Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2016, 08:05:01 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 201 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #  (Read 417422 times)
wizkid057
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1168


View Profile
November 08, 2013, 06:48:37 PM
 #2601

Is the free transaction relay policy still active?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Free_transaction_relay_policy

173.242.112.53  doesn't reply to my pings...

The information is out of date.  I will have to get around to updating it.  For now just peer with wizkid057.com.

Tips: 1LDQrLr6dPVqNJmpZm82eZVKqDFRk7ERW8
Operator of the Eligius Mining Pool - 0% Fee, CPPSRB, GBT, Stratum, IRC+Phone Support, Awesome stats, Generation payouts, and more.
Don't feed the trolls. Science Confirms: Internet Trolls Really Are Narcissistic, Psychopathic, and Sadistic (1)
1480709101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480709101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480709101
Reply with quote  #2

1480709101
Report to moderator
1480709101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480709101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480709101
Reply with quote  #2

1480709101
Report to moderator
1480709101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480709101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480709101
Reply with quote  #2

1480709101
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480709101
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480709101

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480709101
Reply with quote  #2

1480709101
Report to moderator
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
November 08, 2013, 07:33:05 PM
 #2602

Is the free transaction relay policy still active?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Free_transaction_relay_policy

173.242.112.53  doesn't reply to my pings...
Updated the IP on the page, sorry.

incognitoworker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 708


View Profile
November 08, 2013, 09:20:50 PM
 #2603

What about multi merging some more altcoins?
I se some feew others do it, would it be worth it to implement?

Quotient- Closed loop economy enviroment experiment
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1195335.0
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
November 08, 2013, 09:25:28 PM
 #2604

What about multi merging some more altcoins?
I se some feew others do it, would it be worth it to implement?
When there are other legitimate altcoins that support merged mining...
Freicoin has it on their todo list, but there isn't really anything else.

ewibit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1744


View Profile
November 08, 2013, 09:49:36 PM
 #2605

When there are other legitimate altcoins that support merged mining...
Freicoin has it on their todo list, but there isn't really anything else.
devcoin   
groupcoin   
i0coin   
ixcoin   
namecoin   
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
November 08, 2013, 10:08:48 PM
 #2606

When there are other legitimate altcoins that support merged mining...
Freicoin has it on their todo list, but there isn't really anything else.
devcoin   
groupcoin   
i0coin   
ixcoin   
namecoin   
We do namecoin. The rest you list are just scams.

wizkid057
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1168


View Profile
November 08, 2013, 10:50:22 PM
 #2607

When there are other legitimate altcoins that support merged mining...
Freicoin has it on their todo list, but there isn't really anything else.
devcoin   
groupcoin   
i0coin   
ixcoin   
namecoin   
We do namecoin. The rest you list are just scams.

Plus they aren't well maintained either and are a pain to keep in the merged mining setup because of various issues/crashes.

That said, namecoin only for now.

-wk

Tips: 1LDQrLr6dPVqNJmpZm82eZVKqDFRk7ERW8
Operator of the Eligius Mining Pool - 0% Fee, CPPSRB, GBT, Stratum, IRC+Phone Support, Awesome stats, Generation payouts, and more.
Don't feed the trolls. Science Confirms: Internet Trolls Really Are Narcissistic, Psychopathic, and Sadistic (1)
helmax
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
November 09, 2013, 12:03:53 AM
 #2608

how i see luck if i have

looking job
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2013, 10:11:29 AM
 #2609

When there are other legitimate altcoins that support merged mining...
Freicoin has it on their todo list, but there isn't really anything else.
devcoin   
groupcoin   
i0coin   
ixcoin   
namecoin   
We do namecoin. The rest you list are just scams.

What's so good about namecoin? I like what I understand about it, but that's not saying much.

Society doesn't scale.
soy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 12:56:54 PM
 #2610

I've switched to Eligius and have been stuck at 22 minutes left until payout since 3AM.  Is there a problem?  The page doesn't seem to be updating.
shep80
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 01:00:53 PM
 #2611

I've switched to Eligius and have been stuck at 22 minutes left until payout since 3AM.  Is there a problem?  The page doesn't seem to be updating.

Very bad luck on solving the next block. Pool has been working on it for over 8 hours according to the stats.

Nothing seems wrong, just a usual bit of bad luck. Once we solve it things will get rolling again.

spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2013, 01:04:36 PM
 #2612

dat unluck

Society doesn't scale.
soy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 02:54:50 PM
 #2613

I've switched to Eligius and have been stuck at 22 minutes left until payout since 3AM.  Is there a problem?  The page doesn't seem to be updating.

Very bad luck on solving the next block. Pool has been working on it for over 8 hours according to the stats.

Nothing seems wrong, just a usual bit of bad luck. Once we solve it things will get rolling again.



Yes, I saw luck was down in the teens but went back to bed for an hour, got up, made breakfast, looked again and luck was up above 300%, now 154%.  My earnings have finally been moved to the payout queue and will be paid with the next block.

ionstorm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 04:26:49 PM
 #2614

I got an idea for the graph dev's, it would be cool to see a projection of estimated earnings along side the hash rate graph
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
November 09, 2013, 05:51:08 PM
 #2615

What's so good about namecoin? I like what I understand about it, but that's not saying much.
Whether it's good or not is another matter, but it's not just a scam.
Namecoin is applying Bitcoin concepts to a new area - it's not really a currency at all.

soy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 10:08:23 PM
 #2616

I've switched to Eligius and have been stuck at 22 minutes left until payout since 3AM.  Is there a problem?  The page doesn't seem to be updating.

