Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[kudryas]

Actually using a ICO ratings was the best way to find a good project that we need to participate in the bounty campaign or to invest. Because if the ICO rating of the project was too high it means this project must good to invest.

Well some of them are definitely legit but you should always use your own research to reach the final decision.

[seviandyosi]

I do not fully believe in the ranking of ICO as the data they provide are not necessarily all true. And much more than we have to return the check. I see in the list ranking the ICO project get high marks but after I check and I followed the project turned out to be stopped in the middle of the road.

[coolon]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I'm reviewing the rating and idea of ​​the project. Rating does not always justify itself. 3.7 I would not say that the average rating is bad. The main idea of ​​the project but the rating also plays a role.

[Kayuslawal]

They should not be trusted as i believe some might just collect some sort of money from the developer and hype the project or they might also like to invest in a project and tate it high to have more gain.

[udana123]

With my personal experience, never trust the ICO ratings given by such websites like ICOBench, ICOtracker etc. Because motst of the sites manipulate the real overview of the ICO and even for some scam ICOs those sites had given 4 out of 5. Therefore always do an own research to decide whether the ICO is real or not

[Chainsmokers]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I think it is just a reference to measure the level of ICO that has been going on. and it can not be used as a benchmark to invest in it.

[Laace]

I think that ICO rating is only a reference standard, but most of the time, if the ICO project gives ICO evaluation website advertising, so they can get a higher score, so more time need to know their project

[sergeykravcov177]

There are a lot of rating organizations! they can not all guarantee the success of a project! in any case, there are not fools sitting there! Rating agents, most of them, are people who have experience of analysis! Before investing in the project, I personally always look at the project team, on their product and on their movements! You should always have a head on your shoulders, and think for yourself, and do not completely trust the rating agencies!

[Omighty28]

My observations about ICO ratings are, new coins recently fall below half of what their ICO ratings was. So I just take ICO ratings as a guide to know about a coin and just a way of familiarizing with any new coin before lunching into the market.

[zenfo]

you shouldn't trust anything 100% but ICO ratings and reviews give you a solid ground for future research. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.

[suzanogbomo]

They are some what an indication of what a project is like, just preliminary. A project that scores very low on rating sites is close to be scams in most cases.

[BeeDrill]

I choose the bounty campaign not according to the ratings, but I also looked at the ratings. There is a small probability that the company's rating in the rating can be bought

[engrawaz]

I don't rely on website ratings they are either done by the website bot or incentivized to give good ratings.

[Unknown Artist]

I read the story of one person who shared information about how the staff of rating agencies could give you almost any rating for 300-500 dollars according to your desire. They traded these ratings. Therefore, I have not trusted these people for a long time.

[akosipepot]

My observations about ICO ratings are, new coins recently fall below half of what their ICO ratings was. So I just take ICO ratings as a guide to know about a coin and just a way of familiarizing with any new coin before lunching into the market.

I very much agree with you on this. And, yes, ICO ratings act as a reasonable indicator for its coin and if possible should always consult them as an index to buffer your expectation for that particular ICO.

[Endorphinity]

I trust the ratings. But every time, I try to conduct an additional independent analysis of the project in order to understand whether it is worth investing in such a project.

[Yeahnoh]

I don't that those sites are completely legit or that you can trust them, they are probably getting paid to promote the ICOs putting them on top of their lists without even checking if they are promoting an scam or something like that.

[spngebob]

Based on what are they rating projects? Probably who has social media accounts got better rank.
I like to do research before joining bounty, I don't think these ICO rating sites are good and I think my judgement is better than random internet dude judgement.

[praizepraise1]

I do but not 100% because nothing is promised in Crypto. Most ICO Listing platforms rate their ICO by their own rules and asses them using certain methodologies.

Now many sites offer information about new ICO projects. Therefore, the competition is large and each platform is trying to get ahead. For me, the indicator of good and quality service is the traffic provided by these platforms.

[quanahri]

Reviews on ico can only be consulted. I usually check the ico project myself. There are many projects> 4.0 points but prices drop sharply after listed.