Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2019, 09:26:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 [433] 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade  (Read 1029541 times)
chinaBLK
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 02, 2017, 07:43:19 PM
 #8641

Does quark have a developer?

It looks like a quark is dead.
 
If someone wants to change quarks,I can tell the quarrel news to the Chinese exchange. Just need to reply to me.
1547889983
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1547889983

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1547889983
Reply with quote  #2

1547889983
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1547889983
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1547889983

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1547889983
Reply with quote  #2

1547889983
Report to moderator
1547889983
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1547889983

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1547889983
Reply with quote  #2

1547889983
Report to moderator
1547889983
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1547889983

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1547889983
Reply with quote  #2

1547889983
Report to moderator
mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 02, 2017, 10:37:29 PM
 #8642

Does quark have a developer?

It looks like a quark is dead.
 
If someone wants to change quarks,I can tell the quarrel news to the Chinese exchange. Just need to reply to me.

Hi chinaBLK - if you look above, w're in the planning stages of reviving the coin, and Max has been active the last several weeks. Coding on changing the coin from POW to hybrid POW/POS should begin soon, and masternodes will likely be implemented in the near future as well! In addition, another developer team, cryptocoderz, has been added to alongside Max, so we are getting things moving again!
mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 01:38:14 AM
Last edit: May 03, 2017, 03:28:47 AM by mcphervi
 #8643

Does quark have a developer?

It looks like a quark is dead.
 
If someone wants to change quarks,I can tell the quarrel news to the Chinese exchange. Just need to reply to me.

Hi chinaBLK - if you look above, w're in the planning stages of reviving the coin, and Max has been active the last several weeks. Coding on changing the coin from POW to hybrid POW/POS should begin soon, and masternodes will likely be implemented in the near future as well! In addition, another developer team, cryptocoderz, has been added to alongside Max, so we are getting things moving again!

It's come to the teams attention that people are having issues with deposits and withdrawals from btc38 - I've contacted Max to look into the issue, but I'd recommend that people hold off on moving any coins to or from there for now until we can address this. I'm not sure if this is a general or specific issue right now - we're looking into it.

Edit: It looks right now like its isolated to BTC38
quarkcoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 03, 2017, 09:27:25 AM
 #8644

Quark 0.10.4.5

* Checkpoints
* Remove obsolete version warning

https://github.com/quark-project/quark/releases/tag/v0.10.4.5
Coinmama2014
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 05:55:15 PM
 #8645

holders of Quark who would like to see Quark innovate, come together and form a community that participates and contributes to adding some changes to this project that will potentially put Quark back into the top 10 on coinmarketcap.com.

To clarify, I am not a developer and I am only looking from a business mind prospective, but in order for any move forward we need a business plan and the means to attract developers to be interested in this project and they need to be able to produce a healthy good income. So be kind to any ignorance you may find in my ideas for change as this is what I have gleaned from the market and if Quark could implement these changes I believe we could be back in the top 10 purely from a market perspective.

Some changes to Quark that I feel through my research that would produce such results are as follows.

1. POW / POS

2. Dash has a great way of producing an income for there development team and this should be copied or improved upon.

3. The voting system of Dash masternodes seems like a good idea and something similar but more decentralized needs implementation.

4. Segwit implementation to be added.  

5. Anonymity option

6. Smart Contracts

7. Debit card that links Quark wallet with Visa

This is a lot of development but this is also technology that already exists.

Who would like to discuss this?

The first 4 would be my short term goals. Anon has pluses and minuses that I would like to actively discuss. I would add side chain implementation as well to the list. Quark at its core was originally about innovation, transaction speed and security - I would like to build towards those as the central principle.
Well Well Well! How very interesting to see this coin is in revitalization mode!


Coinmama: Kiss Kiss
Coinmama2014
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 05:55:49 PM
 #8646


We're having internal discussions right now regarding a change in the inflation percentage in order to promote mining/staking which would then also provide income for masternodes as well. Max is looking at POS/POW implementations right now. We're also looking at 10% for development as well.

Great suggestions. This could really bring the coin to life.

