Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 05:22:58 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 333129 times)
gnaget
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 06:55:33 PM
 #1721

]there must be some sort of lag time when connecting to a new server in which your miner is doing no work. This lag IMHO probably eats up the tiny advantage.

There was a small lag up until yesterday when you'd end up with stales, but that has been fixed and now miner switch seamlessly between pools
1481347378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481347378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481347378
Reply with quote  #2

1481347378
Report to moderator
1481347378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481347378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481347378
Reply with quote  #2

1481347378
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:03:37 PM
 #1722

i wonder if bitclockers will stop hating now yall fixed he stales

mooo for rent
gnaget
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:04:27 PM
 #1723

i wonder if bitclockers will stop hating now yall fixed he stales

I also just committed the mine_friendly role, so if they want to work with us more, it might actually benefit them
iopq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:27:28 PM
 #1724

Update.. Downgrading from Python 64bit to 32bit version solved the problem..
I suspect because of OpenSSL

joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:30:44 PM
 #1725

what does mine_friendly do? jump back when they got big blocks?


small request...to make the server names on the website.. links.. seems like we already have most of the links in the cfg though they tend to be commented out.

mooo for rent
Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:32:45 PM
 #1726

there must be some sort of lag time when connecting to a new server in which your miner is doing no work. This lag IMHO probably eats up the tiny advantage.
There is very little lag and actually one could prefetch getworks to reduce it even further (just stay connected to several pools at once). Currently most of the lost profit was due to shares being submitted to the wrong pool (a few % less) but anyways - as the earnings are enourmously higher than expected if you hop several pools it still paid off.

We'll need the "staying connected to several pools at once" anyways in the future for Long Polling timing

Currently I'm researching autobuild mechanisms... Jenkins seems quite ok. Now to creating a single executable with a python interpreter that runs on Windows under Linux...

https://bitfinex.com <-- leveraged trading of BTCUSD, LTCUSD and LTCBTC (long and short) - 10% discount on fees for the first 30 days with this refcode: x5K9YtL3Zb
Mail me at Bitmessage: BM-BbiHiVv5qh858ULsyRDtpRrG9WjXN3xf
gnaget
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:45:47 PM
 #1727

Currently most of the lost profit was due to shares being submitted to the wrong pool (a few % less) but anyways - as the earnings are enourmously higher than expected if you hop several pools it still paid off.

Update to the latest version, I think you'll be quite pleased
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:51:37 PM
 #1728

Any one else getting api_disable with mt.red? I checked the api key and it's correct and api link works in browser.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:54:29 PM
 #1729

i dont know how long that api_disabled lasts, I restarted the hopper and it is fine now.. they are nearly at 300% so you arent missing anything right now

mooo for rent
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 07:59:15 PM
 #1730

Yeah just restarted, working fine now.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
Tmoney
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:14:53 PM
 #1731

I've been testing out some namecoin mining.



mine_nmc does what it's supposed to do and stops mining at .40 of namecoin difficulty, however, when bithopper compares a namecoin pool to a bitcoin pool it always prefers namecoin because it uses bitcoins dificulty ratio to compare the two.  Also, the stats page displays namecoins percentages with bitcoins difficulty.  In this picture namebit should be around 28% rather than 1.57%.
iopq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:18:11 PM
 #1732

should I use mineco.in as a backup pool? it doesn't punish hopping

also, why is it mining slush like crazy? aren't you supposed to hop away from slush earlier than other pools due to the decay factor? it's still mining slush at 37% instead of a backup
it stopped mining slush at 41.48%

djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
 #1733

tmoney: whos version of bitHopper are you using?

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
ewibit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1749


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:29:49 PM
 #1734

#and for every update run
git pull
now I have done the latest update:
--------------------------------------
xxx@yyy:~/bitHopper$ git pull https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper.git
remote: Counting objects: 5, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1/1), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 2), reused 3 (delta 2)
Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done
From https://github.com/c00w/bitHopper
 * branch            HEAD       -> FETCH_HEAD
Updating 73e3015..dfa8302
Fast-forward
 index.html |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
--------------------------------------
and when I start:
--------------------------------------
xxx@yyy:~/bitHopper$ python bitHopper.py
[22:24:18] Updating Difficulty
[22:24:18] 1690895.8030524
[22:24:18] Updating NameCoin Difficulty
[22:24:19] 94037.96
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "bitHopper.py", line 227, in <module>
    bithopper_global = BitHopper()
  File "bitHopper.py", line 43, in __init__
    self.pool = pool.Pool(self)
  File "/home/xxx/bitHopper/pool.py", line 27, in __init__
    self.servers[pool]['default_role'] = self.servers[pool]['role']
KeyError: 'role'
---------------------------------------
the same as before... Huh
Tmoney
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:38:49 PM
 #1735

Djex, latest from c00w.
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84



View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:39:25 PM
 #1736

Also had Mt.Red Api disabled.  Restart fixed it.

I drink it up!
iopq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 08:45:42 PM
 #1737

why is btcworld set to info? what does that even mean? should I try enabling it?

paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 08:49:56 PM
 #1738

#and for every update run
git pull
now I have done the latest update:
.................................................
the same as before... Huh


run with --debug like c00w said

xxx@yyy:~/bitHopper$ python bitHopper.py --debug

and post output here or in pastebin

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2011, 08:51:37 PM
 #1739

Also had Mt.Red Api disabled.  Restart fixed it.

seems like mtred slowed down their api update Sad

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
July 30, 2011, 09:07:54 PM
 #1740

Regarding namecoin mining.

I think the approach used to mine up to 40*nmc_difficulty is wrong.

The correct approach to atleast get profitibility out of the time spend mining namecoins should be like this:

- scrape nmc/btc exchange rate, use the daily low here : https://exchange.bitparking.com/main
- scrape required difference required to be 1:1 to BTC(atleast for the purpose of mining time spend on shares) here : http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php
- follow conventional 0.43*difficulty thus in this case (0.43*nmc_difficulty) * (nmc daily low / nmc required for 1:1 with btc) ie. ( 0.43 * 94037.96 ) * ( 0.02721001 / 0.0556 ) = 19789.0781969645 (we could simplify and use only the whole numbers for difficulty to make it less messy)

What we would get in this case is relatively the same outcome as what we have atm with hopping 0.43*btc_difficulty, it would obviously happen less often but while we apply this we should know that atleast whatever coins we earn we would not end up mining at higher cost than what the exchange offers. The approach works best to sell as soon as you clear any coins, at the available market price for safety.

Im sure c00w or ryo or someone would be able to apply something like this faster than me since I am no python expert other than tweaking what they allready provide "_"

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!