Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 06:26:37 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #  (Read 417606 times)
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 08:45:44 AM
 #3181

So wk, you're saying the double payment has caused you to lose 25BTC?

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

Since you're not honest about the problem, dont be offended if i dont trust your whole payout system. (I understand the payout method)
1480875997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480875997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480875997
Reply with quote  #2

1480875997
Report to moderator
1480875997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480875997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480875997
Reply with quote  #2

1480875997
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480875997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480875997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480875997
Reply with quote  #2

1480875997
Report to moderator
1480875997
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480875997

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480875997
Reply with quote  #2

1480875997
Report to moderator
HellDiverUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 10:45:23 AM
 #3182


Since you're not honest about the problem, dont be offended if i dont trust your whole payout system. (I understand the payout method)

Wow, you REALLY know how to make a mountain out of a mole hill, don't you?   Roll Eyes

If you don't like Eligius, why don't you go mine somewhere else?  GHash.io are really transparent...  Roll Eyes
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 12:01:00 PM
 #3183

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

If the same thing happened as last time, it will come out of wk's pocket.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
December 29, 2013, 01:21:31 PM
 #3184

So wk, you're saying the double payment has caused you to lose 25BTC?

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

Since you're not honest about the problem, dont be offended if i dont trust your whole payout system. (I understand the payout method)
Obviously he's covering it out of pocket. I don't know what you're accusing him of being dishonest about...  Huh

seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 02:42:01 PM
 #3185

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

If the same thing happened as last time, it will come out of wk's pocket.

So the pool's wallet and his personal wallet is one? Because otherwise he would have noticed the double payout or the server wouldnt have made the double payout due to empty balance.

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
December 29, 2013, 02:44:37 PM
 #3186

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

If the same thing happened as last time, it will come out of wk's pocket.

So the pool's wallet and his personal wallet is one? Because otherwise he would have noticed the double payout or the server wouldnt have made the double payout due to empty balance.
Uh, you must be new here. Eligius generates payouts, they don't come out of a wallet except in rare cases.

seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 02:44:48 PM
 #3187

So wk, you're saying the double payment has caused you to lose 25BTC?

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

Since you're not honest about the problem, dont be offended if i dont trust your whole payout system. (I understand the payout method)
Obviously he's covering it out of pocket. I don't know what you're accusing him of being dishonest about...  Huh

I'm not accusing. He withhold the information. I understand his reason but i dont understand how double payout is possible if the pool's wallet is empty!
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 02:48:04 PM
 #3188

Where did that extra 25BTC come from? I thought based on CPPSRB, the pool would not have any reserved fund and all shelved shares will be paid for. Its essentially max at PPS.

If the same thing happened as last time, it will come out of wk's pocket.

So the pool's wallet and his personal wallet is one? Because otherwise he would have noticed the double payout or the server wouldnt have made the double payout due to empty balance.
Uh, you must be new here. Eligius generates payouts, they don't come out of a wallet except in rare cases.

Then explain to me where did the extra 25btc comes from? I know it came from a new block but it wasnt paid out according to shares log.... (shelved shares). How did that happen?

Edit: basically from what i read wk's post, the payout system didnt have the updated shares log (or its not synced properly). So the shelved shared were not paid and how exactly wk is going to do to fix it? can wk explain how the miners would have to "work off" the double paid? dont they already shelved shares to be deleted?
bmoconno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


New In Town...


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 03:05:12 PM
 #3189


Then explain to me where did the extra 25btc comes from? I know it came from a new block but it wasnt paid out according to shares log.... (shelved shares). How did that happen?


If you read wk's post from last night he clearly explains that the BTC for the double-payment came from block #277361 that was found just as he was taking the system out of fail-safe.  The original payment was meant to come out of the BTC mined from block #277343, which was found just before the system went into fail-safe mode.

Hope this clears it up for you, if not, please re-read the entirety of wk's post from last night where he explains the situation.

Chained To Your Miners?  Try Miner Minder for a web based stratum proxy that you control!
If I've helped you out, or you just think I'm awesome… 13SZex4uANVrfTeeuFEXGu6W8EVYtWVB53
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:08:10 PM
 #3190


Then explain to me where did the extra 25btc comes from? I know it came from a new block but it wasnt paid out according to shares log.... (shelved shares). How did that happen?


If you read wk's post from last night he clearly explains that the BTC for the double-payment came from block #277361 that was found just as he was taking the system out of fail-safe.  The original payment was meant to come out of the BTC mined from block #277343, which was found just before the system went into fail-safe mode.

Hope this clears it up for you, if not, please re-read the entirety of wk's post from last night where he explains the situation.

I understood the mess up. Please read the post above
bmoconno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


New In Town...