Yeah, I agree - I think this will really get the coin back on its feet, and get us moving again. Once the core of the upgrades is in place, and we have some more development funding we will make sure to get additional manpower to help support Max as well. I think this is really moving in the right direction.

More important still what is max saying?

If he is wasting time on these other coins with a load of different usernames then that is a very bad indication for the future of quark.

If those allegations are groundless then lets hear what he says. I hope they are groundless.

Wasting time on these projects whilst neglecting an aged and famous coin like quark is foolish.

Let's hope he says something anyway soon. Also if he is 100% going to focus on qrk now i hope he has incentive to see it through.


However, before anyone goes too far to revitalize on this one it I would warn that, speaking from experience... its history is steeped in shady dealings and therefore the only hope for its future is for present bagholders to get a good dump into the current altcoin craze/ pumps... Too bad we couldn't get something like a Pivx going when we were working so hard and looking for our long lost dev who was found working on Myriad and other coins...The dev who refused to realize that his right hand man "digital industry" was a complete and total scam artist, who actually worked against Quark for his own (and friends) purposes (i.e., selling to get more bitcoin)
Best hope for this coin (which *had* great potential!) is to start from scratch, Quark 2.0, with adequate time for all to prepare for launch(i.e. no scammy premine...)

Coinmama: Kiss Kiss
Coinmama2014
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 133
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 05:56:17 PM
 #8647


Although this all seems kind of annoying he would waste time on these other projects when the top alt (except) LTC of 2013 with one of the best names QUARK and most famous project is reduced to a shadow of itself...... if it is true anyway.

It is not all bad. The guy can obviously code and has some good skill set. PIVX is using quark algo 4 years later and quark algo is still one of the best.


Do you know what annoyed me?
Not that he copied dozens of other coins
Not that he wastes time on other projects
That is his own problem.

What annoys me is:
that "Max", who cloned Quark, works together with immoral people.
If it was about fiat money, I would call it a "criminal organization".
For Max and his friends the alt coin scene is a "wild west" scene; Everything is allowed.
Therefore instead of a "criminal organization" I will call Max and his team a "wild west organization".

And yes, he can code (or copy/paste), that is why he is included in this wild west organization.

Every clone of him follows more or less the same pattern:
Coin is announced as a fair new coin without a pre-mine, it is always picked up by the same mine pool, and after it is mined as hell (by this "wild west organization") the coin is listed at the same shady exchange where all his coins (also the ones which are more or less dead) are listed.
How shady the exchange is, I did read here in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1221426.msg12934107#msg12934107

And then the scammers he cooperates with. At Quark we all know of course Digitalindustry. But there are more like this one;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299308.msg10667896#msg10667896
(I call him the UNO scammer, because he runs a moderated UNO thread at bitcointalk where you can find his dozens of sockpuppets).
"Max" now and then visits the UNO thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=527500.msg10067608#msg10067608
This UNO scammer also now and then visits the Quark thread, therefore I am confident he holds a significant amount of Quark too:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg11199646#msg11199646

The complete "wild west team" is an anonymous group of people, hiding their self behind their sockpuppet accounts.

And what annoys me the most is that Max announces his copied coins as a "community coin". He and his team creates a "foundation" for his coins. The foundation is usually a group of naive, integer people who market his coins. Meanwhile the "wild west team" is cashing the mined coins.



I hope you have enough quark now and enough sense to see quark is a project that needs to be brought back...



Don't be afraid, he and "his friends" has more than enough to manipulate the Quark market on the right moment. Just be patient. You don't need to do anything.
Yes, exactly... So nice to see some people still keeping an eye on things after all this time!

Coinmama: Kiss Kiss
mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 03, 2017, 08:11:23 PM
 #8648


We're having internal discussions right now regarding a change in the inflation percentage in order to promote mining/staking which would then also provide income for masternodes as well. Max is looking at POS/POW implementations right now. We're also looking at 10% for development as well.

Great suggestions. This could really bring the coin to life.

Yeah, I agree - I think this will really get the coin back on its feet, and get us moving again. Once the core of the upgrades is in place, and we have some more development funding we will make sure to get additional manpower to help support Max as well. I think this is really moving in the right direction.

More important still what is max saying?

