Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2017, 05:31:33 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 339979 times)
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 01:30:58 AM
 #1581

Are those errors from trunk?

EDIT: Oh I see you were using gnagets branch. Yeah he doublecalled the getworks. So most of those rejects are actually not rejects. But its still wrong. I left some comments on github.

The problem wasn't the double call, though I fixed that.  The problem was the fact that the work variable in jsonrpc_getwork could be either bool or dictionary.  I was treating it as a dictionary all the time Sad

It is running beautifully now, I am watching it for a few more minutes before I create a pull request.

You can all send me 1% of your returns, since you'll get a 2-3% increased efficiency now
1490808693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490808693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490808693
Reply with quote  #2

1490808693
Report to moderator
1490808693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490808693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490808693
Reply with quote  #2

1490808693
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1490808693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490808693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490808693
Reply with quote  #2

1490808693
Report to moderator
1490808693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490808693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490808693
Reply with quote  #2

1490808693
Report to moderator
1490808693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490808693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490808693
Reply with quote  #2

1490808693
Report to moderator
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 01:33:48 AM
 #1582

[20:37:27] RPC request [d175a000] submitted to BTC Guild
[20:37:27] RPC request [82d0a000] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:27] Added work to store
[20:37:27] RPC request [9c730000] submitted to BTC Guild
[20:37:28] RPC request [getwork] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:28] RPC request [getwork] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:28] RPC request [f00f6000] submitted to BTC Guild


That's promising
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 01:35:26 AM
 #1583

Bleeding tip has it disabled because i want to see what happens on my test server. If my rates are low after a couple of hours I'll reenable it.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 01:50:07 AM
 #1584

ok, it is working well on my end, still seeing more stales than I'd like, but none from switching
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 02:19:22 AM
 #1585

triplemining.com   8030755...  8 million+  wow
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 02:28:34 AM
 #1586

triplemining.com   8030755...  8 million+  wow

BTCguild just broke all records, just over 13million share block Tongue

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 02:32:45 AM
 #1587

13 million... jesus
well i dont feel as bad for triple then.. i keep watching thinking they wll hit zero any second now.

I'm betting if you asked them.. they'd like the hoppers to use them as back up until they kill that beast

mooo for rent
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 02:47:29 AM
 #1588

triplemining.com   8030755...  8 million+  wow

BTCguild just broke all records, just over 13million share block Tongue

Wow, glad I left them to hop...

gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 02:49:19 AM
 #1589

Who all is testing the getwork store?  I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking.  I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales.  If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it

Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales
Keninishna
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 551



View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 02:57:39 AM
 #1590

Who all is testing the getwork store?  I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking.  I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales.  If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it

Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales

link?
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 03:04:19 AM
 #1591

Who all is testing the getwork store?  I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking.  I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales.  If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it

Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales

link?

here's one  https://github.com/gnaget/bitHopper/commit/742a5082862870b63ac3e95432c97d1223ece030

@gnaget don't miss the stales pls Tongue

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:07:05 AM
 #1592

Who all is testing the getwork store?  I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking.  I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales.  If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it

Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales

link?

here's one  https://github.com/gnaget/bitHopper/commit/742a5082862870b63ac3e95432c97d1223ece030

@gnaget don't miss the stales pls Tongue

2700 shares / 0 stales.  I would say I'll actually MISS them...

Edit: 3300 shares / 0 stales.  I'm digging this
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:12:33 AM
 #1593

Trunk Link:

https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper/commit/ea3de1b0f0dbbdea37fe6d53607ad508222fec4c

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 03:13:55 AM
 #1594


testing as I'm speaking ...

edit: ups I'll wait on this one, it's the "bad" merge

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:15:10 AM
 #1595


Did you get it working?  I made some changes to flow, but I know you made your own fixes, so I don't know how similar our code bases are
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:18:05 AM
 #1596

c00w: I just saw you have user data in the data site.  What are the number representative of, and over what period?



4500 / 0
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 03:26:23 AM
 #1597

funny to see how some ppl take their measures against hoppers...



edit: forgot to tell, it's c00w's hopper but I like gray more than "that" blue hehe

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:27:40 AM
 #1598

Um bad merge meant I left in one conflict...

The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.

Other than that the code is the same.

User shares are over the life of the database.


1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 03:30:27 AM
 #1599

The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.


??  My pruning function was working when I committed it

Edit: I see what you did, I put the LoopingCall in bitHopper.main() to keep it consistent

Edit Edit: Yup, you have 2 LoopingCalls
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 03:32:43 AM
 #1600

Um bad merge meant I left in one conflict...

The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.

Other than that the code is the same.

User shares are over the life of the database.



okay

uuuhh a shiver passed on my spine, this will be a little hopping beast guys. When it will reach critical mass I'm gonna see a handful of proud coders Wink

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!