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 03:11:44 PM
 #3191


Then explain to me where did the extra 25btc comes from? I know it came from a new block but it wasnt paid out according to shares log.... (shelved shares). How did that happen?


If you read wk's post from last night he clearly explains that the BTC for the double-payment came from block #277361 that was found just as he was taking the system out of fail-safe.  The original payment was meant to come out of the BTC mined from block #277343, which was found just before the system went into fail-safe mode.

Hope this clears it up for you, if not, please re-read the entirety of wk's post from last night where he explains the situation.

I understood the mess up. Please read the post above

Ok, we'll try it like this…

25 BTC came from block #277361
25 BTC came from block #277343

That's where the BTC for the double payment came from.

Chained To Your Miners?  Try Miner Minder for a web based stratum proxy that you control!
If I've helped you out, or you just think I'm awesome… 13SZex4uANVrfTeeuFEXGu6W8EVYtWVB53
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:14:29 PM
 #3192


Then explain to me where did the extra 25btc comes from? I know it came from a new block but it wasnt paid out according to shares log.... (shelved shares). How did that happen?


If you read wk's post from last night he clearly explains that the BTC for the double-payment came from block #277361 that was found just as he was taking the system out of fail-safe.  The original payment was meant to come out of the BTC mined from block #277343, which was found just before the system went into fail-safe mode.

Hope this clears it up for you, if not, please re-read the entirety of wk's post from last night where he explains the situation.

I understood the mess up. Please read the post above

Ok, we'll try it like this…

25 BTC came from block #277361
25 BTC came from block #277343

That's where the BTC for the double payment came from.

LOL thanks Cheesy

But thats not my question. Look the payout method is sound but the implementation IMO isnt.
I would have gotten my own answers if there were stats to show all my submitted shares, paid out shares and shelved shares.

Where can we see this shares log?

Edit: wk's stats shows "rewards" which got messed up because it doesnt show negative balance. After this you understand why "shares"are more transparent than "reward". Look at BTCguild's PPLNS stats for example.
novymivo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:16:02 PM
 #3193

I don't understand some people here.
He paid from his own pocket, what else you want from him?
wk please put the list of addresses with double pay :
If i see my address here i will return the money , simple.
Don't forget we do not pay anything for using Eligius.st !!!!

1DP6hkRCNoxE15QFfyeqxRk1qu7gX4FzGS
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:20:57 PM
 #3194

I don't understand some people here.
He paid from his own pocket, what else you want from him?
wk please put the list of addresses with double pay :
If i see my address here i will return the money , simple.
Don't forget we do not pay anything for using Eligius.st !!!!


Didnt i get ppl here to confirm that he didnt pay out of his pocket?

My question is to get this clear. His payout got messed up meaning it wasnt paid out according to a proper shares log.

Hence my question "where did that 25BTC come from? "...... because it has to come from miners whose submitted shares werent paid. (shelved shares)
bmoconno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


New In Town...


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 03:28:29 PM
 #3195

I don't understand some people here.
He paid from his own pocket, what else you want from him?
wk please put the list of addresses with double pay :
If i see my address here i will return the money , simple.
Don't forget we do not pay anything for using Eligius.st !!!!


He didn't pay out of pocket, he accidentally used the reward from the block that was found while he was fixing the system.  As a result, people who received a double payment had a negative balance set (it read as 0.00000000 BTC on stats).  This balance was "worked off" by the miners continuing to use the pool.  So, if you got a double payment, and you didn't do anything to your miners… they likely already payed off your double payment.

@seriouscoin

hahahahaha I must be tired, I see that you're asking how the shelving system was circumvented.  I don't believe it was, since the double payment that went out was merely a manual payment of what the system already had in the queue.  Since the system was in fail-safe mode and wk didn't check to see if a payment was made, his manual payment simply payed off what had been in the queue.

I see how having knowledge of how many shares you had in each block could be beneficial to miners, but I don't think it would have fixed this problem.  

A mistake was made, and I think that wks way of solving it was probably the best way to go about fixing it.  If he had made an announcement, it's likely that the pool would be at a -25 BTC deficit, because most of the people who got a double payment would have switched pools or changed their payout address to get around "working off" the double payment they received.

Chained To Your Miners?  Try Miner Minder for a web based stratum proxy that you control!
If I've helped you out, or you just think I'm awesome… 13SZex4uANVrfTeeuFEXGu6W8EVYtWVB53
novymivo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:32:48 PM
 #3196

I don't understand some people here.
He paid from his own pocket, what else you want from him?
wk please put the list of addresses with double pay :
If i see my address here i will return the money , simple.
Don't forget we do not pay anything for using Eligius.st !!!!