If he is wasting time on these other coins with a load of different usernames then that is a very bad indication for the future of quark.

If those allegations are groundless then lets hear what he says. I hope they are groundless.

Wasting time on these projects whilst neglecting an aged and famous coin like quark is foolish.

Let's hope he says something anyway soon. Also if he is 100% going to focus on qrk now i hope he has incentive to see it through.


However, before anyone goes too far to revitalize on this one it I would warn that, speaking from experience... its history is steeped in shady dealings and therefore the only hope for its future is for present bagholders to get a good dump into the current altcoin craze/ pumps... Too bad we couldn't get something like a Pivx going when we were working so hard and looking for our long lost dev who was found working on Myriad and other coins...The dev who refused to realize that his right hand man "digital industry" was a complete and total scam artist, who actually worked against Quark for his own (and friends) purposes (i.e., selling to get more bitcoin)
Best hope for this coin (which *had* great potential!) is to start from scratch, Quark 2.0, with adequate time for all to prepare for launch(i.e. no scammy premine...)


Hi coinmama - its good to see you. Please check your pm.
othell_rogue
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:07:48 AM
 #8649


We're having internal discussions right now regarding a change in the inflation percentage in order to promote mining/staking which would then also provide income for masternodes as well. Max is looking at POS/POW implementations right now. We're also looking at 10% for development as well.

Great suggestions. This could really bring the coin to life.

Yeah, I agree - I think this will really get the coin back on its feet, and get us moving again. Once the core of the upgrades is in place, and we have some more development funding we will make sure to get additional manpower to help support Max as well. I think this is really moving in the right direction.

More important still what is max saying?

If he is wasting time on these other coins with a load of different usernames then that is a very bad indication for the future of quark.

If those allegations are groundless then lets hear what he says. I hope they are groundless.

Wasting time on these projects whilst neglecting an aged and famous coin like quark is foolish.

Let's hope he says something anyway soon. Also if he is 100% going to focus on qrk now i hope he has incentive to see it through.


However, before anyone goes too far to revitalize on this one it I would warn that, speaking from experience... its history is steeped in shady dealings and therefore the only hope for its future is for present bagholders to get a good dump into the current altcoin craze/ pumps... Too bad we couldn't get something like a Pivx going when we were working so hard and looking for our long lost dev who was found working on Myriad and other coins...The dev who refused to realize that his right hand man "digital industry" was a complete and total scam artist, who actually worked against Quark for his own (and friends) purposes (i.e., selling to get more bitcoin)
Best hope for this coin (which *had* great potential!) is to start from scratch, Quark 2.0, with adequate time for all to prepare for launch(i.e. no scammy premine...)

So you don't recomand to invest in this coin?

thunderjet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 663
Merit: 290


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 04:51:19 PM
 #8650

There are almost no nodes after wallet upgrade to 10.4.3 and later versions.I get 1,very rarely 2.It is high risk for network safety.
nuttynoah
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 07:29:01 PM
 #8651

213.32.98.226
95.183.52.52
69.9.43.163
125.238.166.39
208.94.242.218
88.101.6.125
ghzsymc2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 09:56:50 PM
 #8652


         - Inflation change from 0.5%/annum, infinite supply to 3-3.5% per annum. This preserves the original intent of a switch to low inflation following an original mining period, with a constant supply into the future to preserve mining incentive indefinitely
         - Using the 3.5% figure, have a split of 1.35% POS, 1.85% POW, 0.3% Development
         - Have the development funding placement into escrow or multisig requiring address

4-10 months:
         - Engage developers to look at implementing a sidechain with anon features - this allows an anonymity solution while ensuring that there is a public transaction record for Quark proper to ensure transparency
                         - Have a deflationary charge built into the system when taking the coins off chain - ie. remove a small subset (maybe 0.1% of the sent coins from circulation when taking chains onto the side chain)
                                    - This offsets some of the additional inflation being built in by the increase in coin supply as per above



I am a private investor in China.

Since 2013, I began to support the quark COINS, because the Chinese government, digital currency prices began to decline, but did not see the rebound in the quarks, I don't know why, but I know now.

