|
Plazma
|
 |
July 13, 2013, 11:24:22 PM |
|
Any1 who understands from code checked it? account at sourceforge.ne created 2 hours ago. |
BTC: 1A1Mwjfw2mTko4N2UuVQ3RK4hXJunsPA3j
XMP: AcT3PK4wofjCMt6irN4HXENUqPvoBJRWk3
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3006
Terminated.
|
|
July 13, 2013, 11:34:02 PM |
|
Any1 who understands from code checked it? account at sourceforge.ne created 2 hours ago. It seems to be working, and giving high PPS, but I'm not sure if that equals to more blocks found. |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
|
Plazma
|
|
July 13, 2013, 11:36:57 PM |
|
Any1 who understands from code checked it? account at sourceforge.ne created 2 hours ago. It seems to be working, and giving high PPS, but I'm not sure if that equals to more blocks found. here is something I read on reddit that scared me: "Well without too much technicality, the custom miners can steal your wallet.dat which stores your Prime Coins, addresses, and private keys. Along with that, they can change the code to give you a higher, false PPS rate leaving you to believe that it works better but in the end, it's only mining for the creator. So what most people suggest is running the custom miner in a VM for sometime and see what happens. If all goes smooth and nothing bad happens, it's probably safe to run it on your actual OS, not the VM. Another thing that is recommended is to always read the code (i.e. on github) to see if there's something fishy. You don't have to understand all of it, but if you think something is fishy then don't use it. " |
BTC: 1A1Mwjfw2mTko4N2UuVQ3RK4hXJunsPA3j
XMP: AcT3PK4wofjCMt6irN4HXENUqPvoBJRWk3
|
|
|
|
Tuck Fheman
|
|
July 13, 2013, 11:40:00 PM |
|
No blocks in 2 days (v12), then 3 blocks in last 5 hours (0.1.1).
|
|
|
|
Vannicke
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
That guy, you know, with the face
|
|
July 13, 2013, 11:45:08 PM |
|
has anyone done a compare between Mikaelh and Sunny's source code? That may give you the best hints as to whether it's good or not. I may be kicking myself if it's too good to be true, but I've already gotten what i had in 4 days in the past hour. Though that may just be odd luck since I've only had 6 blocks, and 3 on his client.
|
The Satoshi Jar: 16t2BLGZyaMpGm3vzYWxucGz8g4bVotr1h
|
|
|
|
OnlyC
|
|
July 14, 2013, 12:19:59 AM |
|
Any1 who understands from code checked it? account at sourceforge.ne created 2 hours ago. It seems to be working, and giving high PPS, but I'm not sure if that equals to more blocks found. here is something I read on reddit that scared me: "Well without too much technicality, the custom miners can steal your wallet.dat which stores your Prime Coins, addresses, and private keys. Along with that, they can change the code to give you a higher, false PPS rate leaving you to believe that it works better but in the end, it's only mining for the creator. So what most people suggest is running the custom miner in a VM for sometime and see what happens. If all goes smooth and nothing bad happens, it's probably safe to run it on your actual OS, not the VM. Another thing that is recommended is to always read the code (i.e. on github) to see if there's something fishy. You don't have to understand all of it, but if you think something is fishy then don't use it. " idk about stealing wallet but got 1 block since using it. |
|
|
|
|
|
duke1839
|
|
July 14, 2013, 12:25:21 AM |
|
is the expansion of collective knowledge enough?
