|
B.T.Coin
|
 |
October 09, 2013, 11:45:50 PM |
|
NVC and FTC is something we want to add, just don't want to try it if it's too early? What is you're guys opinions on these? Think we have enough hash to give it another go?
At the current difficulty, it would take an average of 30 minutes to mine a FTC block with 500Mhash. So if you would be on FTC for 10 minutes, you are not guaranteed to find a block (but you might, 33% chance). When FTC is profitable, you will be much longer on FTC than 10 minutes a day so I do think it's worth adding. The only thing that will happen is people crying when you switch off FTC after 10 minutes without finding a block, but these people have to realize that you might just as well find a FTC block the next time you are on it for 10 minutes which evens out over the day. Since 500Mhash will take 1 hour for NVC and 2 hours for LTC to find a block, you should test with FTC first to see how that works out. |
A fine is a tax you pay for something you did wrong.
A tax is a fine you pay for something you did right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LiteMine
|
|
October 10, 2013, 03:13:46 AM |
|
When you can find a block in < 10 minutes, give it a go. Not sure I want to waste hash in this current low-profit environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nearmiss (OP)
|
|
October 10, 2013, 04:13:55 AM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
|
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC |
|
|
BrainShutdown
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1052
Merit: 1004
|
|
October 10, 2013, 10:54:52 AM |
|
Hi
Can anyone confirm that this pool is using the updated DGC daemon with the new difficulty adjustment?
|
|
|
|
|
nearmiss (OP)
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:13:43 AM |
|
Hi
Can anyone confirm that this pool is using the updated DGC daemon with the new difficulty adjustment?
It is, yes. Also, website down for a few minutes. No effect on mining. |
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC |
|
|
|
nearmiss (OP)
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:26:31 AM |
|
Also, website down for a few minutes. No effect on mining.
And we are back. |
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC |
|
|
BrainShutdown
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1052
Merit: 1004
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:40:12 AM |
|
Hi
Can anyone confirm that this pool is using the updated DGC daemon with the new difficulty adjustment?
It is, yes. Also, website down for a few minutes. No effect on mining. Nice, always on top  |
|
|
|
|
aTriz
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:43:16 AM
Last edit: October 10, 2013, 12:10:23 PM by aTriz |
|
FLO seems to have some kind of issue, letting nearmiss know should have it fixed in a few!Fixed I believe  |
|
|
|
|
Eastwind
|
|
October 10, 2013, 01:20:46 PM
Last edit: October 10, 2013, 01:57:58 PM by Eastwind |
|
I have 11.5MH/s from 4 rigs. It displays 10.4MH/s from the hash cow website. I have no problem with that as that value varies a lot. At the moment, it is mining WDC. My submitted share is 470, the total share 46850. So my percentage share of the total share is 1%. The total Hash is 532 MH/s at the moment, my percentage share of the mining power is 2%. So why there is such a big difference? My reject rate is 3.5%
Is it because the my submitted share and total number of share are not difficulty level adjusted (weighted differently)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
12gaFacelift
|
|
October 10, 2013, 01:46:10 PM
Last edit: October 10, 2013, 02:39:22 PM by 12gaFacelift |
|
No Withdraw today? i make one at 9:20 and 25 minuts later still nothing in the exchange. edit: ok ok i take it back, the exchange is having problem  ....as usual |
|
|
|
|
B.T.Coin
|
|
October 10, 2013, 04:57:48 PM
Last edit: October 10, 2013, 07:44:01 PM by B.T.Coin |
|
I surely hope the estimated payout counter is broken. It is showing about 1/3 of what I usually get.
EDIT: It's a few hours later now and the estimation went back to normal.
|
A fine is a tax you pay for something you did wrong.
A tax is a fine you pay for something you did right.
|
|
|
Araviel
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2013, 11:19:04 PM |
|
can you put a manual edit on difficulty of worker please ? We actually mine XNC and with a 200 dif I can't find any share between blocks...
thanks in advance.
Edit : XNC pool is around 70% stale lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
aTriz
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:20:33 AM
Last edit: October 11, 2013, 12:48:19 AM by aTriz |
|
Xnc just couldn't handle the hash heh... still the payout as you guys can see is still well worth it, even with the stales. (For me at least) Hopefully soon we will have some different difficulty options for you guys to mess around with |
|
|
|
|
LiteMine
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:48:39 AM
Last edit: October 11, 2013, 01:05:50 AM by LiteMine |
|
That XNC was smokin'! And 35% stale, not 70 lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Racer8
|
|
October 11, 2013, 11:00:24 AM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything? Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
TheQuin
|
|
October 11, 2013, 11:09:14 AM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything? Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider. You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads. |
|
|
|
|
Racer8
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:02:12 PM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything? Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider. You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads. It's a very good point - the pool must keep us troops happy I should probably give up at this point but the last 30 rounds have an average period of 28 minutes so for a 30 min average block time if you get 5+ rounds a day on it then it will yield fairly consistent returns on a 24 hour basis? |
|
|
|
|
|
TheQuin
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:12:30 PM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything? Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider. You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads. It's a very good point - the pool must keep us troops happy I should probably give up at this point but the last 30 rounds have an average period of 28 minutes so for a 30 min average block time if you get 5+ rounds a day on it then it will yield fairly consistent returns on a 24 hour basis? It doesn't really matter how long the rounds are. e.g. If the pool mined FTC for 4 hours in a week if that was 40 rounds of 10 minutes or 4 rounds of 1 hour the same number of shares would be submitted with exactly the same chance of getting blocks, in this example it should be 8 blocks but of course will vary. In short the long term rewards are the same but with a larger short term variance. To put it another way I agree with you that FTC should be added but if it is I'll have to stop watching this thread for a while.  |
|
|
|
|
aTriz
|
|
October 11, 2013, 12:27:44 PM |
|
I think FTC would be a good add, especially since we have a little over 600mh/s now, I will talk to nearmiss and we will see about it getting enabled today.
|
|
|
|
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
|
|
October 11, 2013, 03:50:23 PM |
|
if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.
I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything? Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider. You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads. And they would have a point. Miners are not supposed to have loyalty to a pool that does not have loyalty to a coin |
|
|
|
|