It is a pleasure and a great appreciation to have seen all the positive action recently.

The key I want to say is: everyone knows that quark on an extra 1 million a year, you can upgrade innovation, add people feel great science and technology, but don't increase the total amount.

The first、 Why we watch the digital currency is that it won't print as much as they want to print like paper, and if We're going to change it to 7-8 million because the market price is low this time , the next time change to 10-20 million - when you like, What's the difference between it and paper money? If you do that, many Chinese investors will see this currency as a game, not a future.

The second、Let's say 10 years from now  BTC is a trillion dollars and quark successfully raised hundred billion of magnitude or more, according to 3.5% a year, will be at a certain price point, the market can't afford this 3.5%  causes the price no longer growth , or even fall. So you can expect the price of a currency to go down in a certain amount of time, and people also lose coin because of 0.1% rules,This is terrible.

My suggestion is that we can reduce the setting of one quark per block, for example 0.1 to 0.3 quarks or other quantities. When the price is high enough, there will be more and more people digging.

Really reduce miners, is not the amount of 1 million is too little, but for some reason did not move over the past two years, when we started running again, prices will rebound, at that time, people will come back.

And Now we don't need too much innovation, in a bull market, all COINS in btc38 have increased nearly 10 times, only the quark did not move, just need to the development team to release some news, is enough to make the price more than 5 times. It is an opportunity.

I'll do a little bit of help if I can.
rdfd1217
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:13:05 PM
 #8653


         - Inflation change from 0.5%/annum, infinite supply to 3-3.5% per annum. This preserves the original intent of a switch to low inflation following an original mining period, with a constant supply into the future to preserve mining incentive indefinitely
         - Using the 3.5% figure, have a split of 1.35% POS, 1.85% POW, 0.3% Development
         - Have the development funding placement into escrow or multisig requiring address

4-10 months:
         - Engage developers to look at implementing a sidechain with anon features - this allows an anonymity solution while ensuring that there is a public transaction record for Quark proper to ensure transparency
                         - Have a deflationary charge built into the system when taking the coins off chain - ie. remove a small subset (maybe 0.1% of the sent coins from circulation when taking chains onto the side chain)
                                    - This offsets some of the additional inflation being built in by the increase in coin supply as per above



I am a private investor in China.

Since 2013, I began to support the quark COINS, because the Chinese government, digital currency prices began to decline, but did not see the rebound in the quarks, I don't know why, but I know now.

It is a pleasure and a great appreciation to have seen all the positive action recently.

The key I want to say is: everyone knows that quark on an extra 1 million a year, you can upgrade innovation, add people feel great science and technology, but don't increase the total amount.

The first、 Why we watch the digital currency is that it won't print as much as they want to print like paper, and if We're going to change it to 7-8 million because the market price is low this time , the next time change to 10-20 million - when you like, What's the difference between it and paper money? If you do that, many Chinese investors will see this currency as a game, not a future.

The second、Let's say 10 years from now  BTC is a trillion dollars and quark successfully raised hundred billion of magnitude or more, according to 3.5% a year, will be at a certain price point, the market can't afford this 3.5%  causes the price no longer growth , or even fall. So you can expect the price of a currency to go down in a certain amount of time, and people also lose coin because of 0.1% rules,This is terrible.

My suggestion is that we can reduce the setting of one quark per block, for example 0.1 to 0.3 quarks or other quantities. When the price is high enough, there will be more and more people digging.

Really reduce miners, is not the amount of 1 million is too little, but for some reason did not move over the past two years, when we started running again, prices will rebound, at that time, people will come back.

And Now we don't need too much innovation, in a bull market, all COINS in btc38 have increased nearly 10 times, only the quark did not move, just need to the development team to release some news, is enough to make the price more than 5 times. It is an opportunity.

I'll do a little bit of help if I can.
     I agree with you. Inflation makes money worth less. We would be just like government money. No better than the Federal Reserve.
mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:18:34 PM
 #8654


You know what I think is the only way forward. PUBLIC REPENTANCE.

This is all but forgotten is our current day and age. But I can tell you that repentance and forgiveness are foundations that will never ever be broken. They are woven into creation itself and produce healing and productiveness. This is truth.