Very bad luck on solving the next block. Pool has been working on it for over 8 hours according to the stats.

Nothing seems wrong, just a usual bit of bad luck. Once we solve it things will get rolling again.



Yes, I saw luck was down in the teens but went back to bed for an hour, got up, made breakfast, looked again and luck was up above 300%, now 154%.  My earnings have finally been moved to the payout queue and will be paid with the next block.



The payout went smoothly with the new block.  I notice it seems less 'spendable', having 26 confirmations already but needing 94 more blocks, than BTC earned elsewhere.  Also the clear demarcation of 'Mined'.  I wonder if this will prove a problem with that obscure rule that mined bitcoins make one an international money transfer agent if one tries to use it for anything but barter.  Bitcoins mined on another pool have not that demarcation.

But the question I wish to ask, is the minimum payout stat changeable on the configuration page?  I have Bitcoin-QT on another machine than the one having the cookie storing the receive address.  I generated the signed message which included in the encrypted string a lowering of the minimum payout trigger to 0.1000btc but it didn't take.  After the initial payout since the signed message configuration change I expected the payout to be lowered but it was not.  Is the minimum not changeable below what is dictated by the value equation used by Eligius staff?
shep80
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 10:26:07 PM
 #2617


Looks like stats may be hung up. We have solved a few blocks that may not be reported on stats.
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 939



View Profile
November 09, 2013, 10:34:05 PM
 #2618


The payout went smoothly with the new block.  I notice it seems less 'spendable', having 26 confirmations already but needing 94 more blocks, than BTC earned elsewhere.  Also the clear demarcation of 'Mined'.  I wonder if this will prove a problem with that obscure rule that mined bitcoins make one an international money transfer agent if one tries to use it for anything but barter.  Bitcoins mined on another pool have not that demarcation.

But the question I wish to ask, is the minimum payout stat changeable on the configuration page?  I have Bitcoin-QT on another machine than the one having the cookie storing the receive address.  I generated the signed message which included in the encrypted string a lowering of the minimum payout trigger to 0.1000btc but it didn't take.  After the initial payout since the signed message configuration change I expected the payout to be lowered but it was not.  Is the minimum not changeable below what is dictated by the value equation used by Eligius staff?

A standard bitcoin transaction is spendable after only one confirmation, and fully confirmed after 6 confirmations.  When a new block is mined, the coinbase transaction that gives the 25 BTC + transaction fees requires 120 confirmations before it is spendable.

Most pools send the output of the coinbase transaction to a pool-owned address, then pay you in a separate normal transaction.  It will appear in your wallet as 'unconfirmed' until one more block is mined (the confirmation).  Eligius (and also P2pool) pay miners directly from the coinbase transaction.  That's why the transaction shows up a a 'mined' transaction which shows up as 'immature', and takes 120 confirmations to mature.

You can set you minimum payout to anything >= 0.01 BTC.  If it didn't work, it probably means that the signature failed.  It should tell you whether if it passed or failed a few lines up toward the top of the page.

Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086



View Profile
November 09, 2013, 10:39:12 PM
 #2619

Also the clear demarcation of 'Mined'.  I wonder if this will prove a problem with that obscure rule that mined bitcoins make one an international money transfer agent if one tries to use it for anything but barter.
I don't know that any nation has a rule like that... the closest I'm aware of would be FINCEN's guidance that created virtual currency has such regulatory properties - but miners just discover coins predetermined by the protocol, they don't create them. In any case, I doubt any legal institution cares about technicalities.

soy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854


View Profile
November 09, 2013, 11:29:14 PM
 #2620


The payout went smoothly with the new block.  I notice it seems less 'spendable', having 26 confirmations already but needing 94 more blocks, than BTC earned elsewhere.  Also the clear demarcation of 'Mined'.  I wonder if this will prove a problem with that obscure rule that mined bitcoins make one an international money transfer agent if one tries to use it for anything but barter.  Bitcoins mined on another pool have not that demarcation.

But the question I wish to ask, is the minimum payout stat changeable on the configuration page?  I have Bitcoin-QT on another machine than the one having the cookie storing the receive address.  I generated the signed message which included in the encrypted string a lowering of the minimum payout trigger to 0.1000btc but it didn't take.  After the initial payout since the signed message configuration change I expected the payout to be lowered but it was not.  Is the minimum not changeable below what is dictated by the value equation used by Eligius staff?

A standard bitcoin transaction is spendable after only one confirmation, and fully confirmed after 6 confirmations.  When a new block is mined, the coinbase transaction that gives the 25 BTC + transaction fees requires 120 confirmations before it is spendable.

Most pools send the output of the coinbase transaction to a pool-owned address, then pay you in a separate normal transaction.  It will appear in your wallet as 'unconfirmed' until one more block is mined (the confirmation).  Eligius (and also P2pool) pay miners directly from the coinbase transaction.  That's why the transaction shows up a a 'mined' transaction which shows up as 'immature', and takes 120 confirmations to mature.

You can set you minimum payout to anything >= 0.01 BTC.  If it didn't work, it probably means that the signature failed.  It should tell you whether if it passed or failed a few lines up toward the top of the page.


Thank you for explaining the difference.

Then if I take the hash generated by the signature, paste it in and decode it I should see the message?  And if so then it's something else I'm not doing correctly.  For instance, I put a minimum diff of 121 for the Mercury on the address.  Then later that day I added two more miners who's diff might more correctly be 7 and 2 but didn't change the requested min diff of 121.  Would that prevent all config changes from being accepted?
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 201 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!