Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[JENREM]

I guess those sites are for informational purposes only... You and only you will decide how to invest. But however, those sites summarize and update information and that has a part in our success...

Correct! Its all depend on you. On what you think most trusted or not. But basically ICo ratings is good in terms of summarizing information or updates. I believe in Ico ratings because it is one of the basis as well.

[ratnawide]

I actually believe in ICO rating, especially if its ICO rating is evenly distributed. both from the ICO team, vision, mission, products and profile. although in the end a rating can not be a benchmark of success or not an ICO project

[Coremi9]

I see them as a guideline for me when I choose ICO, they will help me to make compares in different platforms, so based on that they make it easier to decide shall we buy or  we shall not

[hakertajniak]

i am not believing ICO rating only, i am do many research for the ICO i want to invest as well.
believing ICO rating only won't guarantee you to participate a good ICO. always do personal research.

[stickkelsey]

I believe, maybe the ico rating is given after analyzing the whole ico, and become a benchmark to know the ico is good or not

[Neutrality]

It is important that most of the ratings are quite subjective. And ICOs ratings are not an exception. Ratings can be only served as a guide in your evaluating the ICO, but fully relying on them is very reckless for everyone.

[siggy]

Most of them are shits, other make paid promotions for ICO-projects. All of them are not honest or objective.

[sofiasalmon]

Some of the sites there is a rating of ICO is not true. And they make research from sources which we don't know. So I am not convinced by them. I prefer to see ICO from a trusted source and we can do an analysis to ascertain the truth.

[Mr.Noda]

I do not believe anything but myself and count only on my prediction! Do not believe everything that they write can be compromised.

[vendy86]

sorry i dont believe at all to ico review site.
i prefer to do my own research before i decide to join ico.
i usually use ico review site only for find new upcoming ico or just to see ico hype.
i suggest you all to dont trust ico review too.there are so many site that list ico with high rating because they get pay for it.

[kliown]

Basically, all the projects, the rating of which I want to see on any resource, are displayed approximately the same. Their rating is almost always at an equal level, so I do not see the point in using this method of checking the ICO of the project.

[Leonard2016]

The only website i check the ICO rating when i want to see the rating is ICODrop , i don't believe in ICObench , most of the times it introduces scam ones!
better see the history of its ratings if you want to see how expert they are! for ex icobench gave fantom 3.7 and it was one of the most successful  ICOs of the year , sold out very quick!

[kudryas]

The only website i check the ICO rating when i want to see the rating is ICODrop , i don't believe in ICObench , most of the times it introduces scam ones!
better see the history of its ratings if you want to see how expert they are! for ex icobench gave fantom 3.7 and it was one of the most successful  ICOs of the year , sold out very quick!

Thanx for the tip. I used ICObench and wasn't very satisfied.

[YoungMaster]

I don't fully believe with the ratings because there are many high rating ICOs out there however they didn't sold out and some not reach the soft cap, in other side the other ICOs with average rating actually sold out.
So i think it's all about the quality of project affects the sale.

[GalaxyWorld]

Some of the sites there is a rating of ICO is not true. And they make research from sources which we don't know. So I am not convinced by them. I prefer to see ICO from a trusted source and we can do an analysis to ascertain the truth.

I only use the ICO review pages for reference and do not over-rely on these reviews because I believe that ICO projects can fully use this evaluation website to PR for their projects. Most of the projects that I invested in by myself analyzed and decided to invest.

[gabchuks]

Well yeah I somehow believe in ico rating because some professionals will have to analyze the ico based on their own understanding and that can help you in analyzing it to your own understanding

[Auto9372]

I do not trust the ICO ratings and conduct the research of projects myself. think that on such sites all purchased.

[Cocoincos]

I think about it - and I understand that the most of sites are lie, but I using ICO bench I think it the best ratings, also they ask team to pass KYC

[Name_none]

I use that kind of sites just to see which criteria they rated and read information about the project. But amount of rating sites so high that i chose couple for me and rest just ignore

[JustBetweenUs]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I think they are a good guideline but you shpuld alwys trust your own research more as it’s the only one that is manipulated. You never see behind the screen and connect all the dots.