Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 08:30:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 367 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Black Arrow 28nm 100Ghash Bitcoin ASIC from $0.49/GH/s  (Read 787031 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 10:04:10 AM
 #2481

it's like avalon chips(mass produced, rushed to market) the chips themselves just are not that great(clocked tot eh max), but the costs in china are cheap.

elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 10:09:26 AM
 #2482


Edit: looks like the inefficient is due to overclocking. An antminer is 1w/gh at 80gh.

but that would involve more chips to achieve 180GH, costs are kept down by clocking the chips to the max performance.
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 02, 2014, 10:27:20 AM
 #2483


Edit: looks like the inefficient is due to overclocking. An antminer is 1w/gh at 80gh.

but that would involve more chips to achieve 180GH, costs are kept down by clocking the chips to the max performance.

Yea but the fact is they can achieve the same gh/w ratio on 55nm chips. Bitmain can always keep lowering the price but they wont be able to compete with knc 20nm or asicminer 40nm. Unfortunately neither will BA.

But we have a long time before efficiency plays a critical role so it might be better to go with a cheap miner like Blackarrow/Bitmine rather than an efficient one.
elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 10:36:00 AM
Last edit: March 02, 2014, 11:14:39 AM by elasticband
 #2484


Edit: looks like the inefficient is due to overclocking. An antminer is 1w/gh at 80gh.

but that would involve more chips to achieve 180GH, costs are kept down by clocking the chips to the max performance.

Yea but the fact is they can achieve the same gh/w ratio on 55nm chips. Bitmain can always keep lowering the price but they wont be able to compete with knc 20nm or asicminer 40nm. Unfortunately neither will BA.

But we have a long time before efficiency plays a critical role so it might be better to go with a cheap miner like Blackarrow/Bitmine rather than an efficient one.

True.

I look at it as a Loooong game now and always want to have power efficient miners. I mine at home and am limited on how much power i can pull. At present i am running the following

KnC - 790GH - 820W
KnC - 790GH - 820W
KnC - 510GH - 560W
KnC - 680GH - 750W
total - 2770GH - 2950w + 4 x 80 for fans and controllers
for the same power consumption i could only have about 1300GH worth of antminers
Teodor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 01:35:16 PM
 #2485

Bitmain uses 55nm. Process size is not as important as optimization. Bitmain/Bitfury 55nm are both more efficient than knc 28nm. KNC 20nm will be less efficient than Asicminer 40nm.

IS bitfury producing and selling something now? Except those unefficient USBs...?

primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 02:01:27 PM
 #2486

i read somewhere that because Russia bans bitcoin, metabank cannot produce bitfury? Is it true?
bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:46:43 PM
 #2487

i read somewhere that because Russia bans bitcoin, metabank cannot produce bitfury? Is it true?

And that has to do with Black Arrow... how?
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:46:59 PM
 #2488

ASICminer has 40nm coming,but we have no idea of hashrate & cost per miner....as of yet.I'm watching though  Wink  

They look to be about .65-.80 watts per GH,MAYBE.so if they come up with a 250GH miner using 200 watts,it'll be a great thing!!! Watch for em!!!!!!!!!!!!  Wink



Asicminer chips will be 0.2-0.35w/gh and $1-0.5/gh

About twice the efficiency and half the price of anyone else.

Win win.  Wink
Zman8881
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2014, 10:05:19 PM
Last edit: March 30, 2024, 01:43:58 AM by Zman8881
 #2489

If I bought a Black Arrow Prospero X-3, assuming the difficulty is 10Billion in May, how long could I remain profitable if it ran 24/7? (Energy Cost: .09USD/kWh)
Skyhome|
AchrafB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10



View Profile
March 02, 2014, 10:09:16 PM
 #2490

Hey, i have contacted alll the support and waiting to resolve my ticket from 3 weeks :/
it concern my 2nd order,  your support on skype has helped me the first time and processed my order, and i have passed another order for and with the same details
 
and today i noticed that the ticket was closed without any reposne, and it really scares me because I do not know if you received the money the 2nd time
 
can anyone please help me to resovle this trouble and i hope it's just a misunderstanding  Smiley

BTC: 1Hqwet9aNBifehWRptzKyBKnvgw4VzeHh8
ernie-
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 02, 2014, 10:33:18 PM
 #2491

If I bought a Black Arrow Prospero X-3, assuming the difficulty is 10Billion in May, how long could I remain profitable if it ran 24/7? (Energy Cost: .09USD/kWh)
ROI is relative to the currency you used to pay for the miner. It will take a lot longer to get A positive ROI if you paid in BTC compared to USD as the BTC/USD it generally expected to rise. coinwarz.com has useful calculators, I tend to work on $USD/day figures.
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:25:43 PM
 #2492

i read somewhere that because Russia bans bitcoin, metabank cannot produce bitfury? Is it true?

And that has to do with Black Arrow... how?

It means our miners will survive a bit longer if true. Lets be honest, BA cannot compete with the efficiency of a nextgen bitfury considering it barely competes with a current gen bitfury (0.7w vs 0.8w/gh)
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:30:38 PM
 #2493

I'm still baffled on how AM predictions for power consumption are so low using 40nm process node. PFM.  Grin
nexus99
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:31:38 PM
 #2494

I'm still baffled on how AM predictions for power consumption are so low using 40nm process node. PFM.  Grin

Proof will be in the pudding. Till then its just wishful thinking.
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:37:00 PM
 #2495

I'm still baffled on how AM predictions for power consumption are so low using 40nm process node. PFM.  Grin

Proof will be in the pudding. Till then its just wishful thinking.

Can performance improvements be had in a revised hashing algorithm?
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:45:50 PM
 #2496

I'm still baffled on how AM predictions for power consumption are so low using 40nm process node. PFM.  Grin

Proof will be in the pudding. Till then its just wishful thinking.

Can performance improvements be had in a revised hashing algorithm?

Must be possible if a 55nm chip can be as efficient as a 28nm chip. I doubt it is as simple as one algorithm fits all. I know diddly squat about designing asics so I could be wrong.

But yeah AM gen3 specs are unbelievable and if FC can pull it off this might be an interesting year for them.
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 11:49:45 PM
 #2497


But yeah AM gen3 specs are unbelievable and if FC can pull it off this might be an interesting year for them.

Indeed. FC certainly appears to be resourceful and have the resources to make this happen.
Teodor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 07:44:56 AM
 #2498

FC Huh
What this means? Football Club?  Grin

Seven111
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 10:29:32 AM
 #2499

Does anyone know if these miners can only be used for Bitcoins or can they be used for any SHA-256 coin?
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 10:35:10 AM
 #2500

Does anyone know if these miners can only be used for Bitcoins or can they be used for any SHA-256 coin?

Alts sha256 can be mined. No scrypt.
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 367 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!