Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2019, 07:39:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 [893] 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees  (Read 652471 times)
lsd400
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 03:51:59 AM
 #17841

Now sv are posting here before it was core spreading shit. How do you explain it?

Being forks of each other, ABC and SV share a common heritage. As such, this thread is as applicable to SV as it is to ABC.

Paths are different, tickers are different. And there is BCH and BSV from 15 Nov and on. Just get over it sv forked off from BCH.

Nope. U can do better research. But now we are where it is.

Is that false what I've said? Anyway check this out cool thing coming to BCH don't confuse with sv.
https://www.cashaccount.info/
1561621162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561621162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561621162
Reply with quote  #2

1561621162
Report to moderator
1561621162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561621162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561621162
Reply with quote  #2

1561621162
Report to moderator
1561621162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561621162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561621162
Reply with quote  #2

1561621162
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1131



View Profile
January 02, 2019, 04:54:11 AM
 #17842

if we break through the line, then further growth




I am thinking that a fair value of BCH (BAB / BSV combined) is somewhere around the 0.10 ratio compared to BTC.
Sure we might see some spikes up like we did a few times last year however I am pretty sure it will settle eventually somewhere around the 10% ratio compared to a Bitcoin.

Right now, the ratio is very very low and I hope that we hit a bottom of it last month. Basically same with the ETH ratio, its about time they rally against the BTC.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 10:34:17 AM
 #17843

Yes, the indicator "Baseline" also shows that the equilibrium price is 0.1





dkbit98
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 34

Crypto Designer


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 11:32:10 AM
 #17844

Opennode Rejects Roger Ver's $1.25 Million Offer to Accept BCH  Grin

Opennode, a bitcoin payment processor rejected Roger Ver's to switch from Bitcoin's Lightning-Network to Bitcoin Cash.

In a Youtube video, Roger Ver criticised Lightning Network's Scalability and offer OpenNode $1.25 Million if they switch to the BCH network.

OpenNode openly rejected Ver's offer on twitter, stating that "better, more open financial system is only possible with Bitcoin."

 Grin Cheesy

source:
https://coinnounce.com/1-24-million-offer-by-roger-ver-to-opennode-for-accepting-bch-rejected/


That is big hint for wise people who are still dreaming this is alive project and they will see this rising again like it gone high in past. OpenNode don't want to make their project suspicious that's why they rejected this offer.

But it was nice bribe money from Roger Kver...
He showed that he is willing to spend millions of dollars for BribeCash coin.
He is also using his dollars to pay japan sockpuppets promotions
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 01:06:45 PM
 #17845

Bitcoin will not be able to increase the size of the block otherwise it will mean the recognition that BCH is better. But without increasing the block to solve the problem of BTC scaling is impossible
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 543

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
January 02, 2019, 02:02:05 PM
 #17846

Now sv are posting here before it was core spreading shit. How do you explain it?

Being forks of each other, ABC and SV share a common heritage. As such, this thread is as applicable to SV as it is to ABC.

Paths are different, tickers are different. And there is BCH and BSV from 15 Nov and on. Just get over it sv forked off from BCH.

Nope. U can do better research. But now we are where it is.

Is that false what I've said? Anyway check this out cool thing coming to BCH don't confuse with sv.
https://www.cashaccount.info/

https://twitter.com/ari_cryptonized/status/1080454843658055681?s=21

Honest miner did apply to Nakamoto consensus  ABC did not. But cheated and grabbed the ticker.

Hm.. sounds like blockstream did before?

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
addicto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1012


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 06:23:29 PM
 #17847

Bitcoin will not be able to increase the size of the block otherwise it will mean the recognition that BCH is better. But without increasing the block to solve the problem of BTC scaling is impossible

This is totally nonsense to make confuse the people with this bigger block size now that has been over with the fork. BCH ABC and SV both are fall under altcoins so this is not your problem how BTC will overcome on these issue which is not important at this point.
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 09:30:04 PM
Last edit: January 02, 2019, 09:52:05 PM by alevlaslo
 #17848

Bitcoin will not be able to increase the size of the block otherwise it will mean the recognition that BCH is better. But without increasing the block to solve the problem of BTC scaling is impossible

This is totally nonsense to make confuse the people with this bigger block size now that has been over with the fork. BCH ABC and SV both are fall under altcoins so this is not your problem how BTC will overcome on these issue which is not important at this point.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49017476#msg49017476
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1131



View Profile
January 02, 2019, 09:55:58 PM
 #17849

The reason why people don't always want bigger blocks is due to centralization risk.

