Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Cocoincos]

I believe but not in all, I like ratings from ICO bench! because there we can see team who passed the KYC, now it important, because too much scam

[1714487732]

1714487732

[1714487732]

1714487732

[1714487732]

1714487732

[BigBoy89]

Sometimes I look at the ratings to choose projects for investing or participating in a bounty campaign. But I understand that I do not need to believe completely in ratings.

Yes, ICO ratings are good for initial information and give you just an idea, but you cannot relay on the ratings completely. Some of them are not so honest and objective.

[Bambam28]

Sometimes I look at the ratings to choose projects for investing or participating in a bounty campaign. But I understand that I do not need to believe completely in ratings.

Yes, ICO ratings are good for initial information and give you just an idea, but you cannot relay on the ratings completely. Some of them are not so honest and objective.

I'm sure that 50% of the ratings are lying. Most likely they are doing this because of the fact that dishonest companies pay them a lot of money for this. We must always remember this.

[Pistachiop]

These sights are only good for information purposes, but do not take them as seriously when it comes to the  quality of the coin or use them as an investment advice as they might not as accurate

[Talkingbest]

I think some rating site such as icobench coukd be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.

[boyjack]

ICO rating is very good to find out good ICO project, my selection I will check first ICO rating website but some website are paid one and good website always giving good review rating only.Don't believe all rating sites, my opinion you have to search your self and take decisions,which is good that you should select,read road maps,white papers and project updates in social medias,who behind the team of the projects, these all will help to find out good ICO projects.

[Psalmy2cute]

I think nobody should trust blind in Initital coin offerings rating sites. I think they are a great oppurtinity to save some of your time. But you also have to do researches about every project before you invest in them

[Arya_anime]

Personally, I believe in some reliable ICO ratings, which have already proven themselves in practice. But in any case, it is also necessary to consider the opinions of experts and their research.

I also believed in some and i have also experienced of an ICO rating website that is so lazy to update the the ICOs status. I've been into ICO that has a token value at 1$ only to find out that ICO price was already below that price. I think price don't have something to do with the rating of an ICO but their information is really misleading to the public.

I agree with your opinion, because it is not a guarantee, I've been stuck with a good rating ico, the result, after the ICO project is completed, it turns out the price at launch, the price is destroyed to 100%

[kudryas]

I think nobody should trust blind in Initital coin offerings rating sites. I think they are a great oppurtinity to save some of your time. But you also have to do researches about every project before you invest in them

If you always take things for granted you're usually wrong. Everything should be rechecked about ICOs.

[Raidzin]

I think nobody should trust blind in Initital coin offerings rating sites. I think they are a great oppurtinity to save some of your time. But you also have to do researches about every project before you invest in them

If you always take things for granted you're usually wrong. Everything should be rechecked about ICOs.

I think that really it is best to do your own research not based on foreign judgments. Check it yourself, and then compare with other people's speculation and understand what the focus.

[jouns]

Yes, I believe in the ICO rating, maybe project with a good rating will can't collect its soft cap in hard times, but at least it will not be fraud.

[Schevascheva]

Recently, I notice that this rating is only the figures in the graph, since it does not depend on what will happen to the project at the end, that it can merge or cut payments, but whatever the rating should be done, the analysis of the project itself and in this case you will definitely not go wrong

[smellmycheese]

No take them with a pinch of salt. Remember they are pay to play. This means that ICOs that might be amazing but do not have a big budget won't be on the websites.

Use them as a place to find some, but never invest into them solely on the fact they are on the website.

[lana_93]

It seems to me that these ICO ratings websites have stopped evaluate projects. I can remember which projects, but I saw some with high ratings with good colected investments have not yet been implemented. I hope that the projects like https://www.menlo.one/ really help in choosing of the ICO for participation.

[p.solovey]

fantom - has a high rating - their server was hacked and stolen 30k passport photos.
I do not trust a project that can not be protected by a server from hackers

[moonriver]

I really think ICO rating should not be considered as a reference for good or not an ICO project.
we need to learn more about the project so do not just look at its rating alone.

[stepanLan]

Unfortunately I think that a lot of ratings are being paid.
And you can not guess which rating will be real.

[iamsediii]

More than 100 new ICO per month is created, fow now it's difficult to know what is the real project that will continue the development at the end of the day, because so many ICO is scam, in my prediction 90-95% ICO is scam and those are not continue the development. Basically, most of the investors are seeking the reference on how or where they invest their money in cryptocurrency, they didn't know what is real, it's challenging to find the ICO. Thus, ICO rating sites were created to help us easily sort them out, like example you said is ICObench.com. The problem on the ICO rating sites is lack of experts reviewers. Many of the volunteer on reviewers is prenteding they are experts on the projects and pretending experts on prediction for the value of the token at the end of ICO. One more problem on the other ICO rating sites is all viewers can review the ICO. They can manipulate reviews.

So in my opinon I don't believe on ICO Ratings, because as of now the percentage of scam ICO is very high, and most of them are reviewed on the ICO Ratings which is good rating, but they are scam at the end of the day.

[zDNkfr9]

I think ico's rating is important, and there is a team of engineers who look at ico's project planning team. All future white papers must be carefully examined.

[ashlyvash00]

Will for me im not quetly trust ico rating sites. Because there are some possible that the website will pay by the owner ico to fet good ratings. Thats why to be make sure make your own analysis on the ico.