I will start.

I for one am very sorry for not contributing or participating years ago with Quark. I sat back and waited passively for everyone else to do the work on Quark.

I sincerely apologize for my actions. This was wrong. I had expectations on people that should have been upon myself.

So Please forgive me. I will now be participating and contributing and I hope you will accept my apology.

I really believe if we can all repent and forgive one another, that we will have something very special here. We can restore the wrongdoing by repentance and forgiveness.

The Crypto space was very immature back years ago. I feel we have begun adolescent period where we are establishing ourselves. We are maturing. Even the authorities are maturing.

Why don't we come together and put the past behind us and put it right with one another and make a new beginning with the intent of making all those involved whole again.

Can we all be mature enough to get past the dishonest, negative history of Quark??

I sure hope so.
 

In this vein - I am very sorry that I was not able to get Quark into a position to succeed. It has really weighed on my the last few years how all of this was left, and I am sorry that the great group of people we had couldn't have collectively come together and enacted a plan to get the coin moving in the right direction. This is our chance to finally do so.
mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:40:35 PM
 #8655


         - Inflation change from 0.5%/annum, infinite supply to 3-3.5% per annum. This preserves the original intent of a switch to low inflation following an original mining period, with a constant supply into the future to preserve mining incentive indefinitely
         - Using the 3.5% figure, have a split of 1.35% POS, 1.85% POW, 0.3% Development
         - Have the development funding placement into escrow or multisig requiring address

4-10 months:
         - Engage developers to look at implementing a sidechain with anon features - this allows an anonymity solution while ensuring that there is a public transaction record for Quark proper to ensure transparency
                         - Have a deflationary charge built into the system when taking the coins off chain - ie. remove a small subset (maybe 0.1% of the sent coins from circulation when taking chains onto the side chain)
                                    - This offsets some of the additional inflation being built in by the increase in coin supply as per above



I am a private investor in China.

Since 2013, I began to support the quark COINS, because the Chinese government, digital currency prices began to decline, but did not see the rebound in the quarks, I don't know why, but I know now.

It is a pleasure and a great appreciation to have seen all the positive action recently.

The key I want to say is: everyone knows that quark on an extra 1 million a year, you can upgrade innovation, add people feel great science and technology, but don't increase the total amount.

The first、 Why we watch the digital currency is that it won't print as much as they want to print like paper, and if We're going to change it to 7-8 million because the market price is low this time , the next time change to 10-20 million - when you like, What's the difference between it and paper money? If you do that, many Chinese investors will see this currency as a game, not a future.

The second、Let's say 10 years from now  BTC is a trillion dollars and quark successfully raised hundred billion of magnitude or more, according to 3.5% a year, will be at a certain price point, the market can't afford this 3.5%  causes the price no longer growth , or even fall. So you can expect the price of a currency to go down in a certain amount of time, and people also lose coin because of 0.1% rules,This is terrible.

My suggestion is that we can reduce the setting of one quark per block, for example 0.1 to 0.3 quarks or other quantities. When the price is high enough, there will be more and more people digging.

Really reduce miners, is not the amount of 1 million is too little, but for some reason did not move over the past two years, when we started running again, prices will rebound, at that time, people will come back.

And Now we don't need too much innovation, in a bull market, all COINS in btc38 have increased nearly 10 times, only the quark did not move, just need to the development team to release some news, is enough to make the price more than 5 times. It is an opportunity.

I'll do a little bit of help if I can.

Hi ghzsymc2 - I am very happy to see one of Quark's Chinese investors join the conversation - historically it was very hard to know how the coin was being perceived and discussed in China. Your input is very much appreciated.

I historically completely agreed with you - however, we have 4 years of data which indicates that the current 0.5% inflation is simply not adequate to secure the network, as the miners are not being paid enough to support a hashrate that can properly secure the network and prevent it from being very vulnerable to 51% attack. This is made worse if we switch to a hybrid POS/POW system is we do not increase the inflation, as the 0.5% would have to been split between the two systems - POW (miners) and POS (stakers/masternodes), making each that much less profitable, and thus that much less appealing to both parties. The current situation is the result of us not taking action when we as a community realized this was going to be the truth. This drove away a lot of the external broader bitcoin community because they didn't trust the coins future health.