Basically assume BSV has an 128MB block thats completely filled up. If a miner finds a block but he has a slow internet connection and takes him a few seconds longer to upload his block data while at the same time another miner with a faster internet connections finds it a few seconds later but gets it sent to the nodes first, his block will get accepted instead.

Another issue is that size needed to run a node. Look at ETH, I am pretty sure its almost at 1TB and because of this reason many people don't want to run a node. Since more bandwidth and more hard drive space cost more money.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
January 02, 2019, 10:11:29 PM
 #17850

if will add masternodes and reward for them, there will be many who want to install a full node
lsd400
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 03, 2019, 01:45:41 AM
 #17851

Now sv are posting here before it was core spreading shit. How do you explain it?

Being forks of each other, ABC and SV share a common heritage. As such, this thread is as applicable to SV as it is to ABC.

Paths are different, tickers are different. And there is BCH and BSV from 15 Nov and on. Just get over it sv forked off from BCH.

Nope. U can do better research. But now we are where it is.

Is that false what I've said? Anyway check this out cool thing coming to BCH don't confuse with sv.
https://www.cashaccount.info/

https://twitter.com/ari_cryptonized/status/1080454843658055681?s=21

Honest miner did apply to Nakamoto consensus  ABC did not. But cheated and grabbed the ticker.

Hm.. sounds like blockstream did before?

Guy get's too emotional I guess. Roger has shit load of btc, bch and sv. But as you know sv leaders craig, calvin keeps him out of that coin.
lsd400
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 12


View Profile
January 03, 2019, 01:51:31 AM
 #17852

Opennode Rejects Roger Ver's $1.25 Million Offer to Accept BCH  Grin

Opennode, a bitcoin payment processor rejected Roger Ver's to switch from Bitcoin's Lightning-Network to Bitcoin Cash.

In a Youtube video, Roger Ver criticised Lightning Network's Scalability and offer OpenNode $1.25 Million if they switch to the BCH network.

OpenNode openly rejected Ver's offer on twitter, stating that "better, more open financial system is only possible with Bitcoin."

 Grin Cheesy

source:
https://coinnounce.com/1-24-million-offer-by-roger-ver-to-opennode-for-accepting-bch-rejected/


That is big hint for wise people who are still dreaming this is alive project and they will see this rising again like it gone high in past. OpenNode don't want to make their project suspicious that's why they rejected this offer.

But it was nice bribe money from Roger Kver...
He showed that he is willing to spend millions of dollars for BribeCash coin.
He is also using his dollars to pay japan sockpuppets promotions

Bribecash? Really? there is no such coin. You guys getting creative  Smiley
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 1293


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 03, 2019, 02:04:20 AM
 #17853

The reason why people don't always want bigger blocks is due to centralization risk.

Basically assume BSV has an 128MB block thats completely filled up. If a miner finds a block but he has a slow internet connection and takes him a few seconds longer to upload his block data while at the same time another miner with a faster internet connections finds it a few seconds later but gets it sent to the nodes first, his block will get accepted instead.

Silly. If a miner is slow to propagate his block, he stands a higher chance of having that block orphaned. This is true. But this is true regardless of the block size.

Which, of course, is why miners -- who tend to have relatively large investments in mining hardware (e.g. multiple millions of USD) -- tend not to skimp on the mechanisms employed to get their blocks propagated with All Due Alacrity.

If not, then too bad, so sad. They get outcompeted. Waah.

Quote
Another issue is that size needed to run a node. Look at ETH, I am pretty sure its almost at 1TB and because of this reason many people don't want to run a node. Since more bandwidth and more hard drive space cost more money.

