Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[shtodelat]

I do the analysis on my own, in any case the ICO is a risk, and I can't trust anyone when it comes to money

[totholio]

The whole ICO market is rushing towards VCs and private investors getting 50-80%+ and a couple ETH max cap remaining for crowdsale. Icobench and such sites are very bad, people just buy some reviews.

[clarkey2013]

Partly yes! I'm used to base and analyze the project for its popularity! I think that no one will argue that popular projects are always faster and more likely to collect the necessary investments!

[commander11]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!

I don't think ICObench and ICOrating is reliable enough to consider a coin to invest. There are a bunch of scam ICO out there that has a high ratings in different ICOfeed website but fails to verify the identity of the team.

For instance, provided the qouted post of Hellmouth42

ICO Track: 4.7/5
ICO Benchmark: 4.8/5
Holder ICO: 4.2/5

These are very good grades! Would it be possible to have the please links?

Indeed:
- I don't know "ICO track" (I know "TrackICO, but they don't know you)
- I don't know "ICO Benchmark" (I know "ICOBench", but they do not know you)
- I don't know "Holder ICO" - I know "ICO Holder", and they know you!
https://icoholder.com/en/tonal-quantum-network-21443

But, here, the result is not very convincing...the team members are "unverified".////

In conclusion, you should base your decision in your fair judgement, not in the ratings of different website.
So that if it turns out to be scam. you won't blame others who only provide information solely and not for financial advice.

[Lucio19]

In my opinion, those sites are for informational purposes only and may be used for reference! You and only you will decide how to invest. But however, those sites summarize and update information and that has a part in our success

[so_stupid]

You can not exclude the possibility of buying a rating on the sites. Sites do not bear any responsibility for the future of the project, and the trust accumulated by time will not immediately disappear.

[Tigerw]

You can not exclude the possibility of buying a rating on the sites. Sites do not bear any responsibility for the future of the project, and the trust accumulated by time will not immediately disappear.

if we already very often see fraudulent actions against the ico company, then scammers use a lot of money to attract investors' attention. Thus, they can pay to rating companies that will exhibit high ratings for their ico company.

[kudryas]

You can not exclude the possibility of buying a rating on the sites. Sites do not bear any responsibility for the future of the project, and the trust accumulated by time will not immediately disappear.

Everything is purchasable and you can count on that. This sites exist to make money not to help us.

[benjaminpeters]

Well, I believe those ICO Ratings can be reference and can help judgment, but you should be responsible for final decisions.

[parkraol]

Somehow I believe in the ICO rating but only 70%. I noticed some ICOs have low ratings but when I studied the project it was nice and worthy to give higher ratings than it was before. I selected these ICOs that have already finished the distribution of token.

[Collider]

Well, it depends on many factors. The final rating depends on many factors, such as experienced team, or the vision or the product.
So if there is ICO with great product but with unknown names then they will receive low final rating.

[yeniruieni]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

There are some ICO rating is indeed accurate and some not. But I prefer the ICO who have good sales as a minimum a soft cap must be achieved and prospects for the future of the token. ICO project we repeatedly have to check that we are not wrong choosing ICO.

[futuristishe]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I believe in ICO rating if the rating is from 5-6 sites! And all sites have about the same score! Then I will trust the rating system for any ICO!

[Youngflydude256]

Recent revelation has revealed and pointed to the fact that these ico ratings website ain't reliable and cannot be trusted. Some ratings are bought. Doing your due diligence is still key then you can just use this rating websites to support your research as your final conclusion.

[Bestthefriend]

Well sometimes these ICO ratings sometimes are a good source of information about ICOs , putting total trust in them however is a risky affair especially when making investment decisions, use them only as a source of knowledge, and as an investment advice, some of the people coming up with the ratings are influencers only hopping to get more people on board

[valeru.aver]

I trust several ICO rating sites, such as ICObench and ICOdrops. Their ratings are often true. I also study opinions on the project on the forum.

[luis fantom15]

The ICO rating sites are nearly worthless. I have seen scams that were easily detectable being given positive reviews by 7 ICO rating sites. You should only trust your own due diligence.

[sjyku]

I think it is necessary to consider ICO rating, which can provide a lot of help. However, ICO ratings may be rated by those who pay for them. ICO's ratings give you a general idea, but I believe the best way to understand whether ICO is worth it is to do your own independent research.

[Jeepney_koh]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

If the website giving ICO rating is reputable, then I believe in it. There are many available website that are rating the ICOs and even recommend good ones. When I choose an ICO< i lok first in the ICO rating website like icobench and others to see if they are legit or not.

[alshulk]

When choosing ICO, I also pay attention to the team, the list of sponsors and advisors, number of followers on Twitter and telegram.