companies.
Both will die if they do nothing.

FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276


View Profile
November 01, 2013, 01:44:11 AM
 #2200


Western Union should buy MtGox.
It would save both companies.
Both will die if they do nothing.


Damn good idea actually.  I gotta wonder if it is not to late for one or both of them already though.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
Pages: « 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 [110] 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 ... 348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!