enmaku
|
|
July 27, 2011, 07:21:52 PM |
|
is namecoin mining dead at this point?
I notice that role:disable is being used now in latest c00w pool.cfg.
With the current exchange rates, I'd say yes. Had nmc-mining enabled (bitparking) for ~18 hrs, and while my efficiency in terms of NMC was 135%, after exchange to BTC it came out to 65% I blame this in part on the extreme youth of namecoin. If namecoin had a GUI it'd be more popular, if there were an exchange that was better looking and (more importantly) easier to use it'd be more popular. It's kind of sitting right now where bitcoin sat a year ago. I think it's got potential but it needs a lot of work still. That said, I'm hoarding every namecoin I mine just in case... Not like they're worth much of anything right now anyway
|
|
|
|
burp
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 27, 2011, 07:39:19 PM |
|
What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine, if namecoin shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty then mine namecoin, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value
|
|
|
|
enmaku
|
|
July 27, 2011, 07:41:58 PM |
|
What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine namecoin if shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value The problem isn't really on the mining/supply side of the fence, there's just not that much demand. also, is anyone else having problems with polmine again? I updated to the regex above and still get 10^10 shares.
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 27, 2011, 07:44:56 PM |
|
What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine namecoin if shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value The problem isn't really on the mining/supply side of the fence, there's just not that much demand. also, is anyone else having problems with polmine again? I updated to the regex above and still get 10^10 shares. for me this works fine api_address:http://polmine.pl/?action=statistics role:mine api_method:re api_key:; </b> <br/>([ 0-9]+)<br/> api_strip:' '
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 27, 2011, 08:19:49 PM |
|
The configuration in the trunk for polmine works...
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 27, 2011, 09:11:42 PM |
|
wow, just had a jawbreak with last release, nice work ppl. wish I had 10 bitcoins for every one of you making this real
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
djex
|
|
July 27, 2011, 09:29:09 PM |
|
I got a question, is bitHopper only meant to have 1 miner connected to it per instance of bitHopper? Like say if I wanted to use bitHopper with all my miners would I have to make accounts for each one and have separate instances of bitHopper for each or can I just point all my miners to bitHopper?
|
: 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 27, 2011, 09:37:57 PM |
|
I got a question, is bitHopper only meant to have 1 miner connected to it per instance of bitHopper? Like say if I wanted to use bitHopper with all my miners would I have to make accounts for each one and have separate instances of bitHopper for each or can I just point all my miners to bitHopper?
I have two computers and only one instance of bithopper running and its flawless. Just use the local ip of the machine running bithopper instead of "localhost".
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
hawks5999
|
|
July 27, 2011, 09:39:54 PM |
|
3 computers, 11 miners all pointing to bithopper.
|
■ ▄▄▄ ■ ███ ■ ■ ■ LEDGER WALLET ████ ■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■ LEDGER WALLET Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Decentralized. Open. Secure.
|
|
|
djex
|
|
July 27, 2011, 09:57:39 PM |
|
Awesome, thanks. But it's got me wondering though. Could it possibly be more profitable if each had its own account and instance of bitHopper? I'm not 100% with how hopping works so forgive me if I'm horribly wrong lol.
|
: 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
|
|
|
hawks5999
|
|
July 27, 2011, 10:34:39 PM |
|
not horribly wrong but yeah it wouldn't help much. flower's fork has slicing that [is | will be] in the main trunk.
|
■ ▄▄▄ ■ ███ ■ ■ ■ LEDGER WALLET ████ ■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■ LEDGER WALLET Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Decentralized. Open. Secure.
|
|
|
ahitman
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:07:47 PM |
|
not horribly wrong but yeah it wouldn't help much. flower's fork has slicing that [is | will be] in the main trunk.
How does one enter payouts into the system now that the web interface has changed to include the cool graphs? I used to be able to enter into the white boxes on the page, but now they are gone. Bitcoin client integration would be killer. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:09:00 PM |
|
I'm concerned by the number of stales I am getting on bitHopper. It is running LP, right? I'm getting around 2-3% stales on most sites, including btcguild (backup), which without bitHopper my stales were < 1%
|
|
|
|
muyoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:14:07 PM |
|
So I am guessing we are the reason that the polmine website and thus the polmine stats keep crashing? Anyone want to tell them to publish stats through json api?
|
I drink it up!
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:16:23 PM |
|
So I am guessing we are the reason that the polmine website and thus the polmine stats keep crashing? Anyone want to tell them to publish stats through json api?
hehe good one, you go first
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:18:33 PM |
|
I'm concerned by the number of stales I am getting on bitHopper. It is running LP, right? I'm getting around 2-3% stales on most sites, including btcguild (backup), which without bitHopper my stales were < 1%
give us a little more detail, what miner do you use and stuff
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:20:22 PM |
|
phoenix miner 1.50, and the latest version of bitHopper
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 27, 2011, 11:24:44 PM |
|
i use phoenix too with phatk kernel and had same issues until realized it was not the proxy but job pre-fetching I'm using queue 2 (-q 2) not 5 (default), requests work lots faster and submits in time switching cost you shares too so expect some eff. loss although LP is active
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 28, 2011, 12:07:36 AM |
|
Unhandled Error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\bitHopper.py", line 44 9, in <module> main() File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\bitHopper.py", line 44 5, in main reactor.run() File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in r un self.mainLoop() File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in m ainLoop self.runUntilCurrent() --- <exception caught here> --- File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in ru nUntilCurrent call.func(*call.args, **call.kw) File "C:\Users\cow\Desktop\Mining\c00w-bitHopper-july27\pool.py", line 160, in update_api_servers if info['role'] in update: exceptions.KeyError: 'role' what did i do this time?
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
bigbeerjr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2011, 12:13:29 AM |
|
mtred should work by default. Are you using the latest version?
.....
Any hints on how to adjust/troubleshoot the lag detection? For whatever reason mtred is always marked as lagged out for me
|
|
|
|
|