Currently, there are 2,880 new Quark per day - at the current market rate, this is $14.4 per day being paid to miners to secure the network. This is getting us approx a little over 500 Mhash (https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/quarkcoin-hashrate.html). There are people on this forum with more hashrate than this in a single mining farm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65803.0), meaning the network is vulnerable. Even a 10-fold increase in value only gives the miners $144/day, which is likewise far too low to adequately secure the network.

The other thing is that the coin needs development funding - we have also seen where the lack of development funding has led us - to the lack of development for years at a time, while coins like Dash has persisted and are self-supporting by virtue of the fact that they essentially have a continuous eternal source of development capital to reinvest.

On your point about continual changes when things get difficult - I **completely** agree that we cannot do this again. This is why we need to get it right this time, right now. I agree that it fundamentally undermines the investor confidence through creating uncertainty in what the underlying fundamentals of your investment is if it changes. However, this I believe is a situation that really requires fundamental change - while honoring the original ideals as I tried to address in the quoted post.

We are committed to restoring Quark to what it should have been - this is a fresh start for a coin that was once great and I really truly believe that we can get it moving towards regaining its status as a premium coin. The community and the investors deserve this and its been too long coming.

cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1089

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:47:29 PM
 #8656

Setting up an exchange with fees used to buy quark to burn would be useful in controlling inflation.

Anyway we may need a coin swap so that may cut back the quark supply drastically.

We need some coins for dev funding and paying masternodes/pos

Sadly the fatal flaw with quark was the emission the only way to fix is inflate it now slightly.


mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:52:04 PM
 #8657

Setting up an exchange with fees used to buy quark to burn would be useful in controlling inflation.

Anyway we may need a coin swap so that may cut back the quark supply drastically.

We need some coins for dev funding and paying masternodes/pos

Sadly the fatal flaw with quark was the emission the only way to fix is inflate it now slightly.



To this point, I'd be unsurprised if the effective coin supply is much less than 250,000,000 at this point with cryptsy closing.
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1089

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
May 04, 2017, 11:58:02 PM
 #8658

Setting up an exchange with fees used to buy quark to burn would be useful in controlling inflation.

Anyway we may need a coin swap so that may cut back the quark supply drastically.

We need some coins for dev funding and paying masternodes/pos

Sadly the fatal flaw with quark was the emission the only way to fix is inflate it now slightly.



To this point, I'd be unsurprised if the effective coin supply is much less than 250,000,000 at this point with cryptsy closing.

i notice a lot of wallets were recovered from there...wonder about the qrk wallet and how much is in it. Someone must know.

mcphervi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 359
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:00:59 AM
 #8659

Setting up an exchange with fees used to buy quark to burn would be useful in controlling inflation.

Anyway we may need a coin swap so that may cut back the quark supply drastically.

We need some coins for dev funding and paying masternodes/pos

Sadly the fatal flaw with quark was the emission the only way to fix is inflate it now slightly.



To this point, I'd be unsurprised if the effective coin supply is much less than 250,000,000 at this point with cryptsy closing.

i notice a lot of wallets were recovered from there...wonder about the qrk wallet and how much is in it. Someone must know.

Hmm interesting. Its a good question I'm not certain of the answer to.
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1089

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
May 05, 2017, 12:02:56 AM
 #8660

Setting up an exchange with fees used to buy quark to burn would be useful in controlling inflation.

Anyway we may need a coin swap so that may cut back the quark supply drastically.

We need some coins for dev funding and paying masternodes/pos

Sadly the fatal flaw with quark was the emission the only way to fix is inflate it now slightly.



To this point, I'd be unsurprised if the effective coin supply is much less than 250,000,000 at this point with cryptsy closing.

i notice a lot of wallets were recovered from there...wonder about the qrk wallet and how much is in it. Someone must know.

Hmm interesting. Its a good question I'm not certain of the answer to.

well if there is a coinswap that needs to be isolated and blocked....cant swap stolen coins.

Pages: « 1 ... 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 [433] 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!