Intentionally crippling the greatest tool for liberty mankind has known in the last century, just to satisfy some Raspberry Pi fetish, is lunacy. Not to mention counterproductive. As the cost of on-chain transactions is fated to again reach stratospheric levels.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
dkbit98
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 34

Crypto Designer


View Profile
January 03, 2019, 10:31:37 AM
 #17854

Nice tweet from Trace Mayer:

Would you rather have: ProofOfKeys or ProofOfRoger (MtGox)?

https://twitter.com/TraceMayer/status/1080641800967213056


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0

ProofOfRoger  Grin no no no

1 more day left for Proof of Keys event.
Interesting to see what will happen.
https://www.proofofkeys.com/
NrX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 254


View Profile
January 03, 2019, 10:39:33 AM
 #17855

What matters the most is trust what plays vital role in ultimate authority and status of anything. Bitcoin is name of trust for being up and resilient to every single attack in a decade time. There can more advanced projects but they can never reach not even near of that status and trust what Bitcoin holds. This is the main thing those understand it will never believe in words of people those can't be trusted.
bitcoin_diamond
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 6


View Profile
January 04, 2019, 08:47:41 AM
 #17856

BCash is having some extreme issues this sort of asset can fall to really new lowest because it cannot get any support from lightning network.
Roger Ver has been rejected for the support from the opennode
this asset is next to 0
dont put your valuable money into junk which you are unaware of .. its your hard earned money i suppose and if you gonna put something in modified source which is not scalable and have issues with coding you are making a big mistake in your life... roger ver and people like craig wright will bring you random coins for their own motives they know themselves what they are bringing to market.. roger ver has even sold most of the BCash these people are curse to crypto community dont be blind into thinking this asset will be any good..
i am just here to help our community i have no other motive then to serve people.
i would suggest anyone to get a new algo coin which are mainly under top 3

please dont burn your money and then get crazy over things that didnt work well.

takecare of your investments and rethink in 2019 this might be just be over for bearmarket and we would jump into bull market soon but not all coins will perform the same.
sarfield
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 04, 2019, 09:01:39 AM
 #17857

It is difficult to be accepted but this is the reality, and we learn for each coin for the investment we will choose. BCH is learning to be the best but still needs a process for that development. Let healthy competition always exist and this will be an interesting one to consider.

[small]Twitter | YouTube | Telegram | Facebook | LinkedIn | Reddit[/small]
[/center]
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 543

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2019, 11:06:10 AM
 #17858

Nice tweet from Trace Mayer:

Would you rather have: ProofOfKeys or ProofOfRoger (MtGox)?

https://twitter.com/TraceMayer/status/1080641800967213056


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0

ProofOfRoger  Grin no no no

1 more day left for Proof of Keys event.
Interesting to see what will happen.
https://www.proofofkeys.com/


Ask yourself, why is name calling needed at all here? What does this proof?

Go and find out yourselve what tech is working and due to Bitcoin's honest purpose..

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 1293


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 04, 2019, 06:38:03 PM
 #17859

BCash is having some extreme issues this sort of asset can fall to really new lowest because it cannot get any support from lightning network.

You need to rethink your assumptions. Bitcoin Cash -- neither ABC nor SV -- want anything to do with LN. However, if they did, it would be a simple matter to add support for 'Lightning Cash Network'. But what would be the point? What with LN currently unable to transact in anything more meaningful than a bumper sticker.

Quote
Roger Ver has been rejected for the support from the opennode

Support? You really do have a simplistic view of the world, don't you? Turns out Roger's offer of $1.25M USD (or whatever the sum) was insufficient for OpenNode to totally scrap their business plan, and revector entirely to a different infrastructure layer. Oh well.

Quote
this asset is next to 0

Especially funny given your username. Bitcoin Cash is not the market cap leader at the moment. But it certainly is not 'next to 0'. You know what it's next to? At #4, it is next to #3 -- XRP -- which really isn't even a cryptocurrency in the true definition of the word. So it's kind of next to #2 Ethereum - which having an unbounded supply, also fails the 'money' test. Which kind of makes it #2, which would be kind of next to Bitcoin Segwit.

You know what Bitcoin Cash is not 'next to'? Bitcoin Cash is not 'next to' Bitcoin Diamond, which seems destined to always be a fourth-rate also-ran.

Quote
roger ver has even sold most of the BCash

I would like to see evidence of that assertion. That is, if you're not just pulling shit out of your ass and throwing it. Just stop. It's unsanitary, and it just stinks up the place. Of course, that's obviously your intent.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Odeoke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 251


View Profile
January 04, 2019, 06:59:47 PM
 #17860

Is the war has been over between ABC and SV? I converted my coins into ABC which looking more strong and now from last few days ABC is still head and in more strong position which is so relaxed for me.
Pages: « 1 ... 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 [893] 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!