Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[mrvision]

I slightly trust them, I look at them and do my ICO analysis, because often ratings are bought. And all decisions must always be made by myself!

[divowok]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I believe in ICO ratings but i think alot of the sites are biased because of money or partnerships.

If you're interested in ICOs...A couple ICOs that haven't launched yet but will in due time, that are worth checking out are Muirfield IP and Fr8 Network.
Fr8 Network's goal is to remove intermediaries from supply chains and bring revenue back to distributors and carriers.
Muirfield is a private equity fund on the blockchain.

[arpaul]

You should not believe the ICO-trackers, as there is also for sale listing . Of course it is very expensive, but the industry contains a lot of money. I am sure that any such site it is possible to negotiate the purchase of anything. The question will be only in price. Maybe there are some honest sites, but I'm sure a few of them.

[MFY151]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I only use it as a basis for gathering impressions for certain ICO's before investing but I do not totally rely on these ratings. I think ICO's who have negative ratings from these are really risky but those who received a low or just the right rating is worth giving efforts for additional research.

[Sanderion]

I don't think that it's a good idea to be guided by the ICOs rating. ICOs Rating is a good website to see the details of an existing ICOs project. I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating... only as one of the reference factors when i will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites.

You definitely shouldn't believe in this ratings! Most of them a simply bought. But still there is ICOdrops who make great research of projects and i believe this guys. Their ratings are pretty fair and they invest in projects from their website themselves. You can find their website easily.

[kriptocin]

You are right, high ratings can be bought. Alas this happens, because not for nothing 80% ico is a scam. Therefore, I always check the company myself, regardless of the rating level.

[RomertL]

I don't believe to sites with ratings. I think they just sell it to ICOs. But maybe I'm not right. I do not have any proof of this.

[Mihaylovic]

i dont believe or trust. because higher ico ratings are mostly the ones that are paid. they pay to get better rating in those popular rating sites. This manipulates the people and gives wrong information for the projects.

[danchozind999]

A big YES,we can see the potential altcoin done in sales transactions on the ico.
We can also get the latest information in an ico that is always fast in providing info.

[dzelenyanskiy]

Many users complain about the icobench site, because they are not objective in their ratings, and some projects overstate the ratings for money. I tend to trust the site icodrops and I know that many people also trust him. Here we have a more objective assessment of the projects, which in the future is reflected in the sales results on their ICOs

[dilshanfernando]

I normally dont believe the ico ratings in the websites like icobench.com , icoratings.com . i think that they are paid to give higher ratings for icos  . you have to have your own research to find out best icos . you can use icodrops.com to find good icos . according to my experience icodrops is not giving good ratings for bad projects.

[kendra1107]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO ratings may not be totally a hundred percent accurate, but there are some truth in them since they are based on surveys and studies. For me, considering ICO ratings in choosing projects to participate in increases my chances of earning profit.

[CryptYeah]

No, they, it seems to me, are useless in assessing the prospects of the project. It is necessary to analyze the company independently, or to read the analysis of other, experienced people.

[jonas5222000]

Sometimes dont you need to follow them because i heard in one of my friend that there is paying or biassed happening when they want to put their own ICO`s in any sites with high rates.

[Stormyblue]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Most of these ratings are based on their own perceptions, and other factors such as how popular the project is on social media, how equipped the project website is, the number of sites talking about it among others. However, some ratings do not take into consideration the strategies, goals and visions, the team and road map of the project. Sometimes these factors go a long ways to determine the success of the project and its ICO.

[DoubleShow]

Sometimes dont you need to follow them because i heard in one of my friend that there is paying or biassed happening when they want to put their own ICO`s in any sites with high rates.

Of course everything in this world is bought and sold. I don't believe in most of these rankings , but constantly watch on them. First they collected the majority of projects among which are excellent . Secondly there is a very detailed can find all the information and it is very convenient to obtain all the data about the project from a single source.

[johnsaributua]

I personally do not fully believe. some other people's posts have the same with me, they do not fully believe in websites that display ICO rating.

[KXC247]

In fact, it's great that there are sites like that. But again, we should use our heads and make a decision based on several sites and maybe even opinions of bloggers who are easier to access and assess. As for me, I reference to the ICO ratings sites but I do not make my decisions based on their rating

[twitami1]

personally I do not believe in these ratings. think, because developers of unpromising projects themselves can pay the site for placing their project in the top of the best. you need to believe the facts: the team, the product and its implementation in the future and the benefits to society, as well as the finer points of fundraising and the adequacy of support managers. only these recommendations will allow you to independently determine the rating of an ICO.

[trade2winnn]

Well, how to say,trust but verify)Better course look myself,the company and its prospects,but I'm sure one will say now, regardless of how interesting the project,the team,how cool is that,any project now after ISO umatyvaet just shit in the bottom of the charge of such a tactic these people who trample down