No. Any number of examples can be given where "expansion of collective knowledge" is a useless endeavor of no arguable benefit to either the individual nor mankind as a whole. Please play again. I.e., narrow the scope of your statement sufficiently and I might even agree with you.  A primitive version of calculus was discovered a thousand years before its usefulness was known. Theoretical physicists researching string theory know there is little real world application to what they're doing now. That doesn't mean their research is a waste of time, there are countless examples of mathematical and scientific discoveries not having an immediate and obvious benefit until many years later. Having said all that primes have a very real current benefit to modern encryption and authentication technology. |
1839REgeNTM2b84byywinp3BjtWdEqw27x
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 14, 2013, 01:45:57 AM |
|
Mikaelh, I'm getting fatal errors when compiling it... :/ Ubuntu 13.04 64bits |
|
|
|
|
|
Zalfrin
|
|
July 14, 2013, 01:51:20 AM |
|
Mikaelh, I'm getting fatal errors when compiling it... :/ Ubuntu 13.04 64bits Works fine on 13.04. Make sure you've done this: apt-get install libgmp-dev |
|
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 14, 2013, 01:55:21 AM |
|
Mikaelh, I'm getting fatal errors when compiling it... :/ Ubuntu 13.04 64bits Works fine on 13.04. Make sure you've done this: apt-get install libgmp-dev Retrying now...thx Zalfrin, you're da man. |
|
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 14, 2013, 01:55:53 AM |
|
Mikaelh, I'm getting fatal errors when compiling it... :/ Ubuntu 13.04 64bits That's descriptive. Well, yeah, when I do the make upnps thingie, it throws a fatal error. That's condescending... |
|
|
|
|
|
forsetifox
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:12:42 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
|
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:13:19 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
use USE_UPNP= as USE_UPNP=0 still builds with UPNP but disables it per default |
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:29:34 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
use USE_UPNP= as USE_UPNP=0 still builds with UPNP but disables it per default Hmmm, I'll try again in a while. Another quick question, sorry for being a linux noob before anyone jumps at my neck. I want to receive the funds as they come, in my wallet, and not have to importprivkey each time I mine a block. How should I go about that? (using vps to mine) |
|
|
|
|
rahlquist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:49:14 AM |
|
Just about to 8. Remember that we're on a wacky logarithmic approximately base-30 scale for difficulty, so difficulty 8 is 30x harder to find a block as compared to difficulty 7. My i5 failed to spit out anything for +72 hrs. I guess I have to check once a week from now on. Most of my miners are i5 and I havent found crap either, I wonder if there is a bug for i5 miners, has anyone gotten a block on an i5? |
|
|
|
|
|
Zalfrin
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:51:13 AM |
|
Just about to 8. Remember that we're on a wacky logarithmic approximately base-30 scale for difficulty, so difficulty 8 is 30x harder to find a block as compared to difficulty 7. My i5 failed to spit out anything for +72 hrs. I guess I have to check once a week from now on. Most of my miners are i5 and I havent found crap either, I wonder if there is a bug for i5 miners, has anyone gotten a block on an i5? I got one a half hour ago with mika's build. i5-2500k. First one in a day or two. |
|
|
|
|
|
rethaw
|
|
July 14, 2013, 02:56:27 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
It's UPNP=- to disable UPNP. |
|
|
|
|
lucasjkr
|
|
July 14, 2013, 03:00:00 AM |
|
Just about to 8. Remember that we're on a wacky logarithmic approximately base-30 scale for difficulty, so difficulty 8 is 30x harder to find a block as compared to difficulty 7. My i5 failed to spit out anything for +72 hrs. I guess I have to check once a week from now on. Most of my miners are i5 and I havent found crap either, I wonder if there is a bug for i5 miners, has anyone gotten a block on an i5? I got one a half hour ago with mika's build. i5-2500k. First one in a day or two. I really don't know where I stand... I've been mining from the get-go almost. Went 17 hrs before I saw anything, and have gone many spurts of 10-12 hrs without. But I'm now at 6 computers on it currently (had 8-10 at some points) and have earned pribably 1200 coins so far. I assume that's par for the course, generally? Some being higher, some being lower, obviously? |
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
July 14, 2013, 03:20:31 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
It's UPNP=- to disable UPNP. wrong  ifndef USE_UPNP
override USE_UPNP = -
endif
ifneq (${USE_UPNP}, -)
LIBS += -l miniupnpc
DEFS += -DUSE_UPNP=$(USE_UPNP)
endif |
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
|
rethaw
|
|
July 14, 2013, 03:29:53 AM |
|
Add "USE_UPNP=0" in the compile line. If that doesn't work try "USE_UPNP= ".
It's UPNP=- to disable UPNP. wrong ifndef USE_UPNP
override USE_UPNP = -
endif
ifneq (${USE_UPNP}, -)
LIBS += -l miniupnpc
DEFS += -DUSE_UPNP=$(USE_UPNP)
endif From build-unix.md USE_UPNP= No UPnP support miniupnp not required
USE_UPNP=0 (the default) UPnP support turned off by default at runtime
USE_UPNP=1 UPnP support turned on by default at runtime When you leave it blank it gets set to -, just like you posted. |
|
|
|
|