He didn't pay out of pocket, he accidentally used the reward from the block that was found while he was fixing the system.  As a result, people who received a double payment had a negative balance set (it read as 0.00000000 BTC on stats).  This balance was "worked off" by the miners continuing to use the pool.  So, if you got a double payment, and you didn't do anything to your miners… they likely already payed off your double payment.

@seriouscoin

hahahahaha I must be tired, I see that you're asking how the shelving system was circumvented.  I don't believe it was, since the double payment that went out was merely a manual payment of what the system already had in the queue.  Since the system was in fail-safe mode and wk didn't check to see if a payment was made, his manual payment simply payed off what had been in the queue.

I see how having knowledge of how many shares you had in each block could be beneficial to miners, but I don't think it would have fixed this problem.  

A mistake was made, and I think that wks way of solving it was probably the best way to go about fixing it.  If he had made an announcement, it's likely that the pool would be at a -25 BTC deficit, because most of the people who got a double payment would have switched pools or changed their payout address to get around "working off" the double payment they received.

Thank you for explanation.

1DP6hkRCNoxE15QFfyeqxRk1qu7gX4FzGS
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:34:37 PM
 #3197

I don't understand some people here.
He paid from his own pocket, what else you want from him?
wk please put the list of addresses with double pay :
If i see my address here i will return the money , simple.
Don't forget we do not pay anything for using Eligius.st !!!!


He didn't pay out of pocket, he accidentally used the reward from the block that was found while he was fixing the system.  As a result, people who received a double payment had a negative balance set (it read as 0.00000000 BTC on stats).  This balance was "worked off" by the miners continuing to use the pool.  So, if you got a double payment, and you didn't do anything to your miners… they likely already payed off your double payment.

@seriouscoin

hahahahaha I must be tired, I see that you're asking how the shelving system was circumvented.  I don't believe it was, since the double payment that went out was merely a manual payment of what the system already had in the queue.  Since the system was in fail-safe mode and wk didn't check to see if a payment was made, his manual payment simply payed off what had been in the queue.

I see how having knowledge of how many shares you had in each block could be beneficial to miners, but I don't think it would have fixed this problem.  

A mistake was made, and I think that wks way of solving it was probably the best way to go about fixing it.  If he had made an announcement, it's likely that the pool would be at a -25 BTC deficit, because most of the people who got a double payment would have switched pools or changed their payout address to get around "working off" the double payment they received.

Ofcourse having shares stats wont fix the problem. The problem was identified as operator's mistake. But it would show transparency. I also want to here how he would "fix" the problem. Because i dont want to be the one paying for, you know what i mean.

 
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:38:08 PM
 #3198


Thank you for explanation.


Dont forget to thank me for raising the question because at first you gave me attitude.

Even the founder of the pool, Luke , is confused at times. He said its coming from his pocket which is not yet proven. Wk wants miners to work off the mistake but no transparency whatsoever. Is he a saint or hes asking us to trust him completely even after his own mistake? Trust should never be a requirement. Beside, withholding the information means he doesnt trust his miners.
bmoconno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


New In Town...


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2013, 03:39:15 PM
 #3199


Hence my question "where did that 25BTC come from? "...... because it has to come from miners whose submitted shares werent paid. (shelved shares)


You posted this reply while I was posting my last one, but I think I kind of hit on what I think happened.  To make it more clear for others, though, this has less to do with shelved shares and more to do with the payment queue.

0.  Block #277343 is found.
1.  First payment goes out.
2.  System crashes before payment queue gets updated.  (the system probably waits from a confirmation or two before updating the queue to ensure payment happened).
3.  wk goes to the data center and fixes the problem.
4.  Block #277361 is found.
5.  wk initiates a manual payment according to the (now out of date) payment queue.

This means that the people 25 BTC down in the queue from the first payment didn't receive their BTC when expected.  They didn't lose any BTC, but they had to wait an additional block before they received their payment.

I believe that the section of code that he posted yesterday is intended to prevent this type of mistake in the future, because it won't let payments be made from fail-safe mode.  This will allow the queue to get updated accordingly before a payment is sent.

Chained To Your Miners?  Try Miner Minder for a web based stratum proxy that you control!
If I've helped you out, or you just think I'm awesome… 13SZex4uANVrfTeeuFEXGu6W8EVYtWVB53
novymivo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
December 29, 2013, 03:44:21 PM
 #3200


Thank you for explanation.


Dont forget to thank me for raising the question because at first you gave me attitude.
Even the founder of the pool, Luke , is confused at times. He said its coming from his pocket which is not yet proven. Wk wants miners to work off the mistake but no transparency whatsoever. Is he a saint or hes asking us to trust him completely even after his own mistake? Trust should never be a requirement. Beside, withholding the information means he doesnt trust his miners.

Thank you as well Wink

1DP6hkRCNoxE15QFfyeqxRk1qu7gX4FzGS
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!